This study explores the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in fostering trust and enhancing customer engagement within the investment banking sector. The primary aim is to analyze how AI-driven technologies—such as machine learning, predictive analytics, natural language processing, and blockchain—can go beyond operational efficiency to strengthen transparency, personalization, and client relationships.
The research is based on survey data evaluated using statistical tools, including normality testing, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, to reveal demographic variations in the acceptance of AI in financial services. Findings show that younger, urban populations are more receptive to AI-powered banking solutions, while older individuals and residents of rural or semi-urban areas remain more skeptical.
Key barriers to adoption include algorithmic bias, data privacy concerns, and limited transparency. The study recommends a hybrid approach that blends AI capabilities with human expertise to improve decision-making and customer trust. Moreover, financial institutions are urged to invest in digital literacy programs, enhance technological infrastructure, and collaborate with fintech innovators. Regulatory bodies are also called upon to establish clear and supportive frameworks that promote responsible AI adoption without compromising consumer protection.
Ultimately, the study concludes that AI holds immense potential to revolutionize investment banking. However, its success hinges on addressing critical trust-related issues, ensuring ethical implementation, and promoting financial inclusion through targeted engagement strategies.
Table of Content
ABSTRACT
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION TO TOPIC
1.2 NEED FOR THE STUDY
1.3 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
1.4 OBJECTIVES TO THE STUDY
1.5 HYPOTHESIS OF THE STUDY
1.6 SCOPE OF STUDY
CHAPTER 2 - REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.2 RESEARCH GAP
CHAPTER 3 - RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 SAMPLE SIZE
3.2 SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
3.3 DATA COLLECTION
3.4 STATISTICAL TOOLS
3.5 RESEARCH TYP
CHAPTER 4 - DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1 ANALYSIS
4.2 INTERPRETATION
4.3 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
CHAPTER 5 - FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
5.1 FINDINGS
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
5.3 CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing investment banking by enhancing trust, transparency, and customer interaction. Technologies such as machine learning, predictive analytics, natural language processing, and blockchain are transforming how banks operate—automating trading, improving risk management, detecting fraud, and enabling real-time market analysis. These advancements allow investment banks to offer personalized financial recommendations and compliance tools, improving operational efficiency and customer satisfaction.
However, AI adoption in investment banking is not without challenges. Regulatory compliance, ethical concerns, limited digital literacy, and infrastructural gaps—especially in emerging economies—pose significant barriers. This research explores AI’s role in fostering customer trust and engagement, along with the strengths, weaknesses, and issues surrounding its application. Data was collected using surveys and analyzed through statistical tests like normality tests, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis to understand demographic differences in AI adoption. Findings show that urban youth are more open to AI-based financial services, while older individuals and those in rural or semi-urban areas remain skeptical.
Key concerns include algorithmic bias, data security, and a lack of transparency, all of which influence customer trust. The study recommends a hybrid approach that combines AI with human expertise to improve trust and decision-making. Investment banks should also focus on customer education, improving digital infrastructure, and collaborating with fintech firms to enhance AI integration. Additionally, regulatory bodies must provide clear, supportive frameworks to ensure innovation aligns with consumer protection.
In conclusion, AI holds transformative potential for investment banking if trust, transparency, and accessibility issues are addressed. When applied responsibly, AI can drive innovation, improve financial inclusion, and strengthen customer relationships in the evolving financial landscape.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Investment Banking, Customer Trust, Financial Inclusion
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Investment banking is a central part of the global financial system. It helps firms get the capital they need to grow and build the economy. Investment banks have two main roles: they advise firms on mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and they provide special financial advice to help with industrial as well as economic growth. This means that investment banks help firms grow and have a large role in determining how global markets work. Investment banking has grown enormously over the years, changing to suit market trends, what investors want, and new technology. But heightened competition, stricter regulations, and the need to constantly come up with new ideas put massive pressure on investment banks. They must constantly enhance their services, streamline operations, and create new financial products.
Investment banks serve as intermediaries between firms and capital markets, assisting firms, governments, and institutional investors in raising funds they require. They can assist firms in issuing and selling securities, assist in making large acquisitions and mergers, and provide valuable financial advice, which keeps the economy flowing and allows firms to expand. Historically, investment banks have funded large-scale infrastructure projects, assisted firms in expanding, and assisted in international trade. Their advisory role is of the greatest significance in economic decision-making since it assists firms in optimizing their capital structures, managing financial risk, and identifying good investment opportunities. Despite their importance, investment banks are being challenged increasingly by regulations, market trends, and competition from fintech firms. These trends force them to modify their strategies and keep pace with technology in order to remain competitive.
One of the primary forces of change in investment banking is digital transformation, which has transformed financial services in multiple ways. Financial institutions today are leveraging new technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Blockchain, Machine Learning (ML), and Data Analytics to enhance operations, reduce risks, and enhance client services. AI is changing investment banking by enhancing risk management, fraud detection, and predictive analysis. Machine Learning software processes vast amounts of financial data to find patterns, learn about market risks, and forecast economic trends more accurately. This technology enables investment banks to provide personalized financial advice, automate trading strategies, and comply with regulations more effectively.
AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants are increasingly being used to provide customer support and advisory services. These technologies enhance the ease of communication with clients, minimizing the need for human advisors and response times.
Blockchain in investment banking provides enhanced security, transparency, and efficiency in transactions. Distributed ledger technology (DLT) makes financial transactions immutable, traceable, and tamper-proof. Blockchain minimizes the cost and time of transactions by removing intermediaries. Smart contracts, fueled by blockchain, enable automated settlement of transactions with fewer errors in operations and improved contract enforcement in M&A and securities trading. Data Analytics and ML are used by investment banks to derive actionable insights from huge data repositories. These technologies enhance decision-making in portfolio management, market trend prediction, and credit risk assessment. Predictive analytics allows investment banks to forecast customer demands, create financial products in response, and maximize revenue streams.
In spite of technological innovation in backend operations, investment banking has been slow in adopting changes for the benefit of customers. Traditional investment banking is mostly advantageous for large clients and focuses on large deals, not caring for small investors and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This leaves behind some companies, even though they might need sophisticated investment products but do not get the required support. Investment banking mostly works with corporate clients and does not care about offering tailored banking experiences for small investors. In comparison with retail banking, which has implemented AI-driven personal finance products, investment banking has been slow in developing user-friendly digital platforms for different client needs.
In spite of strict controls by regulatory authorities, most investment banks continue to employ opaque fee constructs and complex financial products. Intransparent and not easily accessible financial data damages client participation and confidence. In contrast to retail banking use, investment banking platforms lack user-friendly interfaces that simplify financial decisions for clients. Enhancing digital platforms with AI-driven guidance tools and interactive dashboards would significantly improve user experience.
As the company continues to grow, investment banks need to keep up with new trends that will define financial services in the future. One such major area is engaging more with fintech companies. The partnerships will allow investment banks to utilize new technologies like robo-advisors, automated wealth management, and real-time analysis to deliver better services. More stringent financial regulations mean that investment banks need to utilize better risk management tools. AI-powered compliance software can help them keep up with changing regulations, minimize legal risks, and make their operations more transparent.
The expansion of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investments implies that investment banks must possess sustainable financial products. Banks that adopt global ESG objectives will attract socially responsible investors and remain relevant in the long run. Hyper-personalization using AI will transform banks' customer interactions by offering personalized financial products using real-time information. This will enhance client engagement and result in improved investment outcomes.
1.2 Need for the Study
The growing use of technology in finance and investment banking has mainly aimed at improving business processes and reducing risks. However, with the development of financial markets, there is an urgent need to focus on innovations that are customer-centric. Customers want more interactive and transparent banking options that are based on trust. However, even with the huge potential of AI, blockchain, and other technologies, their use in client servicing has been limited so far.
There are some weaknesses in emerging markets, including poor business protection, complex regulations, and poor adoption of innovative technologies. There is interest from investment banks in these markets, but these markets have rigorous operating challenges that must be addressed. This study can be applied to any investment bank that wishes to know how to attract, interact, and serve customers as optimally as possible with technology in particular markets.
It is tougher in emerging economies to leverage sophisticated financial technologies because they have a longer lag to adopt them. It is hampered by regulatory complexities and weak financial systems, as well as customers' resistance to digital banking, which is a key barrier to adoption. If customers in these areas still insist on traditional banking institutions, it is even tougher to transition to AI financial products. Modern-day investment banks dealing with economies that are slow to adopt sophisticated financial technologies need to blend digital tools with human touch to develop transparent and easy-to-use financial products for clients.
This study takes into account AI and Blockchain technology and digital solutions that will bring finance and technology together to facilitate easier investment banking services to customers and make them more efficient. Banks that address current business challenges with customized solutions can make their services improved without compromising operating standards and regulations. The primary goal is to develop an investment banking division that combines innovative technology with open practices and excellent customer service, and being prepared for future advancements.
1.3 Statement of the Problem
There is no doubt that investment banking has a lot of potential in the future, nearly all of it being the equity and bond trading have experienced better integration of technologies, be it fraud detection or regulation compliance and even portfolio management, is carried out with ease. However, the application of these technologies nearly entirely relies on backend operations to have an impact on customer service improvement is in dire need. Some overseas customer market segments are left out due to all the attention being placed on how such institutions dealing in such markets can enhance their operational efficiencies. Other challenges are the economic, political and social related to the developing economies that restrict the formulation of such strategies aimed at enhancing customer interactions in these economies.
The absence of a comprehensive strategy towards the customer-centric technologies of the investment bank not only confines the growth prospects but also the customers' satisfaction and loyalty. The bridging of this gap is of supreme interest to the investment banks willing to survive in the more competitive environment where the attention is directed towards the customers.
1.4 Research Objectives
1. To analyze how AI enables the development of trust and communication among investment banking clients.
2. To analyze the prospects and challenges of customer centered technologies in developing economies.
3. To suggest solutions for investment banks to use the technology in providing customer oriented, services.
1.5 Hypothesis (Alternative Hypothesis)
The application of AI in investment banking greatly enhances decision-making effectiveness and profitability.
1.6 Scope of the Study
This study is devoted to the application of cutting-edge technologies that redefine and re-write customer-focused investment banking services. It focuses on the application of AI and blockchain in trust, transparency, and customer relationship. Furthermore, this study examines the level of penetration of these technologies in emerging economies, setting up the drivers such as legal framework, security needs, and service readiness. This study also strives to assess best practices and good examples with the objective of providing recommendations that can assist investment banks to provide services that are customer-focused in response to the demands and needs of customers.
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 Review Of Literature
1. According to (AL-Dosari et al., 2024), the banking industry is facing a surge in cyberattacks, driving banks in Qatar to adopt artificial intelligence as a crucial tool for bolstering cybersecurity. This adoption aims to mitigate unauthorized access and cyber threats, but challenges remain. A study involving interviews with nine Qatari banking experts highlighted four key insights: AI enhances cybersecurity significantly, yet its implementation poses difficulties. Additionally, AI can be weaponized, presenting new threats, and AI-based tools have vulnerabilities that can be exploited. As regulatory frameworks evolve and AI-powered malware becomes more prevalent, banks in Qatar must navigate these challenges. The integration of AI into cybersecurity is pivotal for ensuring sustainable growth amidst rapid technological disruptions.
2. According to (Wewege et al., 2020), the emergence of fintech and digital-only neo-banks has significantly disrupted the traditional banking sector, introducing customer-focused financial services that are faster, more convenient, and technologically advanced. These innovations, such as digital wallets and peer-to-peer payment systems, cater to payments, lending, and microfinancing. However, fintechs face challenges, including limited scalability, trust issues, and risks related to credit and liquidity. Despite these hurdles, they are increasingly viewed as valuable partners, driving innovation and fostering collaboration with traditional banks. This digital banking revolution underscores the importance of robust infrastructure for data sharing, cybersecurity, and API standardization, all within regulatory frameworks like data protection and open banking. As fintech continues to mature, its role in shaping the banking industry is set to expand significantly.
3. According to (Alzaidi, 2018), artificial intelligence (AI) is a revolutionary technology that has the potential to transform the banking industry by enabling human-like decision-making while minimizing errors. Despite its promise, the adoption of AI in the Middle Eastern banking sector remains moderate, reflecting the region's mixed pace of embracing advanced technologies. To explore this, a study surveyed 200 employees from selected banks, gathering insights into the implementation and impact of AI. The data, analyzed using SPSS 21.0, revealed both challenges and opportunities associated with AI adoption. These findings shed light on the region's gradual transition towards integrating AI into its financial operations, offering valuable perspectives on the path forward.
4. According to (Dolapo Salaudeen et al., 2024), the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized financial services, particularly in risk management and investment strategies. By utilizing machine learning and data analytics, financial institutions can analyze vast datasets to detect patterns and anomalies, enhancing decision-making and portfolio optimization. Predictive analytics further empower firms to forecast market trends and tailor strategies to specific risk appetites. However, the adoption of AI also introduces ethical and regulatory challenges, underscoring the need for transparency and accountability. As financial markets grow increasingly complex, AI offers a competitive advantage by streamlining operations and improving responsiveness to market changes. These innovations pave the way for greater resilience and innovation across the financial sector.
5. (Königstorfer & Thalmann, 2020), highlight that while AI has been successful in investment banking and backend services, its use in commercial banking, especially in customer interaction, is limited. AI integration in commercial banking could transform processes, reducing lending losses, enhancing payment security, automating compliance, and improving customer targeting. However, challenges include embedding AI into workflows, ensuring transparency for user acceptance, addressing privacy concerns, and maintaining proper documentation. These gaps provide opportunities for research in behavioral finance. The authors propose a research agenda to address these challenges and advance AI applications in commercial banking.
6. (Karnam, n.d.), article delves into the transformative impact of AI on the financial industry, focusing on banking, investment, trading, compliance, and risk management. It emphasizes how AI enhances efficiency and drives innovation in these sectors. The study explores real-world applications by major financial institutions, highlighting both the benefits and challenges of AI adoption. Future advancements, such as quantum computing and explainable AI, are also discussed. Additionally, the article addresses ethical concerns and regulatory challenges that arise with AI-driven financial decision-making. Overall, it provides valuable insights into AI’s evolving role in shaping the financial landscape.
7. (Salem Oudat Umm Al Quwain et al., 2021), analyzed financial risks and performance of commercial and investment banks listed on the Bahrain Stock Exchange from 2015–2019. The study focused on capital, liquidity, and exchange rate risks, with financial performance measured by return on equity. Using panel regression analysis on annual financial reports, it found no significant relationship between financial risks and performance, except for liquidity risk, which significantly influenced investment banks. The study highlights limitations and suggests future research on other financial risks, institutions, and performance measures to address gaps in the current findings.
8. (Cojoianu et al., 2021), analyzed over 840,000 equity, bond, and syndicated loan deals to study fossil fuel investment brokerage profiles in global financial centres from 2000 to 2018. The research examined the influence of city-level divestment commitments and country-level green banking policies on these profiles. While many financial centres shifted their fossil fuel investment activities, city-level divestment commitments did not drive these changes. However, financial centres exposed to voluntary green banking policies saw a reduction in fossil fuel financing. This shift was largely driven by foreign brokers anticipating mandatory green finance policies.
9. (Rita Jain, 2023), artificial intelligence has significantly transformed the banking and finance industry by enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and customer experience. AI plays a crucial role in fraud detection, credit scoring, customer service, and investment management, making financial operations more effective. It has improved decision-making, reduced operational costs, and increased overall profitability for financial institutions. However, concerns regarding data privacy, bias, and ethical implications continue to pose challenges. Research highlights both the advantages and risks of AI in finance, emphasizing the need for careful implementation. Addressing these issues is essential to ensure the responsible and sustainable adoption of AI in the industry.
10. In their study (Onyenahazi & Antwi, 2024), examine how AI is revolutionizing investment decision-making in financial institutions. They highlight the role of machine learning, natural language processing, and predictive analytics in processing large data sets, recognizing market trends, and optimizing asset management, which can lead to improved returns. However, the authors also address the risks of algorithmic bias, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and excessive reliance on automation. The paper stresses the importance of combining AI with human expertise to maintain transparency and interpretability. Through case studies and data analysis, the authors demonstrate AI’s impact on decision-making accuracy. They conclude that for AI to be effective in investment strategies, it must work alongside human judgment.
11. (Ullah & Rashid, n.d.), explore the impact of Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) on Islamic and conventional banks through a detailed conceptual and literature review. They analyzed research articles from 2000 to 2023, narrowing their focus to studies from ScienceDirect and Emerald. Their findings reveal a stark research gap, with only 18% of studies addressing Islamic bank M&A compared to 82% focusing on conventional banks. The authors stress the importance of establishing mega Islamic banks to match the scale and competitiveness of their conventional counterparts. They recommend that future research should focus more on M&A in Islamic banking to bridge this gap. Such studies could enhance the understanding and development of Islamic financial institutions.
12. (Dwiyanti & Wondabio, 2023), investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on company survival, highlighting mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as a key strategy in Indonesia, influenced by POJK Regulation Number 12/POJK.03/2020 on bank consolidation. Their study evaluates the financial due diligence (FDD) process to minimize M&A failures, prevent losses, and enhance shareholder value. Through a mixed-method approach, they analyze the acquisition of PT Bank Mayora by PT Bank Negara Indonesia Tbk, using Neo-Institutional and signaling theories to explain organizational behavior in achieving value goals. The findings emphasize the role of technology-driven FDD processes and adherence to POJK, providing valuable insights for auditors in navigating M&A practices during the pandemic.
