This annotated bibliography summarizes key texts in Animal Studies. Wolfe’s Human, All Too Human: ‘Animal Studies’ and the Humanities outlines the field’s origins, traits, and challenges, arguing for inseparable human–animal domains and expanding Cultural Studies to non-human concerns. Shell’s The Family Pet examines the human–pet bond as emotional fulfillment, blurring “kind” and “kin.” Descartes’ letters deny animal reasoning, attributing actions to instinct, while Montaigne’s Apology rejects human superiority, urging equal treatment and challenging assumptions about animals’ communicative abilities.
Table of Contents
1. Human, All Too Human: ‘Animal Studies’ and the Humanities
2. The Family Pet
3. From the Letters of 1646 and 1649
4. An Apology for Raymond Sebond
Research Objectives and Themes
This annotated bibliography explores the interdisciplinary field of Animal Studies by analyzing primary texts that investigate the complex relationships, communication capabilities, and ethical standing of non-human animals in relation to human society and culture.
- Theoretical perspectives on the human-animal bond
- Philosophical debates regarding animal consciousness, reason, and speech
- Sociological implications of pet ownership and animal representation
- Ethical criticisms of human claims to absolute superiority over other life forms
- Methodological approaches to bridging understanding between human and non-human beings
Excerpt from the Book
From the Letters of 1646 and 1649
The article “From the Letters of 1646 and 1649”, in which letters of the scholar René Descartes that have been sent to the Marquess of Newcastle are listed, deals with the claim that other scholars like Montaigne and Pythagoras have made concerning the capability of animals to think. He claims that animals do have the necessary organs to motivate speech and therefore to think, but do not have the will to motivate speech, which he assumes to be a scarcity of cogitations.
By saying, that animals do not own reasoning, he means that animals do follow something that he calls passion, where they are inclined to solve a task out of instincts of survival, not because of thinking. All actions of the animal go towards special needs, but are no pure thoughts, but natural instincts.
As well as that, he claims that animals do have a soul, but only one that is relying on the biological mechanisms of each individual organism. With that saying, they possess a “corporeal soul”, but lack the “incorporeal mind” that we humans use to cogitate and to reason.
To conclude, Descartes would say that habits that an animal in, for instance, domestication adopts would solely rely on the fact that they have imprinted a procedure to survive, to eat and to get protection in their awareness. According to Descartes, Animals would not be motivated to repeat this procedure because they think about it, but because they are driven to do everything possible for their own viability.
Chapter Summaries
Human, All Too Human: ‘Animal Studies’ and the Humanities: This chapter introduces the overarching field of Animal Studies, examining how humans and animals influence one another and why this domain is inseparable from cultural studies.
The Family Pet: This summary focuses on the human-pet bond as a societal construct, exploring how pets fulfill emotional voids and how our perception of animals shifts from "savage beasts" to "family members."
From the Letters of 1646 and 1649: This section analyzes Descartes’ philosophical stance, which limits animal cognition to instinct and survival mechanisms while denying the existence of an "incorporeal mind."
An Apology for Raymond Sebond: This chapter contrasts Descartes’ views with Montaigne’s skepticism regarding human superiority, arguing against the lack of understanding of animal communication and the ethical ramifications of such hierarchies.
Keywords
Animal Studies, Human-Animal Bond, Cultural Studies, Animal Consciousness, Philosophy, Cognition, Ethics, Speciesism, Descartes, Montaigne, Communication, Anthropocentrism, Instinct, Sociology, Representation
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this document primarily focus on?
The work provides an annotated bibliography and critical analysis of key historical and contemporary texts to explore the evolving discourse within the field of "Animal Studies."
What are the central thematic areas?
The core themes include the philosophical status of animal thought, the sociological role of pets, the historical debate on animal consciousness, and the ethics of human-animal interactions.
What is the primary objective of this writing?
The goal is to map the theoretical challenges in defining the boundaries between humans and non-human beings through the lens of scholars like Cary Wolfe, Marc Shell, René Descartes, and Michel de Montaigne.
What scientific methods are applied?
The author uses a qualitative, text-analytical method, synthesizing historical arguments with personal critical reflection to evaluate the validity of claims regarding animal reason and hierarchy.
What topics are covered in the main body?
The main body examines the origins of Animal Studies, the psychological functions of domestic pets, and the arguments regarding whether animals possess reasoning or merely natural instincts and "corporeal souls."
Which keywords categorize this work?
The work is best characterized by terms such as Animal Studies, Ethics, Philosophy, Anthropocentrism, and Human-Animal Bond.
How does the author evaluate the "Human-Pet" relationship?
The author highlights that pets are often treated as family members and "fill a void" for human emotional needs, suggesting that humans are largely egocentric in their desire for animal companionship.
What is the author's stance on Descartes' view of animals?
The author disagrees with Descartes, arguing that human inability to directly facilitate or interpret animal speech does not equate to an absence of animal cognition or communicative capability.
What is the significance of the distinction between "kind" and "kin"?
The author notes that while pets are often viewed as "kind" (family-like), human behavior often reveals a specific preference for distinct "kin," a generalization the author challenges by pointing to the possibility of true altruism.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Niklas Richter (Autor:in), 2018, Annotated Bibliography on Animal Studies Literature, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1586959
