The definition of the concept of quality of life (QOL) has long been debated with contributions varying according to the different scientific disciplines, including social sciences, psychology, geography, philosophy, health economics, advertising, medical science, and history (Bowling 1995; Faruqhar 1995, Liddle & McKenna 2000). Taking into account the difficulty of defining QOL (Bowling 1995) this essay will critically discuss the suggestion that "...the experience of quality of life is not dependent upon the quantifiable, material conditions of life but upon subjective, qualitative factors: the content of life" (Hammell 2004, p299). Beginning with a brief definition of the concept QOL in relation to the concept of human occupation and the philosophy of occupational therapy (OT), it will be discussed whether quantifiable conditions in terms of socio-economic resources and measurable physical function are appropriate indicators for QOL. The discussion will then move towards the question of a suitable approach to QOL measurement and explain the implications for the role of OT. In an attempt to define the concept of QOL, Zhan (1992) proposes an example of a conceptual model which speaks of four measurable dimensions of QOL, namely: "life satisfaction, self-concept, health and functioning and socio-economic factors" (Zhan 1992, p796), and suggests, in consensus with Liddle & McKenna (2000), that QOL is both, a subjective as well as an objective concept. Niemi et al (1988) prefer to define QOL as referring to "a person's subjective wellbeing and life satisfaction", which includes health, material well-being, interpersonal relationships", as well as "personal development", work and recreation (Niemi et al, cited in Mayers 2000, p591).
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Conceptualizing Quality of Life
3. Human Occupation and Occupational Therapy Philosophy
4. The Role of Occupation in Wellbeing
5. Quantifiable Conditions and Socio-economic Factors
6. Physical Wellbeing as an Objective Indicator
7. Holistic Approaches and Subjective Measurement
8. Implications for Client-Centred Practice
9. Conclusion
Objectives and Themes
This essay aims to critically evaluate the conceptualization of Quality of Life (QOL) within the context of occupational therapy, exploring the tension between objective, quantifiable indicators and subjective, qualitative experiences of well-being.
- The multidimensional nature of Quality of Life.
- The philosophy of occupational therapy and the concept of human occupation.
- The relationship between meaningful occupation, identity, and personal growth.
- The limitations of using solely objective or functional measurements for QOL.
- The necessity of a client-centred approach in occupational therapy practice.
Excerpt from the Book
Human Occupation – Introduction to the theory and practice of occupational therapy
The view of QOL being a multi-dimensional and subjective concept (Bowling 2001) corresponds with the philosophy of OT (Liddle & McKenna 2000), and the concept of human occupation. The philosophy of OT is based upon a holistic view of the client (Sumsion 2006) and on the belief that humans are occupational beings (George et al 2001). In this context it is said that engagement in personally meaningful occupations delivers a sense of identity, worth and purpose and facilitates health and wellbeing (Liddle & McKenna 2000; George et al 2001; Mee & Sumsion 2004; Brott et al 2007).
According to Turner (2002), occupations can be described as “driven by people’s aspirations, needs and environments”, as “the fabric of ‘doings”, “the purposeful use of time”, and as “a means through which people control the balance of their lives” (Turner 2002, in Turner et al 2002, p26). The named balance aspect is also seen as a goal of OT practice, for example, the Canadian Model of Occupational Performance (CMOP) (CAOT 2002, in Sumsion 2006), illustrates the interaction and need for balance between the personal, the occupational, and the environmental component of occupational performance and aims to remind practitioners of the core of occupational performance, which is spirituality or meaning (CAOT 2002, in Sumsion 2006).
Summary of Chapters
1. Introduction: Presents the debate surrounding the definition of Quality of Life and sets the scope for the discussion within occupational therapy.
2. Conceptualizing Quality of Life: Explores various conceptual models, emphasizing the distinction between objective indicators and subjective individual perceptions.
3. Human Occupation and Occupational Therapy Philosophy: Connects the multidimensional concept of QOL to the core beliefs of occupational therapy and the nature of human beings as occupational beings.
4. The Role of Occupation in Wellbeing: Discusses how engagement in meaningful activities contributes to identity formation, "being and becoming," and overall life satisfaction.
5. Quantifiable Conditions and Socio-economic Factors: Analyzes the relevance of material and socio-economic resources as potential determinants for QOL and psychological wellbeing.
6. Physical Wellbeing as an Objective Indicator: Reviews how physical function is traditionally measured in OT and questions its adequacy as a sole metric for quality of life.
7. Holistic Approaches and Subjective Measurement: Argues for integrating both subjective and objective methods to better capture the individual experience of QOL.
8. Implications for Client-Centred Practice: Discusses how the subjectivity of QOL necessitates a client-centred, respectful, and non-authoritarian partnership in therapy.
9. Conclusion: Summarizes that QOL is a complex, multidimensional concept that requires a holistic understanding of the client to effectively enhance their well-being.
Keywords
Quality of Life, Occupational Therapy, Human Occupation, Subjective Wellbeing, Client-Centred Practice, Occupational Performance, Meaningful Occupation, Holistic Health, Self-Actualization, Identity, Qualitative Measurement, Quantitative Indicators.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core focus of this assignment?
The assignment explores the definition of Quality of Life (QOL) and how occupational therapists can best understand and enhance this experience for their clients.
What are the primary themes discussed?
The essay covers the subjectivity of QOL, the philosophy of occupational therapy, the impact of meaningful occupation on well-being, and the shift toward client-centred practice.
What is the central research question?
The work examines whether quantifiable conditions, such as physical function and socio-economic status, are sufficient indicators for QOL, or if subjective, qualitative factors are more significant.
Which scientific methodology is used?
The author employs a critical literature review, synthesizing perspectives from social sciences, health economics, psychology, and occupational therapy literature.
What topics are covered in the main body?
The main body addresses conceptual models of QOL, the role of "being and becoming" in occupation, the use of physical outcome measures, and the necessity of holistic, client-centred intervention.
Which keywords define this work?
Key concepts include Quality of Life, human occupation, occupational therapy, subjectivity, client-centred practice, and well-being.
How does the author define "becoming" in this context?
The author draws on Wilcock's theory, defining "becoming" as the potential for transformation, growth, and self-actualization facilitated by occupational therapy.
Why is a client-centred approach recommended for measuring QOL?
Because QOL is highly subjective, a client-centred approach ensures that the therapy respects the client’s personal values, beliefs, and unique priorities, rather than relying solely on objective clinical scales.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Linda Mathews (Autor:in), 2008, Human Occupation. Introduction to the theory and practice of occupational therapy, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/111661
