The goal of this action research was to see how technology transfer from Misrak Polytechnic College affected small-scale businesses. Based on this, the researcher concentrated on transferred technology in the academic years 2012 and 2013 E.C. and employed a survey methodology to achieve the study's goal. A total of 57 trainers and 8 technology team members were chosen for this research to transfer and facilitate technology. From them 81.5% were male and 18.5% female. In addition, 57 firms were chosen to acquire technology from trainers. Data was collected through questionnaires and observation. To emphasize the link and variance of the variables, the data collected through the questionnaire was analyzed using frequency %, mean and standard deviation. To complement the quantitative statistics, the information gathered through open ended questionnaires was evaluated qualitatively.
The findings suggest that trainers' problem-solving methods on technology transfer are based on their knowledge of how to deal with technology. Although the trainers have a basic understanding of technology, the results show that additional understanding is required. Aside from that, the findings examine knowledge and skills in value chain analysis. The mean value was 3.38 and the standard deviation was computed as 1.07, which is larger than one, implying that the data was spread out over a wide range of values, implying that respondents had a variety of alternatives when it came to this particular variable.
There are no widespread surveys on the college's suitability for technology development and transfer. In the previous two years, 85.2 percent of trainers produced and transmitted technology for small businesses, but no single technology has been duplicated or made available to the general public by SMEs. The transferred technology is not being imitated by SMEs, but the results demonstrate that the enterprises are interested in technology transfer. The majority of the trainers believe that the transferred technology has a functional difficulty, lacks a nice physical look, and does not match the planned goal.
Table of Contents
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Statement of the Problem
1.3 Basic Research Question
1.4 Objectives of the study
1.4.1 General Objective
1.4.2 Specific objective
1.5 Significance of the Study
1.6 Scope of the Study
1.7 Limitation of the Study
1.8 Organization of the Study
CHAPTER TWO
Related Literature Review
2.1 The Definition of Technology
2.2 The Concept of Technology Transfer
2.3 Channels of Technology Transfer
2.3.1 Market-mediated channels
2.3.2 Non-market channels
2.4 Process of Technology Transfer
2.5 The Role of Stakeholder in Technology Transfer
2.6 Linkages of TVETs and MSEs
2.7 The Role of TVET to Strengthening MSE
2.8 Technology and Micro small and medium enterprises (SMEs)
2.9 Factor Affecting Technology Transfer in MSE
2.10 Conceptual Framework
CHAPTER THREE
Research Design and Methodology
3.1 Research Design
3.2 Intervention Strategies
3.2.1 Initial Reflection (Problem Identification)
3.2.2 Plan
3.2.3 Action Plan
3.3 Population Size
3.4 Samples and Sampling Techniques
3.5 Sources of Data
3.6 Types of Data and Tools of Data Collection
3.7 Procedures of Data Collection
3.8 Data Analysis
3.9 Ethical Considerations
CHAPTER FOUR
4.1 Background Characteristics of the Respondent
4.2 Analysis of Main Data
Chapter Five
5.1 Summary
5.2 Major Finding
5.3 Conclusions
5.4 Recommendation
Research Objectives and Themes
This research aims to assess the impact of technology transfer from Misrak Polytechnic College to micro and small enterprises (MSEs). The study explores the effectiveness of current transfer methods, identifies gaps in trainer capabilities and market adaptation, and evaluates the suitability of the organizational environment for generating competitive, problem-solving technologies for local businesses.
- The effectiveness of technology transferred to local small-scale enterprises.
- Technical and pedagogical constraints faced by trainers during the transfer process.
- The presence of institutional support and value chain analysis capacity.
- Barriers to technology adoption and duplication by small-scale enterprise operators.
Excerpt from the Book
2.1 The Definition of Technology
Researchers in the past have viewed and defined the term 'technology' from a variety of angles, which has affected study design and findings, transfer agreements, and government policies in general (Reddy and Zhoa, 1990). As a result, prior literatures have provided varied meanings to the term technology. Technology, according to Kumar et al (1999), has two main components: 1) physical goods such as products, tools, equipment, blueprints, methods, and processes; and 2) informational items such as know-how in management, marketing, manufacturing, quality control, dependability, skilled labor, and functional domains.