13. In their study (Fabian et al., 2023), examine the link between corporate outsourcing and investment bank performance in Nigeria. They collected data from 258 staff members across three investment banks using a survey design and applied multiple regression analysis. The findings reveal that outsourcing is an effective strategy for enhancing performance, reducing costs, and improving operational efficiency in Nigeria’s investment banking sector. The study recommends that investment banks allocate resources strategically and collaborate with external partners. However, the results are limited to investment banks and may not apply to other sectors. The research underscores the importance of integrating outsourcing into corporate culture for greater organizational effectiveness.
14. According to (Dewasiri et al., 2023), the banking sector is undergoing a significant digital transformation, with FinTech serving as the driving force behind this evolution. Key technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Blockchain are at the forefront of this transformation, reshaping traditional banking processes. Chatbots, often seen as the virtual frontline employees of banks, play a crucial role in enhancing customer relationships, boosting sales, and streamlining marketing efforts. On the other hand, Robo-advisors are advanced AI tools specifically designed for investment and portfolio management, offering sophisticated financial solutions to customers.
15. According to (Zhou, 2022), the study explores the impact of COVID-19 on investment banks, showing that while their profits remained stable during the pandemic, they declined afterward. The research focuses on JPMorgan, highlighting its post-pandemic shift toward fintech. A SWOT analysis underscores the necessity of transformation in investment banking. The study proposes five key strategies for sustainable growth: fintech transformation, financing innovation, derivative product innovation, new fund products, and green finance. Some firms have already adopted these strategies, successfully maintaining profitability. Ultimately, the research aims to help investment banks navigate market challenges like COVID-19 and ensure long-term growth.
16. (Krishna et al., 2024), explores how digital innovations like AI, blockchain, and advanced data systems are transforming investment banking. These technologies enhance decision-making, automate trading strategies, and improve risk management, while blockchain ensures faster, more secure transactions. Advanced data tools enable better client services and informed investment decisions, driving cost efficiency and operational improvements. However, challenges such as cybersecurity risks and regulatory compliance remain significant. The paper highlights the potential of these technologies to reshape and redefine the future of investment banking.
17. (Papathomas et al., 2025), investigated AI adoption behavior in the Greek semi-mature banking sector using TAM, UTAUT-2, and PLS-SEM models. The study analyzed data from 297 respondents across bank employees, digital professionals, and the public. Key factors like Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, and Hedonic Motivation significantly influenced AI adoption, while Social Influence had no impact. Demographic factors such as gender and age showed no moderating effect, but occupation and education played crucial roles. The study challenges traditional stereotypes and offers practical insights for AI integration in Greek banks. These findings can also benefit countries with similar digital maturity levels.
18. According to (Mei et al., 2024), the acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Devices (AIDs) in sustainable banking services was analyzed using the AIDUA model. The study surveyed 435 bank customers in China through face-to-face questionnaires. The results revealed that Social Influence (SI), Hedonic Motivation (HM), and Perceived Anthropomorphism (PA) positively influence Green Performance Expectancy (GPE) and Green Effort Expectancy (GEE). Higher GPE and GEE enhance positive customer emotions, boosting AID usage and reducing resistance. The study also found that technological literacy significantly moderates the link between GPE and customer emotions. These findings emphasize the crucial role of AIDs in advancing sustainable banking practices.
19. (Lazo & Ebardo, 2023), explored AI adoption in the banking industry through a systematic literature review of 35 studies from the SCOPUS database. Customers adopt AI for security, trustworthiness, and positive feedback, while trust issues, privacy concerns, and unreliability hinder adoption. Banks adopt AI due to technological resources and infrastructure, but face challenges like high costs and lack of skills. The role of service providers and regulators remains under-researched despite their significance. The study calls for empirical research on regulatory perspectives and collaborative efforts among stakeholders. It highlights the need to enhance the AI talent pool and promote responsible AI practices.
20. According to (Varma, 2021), AI is revolutionizing the banking, insurance, and investment sectors in India by enhancing operational efficiency, customer experience, and risk management. The study examines both the benefits and challenges of AI adoption, along with its impact on workforce dynamics and job roles. A conceptual framework highlights AI's role in improving services while addressing concerns like job loss and skill development. The research gathers insights through structured questionnaires and expert interviews across India's financial sector. The findings emphasize AI's transformative potential in financial services. The study provides recommendations for effective AI implementation across various fields.
21. (Paul & Bhattacharya, 2024), studied factors influencing consumers’ intention to invest via online banking in India, emphasizing the mediating role of service experience. Data from an online survey yielded 561 valid responses (61.78% response rate). SEM-PLS analysis using PLS 2.0 software identified key factors like service awareness, transactional efficacy, trust, brand effect, convenience, and IT support (p < 0.05). Customer service experience was found to mediate the relationship between banking functions and investment intention, affecting cost perception and behavioral factors (p < 0.05). The study provides insights for banks to enhance service experience and drive online investment adoption.
22. (Zhang et al., 2024), introduce an intelligent risk analysis method for investment banking IPOs using machine learning and text analysis. The study develops a system to assess text and company quality based on prospectuses. Analyzing data from China’s Sci-Tech Innovation Board, the findings reveal that the quality of disclosed information influences IPO withdrawal rates. By leveraging machine learning and text analysis, the study effectively predicts IPO business risks. This approach enhances efficiency, reduces resource costs, and improves the standardization of IPO processes. Ultimately, the research contributes to the authenticity and reliability of investment banking IPOs.
23. (Bielenia-Grajewska, 2009), investigates the language of investment banking, emphasizing the importance of metaphors in financial communication. Since new financial products and services can be complex, metaphors help make them more accessible to investors. The study focuses on mergers and acquisitions, highlighting their strong metaphorical nature. A comparative analysis of English, German, Spanish, and Polish reveals both similarities and differences in investment banking terminology. The research summarizes linguistic patterns and their influence on financial discourse. Finally, it offers insights into the future role of metaphors in investment banking communication.
24. (Corwin et al., n.d.), investigate the impact of the Global Settlement on affiliation bias in analyst recommendations. The study finds that sanctioned banks experienced a significant decline in analyst bias following the settlement. However, bias remained prevalent both before and after the settlement for affiliated analysts at non-sanctioned banks. The findings suggest that the settlement increased the cost of issuing biased coverage for sanctioned banks. In contrast, self-regulatory rule changes failed to curb investment banking influence at large non-sanctioned banks. This underscores the limited effectiveness of regulatory measures in addressing analyst bias across the industry.
2.2 Research Gap
Emerging markets are confronted with adoption issues like poor infrastructure, excessive costs, regulatory risks, and insufficient professional capabilities. Economic and cultural determinants also hinder technology adoption, and localized solutions are needed. AI automation in investment banking threatens like data security compromise, algorithmic bias, and accountability. Cyber attacks can facilitate fraud, while biased AI models can lead to discriminatory financial outcomes. Regulatory challenges involve ensuring transparency, adherence to AML and KYC guidelines, and avoiding black box decision-making by AI. Financial institutions need to weigh innovation against shifting legal paradigms across geographies. To enhance customer service, banks implement AI chatbots, predictive analysis, and blockchain for security, which enhance personalization of services, increase efficiency, and foster trust in digital finance. Overall, the articles highlight the disruptive impact of technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain, machine learning, and digital innovation on the financial and investment banking sectors. However, the most critical research gap is that very few studies have explored customer-centric innovations in the application of these technologies. Even though remarkable advancement has been seen in back-end processes like risk management, compliance, fraud detection, and M&A efficiency, very little attention is drawn to how these technologies can enhance customer interaction, trust, and personalization, particularly in emerging economies.
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Sample Size
The total Sample Size taken for the research project is 138.
3.2 Sampling Techniques
The type of sampling used to collect data is Simple Random Sampling. We used primary data as a source of collecting data. The samples were collected by means of sharing of Google forms. The samples were collected from all the age groups between 18 to 60 of men and women. This was chosen to understand the psychology of people of different age groups with respect to savings and investment. We used analytical research as a research type, where facts and numerical information were thoroughly analyzed.
3.3 Data Collection
The data used for the study comprises of primary data majorly.
Primary Data: These are the data that an investigator gathers for the first time with a specific goal in mind. Primary data are "pure" in the sense that they are authentic and have not undergone any statistical procedures.
Using primary data has the benefit of allowing researchers to gather data specifically for their study's objectives. In essence, the inquiries the researchers make are geared towards eliciting the information they need for their research.
Secondary data has been used in order to analyze past research papers and determine the research gap. The study project's goals are founded on primary data. We have created a Google form and sent it to various people as part of this data collection procedure. To accomplish the study's goals and draw results, their responses are taken into account and examined.
3.4 Statistical Tools
Normality Test: This test was conducted to determine whether the dataset follows a normal distribution. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to assess normality, and the results indicated that the data deviated from a normal distribution (p < 0.001). Since the data was not normally distributed, non-parametric statistical tests were used for further analysis.
