In the 1960s the idea of a worldwide communication-platform was born, which later came to be known as the Internet. Being used only by scientists and researchers in its beginning, it gained more and more users over the following decades. Now, the world cannot be imagined without the Internet, as millions of people use it every day. But the Internet is not just for entertainment; many people profit from the Internet in various ways. So do lexicographers. In former times lexicographers had no possibility to have such a quick and close access to the daily language as they have now through the Internet.
Table of Contents
1) Introduction
2) International Journal of Lexicography
3) Dictionary organizations worldwide
3.1) EURALEX
3.2) Dictionary Society of North America
3.3) AFRILEX
3.4) AUSTRALEX
3.5) ASIALEX
3.6) Summary
4) Discussion Lists
5) Conclusion
Objectives and Topics
This paper examines how the Internet serves as a vital resource for lexicographers, exploring the transition from traditional methods to modern digital access and collaboration. The study evaluates various professional organizations and digital platforms to determine their practical utility, reliability, and academic value for individuals working in the field of lexicography.
- Utility of the Internet for modern lexicographical research and practice.
- Evaluation of prominent international lexicographical organizations and their web presence.
- Analysis of the International Journal of Lexicography as an academic and professional resource.
- Significance of digital discussion lists for global communication and data sharing among lexicographers.
- Challenges regarding language representation and the digital divide in lexicographical resources.
Excerpt from the Book
3.1) EURALEX:
EURALEX is the European Association for Lexicography, which is governed by a board of ten members which get elected every two years. EURALEX was founded in 1983 with the aim to further all aspects of lexicography and to promote the exchange of ideas and information. It is concerned with the development of lexicography in every language, but it main emphasis lies on European languages. The association is interested nearly every subfield of lexicography: all kinds of dictionaries, metalexicography, lexicographical history and theory, praxis of dictionary-making and dictionary use, terminology, terminography, corpus lexicography, computational lexicography, dictionaries for natural language processing… EURALEX sponsors the IJL and is a sister organization to the Dictionary Society of North America (DSNA), the African Association for Lexicography (AFRILEX), the Australasian Association for Lexicography (AUSTRALEX) and the Asian Association for Lexicography (ASIALEX).
Summary of Chapters
1) Introduction: Defines the scope of the research and the main objective of investigating how the Internet benefits lexicographers in their daily work.
2) International Journal of Lexicography: Analyzes the journal as a primary academic resource, discussing its focus, subscription features, and contribution requirements.
3) Dictionary organizations worldwide: Provides an overview of various societies and organizations that aim to connect professionals in the field of lexicography.
3.1) EURALEX: Details the history, governing structure, and member benefits of the European Association for Lexicography.
3.2) Dictionary Society of North America: Explores the activities, membership, and resources provided by the DSNA to its diverse international community.
3.3) AFRILEX: Discusses the focus of this organization on African languages and its efforts to promote lexicographical research within that region.
3.4) AUSTRALEX: Examines the role of this organization in promoting lexicography throughout the Australasian region, including indigenous languages.
3.5) ASIALEX: Reports on the state of the organization's web presence and its past activities, noting challenges regarding recent updates.
3.6) Summary: Evaluates the overall reliability and academic usefulness of the surveyed organizations' websites.
4) Discussion Lists: Explores the role of mailing lists and platforms like LinguistList in facilitating professional communication and research assistance.
5) Conclusion: Summarizes the findings and discusses the future trajectory of lexicography in the digital age, highlighting the potential for active participation.
Keywords
Lexicography, Internet, Dictionary, EURALEX, DSNA, AFRILEX, AUSTRALEX, ASIALEX, Computational Lexicography, LinguistList, Academic Research, Digital Communication, Dictionary-making, Language Resources, Professional Organizations
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core subject of this research paper?
The paper focuses on the role of the Internet within the field of lexicography, specifically investigating how digital tools and online organizations assist lexicographers in their professional practice.
What are the primary areas covered in the work?
The work covers the importance of professional lexicographical organizations, the value of academic journals like the International Journal of Lexicography, and the use of digital communication platforms such as discussion lists.
What is the central research question?
The primary research question is: In which way is the Internet useful for lexicographers?
Which scientific methodology does the author apply?
The author uses a qualitative evaluation approach, analyzing and describing selected websites, journals, and organizations to determine their reliability, features, and utility for academic and professional purposes.
What topics are discussed in the main part of the paper?
The main part includes detailed evaluations of international lexicographical societies (EURALEX, DSNA, etc.), an analysis of the International Journal of Lexicography's online features, and an exploration of the benefits of online discussion lists like LinguistList.
Which keywords best describe this paper?
Key terms include Lexicography, Internet, Computational Lexicography, Professional Organizations, and Academic Resources.
How does the author characterize the usefulness of official lexicographical websites?
The author concludes that while some websites are reliable and useful, many suffer from poor design, dead links, and lack of regular updates, often necessitating membership to gain real value.
What significance do mailing lists hold for lexicographers?
Mailing lists are highlighted as the best tool for lexicographers to connect with peers globally, exchange ideas, and keep track of developments in linguistics without needing to travel.
What is identified as a major limitation of current Internet resources for lexicography?
A significant limitation is the dominance of influential languages like English, Spanish, and German, which leaves many African, Asian, and indigenous languages underrepresented online.
- Citation du texte
- Mag. BSc Elisabeth Kuster (Auteur), 2006, Lexicography on the internet, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/182967