Sahal (1981) defined technology as 'configuration,' noting that the transfer object (technology) is dependent on a subjectively decided yet specific collection of procedures and results. Current technology transfer study has linked technology to knowledge, and greater emphasis is being placed on the research and development process (Dunning, 1994). By studying the technological definition, there are two main components that may be identified: 1) 'knowledge' or 'method;' and 2) 'doing'. Technology is usually associated with achieving a specific outcome, fixing a specific issue, performing a specific task utilizing specific abilities, applying knowledge, and maximizing assets (Lan and Young, 1996). The concept of technology does not only relate to the technology that embodies in the product but it is also associated with the knowledge or information of it use, application and the process in developing the product (Lovell, 1998; Bozeman, 2000).
The early idea of technology as information assumes that the technology is broadly applicable and simple to replicate and reuse (Arrow, 1962). However, Reddy and Zhoa (1990) argue that the early concept of technology is incompatible with a body of literature on international technology transfer that claims "technology is conceived as firm-specific information concerning the characteristics and performance properties of the production process and product design." They also contend that the equipment or methods to manufacture a specific product are inherent in the manufacturing process or operation technology.
Chapter Summaries
CHAPTER ONE: Provides an overview regarding the necessity of technology transfer for national development and details the specific problem statement and objectives of the study at Misrak Polytechnic College.
CHAPTER TWO: Outlines the theoretical foundations of technology, the various channels for technology transfer, and the roles played by TVET institutions in supporting micro and small enterprises.
CHAPTER THREE: Describes the methodology, intervention strategies, and data collection procedures used to capture input from trainers, technology team members, and enterprise participants.
CHAPTER FOUR: Presents the primary results of the research, including the statistical analysis and interpretations of respondent data regarding technology creation and transfer practices.
Chapter Five: Summarizes the key findings, concludes the study, and offers practical recommendations for enhancing institutional efficiency in the technology transfer process.
Keywords
Technology Transfer, Misrak Polytechnic College, Micro and Small Enterprises, TVET, Value Chain Analysis, Innovation, Technological Capability, Industrial Extension, Skill Development, Technology Assessment, Knowledge Transfer, Quality Control, Enterprise Productivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core focus of this research study?
The study focuses on evaluating the impact and effectiveness of technology transfer processes from Misrak Polytechnic College to micro and small-scale enterprises (MSEs).
What are the central thematic areas covered?
Key themes include the definition and channels of technology transfer, the role of TVET institutions in strengthening MSEs, and the assessment of trainers' capabilities in technological innovation.
What is the primary objective of this action research?
The primary goal is to assess the impact of technology transfer by identifying the strengths and weaknesses of technologies developed and transferred to ensure they meet the needs of target enterprises.
Which scientific methodology does the author employ?
The author uses a descriptive research approach, utilizing quantitative data collected through questionnaires (Likert scales) and analyzed using frequency, mean, and standard deviation in SPSS, supplemented by qualitative assessment.
What does the main body of the work address?
The main part of the document covers literature reviews of technology concepts, intervention plans for improving transfer strategies, and detailed data analysis from surveyed trainers and enterprise owners.
Which keywords classify this research?
Important keywords include Technology Transfer, TVET, MSEs, Innovation, and Value Chain Analysis.
Does the research consider the perspective of the enterprises involved?
Yes, the study specifically includes an analysis of how enterprises perceive the quality, utility, and market-readiness of the technologies received and whether they feel adequately trained to implement them.
What role does value chain analysis play in this study?
Value chain analysis is identified as a critical skill for trainers, and the study evaluates how well trainers use this analysis to identify enterprise needs when developing new technology.
What specific institutional barriers are identified in the results?
The research highlights issues such as the lack of dedicated technology transfer experts, poor maintenance and appearance of transferred technology, and the absence of follow-up training to ensure successful adoption.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Sintayehu Tadesse (Autor:in), 2022, The Impact of Technology Transfer for Micro and Small Enterprises, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1314871
