Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Seminar für Englische Philologie
Abteilung Linguistik

Hauptseminar: Sociolinguistics: Historical Pragmatics

Quantifying Variation of the Expanded Form in English

Mandy Stein

Table of Contents

1. Introduction ... 2

2. The Articles ... 3

2.1.Dietrich Nehls „Synchron-diachrone Untersuchungen zur Expanded Form im Englischen: eine struktural-funktionale Analyse“ ... 3
2.2. Barabara M. H. Strang “Some aspects of the history of the Be+ing construction” ... 3
2.3. David Denison “English historical syntax: verbal constructions” ... 4

3. Source Constructions ... 5

3.1. The function of the EF in Old English ... 7

4. Modern Usage of the Progressive Form ... 10

5. Comparison of the old and new usage ... 12

6. Mossè and Nickel: sources for the progressive ... 15

7. Conclusion ... 16

8. Works Cited ... 17

1. Introduction

The use of the Present/Past Progressive or as some people call it: Expanded Form (EF)in English is part of the curriculum in schools and every students either native speaker of English or a learner of it as a foreign-language must learn this part of English grammar.
Next to German, where it is sometimes undefined when you do/did a specific task it is specified in English by the progressive form. If you did something next to another action happening you have to use the Progressive tense or if you are doing something at the moment, like the reader of this term paper is reading at the moment.
The topic of this term paper is the quantifying variation of the progressive tense during its development from Old English to Modern English. Therefore I will use works by Nehls, Denison and Strang on that specific field and combine them in their resources with Visser which is one of the richest sources of older English to find out if there are differences or one expands.
First, I am going to give a short summary of the work by the three authors. Second, I will give an overview over the source constructions of the Progressive Form (I will use the term ‘Expanded Form as well as ‘Progressive’ because the composers switch between the two terms). In chapter three I will have a closer look on the Modern use of the Expanded Form in English and in a fourth step I will combine the old and modern usage of it to find out what was left or included during the years. In chapter five I will have a closer look on the mini-corpus-studies by Mossè and Nickel, who dealt with the emergence of the progressive and show what changed since they started research on this field. And finally, I will draw a conclusion about the position of the Expanded Form.

2. The Articles

2.1. Dietrich Nehls „Synchron-diachrone Untersuchungen zur Expanded Form im Englischen : eine struktural-funktionale Analyse“

With his analysis of the ‘Expanded Form’ in English Dietrich Nehls gives a structural and functional analysis. In detail he wants to give an explanation why there is a still a use of the ‘Expanded Form’ in English and when they should be used. So he demonstrates that the co-existence of the ‘non-expandend’ and the expanded form exists because of “die sprachliche Realisiserung des perfektiven und imperfektiven Aspekts” (Nehls, 1974: 9).
In his work Nehls generally describes first the terms he is going to use to define the ‘Expanded Form’ and its use in English in the old and modern time, like tense and aspect. While tense is in “den heutigen indo-germanischen Sprsachen als grammatische Kategorie im Verbalbereich angesiedelt” and „eine sprecherbezogene temporal-deitkische Kategorie zur Bezeichnung der erlebten Zeitstufe.“ (Nehls, 1974: 16 & 19) ), aspect is „eine vorgangsbezogene temporaldeiktische Kategorie, die nur zwei Elemente umfasst: den imperfektiven Aspekt und den perfektiven Aspekt.“ (Nehls, 1974: 28). Therefore tense and aspect are „als deitkische Kategorien per definitonem auf das Sprecherereignis bezogen und somit nur unter Hinzuziehung der pragmatischen Komponente der Sprachbeschreibung zu erklären“ (Nehls, 1974: 29).
Second, he specifies the ‘Expanded Form’ in present times according to its function, its usefulness and in detail the co-existence of the ‘non-expanded’ and expanded form. The use of the ‘Non-Expanded Form occurs if the focus is more on the action and not on their progress.
In part three, Nehls gives detailed information about the usage of the ‘Expanded Form’ during its development from Old English to Modern English according to its function and the description of the tense- and aspect system.
Chapter four deals with the problem of the functional continuity of the ‘Expanded Form’ from Old to Modern English.

[...]