Aim of this Diploma-Thesis is to identify possibilities to reduce the certification costs of smallholders or small-scale producers, who want to comply with the GLOBALGAP standard version 3.0-2_SEP07. Therefore, an analysis of participatory guarantee systems, which exist in the organic sector, was done to identify principles of these systems, which could be implemented into GLOBALGAP. These ideas were discussed in terms of interview with selected experts.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Introduction
- Description of the GLOBALGAP standard version 3.0-2_SEP07
- History and development of the GLOBALGAP standard
- Definition of producer groups within the GLOBALGAP standard
- Certification process of producer groups within the GLOBALGAP standard
- Certification costs for producer groups within the GLOBALGAP standard
- Smallholders within the GLOBALGAP standard
- Existing Participatory Guarantee Systems
- Introduction to Participatory Guarantee Systems
- Participatory Guarantee System in India
- History and development
- Assembly of the Indian Participatory Guarantee System
- Certification process of the Indian Participatory Guarantee System
- Participatory Guarantee System of Rede Ecovida in Brazil
- History and development of Rede Ecovida
- Assembly of Rede Ecovida
- Certification process of Rede Ecovida
- Summary of the cognitions concerning Participatory Guarantee Systems
- Integration of a Participatory Guarantee System into the GLOBALGAP standard
- Comparison of a Participatory Guarantee System with Third Party Certification Schemes
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This diploma thesis examines the potential of integrating Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) into the GLOBALGAP standard to reduce certification costs for smallholders. The study analyzes existing PGS models and explores their compatibility with GLOBALGAP's framework.
- Cost reduction strategies for smallholder GLOBALGAP certification.
- Analysis of existing Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS).
- Comparison of PGS and third-party certification schemes.
- Feasibility of integrating PGS into the GLOBALGAP standard.
- Impact of PGS on smallholder access to GLOBALGAP certification.
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
The introduction lays out the problem of high certification costs for smallholders under GLOBALGAP. Chapters 2 covers the GLOBALGAP standard, detailing its history, producer group definitions, certification processes, and the challenges faced by smallholders. Chapter 3 provides detailed case studies of PGS in India and Brazil, examining their history, structure, and certification processes. Chapter 4 explores the potential for integrating PGS into the GLOBALGAP framework and compares PGS with traditional third-party certification schemes.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
GLOBALGAP, Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS), smallholder farmers, certification costs, organic agriculture, sustainable agriculture, cost reduction, India, Brazil, third-party certification.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Miriam Herr (Autor:in), 2008, Reducing Certification Costs for Smallholders? Potential for Participatory Guarantee Systems in GLOBALGAP, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/186641
