Grin logo
de en es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › Computer Science - Internet, New Technologies

Gender Gap in Blockchain Systems

Women's Perspective on Their Involvement in Blockchain Technology

Title: Gender Gap in Blockchain Systems

Master's Thesis , 2024 , 119 Pages , Grade: 1.5

Autor:in: Amanda Van Annan (Author)

Computer Science - Internet, New Technologies
Excerpt & Details   Look inside the ebook
Summary Excerpt Details

Blockchain focuses on using digital systems to execute and record online transactions that can only be perceived or considered as the building blocks developed from digital algorithms and secured through cryptography. This technology system is one of the key strategic technology trends used in various organizations or public sectors to record transactions. The problem at hand is the gender gap within the blockchain industry, where African American women are underrepresented and face various challenges in their pursuit of opportunities and advancement. Despite the increasing interest in blockchain technology, the participation of women in the industry remains significantly lower compared to their male counterparts.

This gender disparity not only limits the diversity of talent and ideas within the industry but also hinders the industry's overall growth, innovation, and potential for positive social impact. Existing studies on gender gaps in technology fields, while valuable, often provide a limited understanding of the specific dynamics and challenges within the blockchain industry. There is a need for focused research that examines the gender gap in blockchain systems and investigates the unique factors that contribute to women's underrepresentation.

This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the gender gap in blockchain systems, focusing on African American women's perspectives and their involvement in blockchain technology. By addressing this research gap, we can gain insights into the barriers African American women face in the industry and identify strategies to foster a more inclusive and equitable blockchain ecosystem.

The general research question is: What are the potential factors that lead to the gender gap in blockchain systems among African American women in the US who are influencers in the blockchain space?
The sub-research questions are: How does race influence gender inequality in blockchain technology change among African American women in the US? How do trust and transparency influence the leadership position of African American women in the blockchain system? What are the key strategies or success factors to promote future gendered leadership in blockchain systems?

Excerpt


Table of Contents

1. Introduction

1.1. Background Information

1.1.1. The Blockchain Systems

1.1.2. Leadership in Blockchain

1.2. Problem Statement

1.3. Purpose of the Study

1.4. Research Aims

1.5. Research Objectives

1.6. Research Question

1.7. Significance of the Study

2. Chapter 2: Literature Review

2.1. Introduction

2.2. Digital Systems and Leadership Roles

2.3. The Blockchain Systems

2.3.1. Blockchain Systems and Technology in Financial Sector

2.3.2. Blockchain Technology and Online Transactions

2.4. Resistance to Blockchain Adoption and its Impact on Future Employment

2.4.1. People's Perceptions of the Implementation and Usage of Blockchain Technology

2.4.2. Leaders' or Managers' Resistance to Change

2.4.3. Lack of Support and Competencies

2.4.4. Security Concerns

2.5. Gender Gap in Blockchain Systems

2.6. Implementation of Blockchain Technology and Women’s Influential Behaviors

2.7. Blockchain Adoption and Future Women Leadership and Employment

2.8. Gendered Leadership

2.9. Trust And Transparency in Blockchain Systems

Chapter 3: Methodology

3.1. Research Method and Design

3.2. Population And Sampling

3.3. Data Collection

3.3.1. Data Collection Instrument

3.3.2. Data Collection Procedures

3.4. Data Analysis

3.4.1. Data Analysis Procedure

3.5. Ethical Considerations

3.6 Assumptions, Limitations, and Delimitations

3.6.1. Assumptions

3.6.2 Limitations

3.6.3. Delimitations

Chapter 4: Findings

4.1. Introduction

4.1.1. Research Question 1

4.1.2. Research Question Two

4.1.3. Research Question Three

Chapter 5: Discussion, Implications, Conclusion & Recommendations

5.1. Discussion

5.1.1. Research Question 1

5.1.2. Research Question Two

5.1.3. Research Question Three

5.2. Implications of the Findings

5.3. Conclusions

5.4. Recommendations for Practice

Research Objectives and Core Themes

This master thesis investigates the persistent gender gap within the blockchain industry, specifically focusing on the experiences and perspectives of African American women. The study aims to uncover the unique intersectional barriers, biases, and challenges these women encounter in blockchain-related professions and identifies actionable strategies to foster a more inclusive and equitable ecosystem.

  • Intersectional impact of race and gender on career advancement in blockchain.
  • Barriers to quality education, mentorship, and professional network access.
  • Role of trust and transparency in organizational leadership dynamics.
  • Systemic challenges contributing to the underrepresentation of African American women.
  • Strategic frameworks for fostering future diverse leadership and mentorship.

Excerpt from the Thesis

4.1.1.1. Intersectionality

The theme of intersectionality describes how various social identities, such as race and gender, intersect to create unique modes of discrimination and privilege in blockchain technology change among African American women in the United States. Based on the data collected, it is evident that race influences gender inequality where women of color or African American women encounter racial and gender discrimination, resulting in severe socio-economic disadvantages compared to white women or men of the same racial group. This theme was supported by four participants who stated that women of color are discriminated against in the blockchain technology system because of their race and being women. For instance, Ansylla Ramsey echoed,

“Yeah, like I was saying I can only kind of because I don't do as much online, but when I go to in -person events there are very few women, especially women of color, especially mature women of color. Yeah, so there's very few, I mean absolutely minimal…. We have to fight to prove ourselves. We have to fight to get funding. We have to fight to be recognized. And it's so funny you bring this up now, because I just watched this old movie with Whoopi Golberg. where she makes up a white male partner, because she's an investment banker, something like that. And here we are, and that must have been late 80s, And here we are 40 years later, it's the same thing.”

Also, Cleve Mesidor supported intersectionality as the influence of race on gender inequality. The participant shared that even though women take some positions in the blockchain technology system, most positions are taken by white men and Asians, while women, including those of color, are underrepresented. Cleve Madisor said,

“So even when you look at it, I work at the intersection of cryptocurrency and public policy. So, women have a deep bench, but the problem is the structures, media, government, funding, capital sources like funding. They still focus just on white males in this space. Okay, I think that's an important distinction to make. I can't, you know, so that's why my response would be that the state of women in crypto is biased because women are invisible figures in crypto.”

Summary of Chapters

1. Introduction: Provides the background of blockchain as a transformative technology while highlighting the significant gender gap and underrepresentation of women in leadership roles.

2. Chapter 2: Literature Review: Synthesizes existing research on digital leadership, blockchain adoption, gendered leadership dynamics, and the specific challenges women face in technology-driven fields.

3. Chapter 3: Methodology: Details the qualitative research design and descriptive approach used, including purposive sampling of 14 African American women and semi-structured interview data collection.

4. Chapter 4: Findings: Presents the analysis of interview data, identifying key themes such as intersectionality, education barriers, cultural representation, and the critical need for mentorship.

5. Chapter 5: Discussion, Implications, Conclusion & Recommendations: Evaluates the findings against existing literature and provides actionable recommendations for industry stakeholders to improve inclusivity.

Keywords

Blockchain technology, Gender gap, African American women, Intersectional bias, Digital leadership, Mentorship, Networking, Professional advancement, Racial inequality, Trust, Transparency, Inclusive ecosystem, Corporate diversity, Underrepresentation, STEM.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core focus of this research?

The research examines the gender gap within the blockchain industry, with a specific focus on the unique barriers and challenges faced by African American women in the United States.

What are the central themes of the work?

The study highlights intersectionality, lack of access to education, cultural representation issues, the importance of mentorship, and the impact of systemic racism on professional advancement.

What is the primary research goal?

The primary goal is to investigate factors leading to the gender gap and identify success factors that could promote future gendered leadership for African American women in blockchain.

What methodology was utilized?

The study uses a qualitative descriptive research method, utilizing semi-structured interviews with 14 participants to gain deep insights into their lived experiences.

What does the main body address?

The main body reviews existing literature on blockchain and gendered leadership, outlines the qualitative methodology, presents empirical findings from participants, and provides a discussion of these findings in context.

Which keywords best characterize this thesis?

Key terms include blockchain technology, intersectionality, African American women, gender gap, digital leadership, mentorship, and professional equity.

How do race and gender intersect in this context?

The participants' feedback reveals that African American women face a "double burden" where racial bias and gender stereotypes combine to create systemic barriers, making them invisible in technical and leadership roles.

What role does mentorship play according to the study?

Mentorship is identified as a critical success factor that provides personalized guidance, network visibility, and advocacy, which are essential for women to successfully navigate and thrive in the male-dominated blockchain field.

How is trust defined in relation to the blockchain industry?

Trust is analyzed not just as a technical feature of blockchain, but as a socio-professional barrier; the study shows that even when qualified, African American women are often subject to skepticism and unwarranted scrutiny from employers and peers.

Excerpt out of 119 pages  - scroll top

Details

Title
Gender Gap in Blockchain Systems
Subtitle
Women's Perspective on Their Involvement in Blockchain Technology
Course
MBA
Grade
1.5
Author
Amanda Van Annan (Author)
Publication Year
2024
Pages
119
Catalog Number
V1606224
ISBN (eBook)
9783389158173
ISBN (Book)
9783389158180
Language
English
Tags
blockchain technology cryptocurrency crypto gender studies women amanda van annan tech silicon valley
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Amanda Van Annan (Author), 2024, Gender Gap in Blockchain Systems, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1606224
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  119  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint