Index of contents
1. Introduction 3
2. An overview of the EU enlargement 3
2.1 Historical overview 4
2.2 Copenhagen criteria 5
3. The benefits and drawbacks of EU enlargement 6
3.1 Existing member states 6
3.2 New member states 7
4. EU and its members views on the possible accession of Turkey 7
4.1 The view of the European Commission 8
4.2 The view of the member countries 10
5. An estimation of the Turkish governments view 11
6. Conclusion and recommendation 12
1. Introduction
Since its foundation in 1957 the discussion about further enlargements of the European Union has increased significantly. As more and more countries have joined the EU especially during recent years, the debate and the estimation for future enlargements have intensified. The current discussion about Turkey’s accession accompanies with a broad range of political, economical and institutional criteria which determine the opportunity to become a member of the EU. The following elaboration will clarify the different opinions about a new enlargement, concerning Turkey’s preparedness to become a member state and was called by the module leaders of International Business Europe from Napier University Edinburgh.
2. An overview of the EU enlargement
Inspired by Jean Monnet, the French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman stated in 1950: “Europe will not be made all at once, or according to a single plan. It will be built through concrete achievements which first create a de facto solidarity.” (Fondation Robert Schuman 2008). This declaration can be seen as a significant turnaround in the relationship of central European countries and summarizes the idea of a step-by-step enlargement of the EU.
3
Figure 1: The European Union 2007, from eurominority.org (2007)
2.1 Historical overview
Referring to Cepova-Fourtoy (2007) first signs of a collaborative approach could be seen by the establishment of the European Coal and Steal Community (ECSC) which was established by the Treaty of Paris in 1951. France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands which had been previous enemies in the Second World War agreed on sharing the production of coal and steal. These six countries further established the European Economic Community (EEC, now the European Union) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), also known as the Treaties of Rome, in 1957 (El-Agraa 2004).
The first enlargement of the European Community took place in 1973, when Denmark, Ireland and the UK joined the EEC. The second enlargement proceeded in 1981 when Greece acceded as the 10 th member country.
4
Moreover, Portugal and Spain joined in 1986. On the 3 rd October 1990 East and West Germany reunified which increased the territory of the EEC but did not raise the number of member countries (El-Agraa 2004). The next significant step influencing the EU enlargement can be seen in the Maastricht Treaty which was signed in 1992. In general, this treaty led to the creation of the EU and was a result of separate negotiations covering the area of a monetary and political union. In 1995 Austria, Sweden and Finland acceded the EU which was then represented by 15 member countries. The biggest enlargement in terms of scope and diversity occurred in 2004. Ten countries joined the confederation, which was than also called the EU 25; Eight Central European countries which where formerly centrally planned (Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia) and two Mediterranean countries (Malta, Cyprus) (Schadler 2007). The accession of Bulgaria and Romania in 2007 is the most recent enlargement. Thus, today 27 member countries are encompassed by the EU and candidate countries such as Croatia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) and Turkey might broaden the confederation (Schadler 2007).
2.2 Copenhagen criteria
In order to become a member of the EU candidate countries have to fulfil certain political, economic and institutional criteria, also known as the Copenhagen criteria. They were established by the European Council in 1993 and expanded the geographical and general policy criteria represented by the Treaty of Maastricht (Hitiris 2003). Referring to the European Commission (2008) and the summary of Kahal (1998) the Copenhagen criteria were then seen as prerequisites for further accessions and can be subdivided into three areas:
• political criteria
• economic criteria
• institutional criteria As far as the political criteria are concerned, the stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities are required (Kahal 1998). Thus, for a candidate country seeking to get a member of the EU it is necessary to keep a
5
Arbeit zitieren:
Volker Küpper, 2008, Should Turkey join the EU?, München, GRIN Verlag GmbH
Dieser Text kann über folgende URL aufgerufen und zitiert werden:
Einbetten
DOI
Das britische Parteiensystem - Entstehung und Struktur der Parteien
Politik - Internationale Politik - Region: Westeuropa
Ausarbeitung, 4 Seiten
Volker Küpper's Text Should Turkey join the EU? ist nun auf dem Buchmarkt erhältlich
Volker Küpper hat den Text Should Turkey join the EU? veröffentlicht
Volker Küpper hat einen neuen Text hochgeladen
Turkey-European Union Relations: Dilemmas, Opportunities, and Constrai...
Meltem Muftuler-Bac, Yannis A. Stivachtis
Turkey in the European Union: Implications for Agriculture, Food and S...
Alison Burrell, Arie Oskam
Turkey and the European Union: Domestic Politics, Economic Integration...
Ali Carkoglu, Barry Rubin
Turkey and the European Union: Prospects for a Difficult Encounter
Esra Lagro, Knud Erik Jorgensen
Turkey and the European Union: Domestic Politics, Economic Integration...
Ali Carkoglu, Barry Rubin
Greening of the European Union: Examining the Eu's Environmental Crede...
Jon Burchell, Simon Lightfoot
0 Kommentare