Grin logo
de en es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › Engineering - Civil Engineering

Contribution on the behavior of welded joints to metallic structural elements with tubular section

Title: Contribution on the behavior of welded joints to metallic structural elements with tubular section

Doctoral Thesis / Dissertation , 2022 , 183 Pages , Grade: Summa cum laude

Autor:in: Dr.-Ing. Patrick Heinemann (Author)

Engineering - Civil Engineering
Excerpt & Details   Look inside the ebook
Summary Excerpt Details

Steel structures, which are made of hollow section profiles are mainly used for construction structures. There are many fields of applications for structures made of hollow section profiles. Hollow section profiles are lightweight and have got a high resistance to compression, which is an advantage for column structures. The most common profile types have squared or circular hollow cross sections. Connecting two or more pipes by welding, the joints have got different shapes. These joints are part of trusses or columns with a tree-shaped optic. The standards have got restrictions regarding the geometry, material or load cases. By choosing a node, which is excluded in the standards, designing engineers have to create their own models. This thesis is about the designing of a Y-shaped steel joint, full overlapped on top connection, which is not defined in current standards up to the time the thesis is created. In this thesis only uniplanar joints are investigated. A special focus is on the welding line, which has got a three-dimensional shape. The aim is to figure out the influence on the inclination angle between the two members on the resistance of the joint. Beside this, the profile shape and profile thickness vary to see the differences in their resistance. Square and circular hollow section profiles are in focus. To analyse the behaviour of the different steel joints, a numerical and experimental investigation is executed. Design charts are created as a medium for designing engineers to calculate the ultimate resistance in the elastic and plastic state, depending on the steel profile, thickness and inclination angle. The structure of the thesis is split into four main parts. Firstly, there is an explanation of the general topic with its difficultness. Secondly, there is the state-of-the-art presentation of literature and standards in this range. Thirdly, there is a numerical analysis of the joints. The basement of the numerical studies is detailed in pre-studies, which explain and compare different mesh types or geometrical variations. Fourthly, there is an experimental verification of the numerical tests. It is figured out, if the inclination angle increase, the resistance of the steel joint will decrease significantly. This effect is non-linear. Beside this, it is found, that the full overlapped joint with the squared profile has got a higher resistance than a comparable joint with a similar circular hollow section.

