Grin logo
en de es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › Politics - Political systems in general and in comparison

The Paradox of Non-Contestability in the Judicial Reform of Mexican Constitutional Amendments 2024. Formal Analysis and Mathematical Modeling

Title: The Paradox of Non-Contestability in the Judicial Reform of Mexican Constitutional Amendments 2024. Formal Analysis and Mathematical Modeling

Scientific Study , 2024 , 29 Pages

Autor:in: Carlos Medel-Ramírez (Author)

Politics - Political systems in general and in comparison
Excerpt & Details   Look inside the ebook
Summary Excerpt Details

This article critically examines Mexico’s 2024 judicial reform, which introduced the principle of non-contestability (inimpugnabilidad) for constitutional amendments, effectively removing judicial oversight from these amendments. Drawing on comparisons with judicial review frameworks in Germany, India, and the United States, the study reveals the significant risks posed to Mexico’s legal coherence, human rights protections, and democratic accountability under this reform. Using formal logic, set theory, and game theory, it models the potential conflicts and incoherences that arise from an unchecked constitutional amendment process. The study argues that non-contestability enables amendments that might contradict Mexico's constitutional principles to stand without a corrective mechanism, raising critical questions about the balance of power and the protection of fundamental rights. Solutions such as establishing a limited judicial review or an independent constitutional review council are proposed to prevent legal inconsistencies and protect democratic principles.

Excerpt


Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)

  • Introduction
  • Comparative Analysis: Judicial Review Models in Other Countries
    • Germany's Eternity Clause
    • India's Basic Structure Doctrine

Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)

This article critically analyzes the implications of the principle of non-contestability (inimpugnabilidad) in Mexico's constitutional amendment process. It uses formal logic, set theory, and game theory to model potential legal inconsistencies arising from the removal of judicial oversight. The analysis draws on international comparisons to highlight the risks to legal coherence, human rights, and democratic accountability.

  • Analysis of the principle of non-contestability in Mexican constitutional reform.
  • Comparative analysis of judicial review models in Germany and India.
  • Assessment of the risks to legal coherence, human rights, and democratic accountability.
  • Mathematical modeling of legal inconsistencies resulting from unchecked reforms.
  • Proposal of potential solutions, such as limited judicial review or a constitutional review council.

Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)

Introduction: This chapter introduces the Mexican constitutional reform that removes judicial oversight of constitutional amendments, raising concerns about its impact on legal consistency and human rights protection. It highlights the loss of mechanisms to check potential abuses of power and contrasts this approach with those of other countries.

Comparative Analysis: Judicial Review Models in Other Countries: This section compares the Mexican approach to the models employed in Germany and India. It explores Germany's "eternity clause" which protects fundamental principles from alteration, and India's "Basic Structure Doctrine," which safeguards essential constitutional elements from amendment. The chapter analyzes the historical context and practical applications of these mechanisms.

Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)

Non-contestability, Judicial reform, Constitutional amendments, Mathematical modeling, Human rights protections, Judicial review, Germany's Eternity Clause, India's Basic Structure Doctrine, Legal coherence, Democratic accountability.

Excerpt out of 29 pages  - scroll top

Details

Title
The Paradox of Non-Contestability in the Judicial Reform of Mexican Constitutional Amendments 2024. Formal Analysis and Mathematical Modeling
College
University of Veracruz  (IIESES)
Author
Carlos Medel-Ramírez (Author)
Publication Year
2024
Pages
29
Catalog Number
V1516209
ISBN (PDF)
9783389086650
ISBN (Book)
9783389086667
Language
English
Tags
Non-contestability Judicial reform Constitutional amendments Mathematical modeling Human rights protections
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Carlos Medel-Ramírez (Author), 2024, The Paradox of Non-Contestability in the Judicial Reform of Mexican Constitutional Amendments 2024. Formal Analysis and Mathematical Modeling, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1516209
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • https://cdn.openpublishing.com/images/brand/1/preview_popup_advertising.jpg
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  29  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Payment & Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint