Product liability is a field of law which all in all is eco-nomically efficient due to the modifications of the strict liability system, which grants the advantages of the original system, but alleviates some of its disadvantages. Therefore, it must be deemed as generally efficient, although sporadic deviations such as the proliferation of warning, the successful litigation of some plaintiffs despite own negligence and the enor-mous sums of damage granted will go on occurring.
Table of Contents
A. Introduction
B. German product liability law
I. Product liability
1. Product
2. Product defect
3. Infraction on an object of legal protection
4. Indemnifiable violators
5. Default and burden of proof
6. Recoverable damage
7. Disclaimer and limitation to liability
II. Producer’s liability - § 823 I BGB
III. Other bases for claims
IV. Summary and classification
C. US product liability law
I. Theory of general tort law
1. Harm
2. Causation
3. Breach of duty
4. Burden of proof
5. Defences
6. Recoverable damages
7. Licit plaintiffs
8. Indemnifiable violators
II. Suitable basis for claims
1. Strict liability in tort
a) Fault of fabrication
b) Fault of construction
c) Fault of warning or instruction
2. Negligence
a) Duty of reasonable care
b) Degree of liability
III. Summary and classification
D. Economic analysis of liability law
I. General concepts
1. Model of social optimum
2. Analysis of liability rules
a) Strict liability
b) No liability (caveat emptor)
c) Negligence rule
d) Other concepts than liability
a. Contractual solution
b. Product warranty
c. Disclaimers of warranty
3. Sources of interference
a) Court errors
b) Transaction costs
c) Cost of warning
d) Misperception of risk
e) Problems of insurance
f) Adverse preferences
g) Different consumers
II. Analysis of the German and US model of product liability
1. Classification
2. Modifications to strict liability
3. Advantages of the actual system
a) Consumer choice
b) Best cost avoider
c) Distribution of accident costs
4. Disadvantages of the system
a) Punitive damages
b) Defectiveness according to consumer expectations
E. Closing
Research Objectives and Themes
The paper aims to conduct an economic analysis of product liability laws in Germany and the United States, investigating whether current legal frameworks achieve social and economic efficiency in handling defective products.
- Comparative analysis of German and US product liability legislation.
- Economic assessment of liability rules such as strict liability versus negligence.
- Evaluation of transaction costs, court errors, and information asymmetries in liability litigation.
- Examination of the role of insurance, punitive damages, and consumer risk perception.
Excerpt from the Book
1. Product
A product according to § 2 ProdHaftG is every mobile item according to § 90 BGB, even if it is fixed to an immobile item; a prior use of a product does not change this quality. For specific products, numerous judicial decisions exist. Services are not to be deemed as a product.
Chapter Summaries
A. Introduction: This chapter introduces the controversial nature of product liability, balancing consumer protection against the potential for excessive litigation, and sets the scope for the analysis of German and US rules.
B. German product liability law: This section details the German legal framework, specifically the ProdHaftG and § 823 I BGB, covering definitions of products, defects, burden of proof, and grounds for producer liability.
C. US product liability law: This chapter explores the US tort-based system, focusing on strict liability and negligence, including key concepts like harm, causation, breach of duty, and the unique role of punitive damages.
D. Economic analysis of liability law: This core section applies economic models to evaluate the efficiency of liability rules, discussing social optimums, sources of interference like court errors and transaction costs, and comparing German and US models.
E. Closing: The final chapter concludes that product liability is generally economically efficient due to system modifications that retain the benefits of strict liability while mitigating its drawbacks.
Keywords
Product liability, economic analysis, strict liability, negligence, ProdHaftG, § 823 I BGB, tort law, consumer protection, punitive damages, social optimum, transaction costs, risk-utility-test, causation, burden of proof, market efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this paper?
The paper focuses on the economic analysis of liability laws regarding defective products, comparing the legal systems of Germany and the United States.
What are the central themes covered in the text?
Key themes include the comparison of strict liability versus negligence rules, the economic efficiency of liability frameworks, the impact of court decisions on safety incentives, and the distribution of accident costs.
What is the overarching research goal?
The goal is to determine if current product liability outcomes are socially and economically efficient by analyzing legal rules through an economic lens.
Which scientific methods are employed?
The author uses economic analysis, specifically modeling cost curves for prevention versus expected harm, to evaluate legal rules and incentives for injurers and consumers.
What is discussed in the main body of the work?
The main body breaks down the legal definitions and liability bases in Germany and the US, followed by a detailed economic evaluation of liability rules, sources of interference, and an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of current systems.
How would you describe the key terminology?
The work is characterized by terms from law and economics, including strict liability, duty of care, transaction costs, misperception of risk, and social optimum.
How does the author analyze the difference between German and US approaches to punitive damages?
The text highlights that punitive damages are a striking feature of the US system, which can drive damage awards significantly higher than in the German system, where compensation is generally tied to actual harm.
Why is the "consumer-expectation-test" considered controversial?
It is criticized because many products are too technically specialized for average consumers to form reasonable safety expectations, potentially leading to inefficient warning labels or liability outcomes.
- Quote paper
- Dr. Veronka Fischer (Author), 2005, Liability Law - Economic analysis of defective products, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/131570
