When the flexible concept of HRM emerged in the 1980s, in the times of Thatcherism and Reaganomics, it “could not help but look more desirable than personnel management” (Hope-Hailey). The attractiveness of the theory of managing personnel led to a proliferation of HRM language. Nonetheless, it remains to be seen if there is more to HRM than only a new and shining rhetoric.
A number of authors stress the difficulties of identifying clear differences between personnel management and HRM, and maintain that the most obvious change is a “re-labelling process”. Torrington agrees that “a change of label” is obvious, though one cannot be sure that the content differentiates to any extent. However, the new terminology may at least rid personnel management from its unfavourable welfare image and other negative connotations and thus, save the ailing function of managing personnel from marginalisation. Accordingly, some HR academics maintain that new labels on old bottles may have their uses, even if it is only for marketing purposes. Furthermore, a valuable contribution of HRM is to direct the attention to regarding people as the key resource of organisations and lending the management of personnel increased importance. In this essay, the similarities and differences between personnel and HR management are analysed with regard to their theoretical approaches as well as their practical implementation. Before sketching the similarities and differences in some detail, two different models of HRM, the ‘soft’ and the ‘hard’ approach, will be introduced. Finally, the question will be examined if HRM models are manipulative and exploitative, and a conclusion will summarise the results briefly.
Table of Contents
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Personnel Management versus Human Resource Management
- 2.1 'Soft' and 'Hard' Models of HRM
- 2.2 Theory and Philosophy
- 2.2.1 Similarities
- 2.2.2 Differences
- 2.3 Practical Implementation
- 3. Is HRM manipulative and exploitative?
- 4. Conclusion
Objectives and Key Themes
This essay aims to analyze the similarities and differences between personnel management and human resource management (HRM), considering their theoretical approaches and practical implementation. It explores the 'soft' and 'hard' models of HRM and examines whether HRM is inherently manipulative and exploitative.
- Comparison of Personnel Management and HRM
- 'Soft' and 'Hard' Models of HRM
- Theoretical and Philosophical Differences
- Practical Implementation of HRM
- Critique of HRM: Manipulation and Exploitation
Chapter Summaries
1. Introduction: This introductory chapter sets the stage by highlighting the emergence of HRM in the 1980s within the socio-economic context of Thatcherism and Reaganomics. It introduces the debate surrounding the actual differences between HRM and personnel management, acknowledging the perspective that the shift might be primarily a "re-labelling process" rather than a fundamental change in practice. The chapter emphasizes the potential of HRM to improve the image of personnel management and increase its strategic importance within organizations by focusing on people as a key organizational resource. The essay's objective is clearly stated: to analyze the similarities and differences between the two approaches, considering both theoretical underpinnings and practical implementation, and ultimately addressing the question of whether HRM is manipulative and exploitative.
2. Personnel Management versus Human Resource Management: This chapter delves into the core comparison between personnel management and HRM. It presents contrasting viewpoints, with some authors emphasizing the significant similarities and others advocating for a radical philosophical difference. The chapter acknowledges the difficulties in clearly defining the distinctions, suggesting that the differences lie more in emphasis and interpretation than in substantive practices. The evolutionary perspective, viewing HRM as an extension of personnel management rather than a revolutionary shift, is also considered. The chapter then lays the groundwork for exploring the 'soft' and 'hard' models of HRM, establishing a framework for understanding the diverse approaches within the HRM paradigm. The importance of strategic context and philosophical underpinnings in influencing the effectiveness of HRM practices is also highlighted.
2.1 'Soft' and 'Hard' Models of HRM: This section differentiates between the 'soft' and 'hard' models of HRM, highlighting their contrasting approaches. While acknowledging the difficulty in precisely distinguishing between them in practice (often a blend exists), the chapter emphasizes their fundamental differences. 'Hard' HRM views employees as a business resource and economic factor, focusing on quantifiable aspects and strategic integration with business goals. In contrast, 'soft' HRM prioritizes the human aspect, emphasizing employee well-being and development. The chapter notes the inherent inconsistencies and ambiguities within both models and suggests that in most organizations a mix of both models are found. This sets the stage for a nuanced understanding of HRM’s multifaceted nature and its potential complexities.
Keywords
Human Resource Management (HRM), Personnel Management, Soft HRM, Hard HRM, Strategic Integration, Human Capital, Employee Relations, Organizational Strategy, Manipulation, Exploitation.
Frequently Asked Questions: A Comprehensive Language Preview
What is the overall topic of this document?
This document provides a comprehensive preview of an essay analyzing the similarities and differences between Personnel Management and Human Resource Management (HRM). It explores the theoretical underpinnings, practical implementation, and critiques of HRM, including the debate surrounding its potential for manipulation and exploitation.
What are the key themes explored in the essay?
The essay's key themes include a comparison of personnel management and HRM; the "soft" and "hard" models of HRM; the theoretical and philosophical differences between the two approaches; the practical implementation of HRM; and a critical analysis of HRM concerning manipulation and exploitation.
What is the essay's objective?
The essay aims to analyze the similarities and differences between personnel management and HRM, considering their theoretical approaches and practical implementation. It also examines whether HRM is inherently manipulative and exploitative.
What are the main sections covered in the essay?
The essay is structured into an introduction, a section comparing personnel management and HRM (including a subsection on "soft" and "hard" HRM models), a section exploring the critical question of HRM's manipulative and exploitative potential, and a conclusion.
How does the essay define and differentiate between "soft" and "hard" HRM?
"Hard" HRM views employees as a business resource and economic factor, focusing on quantifiable aspects and strategic integration with business goals. "Soft" HRM prioritizes the human aspect, emphasizing employee well-being and development. The essay acknowledges that a blend of both models often exists in practice.
What is the historical context presented in the essay?
The introduction situates the emergence of HRM within the socio-economic context of Thatcherism and Reaganomics in the 1980s, acknowledging the debate about whether the shift from personnel management to HRM represents a fundamental change or simply re-labeling.
What is the essay's conclusion (in brief)?
The provided preview does not include the conclusion of the essay. The conclusion would likely summarize the findings of the comparative analysis and offer a final assessment regarding the manipulative and exploitative potential of HRM.
What are the keywords associated with the essay?
Keywords include: Human Resource Management (HRM), Personnel Management, Soft HRM, Hard HRM, Strategic Integration, Human Capital, Employee Relations, Organizational Strategy, Manipulation, Exploitation.
What is the structure of the provided preview?
The preview includes a table of contents, a statement of objectives and key themes, chapter summaries, and a list of keywords.
Where can I find the full essay?
The provided preview does not indicate where the full essay can be found. Further information would be needed to locate the complete text.
- Quote paper
- Marco Köster (Author), 2002, Human Resource Management versus Personnel Management, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/25299
