'Interview with the vampire' and 'Wuthering Heights' and the diabolical reversal of the nuclear family

The novels Interview with the Vampire and Wuthering Heights and the

In the following essay I will talk about the diabolical reversal of the nuclear family in the novels Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë and Interview with the vampire by Anne Rice. I found it very hard to find material on this aspects. There were hardly any books in the library

I could use and I could not find much information or articles about it.

Both novels are filed under Gothic fiction. Gothic always represents “otherness”. “Gothic fiction,…, frequently represents the ways in which both family and class, …, are threatened or attacked by the ‘dark forces’ of transgressive sexuality, illicit desires, and unsanctioned class mobility”(Niqi:1). The Gothic centre is “the realm of the family and the domestic and the class structures”(Niqi:2). Anne Williams argues that “the Gothic myth” (Williams: 22) is the patriarchal family. Gothic is determined by the rules of the family because family structure also generates the plots within Gothic. “Gothic plots are family plots, Gothic romance is family romance.” (Williams: 22) In the English language plot also means “an area of ground” and therefore the “Gothic myth” has special kinds of settings. Not every story can take place in a haunted castle.

In Gothic literature the nuclear family is diabolically reversed. The two books in this essay will be compared regarding this diabolical reversal of the nuclear family.

2

With the nuclear family the Americans were creating a new utopia in the home. Consumerism fueled the image of the new nuclear family as survival and security were linked to traditional family values. A house in the suburbs, a wife at home, 2.17 children and a new family car provided shelter from an increasingly threatening world. The mother became the glue that held their world together while the father went to work to secure their spot in

The first book I am going to discuss is Interview with the vampire.

Two of the cult novels in US gay circles in the 1970s and 80s, though not written by a gay man, have been Anne Rice’s Interview with the Vampire and The Vampire Lestat, in which gay love is an inherent part of the ecstasies of vampirising. Gay writers have often been drawn more generally to the Gothic because it is different.

3

The vampire clearly represents “the other”. He is different from the normal people in society, he is an outcast but still beautiful. He has an obvious sexual symbolism and maybe the highest symbolic representation of eroticism. Vampirism is secret like all our sexuality or like being gay and therefore being the other. The vampire violates the privacy of sexuality of the nuclear family and provides sexual scenes for the narrator to witness. “Until the 1960s,…, sexuality was approved within marriage. Vampirism takes place outside of marriage.”(Radstone:64) Vampirism is something that cannot be done openly and is seen as dark, lustful and malicious. The vampire wasn’t always the centre of the category but instead moved to the centre during the nineteenth century. It has only since Stoker’s Dracula become a stock Gothic character. Dracula is so powerful because he is “a specifically sexual threat that could undermine Western culture itself.” (Williams: 21)

Louis in Interview with the vampire is the protagonist and he is a vampire with human feelings. He still clings to the nuclear family of the normal world he used to live in before he became a vampire. In the beginning he still meets his sister to talk to her although he does not belong to her world anymore. His vampiristic family now is Lestat and later Claudia as well but he still has human feelings which makes him vulnerable in the vampire world. Lestat uses Louis passivity when he creates Claudia as their vampire daughter and he knows that Louis will feel responsible for her and “cannot leave this Unholy Family”(Smith: 27). Lestat made Claudia out of his own egoistic ideals. He wanted to bind Louis to him forever, in which he also succeeded. They are a family now although rather a diabolical one than a nuclear one.

4