Tobacco tax is one of the measures that governments around the world implement in an attempt to curb the use of tobacco products in the country. Multiple studies have suggested that tobacco tax could have considerable impact on consumption and revenue. In this regard, the researcher proposes a structured literature review protocol to explore this study goal. The protocol encompasses a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed sources on the topic. For instance, some studies suggested that tobacco tax leads to an increase in prices of the commodity, thus could deter people from consuming it. Apart from acting as a deterrent to cigarette consumption, it is also an important source of revenue for the government. In a nutshell, the systematic literature review will allow the researcher to compare and contrast multiple sources on tobacco tax and its impact and develop appropriate conclusions. The proposal also highlights the process of literature search and the inclusion criteria in the study.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Background
Research Question and Aims
Perspective and Methodology
Methods: Literature Search Strategy
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Search Strategy
Evaluation of Published Articles for Completeness of Reporting
Methods: Quality Assessment
Data Extraction Tool
Timetable
Budget
Dissemination of Results
Objectives and Core Topics
This paper aims to investigate the impact of tobacco taxation on both cigarette consumption levels and the broader economy of England through a systematic literature review. By synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence, the research seeks to evaluate the efficacy of tobacco taxes as a public health policy tool designed to deter smoking while simultaneously considering the economic implications for household welfare and government revenue.
- Analysis of tobacco tax as a deterrent for cigarette consumption.
- Economic impact of tobacco taxation on the English economy and household welfare.
- Application of mixed-methods systematic literature review protocols.
- Methodological rigor in synthesizing evidence-based health policies using PRISMA guidelines.
Excerpt from the Book
Perspective and Methodology
The research question in this paper encompasses both qualitative and quantitative components. It means that the sources that will be considered for the SLR are both qualitative and quantitative (mixed methods systematic reviews). Mixed methods systematic literature reviews is a type of SLR that integrates the findings from qualitative and quantitative studies into a single systematic review addressing overlapping review questions (Misra & Agarwal, 2018). The mixed-methods systematic review is appropriate for this study because it allows the researcher to engage with various aspects of the questions, resulting in more in-depth knowledge on the research topic. Qualitatively, the researcher seeks to enhance understanding of the workings of the tobacco tax and its implementation as a health promotion policy. Quantitatively, the researcher seeks to assess the association between tobacco tax and cigarette consumption and England economy (Choice Reviews Online, 2014). In both cases, there are multiple resources that the researcher can review to answer the question. In this regard, mixed-methods systematic reviews will be appropriate for this study.
Summary of Chapters
Introduction: Provides the context for tobacco taxation as a policy tool and outlines the anticipated benefits for public health and the economy.
Background: Examines the health and economic burdens of tobacco use and establishes the rationale for using systematic reviews in evidence-based policy making.
Research Question and Aims: Defines the specific primary research question regarding the effects of tobacco tax and lists the secondary objectives of the study.
Perspective and Methodology: Justifies the selection of a mixed-methods systematic review approach to integrate qualitative and quantitative data.
Methods: Literature Search Strategy: Details the systematic approach to keyword searching and the use of Boolean operators to identify relevant literature.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Establishes strict parameters for the selection and rejection of academic studies based on quality and relevance.
Search Strategy: Outlines the practical steps for searching databases like Cochrane and Medline to gather appropriate peer-reviewed sources.
Evaluation of Published Articles for Completeness of Reporting: Describes the process of assessing identified articles for their ability to contribute meaningful data to the review.
Methods: Quality Assessment: Introduces the quality assessment tool used to ensure that only rigorous, scientifically sound studies are included.
Data Extraction Tool: Explains the standardized mechanism for capturing and synthesizing study features and findings.
Timetable: Presents the project timeline and the distribution of tasks over the three-month research period.
Budget: Confirms that the research is an academic exercise requiring negligible funding as it utilizes existing library and internet resources.
Dissemination of Results: Outlines the plan for compiling the final report for presentation to the relevant college department.
Keywords
Tobacco tax, Cigarette consumption, England economy, Systematic literature review, Mixed-methods, Health promotion policy, Smoking deterrence, Public health, Meta-ethnography, PRISMA guidelines, Research methodology, Evidence-based policy.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this research paper?
The paper focuses on conducting a systematic literature review to analyze how tobacco taxes affect cigarette consumption behavior and the overall economy in England.
What are the central themes of the document?
Central themes include the role of tobacco taxation as a health promotion strategy, the economic impact on government revenue, and the behavioral response of consumers to price changes.
What is the core research objective?
The main objective is to answer the question: "What are the effects of administering the tobacco tax on cigarette consumption and England economy?"
Which methodology is adopted for this study?
The study adopts a mixed-methods systematic literature review, utilizing both qualitative and quantitative evidence to provide a comprehensive analysis.
What specifically is covered in the methodology section of the work?
The methodology covers the literature search strategy, the definition of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment tools, and data extraction protocols.
Which specific keywords characterize this study?
Key terms include tobacco tax, systematic literature review, cigarette consumption, English economy, and public health policy.
Why is a "mixed-methods" approach considered appropriate here?
This approach is used because it allows the integration of qualitative insights regarding policy motivations with quantitative data on the statistical relationship between prices and consumption.
How does the author intend to conduct the data extraction efficiently?
The author plans to use a standardized data extraction tool, potentially supported by software like Rayyan, to minimize repetition and time wastage while ensuring accuracy.
- Quote paper
- Mourine Atsien (Author), 2022, A Proposal for Systematic Review of the Effect of Tobacco Tax on Cigarette Consumption and England Economy, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1326038
