Looking at the term “leadership” it can be observed that numerous definitions are existing. According to Koontz and Weihrich it “is defined as the process of influencing people so that they will contribute to organization and group goals (1988, p.392).” This way of definition is even more extended by Yukl. He defines leadership as “[…] the process of influencing others to understand and agree about what needs to be done and how it can be done effectively, and the process of facilitating individual and collective efforts to accomplish the shared objectives (2002, p.7).”
As the universal principle of management and corporate executives, leadership is therefore also of high importance for orchestra conductors, football coaches, army generals and school superintendents (Bennis, 1995). In this sense through the mutual process of interaction be-tween a superior and inferiors leadership is always used for the coordination of activities and memebers within an organization in which labour is divided (Boerner, 2002).
Generally there are two different ways of leadership. According to the way of conducting a group or organisation it can be differentiated between autocratic and democratic leadership. While an autocratic leader is making decisions on his own, democratic leaders prefer their team members being involved in the decision making process (Microsoft® Encarta® Enzyk-lopädie Professional 2003).
Thus, the aim of this paper is to explain which premises for successful leadership have to be met and which different ways of leadership are existing. In the end, it shall become clear how culture is influencing leadership. Through the comparison of leadership styles in Western and Eastern Europe those assumptions shall be proofed.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Introduction
- The meaning of leadership
- The importance of successful leadership
- Premises for successful leadership
- Characteristics of a successful leader
- The importance of implementing a vision
- Finding the appropriate leadership style
- The impact of culture on leadership
- Assumptions about culture
- Necessary preparations for cultural change within organizations
- Boundaries of intercultural leadership
- Recommendations for a successful, intercultural leadership
- A comparison between Polish and Dutch leadership
- Conclusion
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This paper examines the premises for successful leadership, exploring different leadership styles and their impact on organizational effectiveness. It particularly focuses on how culture influences leadership, highlighting the importance of intercultural competence in today's globalized world.- The definition and importance of leadership
- The role of cultural factors in leadership styles
- The challenges and opportunities of intercultural leadership
- The impact of globalization on leadership practices
- A comparative analysis of leadership styles in Poland and the Netherlands
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
The introduction defines leadership and explores its significance in both organizational and societal contexts. It highlights the importance of successful leadership in navigating the complexities of globalization. Chapter 2 delves into the essential characteristics of a successful leader, emphasizing the need for a clear vision, effective communication, and strong personal skills. It also discusses the importance of adapting leadership styles to different situations.
Chapter 3 explores the crucial impact of culture on leadership, examining cultural assumptions and the necessary adaptations required when leading across cultures. It highlights the challenges and opportunities associated with intercultural leadership, emphasizing the importance of cultural sensitivity and understanding. Chapter 4 presents a comparison between leadership styles in Poland and the Netherlands, showcasing the influence of cultural differences on leadership practices.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
This paper focuses on key terms such as leadership, culture, intercultural communication, globalization, organizational effectiveness, and leadership styles. It delves into the intersection of these concepts, exploring the crucial influence of cultural factors on leadership practices in a globalized world.Frequently Asked Questions
How is leadership defined in this paper?
Leadership is defined as the process of influencing others to understand and agree on what needs to be done and facilitating collective efforts to achieve shared objectives.
What is the difference between autocratic and democratic leadership?
An autocratic leader makes decisions independently, while a democratic leader involves team members in the decision-making process.
How does culture impact leadership styles?
Culture influences communication, decision-making, and expectations of authority. Successful leaders must adapt their style to the cultural context of their organization and employees.
What are the premises for successful leadership?
Key premises include a clear vision, effective communication, strong personal characteristics, and the ability to choose the appropriate leadership style for the situation.
How do leadership styles compare between Poland and the Netherlands?
The paper provides a comparative analysis, illustrating how different cultural backgrounds in Western and Eastern Europe lead to distinct leadership practices and expectations.
- Quote paper
- Bachelor Martin Koenig (Author), 2008, Premises for successful leadership, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/116951
