This study was mainly concerned with the roles of school heads, that is, to assess how the execution of the roles of school heads affects students’ academic performance in community secondary schools. The aim was to identify administrative roles of school heads and to evaluate the supervision of the teaching process. The study therefore, was carried out to fill the gap that exists in education context especially on the roles of the schools managers and heads in relation to the students’ academic performance in secondary schools. The study will increase awareness of the problem by showing suggestions on how to improve teaching and learning in secondary schools. The study will help young academicians in the field of education by finding research gaps and conducting more researches in the field of education.
The results of the findings reported in this paper have reached the verdict that these strategies are not effective. A short recap is necessary to qualify the result reached. There were also inconsistencies in instructional supervision by the school head and uncoordinated guidance and counseling practices in the school. Although guidance and counseling was in place in the school, they were not well run due to lack of specialist teachers in the area of guidance and counseling. The recommendations of this study suggests improvements in these areas.
Table of Contents
1.1 Abstract
1.2 Background to the Study
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.3.1 Main Objective
1.3.2 Specific Objectives
1.4 Research Questions
1.5 Significance of the study
3.1 Research Approach
3.2 Sample Size
3.3 Sampling Procedure/technique
3.4 Research Instruments
4.1 Management Training
4.2 The management strategies employed to enhance performance
4.2.1 Management of Teaching and Learning
4.2.2 Internal School Assessment
4.2.3 Alternative Sources of Funds
4.2.4 Guidance and Counseling
4.2.5 Management of Healths of Students
5.1 Conclusion
5.2 Recommendations
Research Objectives and Core Themes
This study aims to assess how the execution of administrative roles by school heads influences students' academic performance in community secondary schools, specifically by evaluating the supervision of the teaching process and identifying necessary management interventions.
- Administrative roles of school heads in secondary education
- Supervision of teaching and learning processes
- Strategies for student academic performance enhancement
- Resource management and alternative funding in schools
- Guidance, counseling, and student welfare services
Excerpt from the Publication
4.2.1 Management of Teaching and Learning
Research studies have demonstrated that the type of teaching methods employed influence students’ academic performance. In this study, slightly over of the teachers in the study locale used lecture method, demonstration method and others used both methods. The teachers and principals concurred that teaching methods used in most of the sampled schools encouraged students to be passive. The teachers on their part reported that the principals hardly monitored the teaching and learning process in their respective schools.
It was evident across the school that there was inconsistent instructional supervision and monitoring of student learning through consistent and more practical assessment procedures. This could have contributed to poor performance because student passivity does not enhance learning and active learning helps students to learn independently and perform well Macttemer & Crawford, (2007). Principals should ensure that there is adequate departmental organization and supervision and engage in classroom supervision to ensure that varieties of teaching methods are used (Mobegi et al., (2010).
Summary of Chapters
1.1 Abstract: Provides an overview of the study's aim to assess how school heads' roles impact academic performance and summarizes the findings regarding management inefficiencies.
1.2 Background to the Study: Discusses the relationship between education management and student performance, noting challenges like teacher shortages and poor resource management.
1.3 Objectives of the Study: Defines the main objective of assessing school head roles and lists specific goals regarding administrative tasks and teaching supervision.
1.4 Research Questions: Outlines the primary inquiries guiding the research concerning administrative contributions and teaching supervision.
1.5 Significance of the study: Highlights the importance of the study for identifying research gaps and improving school management practices.
3.1 Research Approach: Describes the qualitative design used to understand management phenomena in depth.
3.2 Sample Size: Details the selection of participants including managers, heads, deputies, and teachers.
3.3 Sampling Procedure/technique: Explains the use of purposive and random sampling methods for data collection.
3.4 Research Instruments: Identifies in-depth interviews and focus group discussions as the primary tools for data gathering.
4.1 Management Training: Discusses the lack of formal management training among school leaders and its potential negative impact on school performance.
4.2 The management strategies employed to enhance performance: Examines various management pillars including teaching methods, assessment, funding, counseling, and health.
5.1 Conclusion: Summarizes that current management strategies are largely ineffective due to a lack of practical skills and inconsistent supervision.
5.2 Recommendations: Proposes actionable steps such as mandatory management training, income-generating activities, and the establishment of functional guidance units.
Keywords
Management, academic performance, secondary schools, instructional supervision, school administration, teaching methods, student retention, educational quality, guidance and counseling, resource management, professional training, student health, school leadership, assessment strategies, education management.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core focus of this research paper?
The paper primarily investigates the relationship between the administrative roles of school heads and the academic performance of students in community secondary schools.
What are the primary thematic areas covered in the study?
The key themes include school leadership, instructional supervision, teacher-student interaction, financial resource management, and student welfare services like health and counseling.
What is the main research objective?
The goal is to assess how the execution of school heads' roles influences academic outcomes and to identify specific administrative weaknesses affecting secondary education.
Which scientific methodology does the author employ?
The study utilizes a qualitative research approach, employing in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to gather data from school management and teaching staff.
What aspects of school management are addressed in the main body?
The main body evaluates management training, teaching and learning processes, internal assessment strategies, the search for alternative funding, and the effectiveness of guidance and counseling.
How would you characterize this work using key terms?
This work is characterized by terms such as school administration, instructional supervision, academic performance, education management, and school leadership strategies.
Why does the author conclude that existing management strategies are ineffective?
The author argues they are ineffective because despite having academic qualifications, many school leaders lack practical management skills and fail to conduct consistent instructional supervision.
What specific role does the author suggest for guidance and counseling departments?
The author suggests that schools should establish operational guidance units with trained, well-remunerated staff to help mold student character and reduce school dropout rates.
- Quote paper
- Peter Shang'wet (Author), 2020, School Management and Students’ Academic Performance in Secondary Schools. A Case of Selected Secondary School in Iringa Region, Tanzania, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1132951