Excerpt


Table of Content

1 Table of Content

2 Table of Symbols and Variables

3 Introduction

3.1 Scope and Objectives of the Thesis

3.2 The Novelty of the Subject

3.3 Structure of the Thesis

4 State of the Art

4.1 Stress Distribution

4.2 Standards

4.3 FEA – Finite Element Analysis

5 Numerical Analysation – Preliminary Case Studies

5.1 Mesh Influence

5.1.1 CHS Joint

5.1.2 SHS Joint

5.2 Three-Dimensional Column

5.3 Two-Dimensional Column

5.3.1 SHS Joint

5.3.1.1 Symmetrical Model

5.3.1.2 Asymmetrical Model

5.3.2 CHS Joint

5.3.2.1 Symmetrical Model

5.3.2.2 Asymmetrical Model

5.4 Expanded Geometry – With Top Plate

5.4.1 Fixed Branch Length

5.4.1.1 Symmetrical Model

5.4.1.2 Asymmetrical Model

5.4.2 Variable Branch Length

5.4.2.1 Symmetrical Model

5.4.2.2 Asymmetrical Model

5.5 Expanded Geometry – Without Top Plate

5.5.1 Fixed Branch Length

5.5.1.1 CHS Joint

5.5.1.2 SHS Joint

5.5.2 Variable Branch Length

5.5.2.1 CHS Joint

5.5.2.2 SHS Joint

5.6 Influence of Member’s Length & Result Comparison

5.6.1 Results with top plate, fixed or expanded length

5.6.2 Results with top plate, variable and expanded length

5.6.3 Results without top plate, fixed length

5.6.4 Results without top plate, variable length

6 Numerical Analysation - Case Study Small-Scale Model (Testing Model)

6.1 CHS 2.0 mm Model

6.2 CHS 2.8 mm Model

6.3 SHS 2.8 mm Model

6.4 Result Comparison

7 Laboratory Test / Verification

7.1 Description

7.2 Testing Devices

7.2.1 Compression Machine

7.2.2 Strain Gauges

7.2.2.1 Technical Specification

7.2.2.2 Preparation & Conglutination

7.2.3 Resistance Transducer (“LVDT”)

7.2.4 Non-Destructive Tests

7.2.4.1 Image Processing

7.2.4.2 Liquid Testing

7.2.4.2 Ultrasonic Testing

7.3 Testing Specimen

7.3.1 Description of the Specimen

7.3.2 Flat Patterns

7.4 Testing Setup

7.5 Test Execution

7.6 Results

7.6.1 CHS Profile t = 2.0 mm

7.6.1.1 CHS 2.0 mm – 20° Inclination Angle

7.6.1.2 CHS 2.0 mm – 25° Inclination Angle

7.6.1.3 CHS 2.0 mm – 30° Inclination Angle

7.6.1.4 CHS 2.0 mm – 45° Inclination Angle

7.6.2 CHS Profile t = 2.8 mm

7.6.2.1 CHS 2.8 mm – 20° Inclination Angle

7.6.2.2 CHS 2.8 mm – 25° Inclination Angle

7.6.2.3 CHS 2.8 mm – 30° Inclination Angle

7.6.2.4 CHS 2.8 mm – 45° Inclination Angle

7.6.3 SHS Profile t = 2.8 mm

7.6.3.1 SHS 2.8 mm – 20° Inclination Angle

7.6.3.2 SHS 2.8 mm – 25° Inclination Angle

7.6.3.3 SHS 2.8 mm – 30° Inclination Angle

7.6.3.4 SHS 2.8 mm – 45° Inclination Angle

7.6.4 Comparison of the experimental Results

8 Summary and Comparison of the results

8.1 Comparison of the Strain Results

8.1.1 CHS 2.0 mm Profile

8.1.2 CHS 2.8 mm Profile

8.1.3 SHS 2.8 mm Profile

8.1.4 Overall Strain Comparison

8.2 Ultimate Resistance Y-joint

8.2.1 Elastic – Elastic

8.2.2 Plastic – Plastic

9 Discussion

9.1 Comparison to Literature

9.2 Comparison to Standard

9.3 Comparison to Preliminary Studies

10 Conclusion

11 Future Studies, Outlook and Publications

11.1 Future Studies and Outlook

11.2 Publications

12 Author’s Contribution

Research Objectives and Focus Themes

The primary aim of this dissertation is to characterize the mechanical behavior and ultimate resistance of a novel, full-overlapped Y-shaped steel joint, which is currently not sufficiently defined in existing structural standards. By investigating circular and squared hollow section profiles, the study seeks to understand how inclination angles, profile thickness, and geometry influence load-bearing capacity and stress distribution under axial compression, ultimately providing design charts for engineering practice.

  • Numerical analysis of full-overlapped steel joints
  • Experimental validation through laboratory testing series
  • Evaluation of stress distribution and failure modes in nodes
  • Development of design charts for elastic and plastic material states
  • Influence assessment of inclination angles on joint resistance

Excerpt from the Book

3.1 Scope and objectives of the thesis

Steel structures, which are made of hollow section profiles are mainly used for industrial purposes (Heinemann, 2022d) or representative objects. They have got many advantages in opposite to H-beams, like the lightweight, carrying capacity, high rotational stiffness and many possible fields of applications (Heinemann, 2022a)(Heinemann, 2022b). Also, for special purposes, like offshore structures (Heinemann, 2021c)(Heinemann, 2022e), hollow section profiles are widely used due to the high resistance against three dimensional loads. For architectural reasons or geometrical requirements, vertical columns made out of steel hollow sections can have some ramifications. As an example, there are two or more members, which are connected to the vertical column with an inclination angle. These columns have got a visual shape of a tree (Heinemann, 2021a). It gives the structure a natural flair. Figure 3.1 shows an example of the “Skoda” automobile factory in Czech Republic (CZ) (Schlaich Bergermann Partner (SBP) 1995). The joint of the vertical member (in the following named as “chord”) and the connected members (in the following defined as “braces” or “branches”) is called node. This node is, due to the geometrical heterogeneity, the weakest part of the structure (Heinemann, 2022a)(Heinemann, 2022b)(Heinemann, 2022c).

There are mainly three options for creating this node. Firstly, there are steel sheets welded to the pipes. The connection for itself is made by bolts. Secondly, the complete node is made of cast steel and the straight pipes are connected to the cast steel (Fig. 3.1). This is the most expensive alternative, but there are nearly no imperfections. The production of the node can only be made in the factory after numerical designing. There is no possibility to create a cast steel node on the construction site. The third method is to weld the steel pipes in a three-dimensional way together. To avoid a horizontal steel plate, all pipes, in this case three members, have to be cut in a three-dimensional curved way.

Summary of Chapters

1 Table of Content: Lists the organizational structure of the thesis.

2 Table of Symbols and Variables: Provides definitions for all abbreviations and variables used throughout the work.

3 Introduction: Outlines the scope, the research novelty, and the overall objectives regarding full-overlapped tree-shaped joints.

4 State of the Art: Reviews existing literature, international standards, and finite element analysis methods for tubular steel joints.

5 Numerical Analysation – Preliminary Case Studies: Presents initial numerical investigations on mesh influences and simple joint geometries as a basis for final models.

6 Numerical Analysation - Case Study Small-Scale Model (Testing Model): Detailed numerical modeling of the specimens specifically analyzed for validation against laboratory test results.

7 Laboratory Test / Verification: Describes the experimental setup, testing procedures, and measured results for the verification of the numerical simulations.

8 Summary and Comparison of the results: Compares numerical and experimental strain results and introduces design charts for ultimate resistance calculation.

9 Discussion: Evaluates the collected results in the context of academic literature, standards, and previous studies.

10 Conclusion: Summarizes the key findings regarding the mechanical resistance and failure behavior of the researched Y-joint types.

11 Future Studies, Outlook and Publications: Suggests potential research pathways and lists the author’s relevant publications.

12 Author’s Contribution: details the specific contributions provided by the author to the field of standard-undefined steel joint design.

Keywords

Steel structures, hollow section profiles, Y-shaped joint, full-overlapped, finite element analysis, numerical modeling, laboratory testing, inclination angle, ultimate resistance, weld joint, strain distribution, elastic-plastic behavior, structural stability, tree-shaped columns, Eurocode 3

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core subject of this thesis?

The thesis explores the structural behavior and load-bearing capacity of full-overlapped, Y-shaped steel joints using hollow section profiles, which are not currently addressed by standard design codes.

What are the central thematic fields?

The work covers structural engineering, numerical modeling using Finite Element Analysis (FEA), experimental laboratory verification, and the derivation of design criteria for atypical welded steel connections.

What is the primary research goal?

The objective is to calculate the ultimate resistance of these specific joints and provide design charts and correlation factors for engineers to apply in practical construction.

Which scientific methods are applied?

The author utilizes a combined approach consisting of numerical simulation via ANSYS software and extensive experimental verification through physical load testing and strain measurement on customized specimens.

What topics are covered in the main body?

The main body moves from preliminary numerical case studies to a detailed small-scale testing model, followed by a comprehensive verification against laboratory results and final comparison with existing standardization frameworks.

Which keywords best characterize the work?

Key terms include: Steel joints, Hollow section, Full-overlapped Y-joint, Finite Element Analysis, Structural resistance, Inclination angle, and Experimental verification.

Why are these specific Y-joint designs considered unconventional?

They involve a full overlap of three members without traditional intermediate plates, leading to complex geometric and stress scenarios that current standard codes like Eurocode 3 do not officially provide formulas for.

What significance do the generated design charts have?

They provide the first analytical reference for practicing engineers to estimate the resistance of these specific tree-shaped column nodes, bridging a critical gap in current structural standards.

How does the author evaluate the quality of the FEA results?

The author performs mesh metric evaluations, examining factors like element skewness and aspect ratios, and validates the numerical output by comparing it directly with measured strain data from physical laboratory load tests.

Excerpt out of 183 pages  - scroll top

Details

Title
Contribution on the behavior of welded joints to metallic structural elements with tubular section
Grade
Summa cum laude
Author
Dr.-Ing. Patrick Heinemann (Author)
Publication Year
2022
Pages
183
Catalog Number
V1323678
ISBN (PDF)
9783346815682
ISBN (Book)
9783346815699
Language
English
Tags
contribution
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Dr.-Ing. Patrick Heinemann (Author), 2022, Contribution on the behavior of welded joints to metallic structural elements with tubular section, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1323678
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  183  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint