OHADA is a system of business law uniform across 17 west and central African countries. The ultimate goal of the Treaty was to provide its member states with a modern, western style set of business laws thus, making these states more attractive to foreign investors. This supranational organization currently has nine (9) statutes called Uniform Acts which focus exclusively on business matters ; the formation, the operation and dissolution of business entities and, the formation, performance and enforcement of business transactions. Thus it is aimed at accelerating the process of integration in the continent so as to enable it play its rightful role of global economy and addressing its multifaceted socio-economic and political problems. So, OHADA’s main objective is to remedy legal and judicial insecurity that prevails in business law. In addition to the main objective, OHADA also has as goal to promote the system of arbitration as a speedy and discreet instrument of settlement of commercial disputes as well as improving the training of judges and auxiliary officer of justice. This can only be achieved with the establishment of a strong and independent court system in the national courts that can ensure the proper application of OHADA law and an efficient settlement of dispute in west and central Africa. It is therefore the duty of the judge to guaranty the interpretation of laws so as to ensure the direct and obligatory application of the Uniform Act in the various member states and their supranational position.
Nevertheless, where there is a judge, there is a court registrar. This paper therefore seeks to situate the position and role of the registrar in the implementation of OHADA law which is not sufficiently highlighted by the legislator.
To examine its competences during contentious and non-contentious matters, its recognition at the national and international level, its role in the execution of court decisions, the formation, the operation and dissolution of the business entities and during business transactions as far as OHADA law are concerned.
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION
FIRST PART: AN AFFIRMED EFFICIENT ROLE OF THE COURT REGISTRAR IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF OHADA LAW ON CONTENTIOUS MATTERS
CHAPTER 1: THE COURT REGISTRAR, A PROTAGONIST IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF OHADA LAW
SECTION I: A SUPRANATIONAL AND NATIONAL RECOGNITION OF THE ROLE OF THE COURT REGISTRAR
SECTION II: THE COURT REGISTRAR AS A PRIVILEGED WITNESS AND ASSISTANT OF THE JUDGE
CHAPTER 2: THE COURT REGISTRAR AS A GATE WAY AND AN OUTLET OF THE JURISDICTION IN JUDICIAL CONTENTIONS UNDER OHADA LAW
SECTION I: THE INTERVENTION OF THE COURT REGISTRAR IN JUDICIAL CONTENTIONS UNDER OHADA LAW
SECTION II: THE REGISTRAR AS AN ACTOR DURING JUDICIAL SANCTIONS
SECOND PART: AN EFFICIENT ROLE OF THE COURT REGISTRAR IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF OHADA LAW ON NON- CONTENTIOUS MATTERS
CHAPTER 1: THE INTERVENTION OF THE REGISTRAR IN THE ABSENCE OF DISPUTES
SECTION I: THE COURT REGISTRAR AS A REVENUE COLLECTOR
SECTION II: THE EXERCISE OF THE FUNCTIONS OF THE COURT REGISTRAR IN THE COLLECTIVE PROCEEDINGS OF WIPING OF DEBT
CHAPTER 2: THE INAVOIDABLE AND AUTONOMOUS PRESENCE OF THE COURT REGISTRAR IN THE MANIPULATION OF JUDICIAL FACTS AND INFORMATION
SECTION I: THE INEVITABLE PRESENCE OF THE COURT REGISTRAR IN THE HANDLING OF JUDICIAL FACTS
SECTION II: THE RESOURCE PERSON OF THE JURISDICTION
CONCLUSION
Research Objectives and Topics
This work aims to analyze the role and efficiency of the court registrar within the OHADA legal framework. While the judge's role is well-defined, the registrar's substantial contribution to the administration of justice and the implementation of business law remains insufficiently highlighted by the legislator. The study focuses on the registrar's involvement in both contentious and non-contentious matters to situate their position as an essential actor in the judicial process.
- The supranational and national legal status of the court registrar.
- The registrar's role as a privileged witness and assistant to the judge during hearings.
- Administrative functions of the registrar, including revenue collection and official acts.
- Operational responsibilities during collective proceedings and business insolvency cases.
- The registrar's position as the gatekeeper of judicial records and data within the OHADA framework.
Excerpt from the Book
A) The registry of the court of first instance
The registrar is a regular channel of communication to and from the court and in particular is responsible for all communications. Thus, the Cameroon legal system has regulated the registry corp through the administrative organization of courts as an administrative backbone of the court. This text outlines the administrative body of the registry corp and their diverse responsibilities. It clearly states and organizes the structure of the registry in the court of first instance, high court, appeal and supreme courts.
To begin with, the registry of the court of first instance shall be under the authority and responsibility of the registrar in chief. This registry comprises of five sections where the civil and commercial section and the trade and personal property register (TPPR) are part of them. These are sections which deals greatly with the OHADA regulations. While the civil and commercial section deals with the civil and commercial matters and application of legal aid where the registrar greatly intervenes, the TPPR receives declarations for the opening of companies, issue trade certificates, open and handle company registers, handle company disputes and issue extracts of trade register which are all under the responsibility of the registrar.
Summary of Chapters
CHAPTER 1: THE COURT REGISTRAR, A PROTAGONIST IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF OHADA LAW: This chapter establishes the foundational role of the registrar by examining their recognition at both supranational and national levels.
CHAPTER 2: THE COURT REGISTRAR AS A GATE WAY AND AN OUTLET OF THE JURISDICTION IN JUDICIAL CONTENTIONS UNDER OHADA LAW: This chapter analyzes how the registrar functions as a central figure in managing judicial contentions and bankruptcy-related processes.
CHAPTER 1: THE INTERVENTION OF THE REGISTRAR IN THE ABSENCE OF DISPUTES: This chapter explores the registrar's non-contentious duties, focusing on revenue collection and their role in insolvency procedures.
CHAPTER 2: THE INAVOIDABLE AND AUTONOMOUS PRESENCE OF THE COURT REGISTRAR IN THE MANIPULATION OF JUDICIAL FACTS AND INFORMATION: This chapter details the registrar's responsibility for maintaining court registers, archives, and official records within the judicial system.
Keywords
OHADA, Court registrar, Judicial administration, Business law, Uniform Acts, Conciliation, Litigation, Bankruptcy, Legal insolvency, Revenue collection, Judicial records, RCCM, Enforcement, Civil procedure, Cameroon
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this research?
The work explores the role and functional challenges of the court registrar in the context of OHADA business law, specifically highlighting their position as an administrative backbone of the judiciary.
What are the central themes of the study?
The study revolves around the legal status of the registry corps, the registrar's contribution to legal procedure in contentious settings, and their administrative duties in non-contentious matters.
What is the primary research question?
The research seeks to verify whether the registrar’s role in the implementation of OHADA law is strictly contentious or if it encompasses a broader, more vital autonomous function.
Which scientific methodology does the author use?
The author utilizes a methodology based on the compilation of documentation from the University of Douala, legal doctrine, OHADA Uniform Acts, previous research, and interviews with court registrars within Cameroonian courts.
What topics are covered in the main body?
The main body treats the registrar as an essential assistant to the magistrate, a revenue collector for the state, and the primary manager of judicial processes and company registrations under the RCCM.
Which key terms characterize this research?
Key terms include OHADA, judicial administration, court registrar, insolvency, enforcement of judgments, and civil procedure in the African context.
How is the registrar involved in OHADA-related insolvencies?
The registrar manages the receipt of petitions, verifies necessary documents, facilitates communication between parties, and ensures the proper publication of decisions to creditors.
Why is the registrar considered the 'gatekeeper' of the jurisdiction?
Because they are responsible for the reception of cases, the maintenance of the record books (plumitif), and the authentication of all procedural acts that move through the court system.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Achancho Ojogho (Autor:in), 2025, The role of the Court Registrar in the Implementation of OHADA Laws, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1571279
