Mineral wealth and concomitant phenomena of violence state weakness and corruption
have been widely brought into contact by numerous scholars, as a considerable number
of empirical cases seem to give evidence to this. Particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa the
examples of Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo and Angola – just to
mention some of the most striking ones – led to various hypotheses about the influence of
resource plenty on governance issues. Due to several specific characteristics, the case of
Nigeria is different to many others. First of all, the Federal Republic of Nigeria turned out
to be Africa’s most populous state with about 140 million citizens. In addition the social
situation is rather unique, as Nigeria consists of more than 250 ethnic groups. The more
than 500 spoken languages spoken in the country further illustrate the socio-cultural
diversity. Nevertheless the three major communities include more than two thirds of the
country’s total population.
On the socio-economic dimension a key feature is the overwhelming importance of
oil as almost single export good and major contributor of the country’s GDP. The strong dependence on oil has been challenging Nigeria’s economy
considerably and can be seen as a major reason for socio-economic disparities throughout
the country, not to forget that it has been the origin for its ‘(political) Dutch disease’.
Contrarily to other so-called ‘crisis-states’ the main issues threatening statehood and
stability in Nigeria can be rather seen as domestic problems. Transnational issues like the
relations with Cameroon do not have the same structuring quality as in other states.
Although Nigeria improved in TI's CPI of 2008 the country still faces ‘institutionalized’ clientelism and
rent-seeking at almost each political and social level as poor performance in ‘group grievance’, ‘delegitimization of the state’ or ‘factionalized elites’ may illustrate. Secondly
manifold forms of institutional and informal violence are destabilizing the socio-political
architecture. Various attempts to counter those phenomena have been ineffective or
implemented insufficiently, sometimes not at all. The result is a current situation of
disorder, human insecurity, economic inequality fed by a prosperous environment for
individual enrichment provided by a state which is rather effective in facilitating illicit
political and economic behaviours, be they plundering of public goods, drug or weapon
trade or other.
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. THEORETICAL ASSUMPTIONS
2.1 STATE WEAKNESS AND STATE FAILURE
2.2 'SHADOW-STATEHOOD'
2.3 GREED AND GRIEVANCE IN WAR ECONOMIES
2.4 'THE POLITICS OF THE BELLY' REVISITED
3. POLITICO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
4. THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF NIGERIA
5. POLITICS, VIOLENCE & IMPUNITY
6. GODFATHERS, CORRUPTION & CLIENTELISM
7. EXTERNAL FACTORS
8. ON THE NIGER DELTA CONFLICT
9. CONCLUSION
Research Objectives and Key Themes
This paper aims to provide a framework for understanding Nigeria's complex socio-political situation by examining the hypothesis that resource abundance contributes to institutional weakness, fostering corruption and violence that serve as precursors to state failure.
- The relationship between abundant natural resources and governance challenges.
- Theoretical models of state failure, shadow-statehood, and the "politics of the belly."
- The impact of oil wealth on political corruption, clientelism, and violence.
- The role of "godfathers" and extra-legal patronage networks in Nigerian politics.
- The regional dynamics of the conflict in the Niger Delta.
Excerpt from the Book
6. GODFATHERS, CORRUPTION & CLIENTELISM
Hence the increasing violent modes of carrying out conflicts seem to correlate with this index but in both cases the promotive factor is to be found in the blatant corruption prevailing in Nigerian politics. In almost every economically important area clientelist and patronage structures have taken the place of regular state institutions like “public revenues are not only stolen and misused, but often pay for the services and weapons behind the political violence”169. Once the violence has begun not seldom a vicious circle of violence and counter-violence gets the seek of financing rolling and thus economically strong patrons or godfathers enter the stage:
“These godfathers are not mere financiers of political campaigns. Rather they are individuals whose power stems not just from wealth but from their ability to deploy violence and corruption to manipulate national, state or local political systems in support of the politicians they sponsor. In return, they demand a substantial degree of control over the governments they help bring into being—not in order to shape government policy, but to exact direct financial “returns” in the form of government resources stolen by their protégés or lucrative government contracts awarded to them as further opportunities for graft. Godfathers also require their sponsored politicians to use government institutions to generate patronage for other protégés.”170
Summary of Chapters
1. INTRODUCTION: Outlines the research hypothesis regarding resource abundance, governance issues, and the unique socio-political landscape of Nigeria.