Shapiro Wilk Test: This test was specifically used to check the normality of the dataset. A p-value of less than 0.001 in the test results confirmed that the data did not follow a normal distribution, reinforcing the need to use non-parametric methods for comparison instead of parametric tests.
Mann Whitney U Test: Since the data was not normally distributed, the Mann-Whitney U Test was applied to compare differences between two independent groups. It was used to analyze variations in responses based on occupation, area of living, and age group. The results indicated that, in most cases, there were no statistically significant differences between groups, except for the comparison between the 18-27 and 28-35 age groups, where a significant difference was observed in their perceptions of AI-powered predictive analytics in investment banking.
3.5 Research Type
The methodological approach used for the investigation of the research problem by us is a mix of both quantitative (process of collecting and analyzing numerical data) and qualitative (collecting and analyzing non-numerical data e.g., text, video, or audio).
The research type is analytical in nature as that involves evaluating facts and information relevant to the topic being researched. The savings and investment pattern of individuals, both male and female, has been critically evaluated and analyzed in order to reach a conclusion.
CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
4.1 Analysis
Demographic Profile
4.1.1 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.1 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The majority of the respondents, that is, 85.5%, reside in cities. This indicates that city dwellers are more engaged with AI in investment banking. This can be attributed to the fact that they have better access to technology, better financial services, and more investment banking services in urban areas. Alternatively, fewer semi-urban and rural residents responded, with only 8% and 6.5%, respectively. This disparity indicates that the application and comprehension of AI in these regions may be held back by obstacles such as poor access to technology, poor financial literacy, and fewer investment banking services. Targeting investment banks that are willing to expand the application of AI solutions, outreach targeting in semi-urban and rural areas can close this gap. It could enlighten them, enhance access, and make the financial system more inclusive.
4.1.2 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.2 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The survey indicates that the majority of the respondents who replied are students, which account for 58.7%. This indicates that the majority of the users of AI in investment banking are young individuals who are still learning and not yet utilizing AI in the workplace. Employees with employment account for 31.2% of respondents and are the most significant sector to utilize AI in banking because 31.2% of them are likely to utilize AI technology and tools on a daily basis. Self-employed individuals and unemployed individuals, on the other hand, have very small numbers, accounting for 5.8% and 3.6%, respectively, and this indicates that AI is not a priority concern for business owners or unemployed individuals. Retirees account for an even smaller percentage at 0.7%, and this confirms the argument that AI in investment banking is all about younger, working-age individuals. The findings of the survey appear to concentrate more on the youth, and consequently, may overlook experienced investment professionals as well as affluent individuals who are more likely to utilize AI-based financial solutions. If banks have intentions to encourage the utilization of AI in real-life investment banking, they may need to concentrate more on reaching out to workers, business owners, and institutional investors with special awareness campaigns and AI-based financial solutions.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.3 Table
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.3 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The results from the survey indicate that the majority of the respondents who took part, 71.7%, are aged between 18 and 27 years. This corresponds to the vast majority of students in the employment data. This aligns with the indication that the majority of the observations in the survey are from young people who are likely still in the learning phase and yet to apply AI in investment banking. Only 16.7% of the respondents are between 28 and 35 years, which corresponds to fewer working professionals—who apply AI solutions predominantly in banking—represented in the data. In contrast, individuals above 36 years old account for less than 12% of the respondents. This indicates a probable gap in how the older generations apply AI or that they are not likely to respond to online surveys on AI in finance. This age difference indicates that the data may not say much positively about how AI influences experienced investment banking professionals, particularly those in management who have a significant role in applying AI in financial institutions. Due to this, the findings may be more likely to trend towards theory and academic interest and not how AI is actually applied in actual investment banking.
AI-based solutions in investment banking improve your confidence in financial decision-making.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.4 Table
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.4 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The findings from the survey indicate that nearly half of the respondents (49.2%) are in agreement or strongly in agreement that AI tools make them feel more confident in making financial decisions. This indicates that most people view AI tools as helpful in providing clear information, reducing uncertainty, and enhancing investment plans. Investors feel comfortable with the capability to view complex financial information, find trends, and make more accurate decisions with AI. The positive response to AI in this regard indicates that most people comprehend how AI can enhance their financial knowledge and decision-making capabilities.
However, a considerable percentage of respondents (39.9%) are neutral, suggesting uncertainty or doubt about whether AI raises financial confidence. This neutrality can be due to low familiarity with AI-based tools, low faith in their reliability, or not knowing how AI processes financial information. Doubt that AI is not trustworthy and biased could be the basis of this conservative stance. Contrariwise, an insignificant minority (10.8%) of respondents disagree or strongly disagree that AI raises their confidence, likely because they are apprehensive about the transparency, trust, or miscalculations of AI-informed decision-making. The comparatively low level of disagreement suggests doubt is not an overwhelming sentiment. To facilitate confidence and usage, investment banks and AI designers would need to put more effort into increasing AI transparency, educating customers on AI strength and weaknesses, and assuaging doubts about trust and potential biases.
AI-Powered Personalized Recommendations and User Engagement
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.5 Table
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.5 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The test results indicate that personalized recommendations through AI have improved user experience in investment banking. Nearly 48.5% of the users were in agreement or strongly agreed that the recommendations improved their experience. This indicates that AI can analyze users' behavior and deliver personalized insights, making investment banking interactive and user-friendly. Since AI recommendations provide personalized investment advice and useful suggestions, users can comprehend complex financial markets and have a more interactive banking platform experience.
But a huge 39.9% are neutral, like the direction of answers to whether AI influences trust in financial decision-making. The neutrality indicates that while AI suggestions are useful to some consumers, many have yet to embrace them. This could be because they do not comprehend how AI personalization is done, are unsure of how accurate it is, or simply prefer the old method of decision-making. In the meantime, only 11.6% disagree or strongly disagree, which implies that while some may still desire the old method of investing, AI-based recommendations are largely considered useful.
The slightly reduced "Strongly Agree" response rate (12.3%) for the confidence-enhancing aspect of AI (15.9%) indicates that while AI suggestions are helpful, they are perhaps less effective at motivating users as opposed to making them more confident in their choices. This can indicate that AI-powered suggestions have to be stronger in order to suit individual users' financial objectives. To ensure greater involvement, investment banks and fintech players have to strive to simplify AI, educate users about the advantages of personalized suggestions, and render such insights congruent with individual investment choices and risk tolerance.
AI’s Role in Transparency and Trust in Investment Banking
4.1.6 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.6 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The survey indicates that the majority of individuals (51.4%) agree or strongly agree that AI increases the transparency and trustworthiness of investment banking. This indicates that the majority of individuals understand how AI can make services more dependable, provide data-based insights, and remove human prejudice in financial decisions. Through automating processes and maintaining banking operations in a similar manner, AI can assist in creating trust by removing errors and enhancing the precision of financial recommendations. This favourable disposition towards AI indicates that a larger number of individuals embrace it as a valuable tool for enhancing transparency in investment banking.
But a significant 35.5% of respondents are neutral, i.e., they are not certain how AI really influences trust and transparency. This can be because they lack first-hand experience with AI banking applications, are concerned with how AI decides, or lack clear insight into how AI makes financial services transparent. Conversely, a minority of 13% disagree or strongly disagree, i.e., some individuals are skeptical about the ability of AI to enhance transparency. This can be because they are concerned with algorithm bias, unclear AI decisions, or the perception that AI lacks adequate human oversight.
The high level of neutrality emphasizes the need for banks and financial institutions to improve AI-based transparency initiatives. By providing better explanations of AI-based decisions, enhanced explainability, and effective communication of the value proposition of AI to customers, banks can strive to increase trust and adoption. Relative to other elements of AI, trust is still a top issue that needs to be tackled by financial institutions in a bid to guarantee broad-based trust in AI-based investment banking services. Increasing transparency and educating users on AI's contribution to financial decision-making will be key to building long-term trust and engagement.
Impact of Limited Digital Infrastructure on AI Effectiveness in Developing Countries
4.1.7 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.7 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The survey statistics indicate that the majority of the respondents (57.2%) believe that limited digital infrastructure is a significant barrier to AI-based customer-centric technologies in investment banking. This suggests that poor technology infrastructure, particularly in the developing world, is preventing the seamless adoption and effectiveness of AI-based financial solutions. Ineffective internet connectivity, outdated banking systems, and poor data processing capabilities could be some of the root causes that prevent investment banks from achieving the full potential of AI. Given the increasing reliance on AI for data-driven decision-making, fraud detection, and personalized investment strategies, the absence of a robust digital foundation can easily slow down development and limit access to AI-based financial services.
A whopping 30.4% of respondents are neutral, meaning that some would not be experiencing the problems of digital infrastructure or would not view it as a significant problem. This may be attributed to diverse experiences in diverse locations, where people from advanced financial centres may not experience the same problems as people in emerging markets. Nevertheless, only a small number (12.3%) do not agree or strongly do not agree that digital infrastructure is a problem. This shows that most people do recognize the importance of a stable digital foundation for having AI work effectively in investment banking.
