Paralysis that only affects one side of your body is referred to as hemiplegia. Up to 85% of stroke victims suffer upper limb sensory deficits, dexterity and movement quality.
To determine effects of visual tactile stimulation on upper limb sensory impairment, dexterity, and quality of movement with sub-acute hemiplegic patients. A randomized controlled trial, conducted on 26 sub-acute hemiplegic stroke patients age of 35 to 80 and sample was collected from Zafar hospital, Lahore. Upper limb sensory deficit, dexterity, and quality of movement were checked by standardized tools which were fugyl-meyer scale, Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament, box and block test and motor activity log assessment. Social package for statistical sciences version 25 used for statistical work.
Parametric Independent sample t test was used for between group studies which shows that p-values of all the variables were less than 0.05 which means that there is a significant difference in pre- and post-intervention. Within group studies done by using paired sample t test which shows there is a difference in pre- and post-interventions of all variables but mean differences of all variables in experimental group was more significant. It is concluded that both interventions group shows difference, but visual tactile stimulation group shows better results.
Table of Contents
1.INTRODUCTION:
2.LITERATURE REVIEW:
3.OBJECTIVES
4.HYPOTHESES
4.1.NULL HYPOTHESES:
ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS:
5.MATERIAL & METHODS:
5.1.STUDY DESIGN
5.2.SETTING
5.3.DURATION OF THE STUDY
5.4.SAMPLE SIZE
5.5.STUDY GROUPS:
5.6.SAMPLE SELECTION:
INCLUSION CRITERIA
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
5.7.DATA COLLECTION TOOL:
5.8.DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:
Enrolment:
Randomization:
Collection procedure:
5.9.DATA ANALYSIS:
5.10.CONSORT
6.RESULTS
7.DISCUSSIONS
7.1.CONCLUSION:
7.2.LIMITATIONS:
7.3.RECOMMENDATIONS:
8.REFERENCES:
Objectives and Topics of the Study
This study aims to determine the impact of visual tactile stimulation on upper limb sensory impairment, dexterity, and quality of movement in patients recovering from sub-acute hemiplegia. By comparing a control group receiving standard therapy with an experimental group utilizing supplemental visual tactile stimulation, the research investigates whether such interventions lead to more significant improvements in motor function and sensory perception.
- Effects of visual tactile stimulation on stroke recovery
- Improvement of upper limb dexterity and sensory function
- Evaluation of quality of movement (QOM) in hemiplegic patients
- Comparative analysis of standardized motor and sensory assessments
- Impact of task-oriented interventions on sub-acute hemiplegic patients
Excerpt from the Book
5.5. STUDY GROUPS:
26 stroke patients of age 18-80 was taken. After the exclusion criteria 26 patient were selected patients who will fulfill in inclusion criteria and randomly divided into two groups having same baseline treatment.
Group A (CONTROL GROUP): This group received conventional treatment that were included ROM exercises, Strengthening and stretching exercises (30 Minutes) along with Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) (20-25 Minutes), twice weekly for 6 weeks.
Group B (EXPERIMENTAL GROUP): This group received conventional treatment that were included ROM exercises, strengthening and stretching exercises (30 Minutes) along with Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) (20-25 Minutes), twice weekly for 6 weeks along with this protocol this group was receive visual tactile stimulation through dynamometer or by placing lights on wall and ask the patient to touch it.
Summary of Chapters
1.INTRODUCTION: Provides an overview of stroke pathology, the challenges faced by hemiplegic patients, and the relevance of sensory and motor rehabilitation.
2.LITERATURE REVIEW: Examines existing evidence regarding mirror therapy, electrical stimulation, and robotic training, identifying gaps that the current study intends to fill.
3.OBJECTIVES: Clearly defines the goal of measuring the efficacy of visual tactile stimulation on specific motor and sensory metrics.
4.HYPOTHESES: Proposes the testing of a null hypothesis against an alternate hypothesis concerning the effectiveness of the intervention.
5.MATERIAL & METHODS: Details the randomized controlled trial design, participant demographics, intervention protocols, and analytical tools used.
6.RESULTS: Presents the statistical data comparing pre- and post-intervention scores across the different therapy groups.
7.DISCUSSIONS: Interprets the findings by linking them to previous research and discusses the broader implications for rehabilitation clinicians.
8.REFERENCES: Lists the academic sources and citations used throughout the provided document.
Keywords
Dexterity, Electrical Muscle Stimulation, Stroke, Sensory Impairment, Visual Tactile Stimulation, Hemiplegia, Rehabilitation, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Motor Function, Quality of Movement, Physical Therapy, Neurological Dysfunction, Sub-acute Stroke.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this research?
The research focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of incorporating visual tactile stimulation into standard rehabilitation programs for patients suffering from sub-acute hemiplegia following a stroke.
What are the main thematic areas covered?
The paper covers stroke recovery neurology, motor control, upper limb sensory impairment, sensory integration techniques, and various therapeutic modalities like mirror therapy and manual mobilization.
What is the core research objective?
The objective is to determine if adding visual tactile stimulation to conventional exercises better improves upper limb sensory function, dexterity, and quality of movement than traditional methods alone.
Which scientific methodology was employed?
The study uses a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, involving 26 participants divided into a control group (standard therapy) and an experimental group (standard therapy plus visual tactile stimulation).
What topics are discussed in the main body?
The main body covers the theoretical background of stroke, a review of existing literature, specific clinical material and methods, statistical results, and a critical discussion of the outcomes.
Which keywords characterize this work?
The work is characterized by terms such as visual tactile stimulation, hemiplegia, stroke rehabilitation, motor function, and dexterity.
How were participants divided for the study?
The study participants were randomly divided into two groups, Group A (Control) and Group B (Experimental), ensuring both groups received similar baseline therapy while Group B received the additional visual tactile stimulation.
What was the key conclusion of the study?
The study concluded that while both groups showed improvement, the patients in the visual tactile stimulation group experienced significantly better outcomes regarding motor and sensory function recovery.
What specific assessment tools were used?
The study utilized the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, the Box and Block Test, the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament examination, and the Motor Activity Log (MAL) for data collection.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Muflaha Jafar (Autor:in), 2021, Effects of Visual Tactile Stimulation on Upper Limb Sensory Impairment, Dexterity, and Quality of Movement, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1380644
