Seminar Paper, 2006, 21 Pages
Term Paper, 4 Pages
Seminar Paper, 10 Pages
Term Paper (Advanced seminar), 39 Pages
Project Report, 13 Pages
List of Figures
2. Necessity of Intercultural Understandings
2.1 What is Culture?
2.2 Theoretical Constructs of Culture
2.2.1 Hofstedes Dimensions of Culture
2.2.2 Halls Model of Cultures
3. Differences in American and German Business Cultures
3.1 Different Ways of Saying
3.2 Hofstedes most significant differences
3.2.1 Individuality versus Collectivism
3.2.2 Uncertainty Avoidance
3.3 Further Differences
4. Concluding Remarks
§ Figure 1: According to Hofstede, G. (1991), “Cultures and Organizations”, McGraw-Hill, London.
Globalization has led to remarkable changes in the way we conduct the world’s business. International Mergers and acquisitions are en vogue today. The advantages quoted by managers include advantages of scale, increased shareholder value, access to new markets, lower overheads and so on. The number of international mergers and acquisitions between German and American companies increased a lot during the last years, as well.
At the beginning there are high hopes and elation connected with the deal. But the long-term reality, however, is much the opposite. At least 50 percent of all international mergers and acquisition activity fails, no matter how the success is measured.
There are also lots of companies who failed, who are therefore not able to benefit from some positive synergy effects like cost reductions. Why did that happen?
A survey tried to analyze the reasons for this. The surprising result was that just 30% of the failures were attributed to the “hard factors” of business, like planning, finance or technology. For the rest, the reason lay in the so-called “soft factors”, which contain cultural and organizational behaviour.
Somewhat less acknowledged, although hardly disputed, is the positive and negative impact of cultural aspects on the success of M&A activity.
The following work reveals the differences between American and German business culture and also analyzes its historical and social background. Thereby, the main goal is to disprove that American and German business styles are almost similar.
Furthermore, at the end the reader should know more about the existing differences between the two nations, because their unawareness leads to the failures of M&A.
In the second chapter there is theoretical basis information which helps to reach a better understanding of this work. Thereafter comes the main part about the existing differences between Germans and Americans. Because there are plenty of them, it is just possible to take a brief view on a certain field of life. For this reason the author picks a few, those which seem to be the most relevant differences between the German and American business world. In every part, the author is going to illustrate the differences by means of examples. The main question which is answered in this work is: WHY do these different characteristics exist? Where do they come from?
As the reader has seen in the introduction part, the main reason for the failure of M&A laid in the “soft-factors” containing cultural and organizational behaviour.
The main problem of many persons in leading positions is the fact that they are not aware of the existing cultural differences, or just underestimate them. And this is a major problem between Americans and Germans. Executives in both countries say that their cultures are almost the same.
On the one hand this seems to be true. Both countries have a strong Anglo – Saxon background, which means they are quite pragmatic in the way they do business. In addition, Germans and Americans have a propensity to concentrate on one activity at a time. Both value punctuality, are results-oriented, as well as competitive and practical. Another fact which causes this opinion is that many Germans speak English very well, if not even excellent. The common western mindset of these two cultures intensifies that they appear to be similar.
As a result both sides expect each other to think, communicate and behave the same.
People, who share this opinion, tend to become a victim of the most common mistake in U.S. – German business relations – the “trap of similarity”, the synonym for the fact, that the German and American culture looks very similar at the surface.
But beneath there are existing differences. And because they are not expected, their effect can be even more damaging for every business relation between a German and an American company.
The most important thing to do is to make you aware of the cultural differences – or more general – aware of the differences in the “soft factors”, including also the organizational differences. But to be able to do this you need to know about the existing differences and even more important you need to get an understanding about your own culture and the culture you are dealing with. Therefore it is necessary to analyze “What is culture?” and afterwards describe the differences.
The word culture can have a number of meanings. As a basic for this work culture is seen as a system of shared beliefs, values, customs, behaviors, ideas and artifacts that members of society use to cope with their world and with another. All these are transmitted from generation to generation through learning.
Culture is all what people as members of a society have, think and do. Everybody is part of a specific culture, through the process which is known as socialization. This process of socialization is nothing we are aware of. Culture is so much a part of ourselves that we are hardly able to figure it out or express it. For human beings it is not imaginable to live another way of life than the own one.
Quite often we are not even aware of our own culture just until the moment we were confronted with another culture. This instant in which two different culture patterns clash together leads automatically to confusion and disagreements.
A perfectly metaphor for the terminus “culture” is the construct of an “iceberg”. Only a few aspects are evident – just like the top of the iceberg. These are the identifiable elements for example language, clothing or customs. On the other hand there is the part of the iceberg which we do not see. This is where the more important elements come from, the ones which lead to a deeper meaning and understanding of a culture. These values guide the thoughts and actions of people.
The most interesting question of all is why do people act the way they do? Where do these differences come from? What is the reason for the behaviour of the members of the country?
Scientists developed models to explain why people in different countries do the same things differently. Of course, these models can not be complete, because they base on percentiles and they are not supposed to be absolutely correct or the best ones. But they should be seen as a help, as a practical method to “read” and understand a culture.
The two models of Geert Hofstede and Edward Hall are useful to characterize typical behaviours of people. This allows a comparison between two people, which is the supposed to be part of this work. For this reason the two concepts are explained in the following passages.
 Forstmann, St. (1998), p. 57.
 Schmidt P., (2002b)
 Forstmann, St. (1998), p. 57.
 Which we will see, is also a typical German attribute.
 Schmidt, P. (2002), p. 14.
 Bolten Skript „Einführung IWK“
Term Paper, 4 Pages
Project Report, 13 Pages
GRIN Publishing, located in Munich, Germany, has specialized since its foundation in 1998 in the publication of academic ebooks and books. The publishing website GRIN.com offer students, graduates and university professors the ideal platform for the presentation of scientific papers, such as research projects, theses, dissertations, and academic essays to a wide audience.
Free Publication of your term paper, essay, interpretation, bachelor's thesis, master's thesis, dissertation or textbook - upload now!