The high level of agreement, with 44.9% of the respondents strongly agreeing, indicates that most are aware of this issue. Investment banks and financial institutions seeking to expand AI-based financial services in emerging markets must prioritize expanding digital access and technology infrastructure. This may involve investing in improved internet services, upgrading banking software, and employing frameworks that are AI-compatible to enable AI solutions to integrate seamlessly. By addressing these technology challenges, financial institutions can optimize the advantages of AI, improve customer experiences, and achieve more financial inclusion in various markets.
Lack of Digital Literacy as a Barrier to AI Adoption in Investment Banking
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.8 Table
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.8 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The survey findings indicate that an overwhelming majority of the respondents (68.1%) strongly agree or agree that the absence of digital literacy is one of the greatest impediments to AI adoption among investment banks. This indicates a common concern that numerous customers may not be well equipped to utilize AI-based financial solutions and could thus be limiting their potential for benefitting from automated investment offerings, predictive insights, and tailored banking solutions. In an industry that depends considerably on AI-based decision-making and customer interactions, low digital literacy can promote caution, misperception of AI-based data, and under-use of sophisticated financial services. The issue is critical in areas that have limited familiarity with digital technology, where potential users may be short of appropriate skills to exploit AI-based banking systems with certainty.
A significant 24.6% did not know, suggesting that while the majority see digital literacy as an issue, others may see other challenges—such as trust issues or poor digital infrastructure—as bigger barriers to the uptake of AI. This not knowing may also reflect that some see digital literacy improving or that future generations, who are more digitally literate, will make AI adoption rise in the future. That only 7.2% disagree or strongly disagree with this being an issue, however, gives support to the hypothesis that the majority see digital literacy as a key issue to the success of AI in investment banking.
The high consensus on this dimension indicates that investment banks need to place high emphasis on digital education to bridge the knowledge gap and boost AI adoption. Offering user-friendly AI tools, interactive training programs, and financial education programs can make customers more confident in using AI tools successfully. Moreover, this result resonates with concerns regarding AI transparency and trust, pointing out that adoption issues are not only technological but also pertain to the extent to which users are equipped to collaborate with AI solutions. By addressing digital knowledge issues, investment banks can build an inclusive financial system where AI enables more customers to make better decisions.
Use of Technology by Investment Banks in Developing Countries for Better Customer Service
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.9 Table
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.9 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
Survey feedback shows that most of those who took part (58.7%) agree or strongly agree that technology is being utilized by investment banks in developing nations to improve customer service. What this means is that AI-powered tools, online banking platforms, and automations are striving to improve performance and efficiency for consumers. Investment banks in these nations use chatbots, AI guidance tools, and mobile banking to provide better and personalized financial services. Such a positive view reflects technology's growing role in banking as a way for banks to be in a position to serve more customers, but make the process of maintaining accounts, managing investments, and assessing risks simpler.
But 29% of those surveyed are neutral. This would indicate that most people notice technological advancements, but others are not sure if they function well or are ubiquitous. This could mean that although large financial centers are reaping the benefits of AI, rural areas and small towns may still not have decent digital banking services. Unfamiliarity with AI customer service, uneven internet penetration, and unreliable quality of service may contribute to this neutrality. At the same time, 12.3% of people disagree or strongly disagree, which would indicate skepticism regarding whether investment banks are using technology optimally. Inadequate infrastructure, slow adoption of technology, and inability to access digital services could be the causes of this impression.
Although most of the respondents are aware of the potential of technology in enhancing customer service, the comparatively higher proportion of neutral response indicates the necessity for more conspicuous and large-scale digital transformation activities. Investment banks can place greater emphasis on building digital access, further developing AI-based financial literacy programs, and developing customer engagement campaigns to enable more users to reap technological advances. Extending mobile banking services, enhancing AI-based chat support, and raising awareness about digital banking programs can further strengthen the positive role of technology in emerging economies. By filling these gaps, financial institutions can realize the full potential of AI to transform customer service and achieve greater trust and adoption in the banking industry.
Role of Government and Regulatory Policies in AI Adoption
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.10 Table
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.10 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The survey findings show that the majority of people (65.9%) agree or strongly agree that government and regulatory policies have a very important role in the use of AI in customer-oriented technologies in investment banking. This shows that guidelines and regulations are seen as important elements of how AI is utilized, from adhering to the law to protecting data and ensuring ethical usage of AI. Governments and financial regulators develop regulations for the use of AI, making customer data secure, managing risks, and being transparent while allowing new ideas. With more development of AI banking solutions, AI ethics policies, algorithmic decision-making, and involving all people in finance become more important to the development of the industry.
Meanwhile, 29.7% of the respondents are neutral. This is to say that while most observe the impact of rules, some simply do not know of some rules or feel that other variables such as digital literacy or infrastructure matter more to the deployment of AI. This perception of neutrality can be attributed to the reality that some individuals feel that AI's development relies more on technology and market demand rather than on government rules. Only 4.3% disagree or strongly disagree. This only proves that government rules and adherence are required to deploy AI in finance.
The high degree of consensus indicates that we require robust policies and appropriate rules to make AI innovation go hand-in-hand with security and compliance. While regulations concerning AI evolve globally, investment banks need to keep pace through monitoring policy developments and aligning their AI strategy accordingly. With regulatory guidelines in focus, banking institutions can minimize risks, establish customer trust, and tap into new avenues for AI banking. Through negotiation with policymakers and regulators, banks can create a harmonized approach towards creating technology as well as prudent use of AI in investment banking.
Need for Increased AI Investments to Enhance Customer Experiences
4.1.11 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.11 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The findings of the survey indicate that most individuals are in favor of investing more in AI for investment banking. Approximately 65.2% of the respondents agree or strongly agree that AI financial services need to expand to enhance customer experiences. The large level of agreement indicates that customers are aware of how AI can simplify banking, provide personalized financial advice, and expedite services. AI technologies such as automated financial advisors, fraud management systems, and real-time customer support are now considered a necessity for enhanced banking experiences. The demand for AI services indicates that customers are in favor of faster, more accurate, and personalized banking that traditional methods may not be able to provide.
But 29% of the survey respondents are neutral. This might be some ambivalence about whether or not investment in AI will really enhance customer experience. Some consumers might feel that current AI technology is not good enough to really help with financial decisions. Others will be ambivalent about the effect that AI will have on banking over the long term. This neutrality suggests that banks need not only to invest in AI technology but also to educate customers about its benefits and to make AI solutions easy to use and comprehend.
Just 5.8% of the participants are against greater investment in AI, and this indicates very little resistance to the growth of AI in banking. This strongly affirmative sentiment is a clear message that investment banks must further expand their AI-led initiatives, with emphasis on customer-facing innovations. Further expansion of AI-led financial advisory solutions, greater fraud detection capabilities, and ultra-personalized banking solutions can further cement the role of AI in contemporary finance. By solving customer problems, optimizing AI applications, and enabling frictionless integration, investment banks can harness maximum AI potential to transform customer experiences and generate long-term loyalty.
AI-Powered Predictive Analytics for Personalized Customer Services
4.1.12 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.12 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The poll shows that the majority of people believe in AI-powered predictive analytics. About 70.2% of the respondents agree or strongly agree that the technologies can help improve customized customer services in investment banking. The strong support reflects how people are starting to see the potential of AI in analyzing vast amounts of financial data, predicting what customers need, and providing tailored financial solutions. AI-powered predictive analytics can offer tailored investment recommendations, improve risk assessment, and allow for improved customer interaction by predicting user needs and market trends. Investment banks can create more tailored and efficient banking experiences through the use of machine learning algorithms and data insights. This enables the creation of more robust customer relationships.
However, 25.4% are neutral. This is perhaps because they don't know much about how AI predictive analytics operate in financial services. Some customers have not directly benefited from AI-powered personalization, and others might be curious about how reliable and accurate AI-generated recommendations are. This neutrality indicates that there is a call for more transparency and education to customers on how predictive analytics assist with financial choices. Banks can alleviate this by making AI simpler, offering interactive AI financial planning tools, and enabling users to trust what the technology can accomplish.
Just 4.3% of respondents disagree or strongly disagree that AI predictive analytics assist personalized banking, with barely any doubt about the role of AI in enhancing customer service. The high level of approval is a sign of high demand for AI-driven financial services, and there is a need to invest more in AI technologies. In order to get the most out of AI, investment banks need to enhance their predictive models, make AI interactions simple, and make AI-driven services transparent and simple to use. Through this, banks are able to obtain more customer trust and induce more participation in AI-driven investment banking.
Collaboration Between Investment Banks and Technology Providers for AI Implementation
4.1.13 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.13 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The results of the survey indicate strong support for collaboration between investment banks and technology providers, as 68.2% of the participants concurred or strongly concurred that collaboration can stem AI implementation obstacles. This suggests that most participants recognize the role of technology firms, fintech companies, and AI developers in accelerating AI adoption in banking. Through the cooperation with technology providers, investment banks can enhance their AI infrastructure, increase regulatory compliance, and develop more sophisticated AI-driven financial solutions. Cooperation with AI specialists can also help banks integrate more sophisticated predictive analytics, fraud detection systems, and personalized financial advisory tools, with the aim of delivering a seamless and effective customer experience.
But 24.6% are neutral. That could be interpreted as a reflection that they know little about the reasons investment banks are challenged in using AI. Some may be unaware of the technical or regulatory challenges to implementing AI, while others may assume that whatever is being done separately by the banks is good enough. The neutrality reflects the lack of appropriate information and communication of the evident benefits of collaboration within the industry. Banks can advance successful examples of collaborations that have AI deployed in order to explain how tech vendors help to drive banking services improvements.
Only 7.2% of the respondents disagree or strongly disagree, which means that skepticism against partnerships is low. Total partnership support is consistent with earlier survey reports that highlighted regulatory compliance, digital infrastructure, and AI investments as key areas for banking. Investment banks must engage in partnerships with technology firms to improve AI capabilities, simplify regulatory compliance, and increase AI-driven financial services. Banks and tech companies can join hands to overcome major barriers, making AI adoption worthwhile and fruitful for customers and financial institutions.
Strong Support for Customer Feedback in Enhancing AI-Driven Services
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.14 Table
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.1.14 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
The survey results express that the majority believe customer feedback is essential in a bid to improve AI-driven services. Almost 79% of survey respondents agree or strongly agree that frequent feedback compels investment banks to improve their AI models and better meet customer demands. This points to a common view that AI-powered banking solutions need to be customer-oriented and continuously improved based on customer feedback. By offering instant feedback, banks improve AI algorithms, improve the way they predict trends, and customize financial services in line with customers' expectations. This ongoing process helps AI-driven tools remain current, responsive, and aligned with changing market demands.
But 15.9% of the participants are neutral. This would mean that there are some people who do not fully agree that feedback actually leads to AI improvement. This could be because they have not seen clear changes from past feedback systems or are unsure how banks use customer opinions in AI improvement. To overcome this, investment banks must be open to how customer feedback leads to AI updates and let users see the improvements. By making clear benefits gained from customer feedback visible, banks can convince more people to give feedback and have faith in AI-powered financial services.
Only 5.1% of the respondents disagree or strongly disagree with customer feedback in AI development, demonstrating minimal resistance to feedback-driven improvement. With this near-consensus support, investment banks need to make formal and regular feedback mechanisms so that customers can provide commentary on AI-based banking products. User feedback-driven real-time adjustments can improve customer satisfaction, trust, and adoption of AI-based banking services. Customer-centric AI development will assist banks in making their AI platforms accurate, efficient, and user-oriented.
4.2 Interpretation
4.2.1 Objective 1
4.2.1 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
4.2.2 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.2.1 Figure
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.2.2 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
Interpretation of the Data
The study of central tendency and dispersion reveals important characteristics of the dataset. The average of 2.5000 and the middle value of 3.0000 show a slight left skew, or more values are on the higher side. Yet, the measure of skewness of 0.397 shows that there is a slight right skew, or a few high values are pulling the mean up a little. This small contradiction shows that most of the data is on the left side, but some very high values are strong enough to pull the overall mean up. Also, the standard deviation (0.98344) and the variance (0.967) show moderate variability in the dataset, or the data points are not spread far apart, but there is a lot of change. The range (4.00) and interquartile range (1.00) show that the data spread is fairly tight, with most values in a foreseeable range. The kurtosis measure of 0.175, near zero, verifies this by showing a slightly platykurtic distribution, or the data distribution is flatter than a normal bell curve and has fewer extreme values.
To check if the dataset is normally distributed, normality tests were done employing the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test provided a statistic value of 0.202 and a p-value of less than 0.001, and the Shapiro-Wilk test provided a statistic value of 0.882 with a p-value of less than 0.001. Both of these indicated that we reject the null hypothesis, and that means the dataset is not normally distributed. Such non-normality is significant since it influences the selection of statistical tests for future analysis. Many of the standard tests, such as t-tests or ANOVA, depend on the assumption of normality, and hence their application in this case would be unsuitable. Hence, non-parametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney U Test or the Kruskal-Wallis Test are more suitable for acquiring useful information from the data.
A Q-Q (quantile-quantile) plot was used to see how much the data is diverging from normal. It is a graphical way to display the distribution of the data set. The middle part of the plot has the points roughly following the diagonal reference line, which suggests that the distribution is somewhat normal for the middle values. Differences exist, however, at the extremes. The lower left part of the plot has points dropping below the reference line, which suggests there is a longer left tail. Conversely, the upper right part has points rising above the line, which suggests there is a heavier right tail. These trends at the extremes suggest that the data is skewed and support the point that the data set does not have a perfect bell-shaped normal curve. The graphical evidence from the Q-Q plot makes a stronger case for the use of non-parametric statistical methods in further data analysis.
Since the dataset is not normally distributed and has some variation, it is crucial to select proper statistical procedures to make reliable inferences. Parametric tests such as the t-test or ANOVA are based on normality and equal variance of data, which are not fulfilled with this dataset. Rather, non-parametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney U Test or Kruskal-Wallis Test should be utilized because they do not assume normality and can effectively handle uneven distributions. These tests will help make a more reliable comparison between groups and between relationships in the dataset so that the inferences made through the analysis are reliable and informative in real-life scenarios.
Mann-Whitney U Test Results (Pairwise Occupation Comparison)
4.2.3 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.2.3 Figure
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
Interpretation of the Data
The Mann-Whitney U Test was used as a non-parametric test to analyze levels of trust in AI investment banking services between different job groups. The test is especially effective when data is not normally distributed or where there are differences in the spread of data between groups, and therefore it is an appropriate choice for this data. Instead of using averages and standard measures, the Mann-Whitney U Test ranks the data points and checks whether one group tends to have higher or lower values compared to another. This ranking approach ensures that the analysis is robust even if data is not normally distributed. The main aim of the test was to check whether people from different industries show significant differences in their levels of trust towards AI financial services.
To ensure maximum reliability of the findings, a pairwise comparison approach was employed, where each professional category was compared to every other category. Because multiple comparisons raise the likelihood of Type I errors (false positives), the Bonferroni correction was applied to p-values accordingly. This conservative p-value adjustment method ensures that any statistically significant results are significant and not due to chance. The findings indicated that all adjusted p-values were greater than the conventional 0.05 threshold, meaning there were no statistically significant differences in trusting levels between job categories. Although raw trusting scores may have indicated slight differences between professions, they were not significant enough to be declared statistically significant. This indicates that, on the whole, trust in AI-based investment banking services is fairly consistent across professional backgrounds.
These results are significant for the financial industry. Though AI is increasingly visible in investment banking, trust levels are the same across professions, indicating that the use of AI in finance can so far not instigate so much controversy as has been anticipated. But merely because there are no significant differences does not imply that trust in AI is extremely high or extremely low everywhere; it implies that differences across professions are not significant enough to justify making specific claims. Since awareness of AI, previous experience, and certain risks in industries may influence levels of trust, further research is required to explore these factors.
Having larger samples and having people from varying professional backgrounds work on the project can boost the statistical power of the subsequent studies. Any difference will then be easily discerned.
Its structure can be informed by variables such as trust in regulation, explainability of AI models, and past experience making automated financial choices. Regression models may be better able to accommodate more fully variables representing how age, financial expertise, and having experience with artificial intelligence technologies influence trust levels.
Also, qualitative research techniques such as interviews and surveys may give a better insight into what users perceive. While this research did not discover significant differences in trust between various job groups, it indicates the necessity to investigate further the bigger factors influencing trust in AI-based investment banking. As AI continues to evolve, investment banks need to ensure their AI services are transparent, simple to comprehend, and align with what customers anticipate to maintain and establish trust in all job sectors.
4.2.2 Objective 2
4.2.4 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
4.2.5 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.2.5 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
Interpretation of the Data
The central tendency and dispersion analysis show that the mean is 2.1739 and the median is 2.0000, showing a mild right skew. The trimmed mean of 2.0894 is very close to the mean, showing that extreme values have negligible effect. The standard deviation (0.99571) and variance (0.991) show moderate variability in the data. The range is 4.00 units (min = 1.00, max = 5.00), and the interquartile range (IQR) of 2.00 shows a wider spread in the middle 50% of the dataset compared to the earlier analyses. The skewness of 0.903 confirms the existence of a positive skew, i.e., there are more data points at the lower end with fewer higher values that pull the right tail. Also, the kurtosis of 0.901 shows a leptokurtic distribution, with a higher peak and heavier tails than a normal distribution. Normality testing by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test gave a statistic of 0.250 with a p-value of less than 0.001, resulting in the rejection of the assumption of normality. Similarly, the Shapiro-Wilk test also showed a statistic of 0.845 with a p-value less than 0.001, further showing the rejection of normality. Due to the extreme deviations from normality, coupled with the high skewness and kurtosis values, it is clear that the data is not normally distributed. Hence, non-parametric statistical tests such as the Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis test need to be employed in place of parametric tests for further analysis.
