Precision forestry is an advanced approach to forest management that utilizes cutting-edge technologies and data-driven techniques to optimize forest operations and resource management. It involves the application of highly repeatable measurements, actions, and processes to manage and harvest forest stands efficiently. This approach integrates various technologies such as satellite imagery, airborne sensors, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), global positioning systems (GPS), and other geospatial tools to collect and analyze data about forest resources. These technologies enable forest managers to make informed decisions based on precise, site-specific information, leading to more sustainable and productive forest management
practices.
Precision forestry extends beyond just data collection and analysis. It also encompasses the use of advanced decision support systems, precision harvesting techniques, and wood traceability methods. By linking information between production and the wood supply chain, precision forestry involves resource managers and the environmental community in achieving the broader goal of sustainable forest management.
Table of Content
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Define precision forestry
1.2 Brief overview of its importance in modern forest management
2.0 Historical Context
2.1 Evolution of forest management practices
2.2 Emergence of precision forestry
2.3 Key technological advancements enabling precision forestry
3.0 Core Components 0f Precision Forestry
3.1 Remote sensing and data collection
3.2 Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
3.3 Drones and aerial imagery
3.4 LiDAR technology
4.0 Applications in Forest Management
4.1 Inventory and mapping
4.2 Harvest planning and optimization
4.3 Site-specific silviculture
4.4 Fire management and prevention
4.5 Pest and disease monitoring
5.0 Impact on Forest Health
5.1 Improved resource allocation
5.2 Reduced environmental impact
5.3 Enhanced biodiversity conservation
5.4 Soil and water quality management
6.0 Impact on Forest Productivity
6.1 Increased timber yield
6.2 Optimized harvesting schedules
6.3 Improved plantation management
6.4 Enhanced forest regeneration
7.0 Challenges and Limitations
7.1 Initial implementation costs
7.2 Technical expertise requirements
7.3 Data management and interpretation
7.4 Regulatory and privacy concerns
8.0 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
8.1 Integration with artificial intelligence and machine learning
8.2 Development of more affordable and user-friendly technologies
8.3 Potential for application in small-scale forestry operations
9.0 Conclusion
10.0 References
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Define precision forestry
Precision forestry is an advanced approach to forest management that utilizes cutting-edge technologies and data-driven techniques to optimize forest operations and resource management. It involves the application of highly repeatable measurements, actions, and processes to manage and harvest forest stands efficiently (Corona et al., 2017). This approach integrates various technologies such as satellite imagery, airborne sensors, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), global positioning systems (GPS), and other geospatial tools to collect and analyze data about forest resources. These technologies enable forest managers to make informed decisions based on precise, site-specific information, leading to more sustainable and productive forest management practices (Corona et al., 2017).
Precision forestry extends beyond just data collection and analysis. It also encompasses the use of advanced decision support systems, precision harvesting techniques, and wood traceability methods. By linking information between production and the wood supply chain, precision forestry involves resource managers and the environmental community in achieving the broader goal of sustainable forest management (Corona et al., 2017).
1.2 Brief overview of its importance in modern forest management
Sustainable forest management (SFM) has become increasingly important in modern forestry practices, aiming to balance ecological sustainability with economic viability and social benefits. It encompasses a range of approaches and frameworks designed to conserve biodiversity, maintain ecosystem services, and meet human needs for forest resources (Mori et al., 2016; Raum, 2017). The concept of SFM has evolved to incorporate more complex understandings of forest ecosystems and their natural dynamics. Recent research has challenged traditional views of boreal forests as primarily regulated by stand-replacing disturbances, revealing greater diversity and complexity in forest structures and processes (Kuuluvainen, 2009).
This shift in ecological understanding has led to calls for forest management models that better reflect natural ecosystem dynamics and complexity (Kuuluvainen et al., 2021; Kuuluvainen, 2009). There are ongoing debates about the relationships between various forest management approaches, such as the ecosystem approach, ecosystem services concept, and established forestry paradigms. Some stakeholders conflate these concepts, highlighting the need for clearer understanding of their differences and similarities to ensure successful policy implementation and sustainable forest management (Raum, 2017).
2.0 Historical Context
2.1 Evolution of forest management practices
Forest management practices have evolved significantly over time, adapting to changing ecological, sociocultural, political, and economic contexts. In Mexico, timber management methods have been adapted from approaches developed elsewhere, incorporating sustainability principles and classical yield regulation concepts (Torres-Rojo et al., 2016). However, these methods have sometimes led to unexpected results when applied in complex local contexts, highlighting the need for further evolution in forest management approaches. In Nepal, the implementation of "Scientific Forest Management" (SciFM) has faced challenges due to conflicting stakeholder expectations and interpretations (Poudyal et al., 2019). The program aims to increase forest product supply, but community forest users remain skeptical of potential recentralization and bureaucratic dominance. Similarly, Nepal is experiencing a socio-economic transition in rural areas, leading to changes in forest-people relationships and ecological transitions in community forests (Poudyal et al., 2023).
These changes are driven by factors such as income diversification, declining subsistence utilization of forest resources, and outmigration. The evolution of forest management practices has also been influenced by global initiatives and market forces. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification system exemplifies the growing interactions between global and local processes in forest governance, particularly for communitybased forest enterprises (Wiersum et al., 2011). This trend demonstrates the need for adaptation of global standards to local realities and the importance of multi-level partnerships in forest management.
2.2 Emergence of precision forestry
Precision forestry has emerged as an innovative approach to forest management, leveraging advanced technologies to enhance efficiency and sustainability in forestry practices. This concept extends the principles of precision agriculture to forest ecosystems, enabling highly repeatable measurements, actions, and processes in managing and harvesting forest stands (Corona et al., 2017). The emergence of precision forestry is driven by recent advancements in informatics and communication technologies. It incorporates data from various sources, including satellite imagery, airborne sensors, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), global positioning systems (GPS), and numerous other geospatial tools and sensors (Corona et al., 2017).
These technologies allow for more accurate and detailed forest inventory, improved decision support systems, precision harvesting techniques, and enhanced wood traceability throughout the supply chain. While precision forestry shares similarities with precision agriculture, it faces unique challenges due to the complex nature of forest ecosystems. The implementation of precision forestry practices requires overcoming obstacles such as the need for high-resolution data in dense forest canopies, atmospheric disturbances affecting remote sensing accuracy, and the technical expertise required for effective data interpretation (Fakhar & Khalid, 2023). Despite these challenges, precision forestry offers significant potential for sustainable forest management by enabling more informed decision-making and resource allocation.
2.3 Key technological advancements enabling precision forestry
Precision forestry has been revolutionized by several key technological advancements, enabling more accurate and efficient forest management practices. Remote sensing technologies, including satellite imagery, airborne sensors, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), have significantly improved forest inventory and monitoring capabilities (Corona et al., 2017). These tools provide high-resolution data on forest stand characteristics, allowing for more precise measurements and assessments. Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have become integral to precision forestry, enabling accurate mapping and spatial analysis of forest resources (Corona et al., 2017; Sharma, 2023).
