The Ideal of Objective Science and the Idea of a University Scholars and students of humanities joining the community of a university have never been isolated from their social environments that they try to make sense of. Like any other human being they possess personal attitudes and adhere to certain moral values, which have implicitly an impact on the way they perceive the world. Though they have the ambition to create new knowledge and seek to extend their original understandings of social reality, they cannot escape from being to a certain extent predetermined by their outlook on life (Weltanschauung). In consequence, any knowledge may be regarded as inherently political biased.
There are at least two possible ways how scholars deal with this inherent problem of knowledge creation and scientific rigor. First, in line with Max Weber 1 , some claim that, indeed, since values cannot be scientifically validated, it should be avoided to ascribe absolute objectivity to knowledge. In this way, “good” scholarship has constantly to reflect its values, in order to sharpen intellectual clarity and strengthen its ability to assess. Thus at least, the blurring impact of values on the creation of knowledge can be diminished reaching a stage closer to the ideal of scientific objectivity. In turn, advocates of feminism, postmodernism or hermeneutics have explicitly rejected “this ideal of identifying ‘one true, unbiased’ interpretation” claiming that “all research is biased in the sense that all research is integrally political.” 2 These two distinct self-definitions of scholarship are also represented by different understandings of the purpose and the idea of a university. Whereas the first may be interpreted as an attempt to separate the university as a place of knowledge production from
1 Max Weber, 1904, Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis.
2 Douglas Ezzy, 2002, ‘Politics, Rigour and Ethics,’ Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation, London:
Routledge, pp. 33-59, p. 57.
3
the impact of social interests, the latter acknowledges that this is impossible and suggests a thoughtful intervention into politics.
In this brief paper, I argue in favor of a synthesis of both ideas, claiming that first of all a university should be a place of ‘liberal learning’ free from pressures to perform distinct functions other than allowing intellectuals to experiment and jointly develop their ideas. Only if this freedom is provided, scholarship can give innovative incentives for a pluralistic society. The inherently political implications of any research will then not lead to favor particular social groups but rather to the integration of the society as a whole.
My argument draws from considerations by two authors: Michael Oakeshott (1901- 1990), one of Britain’s most distinguished political philosophers of the 20 th century, has outlined his “idea of a university” in “The Voice of Liberal Learning”, a book which was praised as “an elegant counter-blast to the cruder New Right idea of universities as training institutes.” 3 Douglas Ezzy, an Australian sociologist, has recently made noteworthy contributions in the field of qualitative research methods and teenage witchcraft.
The essay is structured as follows: first, Oakeshott’s ‘idea of a university’ will be broadly outlined. Secondly, Ezzy’s argument that knowledge production serves necessarily political ends will be briefly sketched. Finally, the idea of both authors will be succinctly synthesized in a vision of a university that contributes to a politically pluralist society.
Michael Oakeshott: A Voice of Liberal Learning 4
For Oakeshott the central idea of a university is what he calls ‘the pursuit of learning’. The difference to other scientific institutions is a ‘a special manner of engaging in the pursuit of learning’ that is a ‘cooperative entreprise’. Oakeshott rejects a merely functional purpose of a university: ‘There is, indeed no simple way of determining what composes the world of
3 Peter Coleman, 1991, ‘Beyond the Shadow Line. Michael Oakeshott (1901-1990),’ News Weekly (Australia),
30 March 1991, pp. 22-23.
4
Quote paper:
Christian Ganske, 2005, 'Liberal Learning' and Political Pluralism, Munich, GRIN Publishing GmbH
This text can be quoted and accessed from this url:
Embed
DOI
Formatvorlage (Microsoft Word) für eine Diplomarbeit, Masterarbeit, Ha...
Für MS Word 2003 - Update 2010
Presentations, Models, Tutorials, Instructions
Elaboration, 25 Pages
Formatvorlage (OpenOffice) für eine Diplomarbeit, Masterarbeit, Hausar...
Presentations, Models, Tutorials, Instructions
Elaboration, 35 Pages
Formatvorlage / Vorlage zur Erstellung einer Diplomarbeit, Bachelorarb...
Presentations, Models, Tutorials, Instructions
Elaboration, 15 Pages
Formatvorlage / Vorlage für eine Diplomarbeit / Hausarbeit
Für MS Word 2007 - dotx
Presentations, Models, Tutorials, Instructions
Elaboration, 25 Pages
Anleitung zum Erstellen schriftlicher Arbeiten: Der Aufbau einer wisse...
Presentations, Models, Tutorials, Instructions
Elaboration, 20 Pages
Erstellen einer schriftlichen Hausarbeit
Presentations, Models, Tutorials, Instructions
Termpaper, 14 Pages
Grundtechniken wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens
Bibliografieren - Reden - Schr...
Presentations, Models, Tutorials, Instructions
Script, 46 Pages
Ratgeber zur Erstellung wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten. Diplomarbeiten - ...
Presentations, Models, Tutorials, Instructions
Elaboration, 39 Pages
Christian Ganske has published the text 'Liberal Learning' and Political Pluralism
Christian Ganske has uploaded a new text
The Liberal Conscience: Politics and Principle in a World of Religious...
Politics and Principle in a Wo...
Lucas Swaine
Liberating Learning: Technology, Politics, and the Future of American ...
Terry M. Moe, John E. Chubb
Rethinking Undergraduate Business Education: Liberal Learning for the ...
Anne Colby, Thomas Ehrlich, William M. Sullivan
Dimensions of Curiosity: Liberal Learning in the 21st Century, Essays ...
Nancy Workman, Therese Jones
0 comments