Register or log in at GRIN

Your e-mail-address or password is wrong
Register now
For new authors: free, easy and fast
This will be used as your user name, please specify a valid e-mail address

Lost password

Your e-mail-address or password is wrong

Request a new password
Rewriting Chekhov: a comparison of Mansfield's "The Child-Who-Was-Tired" and Che... close

Please wait

Please install the Adobe Flash Player if no e-book is displayed.

Rewriting Chekhov: a comparison of Mansfield's "The Child-Who-Was-Tired" and Chekhov’s "Sleepy"

Scholary Paper (Seminar), 2001, 15 Pages
Author: Christian Schlegel
Subject: English Language and Literature Studies - Literature

Details

Category: Scholary Paper (Seminar)
Year: 2001
Pages: 15
Grade: 2,3
Bibliography: ~ 10  Entries
Language: English
Archive No.: V78180
ISBN (E-book): 978-3-638-82798-0
ISBN (Book): 978-3-638-83214-4
File size: 301 KB

Abstract

This paper will discuss differences and similarities of The Child-Who-Was-Tired first published on February 24 in the New Age and later, short after her return from Bavaria, in ‘In a German Pension’ published in 19112 by Katherine Mansfield and Anton Chekhov’s Sleepy, which was written nearly 20 years earlier3. The parallels between the characters and the plots, especially in the outcome of both short stories, make Katherine Mansfield suspicious of having committed plagiarism. “Anton Chekhov’s short stories were first welcomed in England and America just after the turn of the century as examples of late nineteenth-century realism [...].“ Characterised as ‘slices of life’ they could have served as patterns or examples for Mansfield’s stories, which are characterised in the same way. In so far she writes at least in Chekhov’s tradition. She “could have read Sleepy at Queen’s College as early as 1903, when [...] her literary interest was expending.” The question of plagiarism will be answered in the conclusion of this paper, when the differences and similarities are worked out properly.


Excerpt (computer-generated)

Johannes- Gutenberg- Universität Mainz

Rewriting Chekhov: A Comparison of Mansfield’s  “The Child-Who-Was-Tired“ and Chekhov’s “Sleepy“

Christian Schlegel

April 17th 2001

 

 

Table of Contents

1 Introduction ... 3
1.1. Background of the Texts ... 3
1.2. Summary of Chekhov’s Sleepy ... 3

2. Comparison ... 4
2.1. The Setting ... 4
2.2. The Plot ... 5
2.3. The Characters ... 5
2.3.1. Varka/The Child-Who-Was-Tired ... 5
2.3.2. The Shoemaker/The Man and The Mistress/The Frau ... 6
2.3.3. The Baby ... 7
2.3.4. Missing and Additional Characters ... 7
2.4. Symbolism ... 8

3. Conclusion ... 10

4. Bibliography ... 11
4.1. Main Sources ... 11
4.2. Secondary Sources ... 11
4.2.1. List of Works Cited ... 11
4.2.2. List of Works Consulted ... 11

5. Appendix: Chekhov’s Sleepy ... 12

 

 

1 Introduction

1.1. Background of the Texts

This paper will discuss differences and similarities of The Child-Who-Was-Tired first published on February 24 in the New Age and later, short after her return from Bavaria1, in ‘In a German Pension’ published in 19112 by Katherine Mansfield and Anton Chekhov’s Sleepy, which was written nearly 20 years earlier3. The parallels between the characters and the plots, especially in the outcome of both short stories, make Katherine Mansfield suspicious of having committed plagiarism. “Anton Chekhov’s short stories were first welcomed in England and America just after the turn of the century as examples of late nineteenth-century realism [...].“4 Characterised as ‘slices of life’ they could have served as patterns or examples for Mansfield’s stories, which are characterised in the same way. In so far she writes at least in Chekhov’s tradition. She “could have read Sleepy at Queen’s College as early as 1903, when [...] her literary interest was expending.”5 The question of plagiarism will be answered in the conclusion of this paper, when the differences and similarities are worked out properly.

[...]


1 Berkman, Sylvia. Katherine Mansfield: A Critical Study. Yale: UP, 1971. p 43.

2 Mansfield, Katherine. The Collected Stories of Katherine Mansfield. London: Penguin, 1981.

3 http://www.eldritchpress.org/ac/jr/index.htm

4 May, Charles E. “Chekhov and the Modern Short Story.“ The New Short Story Theories. Ed. Charles E. May. Athens: Ohio UP, 1994. p 199.

5 Daly, Saralyn R. Katherine Mansfield: Revised Edition. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1994. p 16.


Comments

No comments yet

Add Comment
Your comment is reviewed before being published

Other users also were interested in the following titles:


This text can be quoted and accessed from this url:

http://www.grin.com/e-book/78180/rewriting-chekhov-a-comparison-of-mansfield-s-the-child-who-was-tired
please wait Please wait