The integration of these technologies with advanced sensors and devices has led to the development of sophisticated decision support systems for forest management and planning. Interestingly, the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) technologies, initially developed for precision agriculture, has found applications in forestry as well (Saha et al., 2023; Soussi et al., 2024). These technologies allow for real-time monitoring of environmental factors, soil conditions, and tree health, providing valuable data for informed decision-making.
3.0 Core Components 0f Precision Forestry
3.1 Remote sensing and data collection
Remote sensing technologies have revolutionized precision forestry by providing valuable 3D data sets and enabling a wide range of applications when combined with other geoinformation and logging machine- measured data (Holopainen et al., 2014). These technologies, including laser scanning, digital stereo imagery, and radar imagery, allow for accurate determination of forest characteristics at stand, sub-stand, or individual tree levels (Holopainen et al., 2014). Hyperspectral imagery, particularly from space-borne platforms like PRISMA, has shown great potential in extracting vegetation biophysical parameters (Shaik et al., 2023). However, its use for continuous monitoring may be limited due to factors such as long revisiting times and atmospheric interferences (Shaik et al., 2023). In contrast, low-altitude remote sensing platforms, such as small unmanned aerial systems (UAS), offer high spatial and temporal resolution, flexibility in image acquisition, and cost-effectiveness for precision agriculture applications (Zhang & Kovacs, 2012). The integration of remote sensing data with geographic information systems (GIS) is crucial for precision forestry. GIS technology allows for the integration of various data layers to model and map variations, develop prescription maps, and analyze spatial relationships (Sangeetha et al., 2024). Advanced geospatial technologies, including farm machinery telemetry, wireless sensor networks, and high-resolution satellite imagery, can be employed for site-specific crop management practices and disaster risk reduction in agriculture (Reznik et al., 2017).
Key research frontiers in precision forestry include the use of high-resolution satellite and drone data for within-field analysis, better integration of proximal and remote sensing, and the application of artificial intelligence and cloud-computing facilities to enhance analytical capabilities (Kanga, 2023; Sangeetha et al., 2024). The combination of remote sensing technologies with advanced data analysis methods enables applications such as biomass estimation, yield prediction, drought monitoring, and change detection (Ashraf et al., 2023). Despite the advancements, challenges remain in the adoption of remote sensing technologies for operational forest inventory and monitoring programs. These include user uptake, technical challenges related to forest inventories, and map validation (Fassnacht et al., 2023). To address these challenges, there is a need for multi-disciplinary collaborations, a focus on 'real world' problems that match end-user needs, and the development and application of best practices for map and model validation (Fassnacht et al., 2023).
3.2 Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in precision forestry, enabling advanced forest inventory, decision support systems, precision harvesting, and wood traceability (Corona et al., 2017). GIS technology integrates various data layers to model and map variations, develop prescription maps, and analyze spatial relationships within forest ecosystems (Sangeetha et al., 2024). This integration of spatial data allows for highly repeatable measurements, actions, and processes in managing and harvesting forest stands, contributing to sustainable forest management practices (Corona et al., 2017). Interestingly, while GIS has shown significant advancements in precision agriculture and forestry, there is a recognized need for incorporating more powerful analytical and modeling capabilities to enhance its effectiveness (Fischer & Nijkamp, 1992). The integration of GIS with sophisticated hardware for geographically referenced yield data and variable rate applications of forest management inputs presents opportunities for precision forestry similar to those seen in precision farming (Nelson et al., 1999).
3.3 Drones and aerial imagery
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or drones have become increasingly important in precision forestry, offering significant advantages in monitoring and managing forest resources. UAVs equipped with various sensors, including high-resolution digital cameras, multispectral cameras, and LIDAR, enable the collection of detailed imagery and data for forest analysis (Raparelli & Bajocco, 2019). In forestry research, UAVs are primarily focused on laser and radar data for canopy structural analysis and vegetation mapping (Raparelli & Bajocco, 2019). This technology allows for the capture of high spatial and temporal resolution images, surpassing the capabilities of satellite imagery or manned aircraft (Cuaran & Leon, 2021). The use of drones in forestry applications includes monitoring forest health, detecting diseases, assessing biomass, and mapping forest cover changes. Interestingly, while agriculture and forestry both utilize UAV technologies, their focus differs. Agricultural applications tend to concentrate on precision farming and crop status monitoring, whereas forestry emphasizes canopy structure and vegetation mapping (Raparelli & Bajocco, 2019). This distinction highlights the versatility of UAV technology in adapting to specific industry needs.
3.4 LiDAR technology
LiDAR technology has emerged as a powerful tool in precision forestry, offering high-quality data for various applications. It provides accurate three-dimensional characterizations of forest structures, enabling detailed measurements of tree parameters and stand characteristics (Akay et al., 2008; Dubayah & Drake, 2000). LiDAR can estimate important forest structural attributes such as canopy heights, stand volume, basal area, and above-ground biomass with high precision (Dubayah & Drake, 2000; Evans et al., 2006). The integration of LiDAR with other remote sensing technologies has shown significant improvements in forestry applications. For instance, combining LiDAR with optical sensors has resulted in superior performance for classifying and delineating forest areas (up to 20% accuracy improvement), identifying species (up to 21% accuracy improvement), and estimating forest volume and biomass (up to 55% accuracy improvement) (Xu et al., 2015). However, for tree height estimation, LiDAR alone is already highly effective, with sensor fusion providing only minor improvements of 1-7% (Xu et al., 2015).
4.0 Applications in Forest Management
4.1 Inventory and mapping
Precision forestry has revolutionized inventory and mapping practices through the integration of advanced remote sensing technologies and data analytics. These technologies enable highly accurate and detailed forest assessments at various scales, from individual trees to large forest stands (Corona et al., 2017; Holopainen et al., 2014). Remote sensing plays a crucial role in precision forestry inventory and mapping. Satellite imagery, aerial photography, and LiDAR data provide high-resolution 3D information about forest structure, composition, and health (Holopainen et al., 2014). Drones equipped with advanced imaging technologies offer real-time tracking of changes in forested landscapes, facilitating rapid and precise forest inventory by surveying large areas and providing data on tree species identification, size estimation, and health assessment (Buchelt et al., 2023).
While satellite remote sensing has been widely adopted for regional-level applications, its effectiveness for local forest inventory and planning remains limited. Some studies suggest that satellite images may not always contain sufficient information to support decision-making processes in applied forestry, particularly at the local level (Holmgren & Thuresson, 1998). This contradiction highlights the importance of selecting appropriate remote sensing technologies based on the specific inventory and mapping requirements. Precision forestry inventory and mapping benefit from a multi-source and multi-sensor approach, combining data from various platforms such as satellites, airborne sensors, and ground-based measurements (Corona et al., 2017; Holopainen et al., 2014). The integration of these diverse data sources, along with advanced analytical techniques and GIS technology, enables the development of highly accurate forest inventories, prescription maps, and decision support systems for sustainable forest management (Sangeetha et al., 2024). However, challenges related to data integration, cost-effectiveness, and user adoption must be addressed to fully realize the potential of precision forestry in inventory and mapping applications (Fassnacht et al., 2023).