The Q-Q plot analysis supports the notion that the data is not normally distributed. The middle region of the plot does not conform to the diagonal line, which indicates that even the central values do not conform to a normal distribution strictly. The lower left points are far below the diagonal line, which indicates there is a longer left tail, and the upper points are above the line, which indicates there are more extreme values than usual, which makes the right tail heavier. These two ends' deviations indicate strong skewness and kurtosis, which supports that it is not normal. The Shapiro-Wilk test (p < 0.001) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p < 0.001) both reject the notion that the data is normal, further supporting this conclusion. The skewness measure (0.903) indicates a large right skew, and the kurtosis measure (0.901) indicates heavier tails than a normal distribution, which indicates clearly that the data is not following a normal distribution. Therefore, the application of parametric tests (such as t-tests or ANOVA) would not be appropriate for further analysis, and non-parametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test should be applied to give accurate and reliable statistical results.
Mann-Whitney U Test Results (Pairwise Comparison by Area of Living)
4.2.6 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.2.6 Figure
Abbildung in dieser Leseprobe nicht enthalten
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
Interpretation of the Data
The Mann-Whitney U Test is a test that does not have any assumption of data pattern. It was employed to examine trust levels for individuals who reside in Urban, Semi-Urban, and Rural locations. The findings were that all the p-values were above 0.05. This implies there were no differences in response regarding where individuals live. Yet, the Urban vs Rural (p = 0.060) and Semi-Urban vs Rural (p = 0.064) comparisons were almost significant. This indicates there may be a trend wherein trust levels may vary among these groups, but the data is not as strong as it could be to support it.
The results do not indicate a significant difference, but the p-values near the threshold indicate that there are perhaps differences in trust levels that we did not fully capture due to the small sample size. A larger database or other statistical techniques may determine if these trends are statistically significant. Furthermore, external variables such as familiarity with money, availability of AI investment services, and the way various cultures perceive technology may influence the levels of trust among individuals from various regions.
Follow-up studies must employ a larger sample and incorporate qualitative findings to examine other variables influencing trust in AI-based investment banking services. Investment banks can devise more precise strategies to leverage maximum use of AI and customer participation across various demographic segments by recognizing such variables.
4.2.3 Objective 3
4.2.7 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
4.2.8 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.2.7 Figure
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.2.8 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
Interpretation of the Data
The central tendency and dispersion analysis for Objective 3 indicates that the mean is 2.1667 and the median is 2.0000, indicating a slight right skew. The standard deviation of 0.81575 and variance of 0.665 indicate the data is of moderate variability. The interquartile range of 1.00 means the middle 50% of values are relatively close together. The value of skewness is 0.666, indicating a moderate right skew, and means most data points are in the lower position with a few higher values pulling the right side out. The value of kurtosis is 1.052 and indicates a leptokurtic distribution, which has a more peaked and heavier-tailed distribution than a normal distribution. The normality tests confirm this, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (statistic = 0.284, p < 0.001) and the Shapiro-Wilk test (statistic = 0.841, p < 0.001) both conclude the data is not normal. These findings confirm that the data significantly deviates from a normal distribution and is therefore not appropriate for parametric tests.
The Q-Q plot shows the data is not normal. The middle data points follow the diagonal line, but the ends don't. The lower end goes below the line, showing there are too many low values, and the upper end goes above, showing there are lots of high values. This visual evidence supports the statistical tests, showing the data is not normally distributed. The slight right skew and heavy tails suggest the application of non-parametric tests, such as the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test, for further analysis instead of parametric tests like t-tests or ANOVA.
Mann-Whitney U Test Results (Pairwise Age Comparison)
4.2.9 Table
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
Source: Data is analyzed by the Authors.
Illustrations are not included in the reading sample
4.2.9 Figure
Source: Data is analyzed and compiled by the Authors.
Interpretation of the Data
The difference was significant (p < 0.05) between age groups 18-27 and 28-35 (p = 0.0095). It suggests that their attitudes towards AI-based predictive analytics in investment banking are different. It may be because of differences in the level of information regarding AI and technology, differences in financial goals and trust in AI-based financial products. Young people might be more ready to use AI-based investment tools as they have experienced more digital progress, while people in the age group 28-35 might be more used to traditional ways of making financial decisions.
In contrast to other age ranges, there were no considerable differences (p > 0.05) and their answers were identical. This indicates that individuals aged 36-50 and 50+ perceive AI-driven financial services in a similar manner, likely because they share experiences and have similar investment habits.
Investment banks may need to create individual marketing strategies for different age groups, especially young people (18-27 years) and middle-aged adults (28-35 years). Consistent opinions among older respondents (36-50 and 50+ years) indicate that AI strategy for their adoption can be uniform. Further in-depth studies can investigate why younger generations think in their own manner and on the basis of factors like whether they believe in AI, how much they know about finance, and how they have experienced online investment solutions.
4.3 Limitations Of The Study
- The research only has 138 participants, just a small percentage of Hyderabad city's population of approximately 10.8 million. As there is a wide range of demographic, financial, and economic factors in this city, if the results would be projected to the entire population, it is not absolutely correct. A larger sample size could have provided much stronger and clearer results.
- Others might have wrongly understood some of the questions asked in the survey, leading to wrong responses. This could have introduced differences in the data gathered, making the findings less valid. For example, if the participants had understood some words or phrases differently, it could have led to inconsistencies between what they truly believed and what they had indicated. Misunderstandings reduce the validity of the research.
- The application of a Google Form rather than personal or phone interviews might have maximized the chances of misinterpretation. While face-to-face interaction might allow respondents to clarify points, an online survey does not provide any immediate opportunity to clear doubts. This might have resulted in missing questions, incomplete answers, or misinterpreted responses, thereby affecting data quality.
- The participants' understanding of money matters can affect their answers, and thus can introduce biases. If the interviewees are not well knowledgeable in economic principles, their answers may not be an accurate reflection of their financial choices or behaviors. This is an issue that can make it challenging to decide if the answers are from true knowledge or just assumptions.
- The study was carried out within a brief time frame, not sufficient to view long-term trends, patterns, or seasonal fluctuations. The data were gathered at a single point in time, and therefore fluctuations in money management behavior, economic condition, or environmental factors that might influence respondents' responses over time are not visible. A longitudinal design would have been more informative.
CHAPTER 5 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS
Findings and Conclusion
5.1 Findings
1. Financial decision-making is helped by AI-based solutions, as almost half of the respondents are more confident about AI-based banking solutions.
2. AI-driven personalized suggestions enhance user engagement, but a large number of respondents remain neutral, hence room for improvement.
3. More than 51% of the respondents feel that AI increases transparency and trust in investment banking, yet issues around algorithmic bias and black-box decision-making remain.
4. AI predictive analytics is favorably accepted as being valuable for personal financial services, with 70.2% of the respondents supporting its use.
5. Customer feedback is seen as crucial to improving AI-driven services, with 79% of them emphasizing the importance of its application in improving AI models.
6. Although AI has advantages, there are users who are skeptical because they fear data security, algorithmic bias, and a lack of human intervention in decision-making.
7. Inadequate digital infrastructure is a principal hindrance to AI-driven financial services in developing countries, with 57.2% of the participants agreeing to its effect.
8. Digital illiteracy is a major barrier to AI adoption, and 68.1% of respondents indicated that it was a major barrier to widespread implementation.
9. AI adoption is much stronger in towns that have lower knowledge and involvement levels among rural and semi-urban communities.
10. Policies and regulations of the government are a key driver for AI adoption, and 65.9% of the respondents accepted their role in AI-powered financial technologies.
11. Investment banks in the developing world are using technology to enhance customer service, but most respondents are indifferent to its impact, reflecting the necessity for more visible digital activity.
12. Cultural reasons also fuel resistance to AI adoption since most consumers in emerging markets are used to traditional banking procedures as opposed to AI-based financial services.
13. 65.2% of respondents support more investment in AI for enhancing customer experiences, and there is high demand for enhanced AI-based financial services.
5.2 Suggestions
To make AI more effective in customer service in investment banking, banks need to better guide customers regarding digital tools. Most customers are reluctant to use AI in banking because they lack understanding. Banks need to, therefore, carry out awareness campaigns and training programs to help with this. Banks need to be open with decision-making through AI, giving customers simple explanations of how AI services work. Digital infrastructure needs to be improved, especially in small towns and villages, so that more people can make use of AI. Investment banks need to collaborate with technology firms to make it convenient for people to bank and offer stable internet connectivity. AI tools need to be made easy to use on mobile phones for customers in places with poor digital connectivity.
Regulatory compliance and ethical use of AI must be enhanced to promote responsible use of AI. Investment banks must collaborate with financial regulators to develop stringent guidelines for the use of AI and ensure adherence to financial regulations. AI systems for fraud detection and risk management must be enhanced to enhance security and ensure transparency of financial transactions. Customer feedback must be integrated into AI service improvement through systematic surveys and rapid analysis of customer complaints. A hybrid AI-human model must also be implemented, with the option of AI-based financial guidance and assistance by human counselors. This will allow those who still enjoy banking the old-fashioned way to benefit from AI.
To promote adoption and innovation in AI, investment banks need to join hands with fintech companies and technology providers. These collaborations will facilitate smooth integration of AI-driven financial solutions, including predictive analytics and AI-based customer support systems. AI-driven banking services need to be more inclusive in providing financial solutions to various customer segments, including small and medium businesses and disadvantaged groups. In addition, AI systems need to be constantly monitored to avoid biased decision-making and ensure customer trust. By adopting education, accessibility, transparency, compliance, and collaboration, investment banks can establish a more customer-centric, AI-driven financial ecosystem that fosters greater trust, efficiency, and long-term engagement.
5.3 Conclusion
The research indicates how investment banking is being transformed by AI in terms of improved decision-making, transparency, and customized services. While more individuals are adopting AI, issues such as the insufficient digital skills, weak infrastructure, and regulations that restrict the extensive use of AI remain.
One of the key findings is that younger people and city dwellers use AI more. This means that we need to strive to make AI more known and available in semi-urban and rural areas. Secondly, while most people recognize that AI can be utilized to build customer trust and provide better financial decisions, a large majority are unsure or unconvinced. This means that financial institutions and banks need to strive to be open and explain how their AI services work.
Investment banks will need to employ alternative strategies to counter these challenges. Collaboration with technology firms will be extremely crucial in accelerating AI adoption and making it functional. Regulators will also need to develop clear guidelines for AI application that can be fine-tuned as necessary, to ensure AI is utilized responsibly while protecting consumers. Financial institutions will also need to invest in digital skills training to empower customers to better comprehend AI and make sounder financial choices.
Another key factor is the balance between human interaction and AI automation. While AI products offer efficiency and customization, there are some customers who desire traditional banking. A hybrid approach that integrates AI automation with human advisors can establish customer trust and engagement.
To truly be effective in investment banking, banks need to balance customer needs with new technology. By prioritizing openness, simplicity, and rule compliance, investment banks can build a financial system that is fairer and works better for everyone. As AI develops further, using it well will make banks stronger and build long-term trust and loyalty from customers, proving that AI is an essential part of change in finance.
REFERENCES
Refrences
1. AL-Dosari, K., Fetais, N., & Kucukvar, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Defense System for Banking Industry: A Qualitative Study of AI Applications and Challenges. Cybernetics and Systems, 55 (2), 302–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2022.2112539
2. Alzaidi, A. A. (2018). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Performance of Banking Industry in Middle East. In IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (Vol. 18, Issue 10).
3. Bielenia-Grajewska, M. (2009). The role of metaphors in the language of investment banking.
4. Cojoianu, T. F., Hoepner, A. G. F., Schneider, F. I., Urban, M., Vu, A., & Wójcik, D. (2021). The city never sleeps: but when will investment banks wake up to the climate crisis? Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1995601
5. Corwin, S. A., Larocque, S. A., Stegemoller, M. A., Battalio, R., Brown, L., Chattopadhyay, A., De Franco, G., Harris, T., Kirk, M., Loughran, T., Lu, H., Schultz, P., Walther, B., Carroll, S., Ford, B., Johnson, T., Larocque, S., & Stegemoller, M. (n.d.). Investment Banking Relationships and Analyst Affiliation Bias: The Impact of the Global Settlement on Sanctioned and Non-Sanctioned Banks*. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2548771Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2548771Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2548771
6. Dewasiri, N. J., Karunarathne, K. S. S. N., Menon, S., Jayarathne, P. G. S. A., & Rathnasiri, M. S. H. (2023). Fusion of artificial intelligence and blockchain in the banking industry: Current application, adoption, and future challenges. In Transformation for Sustainable Business and Management Practices: Exploring the Spectrum of Industry 5.0 (pp. 293–307). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80262-277-520231021
7. Dolapo Salaudeen, H., Olawoyin, O., Ope, E. M., & Michael Olawoyin, O. (2024). AI-DRIVEN FINANCIAL SERVICES: ENHANCING RISK MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT STRATEGIES. Article in International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science. https://doi.org/10.56726/IRJMETS61737
8. Dwiyanti, A., & Wondabio, L. S. (2023). Financial Due Diligence in Increasing Company Value Through Banking Mergers and Acquisitions During COVID-19. JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN BISNIS : Jurnal Program Studi Akuntansi, 9 (1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.31289/jab.v9i1.8527
9. Fabian, A. A., Uchechukwu, E. S., Okoye, C. C., & Okeke, N. M. (2023). Corporate Outsourcing and Organizational Performance in Nigerian Investment Banks. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 10 (03), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjebm.2023.v10i03.002
10. Karnam, C. (n.d.). AI REVOLUTION IN FINANCE: TRANSFORMING BANKING, INVESTMENT, AND RISK MANAGEMENT. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), 15 (4), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13270657
11. Königstorfer, F., & Thalmann, S. (2020). Applications of Artificial Intelligence in commercial banks – A research agenda for behavioral finance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100352
12. Krishna, M., Jain, P., Kumar, A., Munni, S., & Jagadeesh, T. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Technology on the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Investment Banking Services. In Int. j. adv. multidisc. res. stud (Vol. 4, Issue 5). www.multiresearchjournal.com
13. Lazo, M. P., & Ebardo, R. A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Adoption in the Banking Industry: Current State and Future Prospects. Journal of Innovation Management, 11 (3), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.24840/218
14. Mei, H., Bodog, S. A., & Badulescu, D. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Sustainable Banking Services: The Critical Role of Technological Literacy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16 (20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208934
15. Onyenahazi, O. B., & Antwi, B. O. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Investment Decision-Making: Opportunities and Risks for Financial Institutions. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5 (10), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.1024.2701
16. Papathomas, A., Konteos, G., & Avlogiaris, G. (2025). Behavioral Drivers of AI Adoption in Banking in a Semi-Mature Digital Economy: A TAM and UTAUT-2 Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives. Information (Switzerland), 16 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/info16020137
17. Paul, P., & Bhattacharya, S. (2024). Impact of banking functions on online investment intention in India: Examining the mediating role of service experience. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21 (1), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.11
18. Rita Jain. (2023). Role of artificial intelligence in banking and finance. Journal of Management and Science, 13 (3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.26524/jms.13.27
19. Salem Oudat Umm Al Quwain, M., A Ali, B. J., Salem Oudat, M., Professor, A., & professor, A. (2021). The Underlying Effect of Risk Management On Banks’ Financial Performance: An Analytical Study On Commercial and Investment Banking in Bahrain The Underlying Effect of Risk Management On Banks’ Financial Performance: An Analytical Study On Commercial and Investment Banking in Bahrain The Underlying Effect of Risk Management On Banks’ Financial Performance: An Analytical Study On Commercial and Investment Banking in Bahrain. Ilkogretim Online-Elementary Education Online, Year, 20 (5), 404–414. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.42
20. Ullah, N., & Rashid, M. M. (n.d.). Merger and Acquisition Strategy for Banks-An Extensive Contemporary Literature Review 1. www.ijmcer.com
21. Varma, A. (2021). REVOLUTION OF FINANCIAL SERVICES: ANALYSING THE IMPACT OF AI ON BANKING AND INVESTMENT. 19 (12), 565–575. https://doi.org/10.48047/nq.2021.19.12.NQ21256
22. Wewege, L., Lee, J., & Thomsett, M. C. (2020). Disruptions and Digital Banking Trends. In Journal of Applied Finance & Banking (Vol. 10, Issue 6). online) Scientific Press International Limited. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343050625
23. Zhang, L., Wang, C., & Liu, X. (2024). Intelligent Risk Evaluation for Investment Banking IPO Business Based on Text Analysis. Information (Switzerland), 15 (8). https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080498
24. Zhou, M. (2022). Research on the Investment Banking Transformation in the Post-epidemic Era (pp. 1223–1232). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-052-7_136
[...]
Buy now
- Quote paper
- P. Y. Radhika (Author), Sikhil Kumar Das (Author), Shelomith Agarwal (Author), Abidan Pillai (Author), Nama Jedidya Williams (Author), A. Pashupathinath (Author), M. Veera Swamy (Author), M. Arul Jothi (Author), 2024, Artificial Intelligence in Investment Banking. Building Trust and Enhancing Customer Engagement, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1577607
