One of the neglected themes of the history of Katsina emirate, was the contribution of the Christian Missionaries to the socio-economic development of the emirate. This is true because early attempts by Christian missionaries to introduce Christianity into Katsina emirate were not accorded serious attention. Likewise in the colonial period, when the Missionaries succeeded in establishing their stations in various parts of the emirate their activities were almost overlooked by researchers and writers. This paper appreciates the nature and the significance of the Christian Missionary activities in Katsina emirate in the pre-colonial and colonial periods.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Geographical Location
British Colonial Occupation of Katsina Emirate 1903 – 1907 A.D.
The Coming of the Missionaries to Katsina Emirate
Major Obstacles to Missionary Activities in Hausaland before 1930s
Conclusion
Research Objectives and Topics
This paper examines the history of the British colonial occupation of Katsina Emirate and investigates the neglected contributions and challenges faced by Christian missionaries in their attempts to establish activities within the region between 1903 and 1936.
- The political and social impact of British colonial occupation on the Katsina Emirate.
- The early historical attempts by Christian missionaries to penetrate Hausaland.
- The primary colonial and socio-religious obstacles to missionary work in Northern Nigeria.
- The shift in missionary strategy through medical intervention, specifically leprosy control.
- The role of the Sudan Interior Mission (S.I.M.) in establishing a presence in Katsina.
Excerpt from the Book
BRITISH COLONIAL OCCUPATION OF KATSINA EMIRATE 1903 – 1907 A,D.
The conquest and occupation of northern Nigeria by the British imperial forces began in 1900. By the beginning of the era of “new imperialism”, in the last quarter of the 19th century, there was negligible colonial presence on African continent. Colonial influence was restricted to Algiers, north Africa and Cape Colony, South Africa. However, by 1914, only Ethiopia and Liberia remained unaffected by direct colonial control. The British occupation of Katsina emirate was among the prevailing revolutionary socio-economic and political changes that affected the emirates of the defunct Sokoto caliphate in the opening years of 20th century. In Katsina, the resultant effect of these major socio-economic and political changes was the dynastic change where the Dallazawa Fulani clan that governed Katsina emirate for almost a century 1806 – 1906 were dramatically removed and replaced with Sullubawa Fulani clan. Although before 1900 A.D. the Royal Niger Company (RNC) had maintained its claims over what was described as Niger territories under the British dominion, the company failed to establish effective control over these vast territories. This failure brought about two disturbing consequences: one, the areas remained vulnerable to penetration by other European powers, such as France and Germany. Secondly the local chiefs and their people were free to exercise their independent practices even if it was contrary to the British interest. This led to the revocation of the charter of the Company (RNC) and a ‘protectorate’ was declared on 1st January, 1900 by Capt. F.D. Lugard at Lokoja. Lugard was then appointed the High Commissioner of this vast protectorate. Henceforward, the High Commissioner embarked on military campaigns to subdue the existing authorities. By March 1903, the major polities in the present northern Nigerian areas had been subjugated by the British colonial army.
Summary of Chapters
Introduction: Provides an overview of the neglected historical theme regarding Christian missionary contributions to the socio-economic development of Katsina Emirate.
Geographical Location: Details the physical and political boundaries of the Katsina Emirate within the context of the Sokoto Caliphate and the transition to British colonial rule.
British Colonial Occupation of Katsina Emirate 1903 – 1907 A.D.: Analyzes the transition from the Dallazawa to the Sullubawa Fulani clan and the passive resistance of the Katsinawa to British subjugation.
The Coming of the Missionaries to Katsina Emirate: Discusses early, sporadic missionary attempts and the eventual turning point represented by the Lezoute conference in the 1920s.
Major Obstacles to Missionary Activities in Hausaland before 1930s: Identifies the British colonial policy of non-interference, the fear of Muslim uprisings, and commercial interests as primary barriers to evangelism.
Conclusion: Summarizes how leprosy control work eventually served as the strategic avenue for the Sudan Interior Mission to enter and operate within Katsina Emirate.
Keywords
Katsina Emirate, British Colonial Occupation, Christian Missionaries, Indirect Rule, Hausaland, Sudan Interior Mission, Sokoto Caliphate, Leprosy Control, Colonialism, Islam, Dallazawa, Sullubawa, Missionary Activities, Northern Nigeria, Evangelical Campaigns.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core subject of this research paper?
The paper focuses on the British colonial occupation of Katsina Emirate and the subsequent attempts and difficulties faced by Christian missionaries in establishing activities in the region between 1903 and 1936.
Which missionary groups were most active in the region?
The Church Missionary Society (C.M.S.), the Sudan Interior Mission (S.I.M.), and the Roman Catholic Mission were the principal societies, with the S.I.M. becoming the most significant long-term presence.
What was the primary research goal?
The goal was to document and appreciate the nature and significance of Christian missionary activities in Katsina during the colonial period, highlighting the obstacles they encountered.
Which historical methodology does the author employ?
The author utilizes a historical analysis approach, synthesizing archival records, academic theses, and seminar papers to construct a narrative of colonial-missionary relations.
What topics are covered in the main body?
The text covers the shift in political power within Katsina, the historical barriers to missionary entry, and the strategic transition to social welfare work as a means for mission entry.
Which keywords best characterize this work?
The paper is characterized by terms such as British colonial occupation, Katsina Emirate, missionary activities, indirect rule, and leprosy control.
How did leprosy control facilitate missionary entry?
Colonial authorities and the British Empire Leprosy Relief Association provided an opening for missions to perform humanitarian work, which served as a "social mission" allowing missionaries to build trust within the Muslim population.
Why did the British colonial government restrict missionaries?
Restrictions were largely due to concerns about security, the potential for political unrest or religious fanaticism among the local Muslim population, and the desire to maintain stability for commercial interests.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Dahiru Rabe (Autor:in), 2011, The British colonial occupation and the christian missionary activities in Katsina Emirate C. 1903 - 1936, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/189401