4.2 Harvest planning and optimization
Precision forestry employs advanced technologies and analytical tools to optimize forest management and harvesting practices. Harvest planning and optimization in precision forestry involve the use of data-driven approaches to maximize timber yield while considering environmental sustainability and economic factors (Corona et al., 2017). One key aspect of harvest planning is the optimization of harvest timing. Flexible harvest timing is essential when transitioning from clear-cut regimes to continuous cover forestry. Models have been developed to optimize harvest timing in both even-aged and uneven-aged management systems, considering factors such as size-structured growth, variable and fixed harvesting costs, and site productivity (Ramo & Tahvonen, 2016; Tahvonen & Ramo, 2016). These models help forest managers make informed decisions about when and how to harvest, taking into account factors like interest rates, regeneration costs, and initial stand states.
The optimal choice between forest management regimes may depend on the initial stand state and whether naturally regenerated seedlings are utilized in solutions with clearcuts (Tahvonen & Ramo, 2016). Additionally, optimizing harvest timing is particularly crucial when transitioning from plantation-type evenaged management to continuous cover forestry without clearcuts (Ramo & Tahvonen, 2016). Precision forestry tools and techniques enable forest managers to make data-driven decisions for harvest planning and optimization. By incorporating advanced technologies like LiDAR, GPS, and remote sensing, precision forestry can improve productivity, optimize resource utilization, and contribute to sustainable forest management practices (Corona et al., 2017; Farhan et al., 2024). However, it's important to note that the effectiveness of these approaches may vary depending on factors such as spatial scale, forest ownership, and management objectives (Pohjanmies et al., 2019).
4.3 Site-specific silviculture
Site-specific silviculture in precision forestry is an emerging approach that combines advanced technologies and ecological understanding to optimize forest management practices. This approach utilizes remote sensing, GPS, GIS, and data analytics to make informed decisions based on the unique characteristics of each forest stand (Corona et al., 2017; Rubilar et al., 2018). Precision forestry enables highly repeatable measurements and processes for managing and harvesting forest stands, allowing for information linkages between production and wood supply chains (Corona et al., 2017). It incorporates large-scale precision silviculture to estimate silvicultural, biotic, and abiotic effects on site-specific forest productivity (Rubilar et al., 2018). This approach is similar to precision agriculture, which aims to match resource application and agronomic practices with soil and crop requirements as they vary in space and time within a field (Whelan & Mcbratney, 2000). While precision forestry focuses on optimizing productivity, it also faces challenges in addressing concerns about intensive land use and providing solutions for water use conflicts while maintaining long-term productivity and sustainability (Rubilar et al., 2018). The integration of ecological principles into silvicultural practices is crucial, as highlighted by the need to understand genetic x environment x silvicultural (G x E x S) interactions to improve productivity and simultaneously provide improved ecosystem services (Puettmann et al., 2009; Rubilar et al., 2018).
4.4 Fire management and prevention
Precision forestry techniques are increasingly being applied to fire management and prevention strategies, offering new opportunities for more effective and sustainable forest management. These advanced technologies enable forest managers to better assess fire risks, plan prevention measures, and respond to fire events more efficiently (Buchelt et al., 2023). The integration of drones equipped with AI and thermal cameras has revolutionized early fire detection and monitoring capabilities. These tools allow for real-time tracking of changes in forested landscapes, facilitating rapid response to fire outbreaks and improving overall fire management outcomes (Buchelt et al., 2023). Additionally, the use of LiDAR and other remote sensing technologies enables the creation of detailed forest inventories and fuel model classifications, which are crucial for accurate fire risk assessments and prevention planning (Novo et al., 2020). The technological advancements play a significant role in fire management, there is growing recognition of the importance of land-use interventions and collaborative approaches in creating fire-resistant landscapes. For instance, the development of agroforestry landscape mosaics and the implementation of "productive fuel breaks" have shown promise in reducing fire spread and mitigating wildfire risks (Bertomeu et al., 2022; Spadoni et al., 2023). Furthermore, silvopasture management has been found to reduce fuel loads and potential wildfire risk by altering forest composition and structure (Batcheler et al., 2024).
4.5 Pest and disease monitoring
Pest and disease monitoring in precision forestry has seen significant advancements through the integration of various technologies, particularly in remote sensing and data-driven approaches. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or drones have emerged as a crucial tool for pest and disease monitoring in forestry. These devices can be equipped with advanced imaging technologies to detect changes in leaf reflectance caused by biotic stress from pests (Iost Filho et al., 2019). The combination of UAVs with multispectral imagery and vegetation indices has shown promising results in improving the precision of pest damage detection. For instance, a study using Sentinel-2 imagery achieved an overall accuracy of 85.11% in segmenting forest areas damaged by bark beetles and aspen leaf miners (Zhang et al., 2022). Traditional methods like wireless sensor networks (WSNs) continue to play a vital role in precision agriculture and forestry. WSNs can collect, monitor, and analyze data from agricultural fields, including information on pest and disease control (Kumar & Ilango, 2017). This highlights the importance of integrating multiple technologies for comprehensive monitoring.
5.0 Impact on Forest Health
5.1 Improved resource allocation
Precision forestry has significantly improved resource allocation and forest health management through advanced technologies and data-driven approaches. The integration of satellite imagery, airborne sensors, unmanned aerial vehicles, and global positioning systems has enabled highly repeatable measurements and processes for managing forest stands (Corona et al., 2017). These technologies allow for accurate determination of forest characteristics at stand, sub-stand, or individual tree levels, facilitating more precise and efficient resource allocation (Holopainen et al., 2014). The need for interdisciplinary approaches to research and forest management, as well as the application of these technologies to ensure economic prosperity, requires careful consideration (Nambiar, 1996). Additionally, the increasing interest in forest health effects and the need for active participation in forestry to avoid conflicts between stakeholders highlight the importance of balancing technological advancements with social and environmental concerns (Addas, 2023). In conclusion, precision forestry has revolutionized resource allocation in forest management by providing detailed, accurate information for decision-making. This approach not only improves the efficiency of forest operations but also contributes to sustainable forest management by enabling better monitoring of forest health, productivity, and environmental impacts (Corona et al., 2017; Holopainen et al., 2014). As the field continues to evolve, integrating these technologies with sustainable practices and stakeholder engagement will be crucial for maintaining forest health while meeting societal demands for forest resources.
5.2 Reduced environmental impact
Precision forestry techniques have shown potential in reducing environmental impact while improving forest health and management. These advanced technologies enable more efficient and targeted approaches to forestry practices, resulting in numerous benefits for forest ecosystems. Precision forestry employs cuttingedge technologies such as satellite imagery, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), global positioning systems (GPS), and various sensors to collect and analyze data for better forest management (Corona et al., 2017). This data-driven approach allows for highly repeatable measurements and processes, enabling forest managers to make informed decisions about resource allocation, harvesting, and conservation efforts (Corona et al., 2017).
