Grin logo
de en es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › Communications - Movies and Television

The Representation of Women in Ancient Comedy and the Modern Sitcom. A Comparison and Analysis

Title: The Representation of Women in Ancient Comedy and the Modern Sitcom. A Comparison and Analysis

Bachelor Thesis , 2022 , 33 Pages , Grade: 1.0

Autor:in: Kevin Jasinski-Moore (Author)

Communications - Movies and Television
Excerpt & Details   Look inside the ebook
Summary Excerpt Details

This paper sets out to analyse and compare the representation of women in ancient comedy and the modern sitcom, arguing that both adhere to a dichotomy of presenting women as either "mothers" or "whores". First, it establishes the sitcom as the modern descendant of the ancient comedy while also considering crucial differences, such as the all-male cast in ancient plays and the concentration on indoor spaces (sitcom) versus outdoor spaces (ancient comedy). Subsequently, by analysing select episodes of "The Big Bang Theory" and plays such as Plautus’ "Cistellaria" and Aristophanes’ "Assemblywomen", it establishes essential ways in which the dichotomy manifests.

Excerpt


Table of Contents

1. Introduction

2. Comparing the Formats of Ancient Comedy and the Modern Sitcom

3. Sex-Gender Systems: One-Sex vs Two-Sex Model

4. Mothers and Whores: The Dichotomy of Women in Comedy

4.1 Women as Whores: Sexualisation and Limitation to the Body

4.2 Women as Mothers: Marriage, Children, and the Household

4.3 The Dichotomy in Action: How the Dichotomy Applies to Women

5. Conclusion

Research Objectives and Themes

This thesis examines and compares the representation of women in ancient comedy and the modern sitcom, exploring the persistent dichotomy that categorizes women into the archetypes of "mothers" or "whores."

  • The sitcom as a modern descendant of ancient comic traditions and plot structures.
  • The influence of one-sex versus two-sex models on the gender perceptions in these formats.
  • Mechanisms of sexualization and the limitation of women to their bodies in media.
  • The intersection of motherhood, marriage, and social class in character development.
  • The comparative analysis of "The Big Bang Theory," "Cistellaria," and "Assemblywomen."

Excerpt from the Book

4.1 Women as Whores: Sexualisation and Limitation to the Body

Throughout human history, women were excluded from academia and politics for systemic and ideological reasons that require a much broader scope than this paper can provide. Nonetheless, for our purposes, this exclusion can be sufficiently understood by using the “symbolic construction of the view of the biological body” (Bourdieu 54), in which certain traits and power relations are naturalised and somaticised, making a person “inclined and able” to enter the “social games most favourable to the development of manliness” (politics, business, science), thereby discouraging girls from entering the same games (Bourdieu 54). The consequences of this exclusion cannot be understated. Two things are likely to occur if a group of people is excluded from the central institutions of power and knowledge for an extended period. Firstly, the group itself will find other ways of accessing power and knowledge, although the power and knowledge gained are most likely of lesser quality or dependent on the dominant group. Secondly, the dominant group(s) will claim that the deficiencies of the inferior group are “implanted upon [them] by nature or the gods” (Elias et al. 34), which will then, since it was claimed by the dominant group, be perceived as universally true and thus adopted by the submissive group (Bourdieu 62).

Accordingly, women found access to power through sexuality, marriage, and manipulation. This strategy, however, may have contributed to the sexualisation of women and the limitation of women to their bodies, thereby naturalising and reaffirming the exclusion of women from institutions of power and knowledge. Although in the modern world of the sitcom, women arguably have equal access to knowledge and power as men, considering that women now make up the majority of university students1 (Hewitt) and increasingly more women hold political office (Inter-Parliamentary Union), we can still find an abundance of evidence for women being limited to their bodies and having to resort to sexuality to exert some influence or power.

Summary of Chapters

1. Introduction: This chapter defines the scope of the study, establishing the link between ancient comedy and modern sitcoms through shared reliance on stereotypes and predetermined character roles.

2. Comparing the Formats of Ancient Comedy and the Modern Sitcom: This section explores structural similarities, such as plot reliance on private affairs and the use of indoor settings vs. street scenes, while establishing the sitcom as the modern equivalent of ancient comedy.