2. THEORETICAL ASSUMPTIONS: Revisits academic approaches by Rotberg, Reno, Collier, and Bayart to classify state weakness, shadow-statehood, and the economics of conflict.
3. POLITICO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: Reviews Nigeria's post-colonial history, focusing on the impact of shifting military and civilian regimes and the central role of oil revenues.
4. THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF NIGERIA: Examines the evolution of the Nigerian federal system and how it has managed, or failed to manage, ethnic and regional cleavages.
5. POLITICS, VIOLENCE & IMPUNITY: Analyzes the normalization of violence as a tool in political competition and the role of hired gangs during electoral periods.
6. GODFATHERS, CORRUPTION & CLIENTELISM: Explores the influence of powerful political patrons and how patronage networks distort state institutions and impede development.
7. EXTERNAL FACTORS: Evaluates the influence of foreign actors, including great powers and transnational oil corporations, on Nigeria's political and economic trajectory.
8. ON THE NIGER DELTA CONFLICT: Assesses the specific regional crisis in the Niger Delta, highlighting the nexus of grievance-based resistance and the struggle for oil resources.
9. CONCLUSION: Synthesizes the theoretical findings and emphasizes the necessity of effective law and economic diversification to move beyond current cycles of corruption and institutional decay.
Keywords
Nigeria, oil, state failure, corruption, clientelism, godfatherism, Niger Delta, violence, resource abundance, politics of the belly, shadow-state, political economy, rentier-state, institutional weakness, governance.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary objective of this paper?
The paper examines how Nigeria’s resource abundance, particularly in the oil sector, has fueled institutional weakness, corruption, and systemic violence, contributing to a state that frequently struggles with stability.
What are the core thematic areas covered?
The core themes include the analysis of state weakness, the role of shadow-state networks, the impact of the "politics of the belly," the rise of political godfathers, and the regional conflict in the Niger Delta.
Which theoretical frameworks are applied?
The author utilizes theories from Robert I. Rotberg on state failure, William Reno on shadow-statehood, Paul Collier on greed versus grievance, and Jean-François Bayart on the "politics of the belly" to interpret the Nigerian case.
What research methodology does the author employ?
The work utilizes a qualitative approach, drawing on empirical reports, case studies, and existing academic literature to create a framework for analyzing Nigeria's socio-political development.
What does the main body of the paper discuss?
It provides a historical overview of Nigeria’s politico-economic development, describes the political system, explains the dynamics of violence and corruption, and details the specific conflicts within the Niger Delta and the influence of external factors.
How would you characterize the work's keywords?
The keywords highlight the intersection of resource-driven economics, political decay, and human security, focusing on concepts like patronage, rent-seeking, and the state-specific challenges of Nigeria.
How does the author define the role of "godfathers" in Nigeria?
Godfathers are described as powerful individuals who use their wealth and control over violence to manipulate political systems, sponsor politicians, and extract financial returns through government contracts and looted resources.
What is the significance of the Niger Delta conflict in this analysis?
The Niger Delta represents a critical case study of how grievance-motivated resistance and the "rent-seeking" behavior of both the state and oil companies create an unsustainable environment of conflict and environmental despoliation.
Does the paper conclude that Nigeria is a "failed state"?
The author argues that while Nigeria exhibits significant weaknesses and "shadow-state" characteristics, it does not fit the classical definition of a "failed" or "collapsed" state, as its core institutions continue to function, albeit to serve specific interests.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Christoph Vogel (Autor:in), 2009, Between Resource Plenty and State Failure, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/181554
