Meta-Epistemic Framework for Inferential Pluralism: A Logic-Consistent Model Beyond Totalization presents a groundbreaking theoretical architecture that challenges classical assumptions in logic, semantics, and epistemology. In an age of increasing complexity and interdisciplinary entanglement, this book proposes a pluralistic, non-totalizing approach to inference—where contradiction, incompleteness, and semantic diversity are not failures, but essential features of real-world reasoning.
Drawing from paraconsistent logic, type theory, dynamic epistemology, and category theory, the author constructs a meta-inferential model that allows agents to reason locally, adapt to contradictions, and interact across divergent semantic domains. This structure permits epistemic mutation and semantic drift, while avoiding the collapse into triviality or dogmatic universality. Instead of seeking ultimate closure, the framework embraces the undecidable, the incomplete, and the heterogenous as central pillars of inference.
The model is defined through formal logic notation and supports applications in quantum logic, ethical reasoning, legal pluralism, cognitive modeling, and the design of AI systems capable of navigating contradictory information. By introducing agents with context-sensitive logic systems and deformation operators, it enables a new class of inference mechanisms grounded in epistemic humility, flexibility, and coherence.
Intellectually rigorous yet conceptually innovative, this work appeals to readers in philosophy of science, mathematical logic, artificial intelligence, political theory, and interdisciplinary research. Whether addressing the paradoxes of self-reference or modeling the epistemic ruptures of scientific revolutions, it invites scholars and practitioners to rethink the very foundations of knowledge, logic, and truth.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Problem Statement
- Model Structure
- The Logical Foundation of the Proposed Model
- Implications
Objectives and Key Themes
This article aims to present a meta-epistemic model for inferential coherence that avoids the paradoxes of logical totalization, semantic universality, and epistemic closure. It proposes a structure supporting logical pluralism, incompleteness, and semantically diverse reasoning, building upon type theory, paraconsistent logic, and dynamic epistemology.
- Inferential Coherence and the Avoidance of Paradoxes
- Logical Pluralism and Incompleteness
- Semantically Diverse Reasoning
- Integration of Type Theory, Paraconsistent Logic, and Dynamic Epistemology
- Applications in Interdisciplinary Domains
Chapter Summaries
Introduction: This chapter introduces the concept of totalizing models of inference and their susceptibility to paradoxes arising from self-reference, ontological overreach, or semantic uniformity. It highlights the limitations of traditional approaches and introduces the proposed non-totalizing framework, emphasizing its capacity to accommodate contradiction, local consistency, and semantic heterogeneity. The chapter establishes the interdisciplinary relevance of the model, mentioning applications in theoretical physics, ethics, political reasoning, and cognitive science. The authors draw inspiration from the work of Gödel, Tarski, Morin, and Sen, foreshadowing the theoretical underpinnings of their approach.
Problem Statement: While not explicitly detailed in the provided text, this chapter likely elaborates on the specific problems associated with totalizing models of inference, providing a more detailed examination of paradoxes related to self-reference, ontological excess, and semantic uniformity. It might delve into specific examples or case studies to illustrate the limitations of these models and further motivate the need for a new framework. This section would set the stage for the detailed presentation of the proposed model in subsequent chapters.
Model Structure: This chapter would detail the architecture of the proposed meta-epistemic model, explaining its stratified structure, the role of deformable agents, and the nature of non-convergent semantic mappings. It would likely elaborate on how the model manages local evaluations and supports the coexistence of contradictory propositions without leading to inconsistencies. A crucial aspect would be explaining how the model's design avoids the pitfalls of totalizing approaches while maintaining inferential coherence.
The Logical Foundation of the Proposed Model: This chapter would delve into the theoretical underpinnings of the model, explaining the integration of type theory, paraconsistent logic, and dynamic epistemology. It would likely discuss how each of these theoretical pillars contributes to the model's ability to handle pluralism, incompleteness, and semantic diversity. The chapter would likely provide detailed explanations of the chosen logical framework and its implications for the overall structure and functionality of the model.
Keywords
Meta-epistemology, inferential pluralism, logical totalization, paraconsistent logic, type theory, dynamic epistemology, semantic heterogeneity, local consistency, contradiction, interdisciplinary applications, self-reference, ontological unpacking.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main topic of the text?
The text presents a meta-epistemic model for inferential coherence designed to avoid the paradoxes of logical totalization, semantic universality, and epistemic closure.
What are the key themes explored in the text?
The key themes include inferential coherence and the avoidance of paradoxes, logical pluralism and incompleteness, semantically diverse reasoning, and the integration of type theory, paraconsistent logic, and dynamic epistemology. The text also discusses applications in interdisciplinary domains.
What is the problem statement addressed in the text?
The text implicitly highlights the problems associated with totalizing models of inference, such as paradoxes related to self-reference, ontological excess, and semantic uniformity. The model is presented as a solution to these limitations.
How does the proposed model achieve inferential coherence?
The model achieves inferential coherence through a stratified structure, deformable agents, and non-convergent semantic mappings. It supports the coexistence of contradictory propositions without leading to inconsistencies by managing local evaluations.
What logical foundations underpin the proposed model?
The model is built upon type theory, paraconsistent logic, and dynamic epistemology. These theoretical pillars contribute to the model's ability to handle pluralism, incompleteness, and semantic diversity.
What interdisciplinary applications are mentioned?
The text mentions potential applications in theoretical physics, ethics, political reasoning, and cognitive science.
What are the key words associated with the text?
Key words include meta-epistemology, inferential pluralism, logical totalization, paraconsistent logic, type theory, dynamic epistemology, semantic heterogeneity, local consistency, contradiction, interdisciplinary applications, self-reference, and ontological unpacking.
What is meant by "totalizing models of inference"?
Totalizing models of inference are characterized by their susceptibility to paradoxes arising from self-reference, ontological overreach, or semantic uniformity.
What is the purpose of using paraconsistent logic in the model?
Paraconsistent logic allows the model to handle contradictions without leading to logical explosion, enabling it to accommodate diverse perspectives and incomplete information.
What is the significance of "semantic heterogeneity" in the context of the model?
Semantic heterogeneity refers to the model's ability to handle diverse interpretations and meanings, avoiding the limitations of models that assume semantic uniformity.
- Quote paper
- Carlos Medel-Ramírez (Author), 2025, Meta-Epistemic Framework for Inferential Pluralism. A Logic-Consistent Model Beyond Totalization, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1572932
