Karl LARENZ (jun) - a "famous prime father" of German legal science (, as e.g. judge Prof Dr Thomas HOEREN put it in the - basically - highy-quality newspaper "FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG"? Immanuel KANT - a "world master" of thinking (, as e.g. GRABNER-HAIDER/WEINKE put it)? - E.g. WIMMER, FIRLA, HENTGES et al cast doubt on the "mode" of presenting e.g. students (almost) "semi-divine" (?) legal thinkers, often not even mentioning any of their pseudo-scientific research. Should holocaust-implications not at least cause a "stir" (of critical re-thinking) the mode of presenting "viri "boni""?
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- 1 Introduction
- 1.1 Introduction with BERNHARD, KEHLMANN et al?
- 1.2 "Tenor(s)" of the study
- 2 ("Holy"?) Bartolomé DE LAS CASAS
- 2.1 Who was DE LAS CASAS?
- 2.2 DE LAS CASAS and human rights "development"?!
- 3 Juan LATINO (Juan DE SESA)
- 3.1 Who was Juan LATINO?
- 3.2 LATINO: unknown to KANT?!
- 4 Anton Wilhelm AMO
- 4.1 Who was Anton Wilhelm AMO?
- 4.2 AMO and the "Ding an sich" (noumenon)?
- 4.3 NTEP on AMO and implications?
- 4.4 AMO: unknown to KANT?!
- 5 David HUME
- 5.1 "Enlightening" David HUME at "WU WIEN"?
- 5.2 Gilles DELEUZE on HUME?
- 5.3 HAYEK and "unser weiser Führer" David HUME?
- 5.4 DAIRE and MOLINARI on HUME?
- 5.5 Gerhard STREMINGER on HUME?
- 6 Race/"Rasse"; "Rassengesetze"; Racism/"Rassismus"
- 6.1 Definition of "Rasse" with BROCKHAUS?
- 6.2 Definition of "Rasse" with BROCKHAUS?
- 6.3 Definition of "Rassismus" with BROCKHAUS?
- 7 Immanuel KANT
- 7.1 KANT on Africo-American people anno 1764 (1766)?
- 7.2 Again: KANT on Afro-americans anno 1766 (1764)?
- 7.3 KLEIN on KANT's "scharfe Beobachtungsgabe"?
- 7.4 Wolbert G. C. SMIDT on KANTs "Erhabenes"?
- 7.5 Patrick FRIERSON on KANTs "Erhabenes"?
- 7.6 Monika FIRLA on KANT and "Zeitgeist"-fiction?
- 7.7 GRABNER-HAIDER/WEINKE on KANT?
- 7.8 VOLPI/NIDA-RÜMELIN on KANT?
- 7.9 PONGS (1976) on KANT?
- 7.10 KLOPFER (2008) on KANT and "Pietismus"?!
- 7.11 KANT, Afro-americans and "phlogiston" anno 1785?
- 7.12 (Sir) Isaiah BERLIN on KANT?
- 7.13 BERLIN on KANT's "scharfer und äußerst klarer Verstand"?
- 7.14 KANT: "Meister der Architektonik der Vernunft" (GADAMER)?
- 7.15 WIMMER on KANT and Wilhelm Anton AMO?
- 7.16 Helmut FUCHS on KANT?
- 7.17 Christof MÜLLER on KANT?
- 7.18 Nikolaus FRANKE on KANT?
- 7.19 Anna GAMPER on KANT?
- 7.20 Fritz SCHEBECK on KANT?
- 7.21 PERTHOLD/SPITZER/WALLNER on KANT?
- 7.22 Thomas OLECHOWSKI on KANT?
- 7.23 Gerhard LUF on KANT?
- 7.24 Again: Gerhard LUF on KANT?
- 7.25 Alexander SOMEK on KANT, HEGEL and ROUSSEAU?
- 7.26 RÜPING/JEROUSCHEK on KANT?
- 7.27 Fritz SCHEBECK on KANT?
- 7.28 PERTHOLD/SPITZER/WALLNER on KANT?
- 7.29 Thomas OLECHOWSKI on KANT?
- 7.30 Alexander SOMEK on KANT, HEGEL and ROUSSEAU?
