For new authors:
free, easy and fast
For registered authors
Seminar Paper, 2017
12 Pages, Grade: 1,2
First Part: Introduction
Second Part: State of Research
Third Part: The Critical Whiteness Debate
A. Whiteness as an (invisibilized) norm
B. Origins of the Term "Whiteness”
c. Critical Whiteness Studies
I. The Emergence of Critical Whiteness Studies
II. Status Quo of the Critical Whiteness Debate in Germany
III. Content of Critical Whiteness Studies (CWS)
Fourth Part: Conclusion
Amesberger, Helga / Halbmayr, Brigitte (2008): Das Privileg der Unsichtbarkeit. Rassismus unter dem Blickwinkel von Weißsein und Dominanzkultur. 119 - 142.
Arndt, Susan (2012): Die 101 wichtigsten Fragen - Rassismus. München: C.H. Beck.
Bonnett, A. (2000): White identities: Historical and international perspectives. Harlow: Pearson.
Bonnett, A. and Nayak, A. (2003). Cultural geographies of racialization - The territory of race. In Anderson, K., Domosh, M., Pile, s. & Thrift, N. (eds.) Handbook of cultural geography, 300 - 312. London: Sage Publications.
Collins, Patricia Hill (1991): Black Feminist Thought. Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Dyer, Richard (1997): White. London: Routledge.
Eggers, Maureen Maisha, Kilomba, Grada, Piesche, Peggy, & Arndt, Susan (Hrsg.) (2005): Mythen, Masken und Subjekte. Kritische Weißseinsforschung in Deutschland. Münster: Unrast.
Farr, Arnold (2005): Wie Weißsein sichtbar wird. Aufklärungsrassismus und die Struktur eines rassifizierten Bewusstseins. In: Maureen Maisha Eggers, Grada Kilomba, Peggy Piesche, Susan Arndt (eds.): Mythen, Masken und Subjekte. Kritische Weißseinsforschung in Germany, Münster.
Guillaumin, Colette (1995): Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology. London: Routledge.
Hooks, Bell (1984): Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.
Hooks, Bell (1986): Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. London: Pluto Press.
Hooks, Bell (1994): Black Looks. Popkultur - Medien - Rassismus (К. Meißenburg, Transi.). Berlin: Orlanda.
Hooks, Bell (1996): Sehnsucht und Widerstand. Kultur, Ethnie, Geschlecht (H. Pfertsch & M. S. Charnitzky, Transi.). Berlin: Orlanda.
Jackson, P. (1998): Constructions of ״whiteness“ in the geographical imagination. Area 30(2), 99-106.
Jencks, Christopher; Phillips, Meredith, eds. (1998): The black-white test score gap. In: Brookings Institution Press.
Jensen, Arthur (1969): ״How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement?“ In: Harvard Educational Review. 39 (1): 1- 123.
Kant, Immanuel: AAIX: Logik - Physische Geographie. 361 et sqq.
Lorde, Audre. (1984): Sister Outsider. Essays and Speeches. Trumansburg, New York: The Crossing Press.
Lorenz, Konrad (1940): Durch Domestikation verursachte Störungen arteigenen Verhaltens. In: Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie und Charakterkunde 59. 2-81.
Magiros, Angelika (1995): Foucaults Beitrag zur Rassismustheorie. Hamburg, Argument.
Morrison, Toni (1993): Playing in the Dark. Whiteness and the literary Imagination. New York: Vintage, Random House Inc.
Peake, Linda (York University, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2009): Social and Cultural Geography: Whiteness in: The International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. 247 - 253.
Piórkowski, Christoph David (2016): ״Critical Whiteness“: Die unsichtbare weiße Norm. Link: http://www.tagesspiegel.de/wissen/critical-whiteness-die-unsichtbare-weisse- norm/13600832.html. Date: 08.11.2017.
Terkessidis, Mark (1998): Psychologie des Rassimus. In: Westdeutscher Verlag. Opladen, Wiesbaden.
Tißberger, Martina (2016): Critical Whiteness. In: fiph. JOURNAL Issue N0. 28. 24-31.
Vincent Tischauser, Leslie (2012): Jim Crow Laws. In: ABC-CLIO.
Tißberger, Martina. Dietze, Gabriele; Hrzán, Daniela; Husmann-Kastein, Jana (Hrsg.).
(2006): Weiß - Weißsein - Whiteness. Kritische Studien zu Gender und Rassismus. Critical Studies on Gender and Racism. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang.
Weiss, Anja (2001): Rassismus wider Willen: Ein anderer Blick auf eine Struktur sozialer Ungleichheit. In: Westdeutscher Verlag. Wiesbaden.
A short time after the assaults on Cologne’s New Year’s Eve, the German newspaper “Focus” headlined with a picture showing a blonde white woman tainted by black palms. The physical marking of the white female body by the black hands revealed the prejudices that people of colour have to face until today. The headline made use of the stereotype of the dark-skinned man, who is only driven by instinet as an inferior counterpart to the white, reasonable Western European. Despite the scientific discrediting of the racial concept, racism is gaining popularity worldwide, especially in Germany, where the so-called “ethnicity” still defines its descents today.
The fact, that the juror of a German casting show sees her dark-skinned partiéi- pant as a foreigner, even though that girl lists Germany as her country of origin, sums up the whole misery. Not only who chants “We are the people!” in Saxony, but also who congratulates a dark-skinned person to their good language skills or asks where they actually come from, treats “white” and German as equivalents.
Especially with the background of this discourse, it is worth taking a look at the concept of “Critical Whiteness”, which has been much discussed in recent years and has its origins in the Afro-American civil rights movement (Tißberger 2016: 24). In the 1990’s it arrived in Germany under the label “Kritische Weißseinsforschung” and since then has been picked up by various scientific areas such as literature, sociology and African studies.
Not even close to being a unified theory, the different approaches still have one thing in common: Racism isn’t understood as the sole problem of some rednecks, but as a matrix that structures society (Magiros 1995; Terkessidis 1998; Weiss 2001; Tißberger 2016: 25; Piórkowski 2016).
The present work sheds light on which dimensions Whiteness has developed, where to look for the historical origins of the phenomenon and how to classify the status quo of the Critical Whiteness debate in German-speaking countries.
Since the 1990’s the discussion on the construct of whiteness increased not only in the u.s. but also in German-speaking countries. Nowadays there are countless existing articles on this topic with more or less extreme opinions. In regards on this essay’s topic the focus lies on the scientific field of Critical Whiteness Studies especially in Germany. In this context leading researches were carried out by Tißberger (2016) and Amesberger/Halbmayr (2008) as well as Peake (2009) and Eggers et al. (2005). In terms of the origin of the Critical Whiteness Studies espe- dally the works of Dyer (1997) and Morrison (1993) are to emphasize since they are of an outstanding importance and play a leading role within this discourse. These works are also the foundation of this essay’s main analysis.
Critical Whiteness Studies (CWS) critically examine whites as the dominant majority and question the sublime position of whites in the social process of hierarchizing (Tißberger 2016: 24). In the US there has been an intensive examination of the topic since the 1990’s, while in Germany there has only been a long phase of so-called “classic” racism research, which means that the supremacy of whites is taken for granted, while blacks occupy a disadvantaged position (cf. Ames- berger/ Halbmayr 2008). It wasn’t until the end of the 20th century that whiteness was associated with criticism of the supremacy of a particular group (here: whites). However, the Critical Whiteness debate in Germany is still in its infancy (Amesberger/Halbmayr 2008).
Whiteness is a rather difficult concept to describe. As many antiracists have argued it may be an invention, but it is also still a cultural construction. This means it is a way of being in the world, a set of cultural practices often not named as “white” by white people but looked at instead as normal or natural (Amesberger/Halbmayr 2008). It basically represents a position of structural advantage and social privilege from which to look at society (Peake 2009: 247).
Whiteness gets its power from the geographically and historically different meanings associated mainly to skin colour but also to facial type and texture of hair (Peake 2009: 247). It is to understand though that whiteness isn’t only performed in relation to race and ethnicity but also to class, gender, sexuality and other aspects of bodily identity (Bonnet 2000). Therefor its legitimate to say that whiteness is a historically and geographically specific social construct which received a supreme position in the system of social stratification and differentiation. It is important to see that whiteness has concrete effects on the life’s of people - white- skin privilege is the other side of racism (Peake 2009: 247).
There are opposite opinions on this view of whiteness, mainly from right-wing theorists and white supremacists who claim that race, and especially the existence of a white race has a foundation in biology (cf. Jensen 1969; Jencks/Phillips 1998; Lorenz 1940). In fact, scientists identified ostensibly biological categories such as Caucasian (read: white). While those categories are nowadays criticised for their racial politics, they have still been taken for real and natural by millions of people
around the world. The consequences of those kind of views are easy to find: from the Nazi-inspired notion of the Aryan nation to the system of apartheid in South Africa.
It is impossible to distinguish the concept of whiteness from its origins in modem- ism. Generally, it’s agreed, that the term of whiteness found its way into the English lexicon in the 17th century as a result of colonialism and the demand for Western European nations to separate themselves from the colonized people especially slaves (Peake 2009: 248). Soon whiteness became a legal category, enshrined in many laws and giving differential status. The way of ruling the colonies didn’t only include stripping colonies of their resources, the enslavement of indigenous people and the development of the slave mode of production, but it also generated a way of knowing and being of the colonialists which still exist today (Jackson 1998: 99). This means that colonial domination was rationalized from a Western point of view and produced an image of the white Western European self. Obviously the concept of whiteness was also used to distance slaves and slave-owners in North America and Canada (Peake 2009: 248).
Already by the 18th century whiteness had become a well-acknowledged racial term and in the 19th century in the U.S., during the Reconstmction period known as “Jim Crow”, the social and cultural hegemony of whiteness was completely established (Vincent Tischauser 2012).
In the late 19th century - long before the appearance of what we call Critical Whiteness Studies today - radical black intellectuals such as Frantz Fanon, Edouard Glissant, C.L.R. James, W.E.B. Du Bois, James Baldwin and Richard Wright already started writing about the white Western European self.
 Focus, Issue of the 9th of January 2016.
 For reasons of simplified expression, persons with different skin pigmentations are referred to as “whites” and “blacks” in terms of their phenotypes.
 Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. Nowadays Jim Crow became a term for the system of maintaining a racial hierarchy in all areas of American Society.
Term Paper (Advanced seminar), 11 Pages
Term Paper (Advanced seminar), 22 Pages
Term Paper (Advanced seminar), 20 Pages
Term Paper (Advanced seminar), 32 Pages
Seminar Paper, 11 Pages
Seminar Paper, 16 Pages
Term Paper (Advanced seminar), 18 Pages
Bachelor Thesis, 35 Pages
Seminar Paper, 11 Pages
GRIN Publishing, located in Munich, Germany, has specialized since its foundation in 1998 in the publication of academic ebooks and books. The publishing website GRIN.com offer students, graduates and university professors the ideal platform for the presentation of scientific papers, such as research projects, theses, dissertations, and academic essays to a wide audience.
Free Publication of your term paper, essay, interpretation, bachelor's thesis, master's thesis, dissertation or textbook - upload now!