By utilizing these technologies, precision forestry can minimize environmental impacts while maximizing productivity and sustainability. One of the key advantages of precision forestry is its ability to optimize resource utilization. For instance, precision agriculture techniques, which are closely related to precision forestry, allow for targeted use of resources such as water, fertilizers, and pesticides, minimizing waste and reducing environmental impact (Gawande et al., 2023). This approach can be applied to forestry operations, leading to more efficient use of resources and reduced ecological footprint. Additionally, precision forestry enables the development of integrated forest management strategies, including professional visitor monitoring, product innovations, and the use of digitalization (Addas, 2023).
5.3 Enhanced biodiversity conservation
Precision forestry practices can have positive impacts on forest health and biodiversity conservation, but there are also some potential contradictions to consider. Precision forestry techniques like site-specific nutrient management and precision irrigation can help optimize resource use and minimize environmental impacts (Adedibu, 2023). This allows for more targeted and efficient forest management, potentially reducing overall disturbance. Additionally, approaches like variable retention harvesting applied at the landscape scale can help preserve structural legacies like old trees and deadwood that are important for biodiversity (Mason & Zapponi, 2016). Creating networks of micro-reserves and habitat corridors within productive forests can also deliver old-growth forest attributes and support connectivity (Mason & Zapponi, 2016).
However, there are some contradictions to note. While precision forestry aims to enhance productivity and efficiency, higher intensity management can negatively impact biodiversity, recreation, and water services (Sing et al., 2017). There is a potential trade-off between maximizing timber/biomass production and other ecosystem services. Additionally, new planted or restored forests, while beneficial, will not fully match the composition and structure of original forest cover (Chazdon, 2008).
5.4 Soil and water quality management
Precision forestry offers significant potential for improving soil and water quality management in forest ecosystems. By incorporating landscape sensitivity and hydrological connectivity into forest management planning, it becomes possible to optimize forestry operations while minimizing impacts on water quality (Laudon et al., 2016). This approach can be operationalized through hydromapping tools that guide the location of forestry practices, off-road driving of machinery, and design of riparian buffer zones to protect water resources. The integration of advanced technologies in precision forestry, such as satellite imagery, unmanned aerial vehicles, and various sensors, enables highly repeatable measurements and processes for managing forest stands (Corona et al., 2017). These tools provide detailed information on forest inventory, support decision-making systems, and facilitate precision harvesting, all of which contribute to sustainable forest management practices that can help maintain soil health and water quality. By utilizing advanced technologies and data-driven methodologies, forest managers can make more informed decisions that optimize resource use while minimizing negative impacts on soil and water quality. However, successful implementation requires a holistic ecosystem approach within a broader landscape perspective (Laudon et al., 2011), as well as consideration of economic, social, and environmental factors to ensure long-term sustainability of forest ecosystems.
6.0 Impact on Forest Productivity
6.1 Increased timber yield
Precision forestry enables highly repeatable measurements, actions and processes to manage and harvest forest stands, contributing to sustainable forest management (Corona et al., 2017). Advanced tools like satellite data, unmanned aerial vehicles, GPS, and other geospatial technologies allow for more precise forest inventory, decision support systems, and harvesting practices (Corona et al., 2017). This precision can lead to improved productivity and efficiency in forest operations. Studies have demonstrated substantial increases in wood volume yields from effective vegetation management, primarily using herbicides. Long-term studies in North America showed yield gains of 30-450% in Pacific Northwest forests, 10-150% in southeastern forests, and 50-450% in northern forests (Wagner et al., 2004). Most studies indicated 30-300% increases in wood volume yield for major commercial tree species across a wide range of site conditions (Wagner et al., 2004). However, it's important to note that productivity gains can vary depending on forest type and management practices. For example, in forested wetlands, alterations to natural hydrologic patterns can sometimes decrease growth rates or even cause forest death (Conner, 1994). Additionally, while short-term productivity gains are often observed, long-term impacts of some management practices are still being studied (Conner, 1994).
6.2 Optimized harvesting schedules
These advanced methods utilize data from various sources such as satellite imagery, unmanned aerial vehicles, and sensors to improve forest management and harvesting practices (Corona et al., 2017). Optimized harvesting schedules in precision forestry contribute to increased forest productivity by enabling highly repeatable measurements, actions, and processes to manage and harvest forest stands. This approach allows for better information linkages between production and wood supply chain, involving resource managers and the environmental community (Corona et al., 2017). The implementation of precision forestry practices can lead to a non-declining or positive trend in forest productivity through successive rotations and harvests while maintaining and enhancing the quality of the soil resource base (Nambiar, 1996). It is important to note that the impact of harvesting on forest productivity is not always straightforward. A study on soil microbial communities revealed that 12 years after forest harvesting, there were reductions in the relative abundances of biomass decomposition genes in both organic and mineral soil layers (Cardenas et al., 2015). This suggests that harvesting may profoundly alter below-ground cycling of carbon and other nutrients, potentially affecting forest regeneration and long-term productivity (Cardenas et al., 2015).
6.3 Improved plantation management
Advanced technologies and data-driven approaches have revolutionized the way forests are managed, leading to enhanced productivity and sustainability (Corona et al., 2017). The integration of remote sensing, unmanned aerial vehicles, global positioning systems, and various sensors has enabled highly repeatable measurements and processes for managing and harvesting forest stands (Corona et al., 2017). These tools provide detailed information about forest conditions, allowing for more precise decision-making in plantation management. For instance, whole-of-forest phenotyping systems incorporating spatial estimates of productivity across large plantation forests have been developed, utilizing machine learning methods to predict forest productivity at a landscape level (Bombrun et al., 2020).The implementation of these advanced technologies requires significant investment, expertise, and data management capabilities (Sharma, 2023). Additionally, the narrow focus on producing forest crops for limited purposes may not meet future societal demands for a range of outputs from plantations, necessitating a balance between productivity and other ecological considerations (Lindenmayer et al., 2003).
6.4 Enhanced forest regeneration
The Autoplant concept, developed through collaborative research, demonstrates improved environmental outcomes by reducing soil disturbances from 50% to less than 3% during regeneration (Hansson et al., 2024). This approach integrates various subsystems, including autonomous driving, plant management, and planting spot detection, which could revolutionize forest regeneration practices. Forest tree breeding programs have also contributed to increased productivity, with improved materials from first-generation seed orchards offering 10-25% gains in yield (Ruotsalainen, 2014). The development of vegetative propagation methods and genomic tools further enhances the efficacy of selection and genetic gain. However, it's important to note that while precision forestry offers numerous benefits, challenges remain, such as balancing machine cost with operating speed and ensuring sensor robustness in various environmental conditions (Hansson et al., 2024).
7.0 Challenges and Limitations
7.1 Initial implementation costs
The adoption of advanced technologies and systems in forestry operations requires substantial financial investments, which can be a major barrier for many forest managers and companies. One of the primary challenges is the high cost associated with acquiring and implementing cutting-edge technologies such as laser scanning, digital stereo imagery, and radar imagery for forest mapping and monitoring (Holopainen et al., 2014). These 3D data acquisition methods, while providing accurate and detailed information, often come with hefty price tags. Additionally, the integration of robotics and artificial intelligence in precision forestry operations demands significant upfront investments in hardware, software, and training (Ferreira et al., 2023). The implementation of precision forestry techniques also requires substantial investments in data management and analysis systems. As noted in (Zou et al., 2019), the improvement in precision and acquisition speed of forestry data has led to challenges in data analysis and storage, necessitating the development of advanced big data technologies. This transition to big data systems in forestry adds another layer of cost to the initial implementation.
7.2 Technical expertise requirements
Precision forestry techniques require significant technical expertise, presenting challenges for widespread adoption and implementation. This limitation is evident across various aspects of precision forestry applications. The use of advanced technologies such as LiDAR and Structure for Motion (SfM) photogrammetry for tracking soil rutting and disturbances caused by forest machinery demands specialized skills. While SfM offers denser point clouds and is more approachable, laser scanning requires a more experienced operator and better data-processing skills (Venanzi et al., 2023). Similarly, the integration of remote sensing with artificial intelligence and machine learning in interdisciplinary research, which could enhance the efficacy of precision forestry, necessitates advanced technical knowledge (Fakhar & Khalid, 2023).
In the context of UAV-remote sensing (UAV-RS) applications, there is a notable lack of flexible and opensource tools for image analysis. Many processes are based on proprietary software, which hinders researcher activities and technology transfer among forestry stakeholders (Dainelli et al., 2021). This limitation underscores the need for more accessible and user-friendly tools to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation. The technical expertise requirement extends to data management and interpretation. The need for high-resolution data and effective interpretation of remote sensing information poses challenges 13
(Fakhar & Khalid, 2023). Additionally, the implementation of advanced analytics in forestry faces obstacles related to data quality, technical expertise, and cost constraints (Raji et al., 2024). To address these challenges, investments in data infrastructure, talent development, and fostering collaborative partnerships are essential for organizations seeking to thrive in a data-driven forestry sector (Raji et al., 2024).
7.3 Data management and interpretation
Precision forestry, like other precision agriculture applications, faces significant challenges in data management and interpretation. The integration of various technologies such as satellite imagery, airborne sensors, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and ground-based sensors generates vast amounts of data that require sophisticated management and interpretation techniques (Corona et al., 2017). One of the primary challenges is the need for high-resolution data and the ability to effectively interpret this data for decisionmaking purposes. Atmospheric disturbances can affect the quality of remote sensing data, making interpretation more complex. Additionally, the technical expertise required for effective data interpretation poses a significant barrier to widespread adoption (Fakhar & Khalid, 2023). The complexity of managing such a large amount of data and simultaneous operations is a notable limitation in precision forestry applications (Escriba-Gelonch et al., 2024).
7.4 Regulatory and privacy concerns
Precision agriculture technologies, including those applied in forestry, face significant regulatory and privacy challenges that can hinder their widespread adoption and effectiveness (Kaur et al., 2022; Ongadi, 2024). The collection and management of large amounts of sensitive data raise concerns about unauthorized access, collection, and sharing with third parties by agricultural technology providers (ATPs) (Kaur et al., 2022). One of the primary challenges is the ambiguity in legal frameworks and agreements surrounding data collection, processing, and sharing, which creates uncertainty in data privacy practices (Kaur et al., 2022). This lack of clarity is exacerbated by the absence of standardized best practices and protocols for farm data protection (Kaur et al., 2022). In the context of precision forestry, these issues are particularly relevant due to the longterm nature of forest management and the potential for data misuse over extended periods. The use of drones in precision agriculture, including forestry applications, introduces additional regulatory complexities. Many African countries, for instance, have either very restrictive regulations or no proper regulation in place, making the process of acquiring a license for drone operation cumbersome (Ayamga et al., 2021).
This regulatory environment can significantly impede the adoption of drone technology in precision forestry, limiting its potential benefits for smallholder farmers and forest managers in developing countries (Mccarthy et al., 2023). To address these challenges, it is crucial to develop robust security protocols and privacyenhancing technologies tailored to the unique needs of precision agriculture and forestry (Ongadi, 2024). This includes implementing encryption, anonymization, and access controls to protect sensitive data (Singhal, 2024). Additionally, there is a need for clear and comprehensive regulatory frameworks that balance innovation with data protection and privacy concerns (Ayamga et al., 2021; Kaur et al., 2022). Stakeholders across the agricultural and forestry sectors must collaborate to establish best practices and standards for data governance, ensuring the responsible use of precision technologies while protecting the rights and privacy of farmers and forest managers (Kaur et al., 2022; Mccarthy et al., 2023).
8.0 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
8.1 Integration with artificial intelligence and machine learning
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in precision forestry presents promising future directions for enhancing forest management and biodiversity conservation. AI and ML algorithms are increasingly being utilized in the forestry sector to improve surveillance, administration, and preservation of forest resources and biodiversity (Raihan, 2023). These technologies offer potential solutions for efficient monitoring and management of forests, which is crucial given the rapid expansion of developmental projects, agricultural areas, and urban spaces that threaten global biodiversity. One of the key future directions is the enhancement of remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) for precision forestry. The integration of AI with high-resolution satellite and drone data can enable more accurate within- field analysis, better integration of proximal and remote sensing, and real-time prescription modeling (Sangeetha et al., 2024). This can lead to more precise and timely decision-making in forest management. However, the implementation of AI in forestry faces several challenges. These include issues related to data availability, quality, and security, as well as the need for technological infrastructure and specialized skills (Assimakopoulos et al., 2024; Raihan, 2023). Addressing these challenges will be crucial for the wider acceptance and implementation of AI technology in forestry.
8.2 Development of more affordable and user-friendly technologies
The development of more affordable and user-friendly technologies in precision forestry is a crucial future direction, as highlighted by several studies in the field. Precision forestry technologies have shown significant potential in improving forest management and monitoring. For instance, remote sensing technologies have revolutionized forestry analysis by providing valuable information about forest ecosystems on a large scale (Kanga, 2023). These technologies, combined with artificial intelligence (AI) techniques and cloud-computing facilities, enhance analytical capabilities and offer new insights in forestry disciplines. However, the adoption of these technologies faces challenges related to affordability and user-friendliness, particularly for small-scale operations.
Some studies have demonstrated that cost-effective solutions are possible. For example, a simple, costeffective instrument for spectral analysis of plants and fruits based on open-source hardware and software has been developed, costing less than USD 100 (Fernandez-Alonso et al., 2023). This instrument has proven capable of precisely monitoring minute spectral changes in plants and fruits, providing essential information for decision-making in crop management. Such affordable tools could potentially be adapted for forestry applications, bringing precision techniques to small-scale forest managers.
