Privatization has been a key economic reform strategy in many developing countries, including Nigeria. This paper critically evaluates the privatization of public enterprises in Nigeria, particularly focusing on the power sector. It explores the rationale, historical context, challenges, and outcomes of privatization, drawing insights from various sources, including the World Bank, academic literature, and case studies. While privatization has led to increased efficiency in some sectors, its implementation in Nigeria has faced significant hurdles. The paper concludes with recommendations for improving privatization policies to maximize economic benefits
Table of Contents
- ABSTRACT
- INTRODUCTION
- STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
- Objective of the research
- Scope and Significance of study
- LITERATURE REVIEW
- METHODOLOGY
- PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS
- PRIVATIZATION WITHOUT PROGRESS: ASSESSING THE STAGNATION IN NIGERIA’S POWER SECTOR
- PRIVATIZATION AND SLOW PROGRESS IN THE POWER SECTOR
- GOVERNMENT'S EFFORTS TO TAKE OVER DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES
- FINANCIAL CHALLENGES AND BANK CONTROL OVER DISCOS
- INFRASTRUCTURE CHALLENGES AND AGGREGATE TECHNICAL, COMMERCIAL, AND COLLECTION (ATC&C) LOSSES
- FINANCIAL PRIORITIES OF DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES
- ELECTRICITY TARIFF ADJUSTMENTS
- LIQUIDITY CRISIS AND ITS IMPACT ON THE POWER SECTOR
- FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE: ESTABLISHMENT OF NELMCO
- FREQUENT LEADERSHIP CHANGES IN NIGERIA'S ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES
- ONGOING GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS IN THE POWER SECTOR
- RECOMMENDATIONS
- CONCLUSION
- REFERENCES (APA 6TH EDITION)
Objective & Thematic Focus
This paper critically evaluates the privatization of public enterprises in Nigeria, with a particular focus on the power sector, to identify its rationale, historical context, challenges, and outcomes, concluding with recommendations for policy improvement.
- Rationale, historical context, challenges, and outcomes of privatization in Nigeria.
- Specific examination of the privatization of the power sector, including the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN).
- Impact of privatization on economic benefits and service delivery.
- Analysis of post-privatization hurdles such as financial instability, infrastructure deficits, and regulatory inconsistencies.
- Recommendations for improving privatization policies and governance structures.
Excerpt from the Book
PRIVATIZATION AND SLOW PROGRESS IN THE POWER SECTOR
Despite the privatization of PHCN, The Nation (2020) reported a slow pace of progress even after seven years, as there has been no significant improvement in electricity supply despite the government spending #1.8 trillion on the sector since 2015. Nigeria currently generates 3,400 Megawatts (MW) of electricity, down from over 4,000 MW before privatization. This falls far short of the estimated 150,000 MW required to support full industrialization and reboot the economy post-COVID-19, prompting renewed calls for a review of privatization.
In 2024, Nigeria's Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, disclosed during the visit of the Senate Committee on Power to the Ministry of Power and the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN) that the government is making efforts to take over the Distribution Companies due to their inefficiency in wheeling power to last-mile customers and mismanagement of the companies.
Five distribution companies are currently under the management of banks and the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) due to their inability to repay loans taken from financial institutions. Abuja DisCo is managed by the United Bank of Africa (UBA), while Fidelity Bank oversees Benin DisCo, Kaduna DisCo, and Kano DisCo (Premium Times, 2024).
One of the major challenges inherited by the DisCos is the presence of obsolete 33kV and 11kV distribution lines and substations, which have significantly contributed to technical losses in electricity distribution. As at the end of December 2018, about 57% of the total registered customers of the DISCOs were unmetered. Although a higher billing efficiency is reported (this is the percentage of the energy received that is billed to customers; the shortfall being attributed to distribution technical losses and energy theft), for example, 81% in the third quarter of 2018, the statistic is of diminished relevance when a significant portion of it is only estimated and subject to dispute by the customers. Little wonder that in the third quarter of the same year 2018, metering and billing complaints constituted more than half of the total complaints received (O. M. Komolafe & K. M. Udofia 2020)
Most DisCos prioritize repaying bank loans taken to finance their 60% equity purchase instead of investing in new projects. To meet their financial obligations, their electricity supply focus is on commercial areas and urban locations with high revenue collection rates. As a result, Nigerians in remote and rural areas may not have a steady electricity supply, unlike during government control, when efforts were made to provide electricity to all Nigerians despite challenges. However, the new private owners prioritize profitability over universal electricity access.
Summary of Chapters
ABSTRACT: This section provides an overview of the paper, highlighting the critical evaluation of privatization in Nigeria, focusing on the power sector, and outlining its exploration of rationale, challenges, and outcomes with recommendations.
INTRODUCTION: This chapter defines privatization, discusses Nigeria's mixed economy, the government's historical dominance in key sectors, and the role of oil discovery in promoting state involvement in economic activities.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: This part identifies the issues arising from public enterprises in Nigeria, their proliferation, lack of sustainability, and the failure of privatization to meet expectations in areas like service delivery and economic growth.
Objective of the research: This section states the primary goal of the research, which is to examine how privatization in Nigeria, particularly in the power sector, has faced setbacks and to highlight the need for improved governance and strategic investment.
Scope and Significance of study: This chapter details the specific focus of the research on the 2013 privatization of the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) and its significance for improving power supply and economic efficiency in Nigeria.
LITERATURE REVIEW: This section defines privatization, discusses various methods, and explores its role in global economic liberalization, state inefficiency, and the poor performance of state-owned enterprises, particularly in developing countries.
METHODOLOGY: This chapter describes the research approach, a desktop review, utilizing both qualitative and quantitative data for gathering, analysis, and review.
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS: This section presents the main challenges affecting the Nigerian power sector, including power outages and unreliable service, and details the unbundling of the national power utility company and the establishment of regulatory bodies.
PRIVATIZATION WITHOUT PROGRESS: ASSESSING THE STAGNATION IN NIGERIA’S POWER SECTOR: This comprehensive section elaborates on the slow pace of progress post-privatization, government efforts to take over distribution companies, financial challenges, infrastructure deficits, and frequent leadership changes, as well as ongoing government bailouts.
RECOMMENDATIONS: This chapter provides actionable suggestions for improving privatization outcomes, including strengthening regulatory oversight, establishing performance monitoring, ensuring transparent bidding, adopting PPPs, capacity building, and maintaining policy consistency.
CONCLUSION: This final chapter reiterates that privatization is a critical policy tool but its implementation in Nigeria has faced significant challenges, especially in the power sector, emphasizing the need for robust regulatory frameworks and an enabling environment for private sector investment.
Keywords
Privatization, Nigeria, Public Enterprises, Power Sector, Economic Reform, Management Strategy, PHCN, Service Delivery, Infrastructure, Regulatory Oversight, Financial Challenges, Governance, Economic Benefits, State-Owned Enterprises, Development.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this work fundamentally about?
This work fundamentally evaluates the privatization of public enterprises in Nigeria, particularly focusing on the power sector, examining its objectives, challenges, and outcomes as a management strategy.
What are the central thematic areas?
The central thematic areas include the rationale and historical context of privatization, its implementation challenges and successes, outcomes in service delivery and economic growth, and the specific case of the Nigerian power sector.
What is the primary objective or research question?
The primary objective is to critically assess the effectiveness of privatization as a management strategy in Nigeria, identify the hurdles encountered, and provide recommendations for improving its policies to maximize economic benefits.
Which scientific method is used?
The study employs a desktop review research approach, utilizing both qualitative and quantitative data for gathering, analysis, and review.
What is covered in the main part?
The main part covers the challenges affecting the Nigerian power sector, the unbundling of the national power utility, slow progress post-privatization, government efforts to intervene, financial issues, infrastructure deficits, tariff adjustments, liquidity crises, leadership changes, and government bailouts in the power sector.
Which keywords characterize the work?
Key terms characterizing the work are Privatization, Nigeria, Public Enterprises, Power Sector, Economic Reform, Management Strategy, PHCN, Service Delivery, and Regulatory Oversight.
What were the key challenges post-privatization in Nigeria's power sector?
Key challenges included slow progress in electricity supply improvement, government efforts to take over inefficient distribution companies, financial issues leading to bank control over DisCos, obsolete infrastructure contributing to technical losses, and DisCos prioritizing loan repayment over universal electricity access.
How has the government responded to the liquidity crisis in the power sector?
The Federal Government established the Nigerian Electricity Management Liability Company (NELMCO) to address legacy debt issues from the defunct PHCN, and has also provided significant bailouts and payment assurance facilities to the sector.
What are the main recommendations for improving privatization policies?
Main recommendations include strengthening regulatory oversight, establishing structured post-privatization monitoring, ensuring transparent and competitive bidding processes, adopting Public-Private Partnership models, investing in capacity building and critical infrastructure, maintaining policy consistency, and enforcing consumer protection mechanisms.
What is the current state of electricity generation in Nigeria compared to its needs?
Nigeria currently generates around 3,400 Megawatts (MW) of electricity, which is significantly down from over 4,000 MW before privatization, falling far short of the estimated 150,000 MW required for full industrialization and economic reboot.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Opeyemi Ipinnaiye (Autor:in), 2025, Privatization of Public Enterprises in Nigeria as a Management Strategy "not to be", München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/1611555
