This work will focus on the structural feature of the play within the play in "Hamlet" and "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead", to unveil similarities and differences of its occurrence. The first chapter will focus on the history of this feature and furthermore on ideals and inspirations for Stoppard’s play. The second chapter tries to define features of the play within the play.
The third and main chapter works out the appearances and differences of this feature in both plays. It will analyse in how far both plays inherit the different types of the category play in the play. Furthermore, this chapter will focus on stylistic means connected with the category like the ambiguous use of words or different layers of reality.
"Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead" is Tom Stoppard’s best known and most performed stage play. Its debut performance was a production by the National Theatre at the Old Vic in 1967. Despite its popularity, critics controversially discussed its artistic achievements. Robert Gordon pointed out that he does not value the play as commentary on Shakespeare’s "Hamlet", derived from an expert reading the text. For the vast majority, "Hamlet" serves as archetypal tragedy dealing with the dilemma of a sensitive individual confronted by a corrupt society and power politics. Nevertheless, only few people value the structural details of the play.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Introduction
- 1. Predecessors and Ideas
- 2. Definition of the Play Within the Play
- Hamlet and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
- 3. The Play Within the Play: Realizations and Differences
- 3.1 The Play Within the Play in Hamlet
- 3.2 The Play Within the Play in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
- 3.3 Interlacing of Play-Layers
- 3.4 Use of Ambiguous Words
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This work aims to analyze the structural feature of the "play within a play" in Shakespeare's Hamlet and Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, highlighting similarities and differences in its presentation. The analysis will explore the historical context of this theatrical device and examine its function within both plays.
- The historical development and usage of the "play within a play" device in dramatic literature.
- A comparative analysis of the "play within a play" in Hamlet and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead.
- Examination of the stylistic techniques employed in both plays in relation to the "play within a play," such as ambiguous language and layering of reality.
- The influence of Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot on Stoppard's work.
- The contrasting portrayals of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern in Shakespeare and Stoppard's interpretations.
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
Introduction: This introduction sets the stage for a comparative analysis of Shakespeare's Hamlet and Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, focusing on the "play within a play" as a key structural element. It establishes the relatively minor roles of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern in Hamlet and contrasts this with Stoppard's elevation of these characters to central figures in his own play. The introduction highlights the critical debate surrounding Stoppard's work and emphasizes the study's focus on unveiling similarities and differences in the use of the "play within a play" device.
1. Predecessors and Ideas: This chapter explores the historical precedents of the "play within a play" device in drama, tracing its usage from ancient Indian drama to the British and Spanish plays of the 17th century. It discusses the interpretations of the device as both a display of the playwright's creativity and a potential indicator of their limitations. The chapter also examines the influence of early 20th-century modernist writers like Joyce, Eliot, Kafka, and Beckett, particularly focusing on Beckett's Waiting for Godot and its impact on Stoppard's approach to character development and theatrical conventions. The chapter highlights differences between Beckett’s minimalist style and Stoppard’s approach, which uses the world of another play as its setting.
2. Definition of the Play Within the Play: This chapter offers a concise definition of the "play within a play," identifying it as a metadramatic device—a drama about a drama—and highlighting its inherent tension between drama and culture. It emphasizes the conscious use of metadramatic elements by skilled playwrights to challenge audience perceptions of the world. The chapter further categorizes metadramatic techniques, including the "play within a play," ceremonies within a play, role-playing, and self-reference, acknowledging the frequent blending of these categories in practice.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
Hamlet, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, Tom Stoppard, William Shakespeare, metadrama, play within a play, theater, dramatic structure, modernism, Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot, character analysis, ambiguity, reality, interpretation.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main focus of this academic text?
This academic text provides a language preview analyzing the use of the "play within a play" structural element in William Shakespeare's Hamlet and Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. It explores the similarities and differences in how this device is presented and functions in both plays.
What are the key objectives and themes explored in this text?
The objectives and key themes include: the historical development of the "play within a play" device, a comparative analysis of its use in Hamlet and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, examination of stylistic techniques like ambiguous language, the influence of Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot on Stoppard's work, and the contrasting portrayals of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.
What does the "Introduction" chapter summarize?
The Introduction sets the stage for a comparative analysis, highlighting the minor roles of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern in Hamlet and contrasting this with Stoppard's elevation of these characters. It also addresses the critical debate surrounding Stoppard's work.
What does the chapter "Predecessors and Ideas" cover?
This chapter explores the historical precedents of the "play within a play" device, tracing its origins and discussing interpretations of its use. It also examines the influence of modernist writers, particularly Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot, on Stoppard's approach.
What is the focus of the chapter "Definition of the Play Within the Play"?
This chapter provides a concise definition of the "play within a play" as a metadramatic device, highlighting its inherent tension between drama and culture. It also categorizes different metadramatic techniques.
What are the keywords associated with this academic text?
The keywords include: Hamlet, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, Tom Stoppard, William Shakespeare, metadrama, play within a play, theater, dramatic structure, modernism, Samuel Beckett, Waiting for Godot, character analysis, ambiguity, reality, and interpretation.
Does this text explore the influence of other works on the plays studied?
Yes, the text explores the influence of Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot on Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, among others.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Guido Maiwald (Autor:in), 2018, Comparison between Shakespeare’s "Hamlet" and Tom Stoppard’s "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead". The Play within the Play - Comparison of Settings, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1556320