8.3 Potential for application in small-scale forestry operations
Recent advancements in technology have made precision forestry more accessible and applicable to smaller- scale operations. For small-scale forestry, precision forestry techniques can be effectively implemented using cost-effective tools such as GNSS-RF (Global Navigation Satellite Systems—Radio Frequency) systems or even smartwatches and smartphones for monitoring worker activities and safety (Venanzi et al., 2023). These technologies enable remote and proximal monitoring of working performance, which can be particularly valuable for small-scale operations with limited resources. Structure for Motion (SfM) photogrammetry presents an interesting opportunity for small-scale forestry, as it offers denser point clouds and a more approachable method compared to LiDAR technology (Venanzi et al., 2023). This technique can be used to track soil rutting and disturbances caused by machinery, allowing small-scale operators to minimize environmental impact. Additionally, the application of precision forestry in forest road planning, even on a small-scale technical level, can aid managers and owners in decision-making processes for forestry operations (Picchio et al., 2018).
9.0 Conclusion
Precision forestry combines advanced technologies such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), satellite imagery, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of forestry operations. This data-driven approach enables forest managers to make informed decisions at a micro-level, taking into account site-specific variables such as tree density, soil composition, terrain, and environmental stressors.
The findings indicate that precision forestry has the potential to significantly improve various aspects of forest management, including inventory planning, timber harvesting, disease and pest detection, fire risk assessment, and biodiversity monitoring. It promotes sustainable forest use by reducing waste, improving yield prediction, and minimizing environmental impact. Furthermore, precision forestry supports adaptive management, allowing for real-time adjustments based on continuously updated field data. This contributes to both ecological sustainability and economic profitability, aligning with the broader goals of sustainable development and climate resilience.
Precision forestry has emerged as an effective and transformative tool in both commercial and conservation forestry. Its strength lies in its ability to collect and process large volumes of spatial and temporal data, leading to more accurate forest inventories, targeted interventions, and optimized resource utilization. By reducing guesswork and enhancing the precision of silvicultural operations, it improves operational efficiency and minimizes environmental degradation.
Moreover, precision forestry enhances transparency and traceability in forest management, which is increasingly important in the global market for certified and sustainably sourced forest products. It facilitates early detection of forest threats, allowing for timely and targeted mitigation strategies that preserve forest health and reduce economic losses.
However, the implementation of precision forestry is not without limitations. The high costs associated with equipment and software, limited technical expertise in developing regions, and challenges in integrating technologies across fragmented landscapes can hinder its widespread adoption. Additionally, issues related to data governance, including privacy, access, and interoperability, must be addressed to fully harness its potential.
Despite these challenges, precision forestry remains a highly promising approach. When supported by appropriate policies, capacity building, and investment, it can play a central role in achieving sustainable forest management and climate adaptation goals.
While precision forestry has shown substantial operational and environmental benefits, several critical research gaps remain. Long-term ecological studies are needed to understand the effects of precision techniques on forest structure, biodiversity, soil health, and hydrology. Most current models focus on largescale operations, leaving a gap in scalable, cost-effective applications for smallholder and communitymanaged forests, especially in the Global South. Additionally, integrating precision forestry with Indigenous and local knowledge systems is essential to ensure ethical, culturally respectful, and inclusive forest management. There's also a need to examine the social and institutional factors influencing adoption, including training, stakeholder engagement, and policy readiness. Furthermore, the development of inclusive regulatory frameworks to address concerns like data ownership and privacy is crucial. Finally, precision forestry's role in enhancing climate resilience and supporting carbon monitoring efforts, such as REDD+ initiatives, deserves greater attention.
In conclusion, precision forestry is a transformative approach for achieving sustainable and resilient forest management. However, its full potential lies in fostering interdisciplinary research, inclusive policy-making, and equitable access to technology supported through collaboration among scientists, policymakers, forest managers, and local communities.
10.0 References
Addas, A. (2023). Impact of forestry on environment and human health: an evidence-based investigation. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1260519
Adedibu, P. A. (2023). Ecological problems of agriculture: impacts and sustainable solutions. scienceopen. https://doi.org/10.14293/pr2199.000145.v1
Ashraf, A., Nazir, S., Ahmad, L., Khan, J. N., Rasool, R., Ferooz, K., Ramzan, S., Akhter, S., Shehnaz, E., Nabi, A., Ashraf, I., & Ul-Shafiq, M. (2023). Remote Sensing as a Management and Monitoring Tool for Agriculture: Potential Applications. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13 (8), 324-343. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i81957
Assimakopoulos, F., Spiliotopoulos, D., Vassilakis, C., Margaris, D., & Kotis, K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Tools for the Agriculture Value Chain: Status and Prospects. Electronics, 13 (22), 4362. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13224362
Ayamga, M., Tekinerdogan, B., & Kassahun, A. (2021). Exploring the Challenges Posed by Regulations for the Use of Drones in Agriculture in the African Context. Land, 10 (2), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020164
Batcheler, M., Smith, M. M., Swanson, M. E., Ostrom, M., & Carpenter-Boggs, L. (2024). Assessing silvopasture management as a strategy to reduce fuel loads and mitigate wildfire risk. Scientific Reports, 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56104-3
Bertomeu, M., Pulido, F., & Pineda, J. (2022). Managing Wildfire Risk in Mosaic Landscapes: A Case Study of the Upper Gata River Catchment in Sierra de Gata, Spain. Land, 11 (4), 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11040465
Bombrun, M., Pont, D., Watt, M. S., Dash, J. P., Dungey, H. S., & Pearse, G. D. (2020). Forest-Scale Phenotyping: Productivity Characterisation Through Machine Learning. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00099
Buchelt, A., Adrowitzer, A., Kieseberg, P., Gollob, C., Nothdurft, A., Eresheim, S., Tschiatschek, S., Stampfer, K., & Holzinger, A. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence for applications of drones in forest ecology and management. Forest Ecology and Management, 551, 121530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121530
Cardenas, E., Hope, G., Kranabetter, J. M., Maas, K. R., Hallam, S., & Mohn, W. W. (2015). Forest harvesting reduces the soil metagenomic potential for biomass decomposition. The ISME Journal, 9 (11), 2465-2476. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.57
Chazdon, R. L. (2008). Beyond Deforestation: Restoring Forests and Ecosystem Services on Degraded Lands. Science, 320 (5882), 1458-1460. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155365
Conner, W. H. (1994). Effect of forest management practices on southern forested wetland productivity. Wetlands, 14 (1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03160619
Corona, P., Sperandio, G., Quatrini, V., Clementel, F., Civitarese, V., Scrinzi, G., Verani, S., Menesatti, P., Puletti, N., Costa, C., Plutino, M., Bernardini, V., Chianucci, F., Turco, R., & Floris, A. (2017). Precision forestry: riferimenti concettuali, strumenti e prospettive di diffusione in Italia. Forest@ - Rivista Di Selvicoltura Ed Ecologia Forestale, 14 (1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3832/efor2285-014
Cuaran, J., & Leon, J. (2021). Crop Monitoring using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Review. Agricultural Reviews, Of. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.r-180
Dainelli, R., Toscano, P., Matese, A., & Di Gennaro, S. F. (2021). Recent Advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Forest Remote Sensing—A Systematic Review. Part II: Research Applications. Forests, 12 (4), 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040397
Del Cerro, J., Cruz Ulloa, C., Barrientos, A., & De León Rivas, J. (2021). Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Agriculture: A Survey. Agronomy, 11 (2), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020203
Escribà-Gelonch, M., Liang, S., Liang, S., Liang, S., Van Schalkwyk, P., Fisk, I., Fisk, I., Long, N. V. D., Long, N. V. D., Long, N. V. D., Hessel, V., Hessel, V., & Hessel, V. (2024). Digital Twins in Agriculture: Orchestration and Applications. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 72 (19), 10737-10752. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c01934
Fakhar, M., & Khalid, M. (2023). SATELLITES TO AGRICULTURAL FIELDS: THE ROLE OF REMOTE SENSING IN PRECISION AGRICULTURE. Biological and Agricultural Sciences Research Journal, 2023 (1), 14. https://doi.ors/10.54112/basrj.v2023i1.14
Farhan, S. M., Yin, J., Chen, Z., & Memon, M. S. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of LiDAR Applications in Crop Management for Precision Agriculture. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 24 (16), 5409. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165409
Fassnacht, F. E., Næsset, E., Wulder, M. A., & White, J. C. (2023). Remote sensing in forestry: current challenges, considerations and directions. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 97 (1), 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpad024
Fernández-Alonso, F. J., Torres-Costa, V., & Hernández, Z. (2023). A Cost-Effective Portable Multiband Spectrophotometer for Precision Agriculture. Agriculture, 13 (8), 1467. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081467
Hansson, L. J., Sten, G., Li, S., Lideskog, H., Manner, J., Rossander, M., Möller, B., Eriksson, A., Rönnqvist, M., Edlund, B., Karlberg, M., Wallner, A., Flisberg, P., & Van Westendorp, R. V. (2024). Autoplant— Autonomous Site Preparation and Tree Planting for a Sustainable Bioeconomy. Forests, 15 (2), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020263
Holmgren, P., & Thuresson, T. (1998). Satellite remote sensing for forestry planning—A review. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 13 (1-4), 90-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589809382966
Holopainen, M., Vastaranta, M., & Hyyppä, J. (2014). Outlook for the Next Generation’s Precision Forestry in Finland. Forests, 5 (7), 1682-1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5071682
Hoque, A., & Padhiary, M. (2024). Automation and AI in Precision Agriculture: Innovations for Enhanced Crop
Management and Sustainability. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 17 (10), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i10512
Lost Filho, F. H., De Lange, E. S., Heldens, W. B., & Kong, Z. (2019). Drones: Innovative Technology for Use in Precision Pest Management. Journal of Economic Entomology, 113 (1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz268
Jandl, R., Roc, J., Vesterdal, L., Bens, O., Badeck, F., & Olsson, M. (2007). Carbon sequestration and forest management. CABI Reviews, 2007 (017). https://doi.org/10.1079/pavsnnr20072017
Kanga, S. (2023). Advancements in remote sensing tools for forestry analysis. Sustainable Forestry, 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.24294/sf.v6i1.2269
Kaur, J., Amiri-Zarandi, M., Dara, R., & Hazrati Fard, S. M. (2022). Protecting farmers’ data privacy and confidentiality: Recommendations and considerations. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.903230
Kendall, H., Jin, S., Chen, J., Frewer, L. J., Li, W., Li, Z., Jones, G. D., Taylor, J., & Clark, B. (2021). Precision agriculture technology adoption: a qualitative study of small-scale commercial \u201cfamily farms\u201d located in the North China Plain. Precision Agriculture, 23 (1), 319-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119- 021-09839-2
Khang, A., Panda, S., Rath, K. C., Sree, P. K., & Panda, S. K. (2023). Revolutionizing Agriculture (pp. 1-22). igi global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9231-4.ch001
Klooster, D. J. (2002). Toward Adaptive Community Forest Management: Integrating Local Forest Knowledge with Scientific Forestry. Economic Geography, 78 (1), 43-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2002.tb00175.x
Kumar, S. A., & Ilango, P. (2017). The Impact of Wireless Sensor Network in the Field of Precision Agriculture: A Review. Wireless Personal Communications, 98 (1), 685-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017- 4890-z
Kuuluvainen, T. (2009). Forest Management and Biodiversity Conservation Based on Natural Ecosystem Dynamics in Northern Europe: The Complexity Challenge. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 38 (6), 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1579/08-a-490.1
Kuuluvainen, T., Kubota, Y., Jogiste, K., Angelstam, P., Frelich, L., Macdonald, E., Koivula, M., & Lafleur, B. (2021). Natural Disturbance-Based Forest Management: Moving Beyond Retention and Continuous- Cover Forestry. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.629020
Laudon, H., Egnell, G., Futter, M., Kuglerova, L., Nordin, A., Bishop, K., Lundmark, T., Sponseller, R. A., & Âgren, A. M. (2016). The role of biogeochemical hotspots, landscape heterogeneity, and hydrological connectivity for minimizing forestry effects on water quality. Ambio, Suppl 45 2 (S2), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0751-8
Laudon, H., Lucas, R. W., Bishop, K., Sponseller, R. A., Egnell, G., Âgren, A., Futter, M. N., Ring, E., & Hogberg, P. (2011). Consequences of More Intensive Forestry for the Sustainable Management of Forest Soils and Waters. Forests, 2 (1), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.3390/f2010243
Lindenmayer, D. B., Hobbs, R. J., & Salt, D. (2003). Plantation forests and biodiversity conservation. Australian Forestry, 66 (1), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2003.10674891
Mason, F., & Zapponi, L. (2016). The forest biodiversity artery: towards forest management for saproxylic conservation. IForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 9 (2), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1657-008
Mccarthy, C., Hoshino, B., Moyo, B., Nyoni, Y., Banfill, J., Banda, L. B., Kachamba, D. J., & Chisambi, C. (2023). Can Drones Help Smallholder Farmers Improve Agriculture Efficiencies and Reduce Food Insecurity in Sub-Saharan Africa? Local Perceptions from Malawi. Agriculture, 13 (5), 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13051075
Mori, A. S., Lertzman, K. P., & Gustafsson, L. (2016). Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54 (1), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12669
Nambiar, E. K. S. (1996). Sustained Productivity of Forests Is a Continuing Challenge to Soil Science. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60 (6), 1629-1642.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000060006x
Nambiar, E. K. S. (1996). Sustained Productivity of Forests Is a Continuing Challenge to Soil Science. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 60 (6), 1629-1642.
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000060006x
Novo, A., Martinez-Sanchez, J., Lorenzo, H., Farinas-Alvarez, N., Fernandez-Alonso, J. M., & Gonzalez-Jorge, H. (2020). Mapping Forest Fire Risk—A Case Study in Galicia (Spain). Remote Sensing, 12 (22), 3705. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223705
Ongadi, P. (2024). A comprehensive examination of security and privacy in precision agriculture technologies. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 18 (1), 336-363.
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.1.0026
Picchio, R., Marchi, E., Venanzi, R., Foderi, C., Benanchi, M., Verani, S., Latterini, F., & Pignatti, G. (2018). The Application of Two Approaches Using GIS Technology Implementation in Forest Road Network Planning in an Italian Mountain Setting. Forests, 9 (5), 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050277
Pohjanmies, T., Eyvindson, K., & Monkkonen, M. (2019). Forest management optimization across spatial scales to reconcile economic and conservation objectives. PLOS ONE, 14 (6), e0218213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218213
Poudyal, B. H., Cockfield, G., & Maraseni, T. (2019). Scientific Forest Management Practice in Nepal: Critical Reflections from Stakeholders’ Perspectives. Forests, 11 (1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010027
Poudyal, B. H., Khatri, D. B., Paudel, D., Marquardt, K., & Khatri, S. (2023). Examining forest transition and
collective action in Nepal’s community forestry. Land Use Policy, 134, 106872. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106872
Raihan, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in forest management and biodiversity
conservation. Natural Resources Conservation and Research, 6 (2), 3825. https://doi.org/10.24294/nrcr.v6i2.3825
Raji, E., Eyieyien, O., & Ijomah, T. (2024). Data-Driven decision making in agriculture and business: The role of advanced analytics. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 5 (7), 1565-1575.
https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v5i7.1275
Ramo, J., & Tahvonen, O. (2016). Optimizing the Harvest Timing in Continuous Cover Forestry. Environmental
and Resource Economics, 67 (4), 853-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0008-4
Raparelli, E., & Bajocco, S. (2019). A bibliometric analysis on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in agricultural
and forestry studies. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40 (24), 9070-9083. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1569793
Raum, S. (2017). The ecosystem approach, ecosystem services and established forestry policy approaches in the United Kingdom. Land Use Policy, 64 (64), 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.030
Reznik, T., Herman, L., Kepka, M., Kfivânek, Z., Reznikovâ, H., Charvât, K., & Lukas, V. (2017). Disaster Risk Reduction in Agriculture through Geospatial (Big) Data Processing. ISPRS International Journal of GeoInformation, 6 (8), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6080238
Ruotsalainen, S. (2014). Increased forest production through forest tree breeding. Scandinavian Journal of Forest
Research, 29 (4), 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.926100
Saha, P., Kathuria, S., Duggal, A. S., Pachouri, V., Gehlot, A., & Kumar, V. (2023). Precision Agriculture Using
Internet of Things and Wireless Sensor Networks. 519-522. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdt57929.2023.10150678
Sangeetha, C., Pandey, S. K., Damor, J. S., M, R., Moond, V., Singh, B., & Kumar, P. (2024). Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems for Precision Agriculture: A Review. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14 (2), 287-309. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i23945
Shaik, R. U., Zeng, W., & Periasamy, S. (2023). Potential Assessment of PRISMA Hyperspectral Imagery for Remote Sensing Applications. Remote Sensing, 15 (5), 1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15051378
Sharma, S. (2023). PRECISION AGRICULTURE: REVIEWING THE ADVANCEMENTS, TECHNOLOGIES, AND APPLICATIONS IN PRECISION AGRICULTURE FOR IMPROVED CROP PRODUCTIVITY AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. Reviews In Food And Agriculture, 4 (2), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.26480/rfna.02.2023.45.49
Sing, L., Ray, D., Metzger, M. J., & Paterson, J. S. (2017). A review of the effects of forest management intensity on ecosystem services for northern European temperate forests with a focus on the UK. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 91 (2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpx042
Singhal, S. (2024). Data Privacy, Compliance, and Security Including AI ML (pp. 111-126). igi global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2909-2.ch009
Soussi, A., Fossa, M., Trinchero, D., Sacile, R., & Zero, E. (2024). Smart Sensors and Smart Data for Precision Agriculture: A Review. Sensors, 24 (8), 2647. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24082647
Spadoni, G. L., Salvati, L., Bonis, E., Romano, R., Marchetti, M., Di Leginio, M., Elia, M., Chirici, G., Garbarino, M., Brunori, A., Dalla Vecchia, I., Tomao, A., Ascoli, D., Munafo, M., Barbati, A., Francini, S., Sibona, E., Corona, P., Ferrara, C., ... Strollo, A. (2023). Active governance of agro-pastoral, forest and protected areas mitigates wildfire impacts in Italy. Science of The Total Environment, 890, 164281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164281
Tahvonen, O., & Rämö, J. (2016). Optimality of continuous cover vs. clear-cut regimes in managing forest resources. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 46 (7), 891-901. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0474
Tang, L., & Shao, G. (2015). Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices. Journal of Forestry Research, 26 (4), 791-797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0088-y
Torres-Rojo, J. M., Mendoza-Briseno, M. A., & Moreno-Sanchez, R. (2016). Sustainable Forest Management in
Mexico. Current Forestry Reports, 2 (2), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-016-0033-0
Venanzi, R., Picchio, R., Latterini, F., & Civitarese, V. (2023). Recent Applications of Smart Technologies for Monitoring the Sustainability of Forest Operations. Forests, 14 (7), 1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071503
Venanzi, R., Picchio, R., Latterini, F., & Civitarese, V. (2023). Recent Applications of Smart Technologies for
Monitoring the Sustainability of Forest Operations. Forests, 14 (7), 1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071503
Wagner, R. G., Cole, E. C., Shiver, B. D., Miller, J. H., & Newton, M. (2004). The role of herbicides for enhancing forest productivity and conserving land for biodiversity in North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 32 (4), 1028-1041. https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2004)032[1028:trohfe]2.0.co;2
Wang, G. G., Lu, D., Gao, T., Zhang, J., Sun, Y., Teng, D., Yu, F., & Zhu, J. (2024). Climate-smart forestry: an Al-enabled sustainable forest management solution for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Journal of Forestry Research, 36 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-024-01802-x
Wiersum, K. F., Van Bommel, S., & Humphries, S. (2011). Certification of community forestry enterprises: experiences with incorporating community forestry in a global system for forest governance. Small-Scale Forestry, 12 (1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9190-y
Yagi, M., Funao, H., Fujita, N., Yamanouchi, K., & Ebata, S. (2023). Revolutionizing Spinal Care: Current Applications and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12 (13), 4188. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134188
Zhang, C., & Kovacs, J. M. (2012). The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review. Precision Agriculture, 13 (6), 693-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-012-9274-5
Zhang, J., Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., Cong, S., & Huang, J. (2022). Detecting Pest-Infested Forest Damage through Multispectral Satellite Imagery and Improved UNet+. Sensors, 22 (19), 7440. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197440
[...]
Buy now
- Quote paper
- Thabiso Mdlovu (Author), 2024, Precision Forestry. Impact on Forest Health and Productivity, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1602643