- 7.31 RÜPING/JEROUSCHEK on KANT?
- 8 HEGEL
- 8.1 RÜPING/JEROUSCHEK on HEGEL?
- 8.2 COOTER/ULEN on HEGEL?
- 8.3 WIMMER on HEGEL?
- 9 Karl LARENZ and the NS-regime
- 9.1 Karl LARENZ on KANT?
- 9.2 RÜPING/JEROUSCHEK on LARENZ?
- 9.3 Thomas OLECHOWSKI on LARENZ?
- 9.4 Thomas HOEREN on "Ur-Vater" LARENZ?
- 9.5 "High quality"? - FAZ, HOEREN, and "Ur-Vater" LARENZ?
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This work aims to conduct a serious, fact-based, and scientific analysis of under-discussed aspects of prominent figures like Kant, Hegel, and others, challenging conventional narratives and addressing the omission of negative historical contexts. The study critically examines the (often positive) portrayals of these philosophers, exploring instances of racism and other problematic aspects.
- The underrepresentation of negative historical contexts in the portrayals of prominent philosophers.
- The role of racism and its influence on historical and philosophical narratives.
- A critical examination of the works of Kant and his contemporaries.
- The exploration of lesser-known figures and their contributions.
- The analysis of historical omissions and their implications.
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
1 Introduction: This introductory chapter sets the stage for the study by questioning the predominantly positive portrayals of influential philosophers like Kant and Hegel, highlighting the absence of discussion regarding their potentially problematic views and actions. It introduces the central theme of critically examining the historical context and challenging the accepted narratives surrounding these figures. The chapter establishes the scope of the analysis and its methodology, emphasizing the importance of a factual and scientific approach.
2 ("Holy"?) Bartolomé DE LAS CASAS: This chapter delves into the life and work of Bartolomé de las Casas, a significant figure in the early debates surrounding colonialism and human rights. It examines his contributions and contradictions, acknowledging both his advocacy for indigenous populations and the complexities of his historical context. The chapter analyzes de las Casas's impact on subsequent discussions of human rights and ethics, providing a nuanced understanding of his legacy.
3 Juan LATINO (Juan DE SESA): This chapter profiles Juan Latino, focusing on his life, contributions, and often overlooked significance. It explores the reasons for Latino's relative obscurity and contrasts his intellectual achievements with the prevailing historical narrative. This chapter serves to highlight the gaps in existing historical accounts and underscore the importance of incorporating lesser-known figures into broader philosophical discussions.
4 Anton Wilhelm AMO: This chapter centers on the life and work of Anton Wilhelm Amo, critically examining his contributions to philosophy and his interactions with prominent European thinkers. The chapter analyzes Amo's engagement with contemporary philosophical ideas and contrasts his unique perspective with the perspectives of European philosophers like Kant. The summary underscores the importance of recognizing and incorporating Amo's contributions into our understanding of the Enlightenment.
5 David HUME: This chapter explores various interpretations and assessments of David Hume's philosophy, analyzing how his ideas have been received and applied across different disciplines and historical periods. It also addresses how economists and political thinkers have used and reinterpreted his work, particularly considering the role that his ideas have played in debates around economics and social science. The chapter explores the broad spectrum of Hume's influence, ranging from his philosophical contributions to the diverse and sometimes conflicting interpretations of his work.
6 Race/"Rasse"; "Rassengesetze"; Racism/"Rassismus": This chapter examines the definitions and historical context of concepts surrounding race and racism, drawing upon dictionaries and scholarly works to critically analyze the evolution of these terms and their impact. The chapter explores different aspects of the historical use of race as a social construct and how it informed legislation and social structures.
7 Immanuel KANT: This chapter provides a multifaceted analysis of Kant's work, integrating various scholarly perspectives to offer a nuanced view of his contributions and shortcomings. It analyzes Kant's views on race and addresses inconsistencies in his body of work. The chapter contextualizes Kant's ideas within the broader intellectual and historical context of the Enlightenment, providing a deep dive into both his strengths and weaknesses in light of contemporary scholarship.
8 HEGEL: This chapter offers a critical assessment of Hegel's philosophical system, exploring how his ideas have been interpreted and applied throughout history. It will analyze his contributions and limitations in relation to contemporary intellectual discourse, considering his impact and influence on subsequent philosophical thought.
9 Karl LARENZ and the NS-regime: This chapter examines the life and work of Karl Larenz, focusing on his engagement with the Nazi regime and the implications of his scholarship. The chapter critically evaluates Larenz's intellectual contributions in light of his involvement with the Nazi regime, analyzing how his work might have been influenced by or contributed to the ideology of the time.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
Kant, Hegel, Enlightenment, racism, colonialism, philosophy, history, critical analysis, under-representation, Anton Wilhelm Amo, Bartolomé de las Casas, Juan Latino, David Hume, Karl Larenz, historical omissions, scientific analysis, German Idealism.
Frequently Asked Questions: A Critical Analysis of Under-Discussed Aspects of Prominent Philosophers
What is the main focus of this academic work?
This work provides a critical analysis of under-discussed aspects of prominent philosophers, particularly focusing on Kant and Hegel. It challenges conventional narratives by examining instances of racism and other problematic aspects often omitted in traditional portrayals. The study aims for a factual and scientific approach, exploring historical omissions and their implications.
Which philosophers are primarily analyzed in this study?
The primary focus is on Immanuel Kant and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. However, the study also significantly features Bartolomé de las Casas, Juan Latino (Juan de Sesa), Anton Wilhelm Amo, and David Hume, analyzing their lives, works, and historical contexts to provide a broader perspective on the philosophical landscape and the role of often-overlooked figures.
What are the key themes explored in this research?
The key themes revolve around the underrepresentation of negative historical contexts in the portrayals of prominent philosophers; the role of racism and its influence on historical and philosophical narratives; a critical examination of the works of Kant and his contemporaries; the exploration of lesser-known figures like Amo and Latino; and the analysis of historical omissions and their implications.
What specific aspects of these philosophers' lives and works are critically examined?
The study critically examines instances of racism and other problematic aspects in the works and lives of these figures. It delves into their views on race, colonialism, and other relevant social and political issues, challenging positive portrayals that overlook these negative elements.
How does the study approach its analysis?
The study employs a serious, fact-based, and scientific approach. It utilizes a variety of scholarly sources and perspectives to offer a nuanced and comprehensive analysis, contrasting traditional narratives with new evidence and interpretations.
What is the purpose of including lesser-known figures like Anton Wilhelm Amo and Juan Latino?
Including lesser-known figures like Amo and Latino serves to highlight the gaps and biases in existing historical accounts. Their inclusion provides a more complete picture of the philosophical landscape and demonstrates the importance of incorporating diverse voices into broader philosophical discussions.
What is the significance of analyzing the historical context surrounding these philosophers?
Analyzing the historical context is crucial to understanding the complexities and limitations of these philosophers' work. By examining the social, political, and cultural environments in which they lived, the study reveals how these factors influenced their ideas and actions.
What is the structure of the work?
The work is structured into chapters, each dedicated to a specific philosopher or theme. It includes an introduction, chapter summaries, key themes, and a list of keywords.
What are some of the secondary sources or scholars referenced in the study?
The study references numerous scholars, including but not limited to: BERNHARD, KEHLMANN, DELEUZE, HAYEK, MOLINARI, STREMINGER, BROCKHAUS, KLEIN, SMIDT, FRIERSON, FIRLA, GRABNER-HAIDER, WEINKE, VOLPI, NIDA-RÜMELIN, PONGS, KLOPFER, BERLIN, WIMMER, FUCHS, MÜLLER, FRANKE, GAMPER, SCHEBECK, PERTHOLD, SPITZER, WALLNER, OLECHOWSKI, LUF, SOMEK, RÜPING, JEROUSCHEK, COOTER, ULEN, HOEREN, and others.
Who is the intended audience for this work?
This work is intended for an academic audience interested in philosophy, history, and critical analysis. It is particularly relevant to those studying the Enlightenment, German Idealism, and the history of ideas.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Mag. Georg Schilling (Autor:in), 2009, „Who was Anton Wilhelm Amo?“ – „Remapping the Jungle“ vs. „Vom faulen Holze lebend“?! , München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/137633
