This research is concerned with education employment equation in education sector. This
research will be based on perception of employers, teachers and students about the competencies
the graduates possess. Many employers think that employability skills should be shaped
somewhere else in graduates before entering workplace, throughout the curriculum at all levels.
They think that students should be prepared for workplace. It is suspected that widening the
access of higher education has increased the heterogeneity of the skills of the students in the
industry. Employers have indicated that students are often not prepared for the workplace and
call on universities to produce work-ready graduates. Educational institutions are under pressure
to generate competent students, so that they are able to respond in ever changing environment
This study aims to explore the level of competencies perceived by employers, teacher’s
perception about their students and students themselves perception about their competencies and
identify the gaps that need to be addressed. This research will focus where students of Comsats
are standing in case of competencies according to employers, teachers and their own perception.
The gaps between the ranks are evaluated. The study is conducted by applying convenience
sampling method. To determine the internal consistency, Cronbach Alpha test of the individual
variables is applied, the overall reliability is found to be acceptable.
Table of Contents
- CHAPTER #1 INTRODUCTION
- 1.1 Objectives
- 1.2 Significance of Study
- CHAPTER #2 LITERATURE REVIEW
- International Competency and Skills Gap Profile for Modern Graduates (from Jackson, 2010)
- 2.2 Application of Competency Gap Analysis
- CHAPTER #3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1 Research Design
- 3.2 Sampling Technique
- 3.3 Research Instrument
- 3.4 Sampling Administration
- 3.5 Theoretical Framework
- 3.6 Hypothesis
- CHAPTER #4 FINDING AND DISCUSSION
- CHAPTER #5 CONCLUSION
- Recommendations
- Future Implications
Objectives and Key Themes
This research investigates the discrepancies between the competencies graduates possess and the expectations of employers, focusing on the perceptions of employers, teachers, and students themselves. The study aims to identify and analyze competency gaps and to evaluate the preparedness of COMSATS Abbottabad graduates for the workplace.
- Competency Gaps between Education and Employer Expectations
- Workplace Preparedness of Graduates
- Perceptions of Employers, Teachers, and Students Regarding Graduate Competencies
- Analysis of Discrepancies in Competency Perceptions
- Evaluation of COMSATS Abbottabad Graduates' Competencies
Chapter Summaries
CHAPTER #1 INTRODUCTION: This chapter sets the stage for the research by outlining the study's objectives and its significance. It introduces the central problem of a potential mismatch between the skills graduates acquire and the skills employers require. The chapter highlights the growing concern among employers about graduates' readiness for the workplace and underscores the need to bridge the competency gap. The introduction lays the groundwork for the subsequent chapters by establishing the context and rationale for the research.
CHAPTER #2 LITERATURE REVIEW: This chapter reviews existing literature on competency gaps between professional education and employer expectations. It delves into the international landscape of skills mismatches and examines the application of competency gap analysis in various contexts. This chapter provides a theoretical foundation and relevant background information, drawing on prior research to contextualize the current study and justify its approach. The review likely includes various studies and analyses that show how the problem of mismatched skills is not unique to the specific area of focus but a widespread issue.
CHAPTER #3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: This chapter details the research design, sampling technique, research instruments used, and data collection methods. It explains the theoretical framework underpinning the study, as well as the hypotheses being tested. This section provides a transparent and rigorous account of how the research was conducted, allowing for assessment of its validity and reliability. The discussion of sampling technique likely includes the justification for the chosen method (convenience sampling) and potential limitations.
CHAPTER #4 FINDING AND DISCUSSION: This chapter presents and analyzes the research findings, discussing the results in relation to the objectives of the study. It likely compares the perceptions of employers, teachers, and students about the competencies of graduates, highlighting any significant discrepancies. The chapter analyzes the data collected to identify the specific areas where gaps exist. The discussion section would interpret the findings in the context of existing literature and theories.
Keywords
Competency gaps, employer expectations, graduate skills, workplace preparedness, higher education, employability, skill mismatch, perception, COMSATS, Abbottabad.
Frequently Asked Questions: A Comprehensive Language Preview
What is the purpose of this research?
This research investigates the discrepancies between the competencies graduates possess and the expectations of employers. It focuses on the perceptions of employers, teachers, and students to identify and analyze competency gaps and evaluate the preparedness of COMSATS Abbottabad graduates for the workplace.
What are the key themes explored in this research?
The key themes include competency gaps between education and employer expectations, workplace preparedness of graduates, perceptions of employers, teachers, and students regarding graduate competencies, analysis of discrepancies in competency perceptions, and evaluation of COMSATS Abbottabad graduates' competencies.
What is covered in Chapter 1 (Introduction)?
Chapter 1 sets the stage by outlining the study's objectives and significance. It introduces the problem of a potential mismatch between graduate skills and employer requirements, highlighting the need to bridge the competency gap. It establishes the context and rationale for the research.
What is discussed in Chapter 2 (Literature Review)?
Chapter 2 reviews existing literature on competency gaps between professional education and employer expectations. It examines the application of competency gap analysis and provides a theoretical foundation and background information, drawing on prior research to contextualize the current study.
What methodologies are described in Chapter 3 (Research Methodology)?
Chapter 3 details the research design, sampling technique, research instruments, data collection methods, theoretical framework, and hypotheses. It provides a transparent account of how the research was conducted, allowing for assessment of its validity and reliability.
What are the main findings and discussions presented in Chapter 4 (Findings and Discussion)?
Chapter 4 presents and analyzes the research findings, comparing the perceptions of employers, teachers, and students about graduate competencies. It highlights significant discrepancies and analyzes the data to identify specific areas where gaps exist. The discussion interprets findings in the context of existing literature and theories.
What does Chapter 5 (Conclusion) include?
Chapter 5 presents the conclusion of the research, including recommendations and future implications based on the findings.
What are the keywords associated with this research?
The keywords are: Competency gaps, employer expectations, graduate skills, workplace preparedness, higher education, employability, skill mismatch, perception, COMSATS, Abbottabad.
What is the overall structure of the document?
The document includes a table of contents, objectives and key themes, chapter summaries, and keywords. It's designed as a comprehensive preview of the complete research.
Who is the target audience for this preview?
This preview is intended for academic use, supporting the analysis of themes in a structured and professional manner.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Mansoor Shahab (Autor:in), 2012, Competency Gap: How Students and Teachers Perception of Competencies Differ from Employers , München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/199079