3. Sex-Gender Systems: One-Sex vs Two-Sex Model: This chapter analyzes the shifting biological and philosophical models of gender, contrasting the ancient "one-sex" hierarchy with the modern "two-sex" system and their impact on female representation.

4. Mothers and Whores: The Dichotomy of Women in Comedy: The core chapter conducts a comparative analysis of primary sources, demonstrating how the mother/whore dichotomy shapes character traits, social constraints, and audience expectations.

4.1 Women as Whores: Sexualisation and Limitation to the Body: This subchapter focuses on how female characters, particularly in sitcoms, are ranked and valued based on physical attractiveness and sexual availability rather than intellect or professional competence.

4.2 Women as Mothers: Marriage, Children, and the Household: This section examines the nurture-centered roles forced upon female characters, exploring the stereotype of the "perfect wife" and the inherent domestic expectations within both sitcoms and ancient dramas.

4.3 The Dichotomy in Action: How the Dichotomy Applies to Women: This chapter synthesizes previous findings to show how social class and institutional roles facilitate or restrict the application of the mother/whore labels in various cultural contexts.

5. Conclusion: The study concludes by reaffirming that while the manifestation of the mother/whore dichotomy differs between ancient and modern formats, it remains a dominant and limiting force in the representation of women.

Keywords

Ancient Comedy, Modern Sitcom, Gender Representation, Mothers and Whores, The Big Bang Theory, Aristophanes, Plautus, Sex-Gender Systems, Stereotypes, Cultural History, Social Role Theory, Feminism, Patriarchal Ideology, Character Archetypes

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary subject of this research?

The research analyzes and compares the representation of women in ancient comedy and modern sitcom formats, focusing on their depiction through the dichotomous lenses of "mothers" and "whores."

What are the central thematic fields covered?

The work covers gender studies, media studies, classical philology, and social psychology as they relate to stereotypical portrayals of women in comedic media over the last two millennia.

What is the primary goal of this paper?

The primary goal is to establish how the "mother and whore" dichotomy manifests in different comedy formats and to identify how cultural and biological models of sex and gender influence these representations.

Which scientific methods were employed?

The author uses a comparative, qualitative analysis of selected primary sources (plays and sitcom episodes) supported by historical and sociological theories, such as gender studies, social role theory, and anatomical history.

What does the main body focus on?

The main body examines the structural foundations of comedy, the historical evolution of sex/gender models, and specific character analyses—such as Penny and Bernadette in "The Big Bang Theory"—in relation to ancient prototypes from Plautus and Aristophanes.

Which keywords characterize this work?

This work is characterized by terms such as gender stereotyping, comedy, sitcom, ancient drama, social hierarchy, and feminism.

How does the "one-sex" model differ from the "two-sex" model in the context of these plays?

The "one-sex" model allows for a vertical hierarchy where women can exhibit supposedly "masculine" traits, whereas the "two-sex" model creates rigid, "incommensurable" boundaries between genders in contemporary sitcoms.

Why are older women often portrayed as grotesque in ancient comedy?

Older women are often portrayed negatively because they fall outside of the reproductive and erotic functions that historically defined a woman’s social value in ancient Greece and Rome.

How does the modern sitcom reinforce the mother/whore dichotomy?

Sitcoms utilize intentional casting and explicit tropes (such as the "dumb blond" versus the "nurturing mother") to solidify these labels, often substituting class-based distinctions used in ancient times with visual and personality-based stereotypes.

Excerpt out of 33 pages  - scroll top

Details

Title
The Representation of Women in Ancient Comedy and the Modern Sitcom. A Comparison and Analysis
College
University of Tubingen
Grade
1.0
Author
Kevin Jasinski-Moore (Author)
Publication Year
2022
Pages
33
Catalog Number
V1328269
ISBN (PDF)
9783346817990
ISBN (Book)
9783346818003
Language
English
Tags
representation women ancient comedy modern sitcom comparison analysis
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Kevin Jasinski-Moore (Author), 2022, The Representation of Women in Ancient Comedy and the Modern Sitcom. A Comparison and Analysis, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1328269
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  33  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint