Grin logo
en de es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › Pedagogy - Theory of Science, Anthropology

Structure vs Process - How to look at politics

Compare, contrast, and assess attempts by at least two anthropologists to analyse politics in terms of temporal processes rather than (a-temporal) structure.

Title: Structure vs Process - How to look at politics

Essay , 2012 , 5 Pages , Grade: 65

Autor:in: Johannes Lenhard (Author)

Pedagogy - Theory of Science, Anthropology
Excerpt & Details   Look inside the ebook
Summary Excerpt Details

Compare, contrast, and assess attempts by at least two anthropologists to analyse politics in terms of temporal processes rather than (a-temporal) structure.

Edmund Leach published his account of the Kachin society in Highland Burma in 1954, fourteen years after Evans-Pritchard’s and Fortes’ classical structural-functionalist collection on ‘African Political Systems’. Only four years after Leach, Barth’s ‘Swat Pathans’ enters the debate. Both Barth and Leach differ remarkably in their methodological approach fousing on change and process. While Radcliffe-Brown (Fortes & Evans-Pritchard, 2006:vi) proclaims in his preface to ‘African Political Systems’ that the aim of anthropology is to "discover the universal, essential, characters which belong to all human societies, past, present and future", Leach (Leach, 2004) heavily criticises the implicit underlying assumption of equilibrium. Instead, he focuses on the study of the “constantly changing environment” and society as “a process in time” (ibid.:5). As I will argue his process is still very much structural, however. In contrast to structure, Barth makes individual action his centre piece that aggregates to higher political levels in temporal processes. In the following analysis, I will complement my analysis of the two core texts mentioned above with methodological writings comparing Barth’s and Leach’s account of political processes in Pakistan and Burma respectively.

Excerpt


Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)

  • Leach's Burma – ‘dynamised' structures in oscillation
  • Barth's Swat Pathans – individual micro-structures and conflict-ridden aggregation

Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)

This text aims to compare and contrast the approaches of two anthropologists, Edmund Leach and Fredrik Barth, who both sought to analyze politics through the lens of temporal processes rather than static structures. It examines how their methodologies, particularly focusing on change and process, differ from traditional structural-functionalist perspectives.

  • The critique of structural-functionalism and its emphasis on equilibrium
  • The importance of historical context and the study of societies "as products of history"
  • The role of individual action and micro-level phenomena in shaping political processes
  • The interplay between structure and process, and the recognition of their "illusory" nature
  • The significance of conflict, instability, and change as inherent features of political systems

Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)

Leach's Burma – ‘dynamised' structures in oscillation

Leach's analysis of the Kachin society in Burma challenges structural-functionalist assumptions of equilibrium. He introduces the concept of "oscillation" to describe the dynamic interplay between different forms of political organization – gumlao, gumsa, and Shan. Leach argues that Kachin communities cycle between these forms, demonstrating inherent instability and change within their political system. His approach emphasizes a historical method, recognizing the influence of historical events on societal development, and highlighting the role of ritual and myth as tools for both integration and disintegration. Despite his focus on process, Leach's analysis still relies on ideal types, suggesting that he is not able to completely detach from structural frameworks.

Barth's Swat Pathans – individual micro-structures and conflict-ridden aggregation

Barth's study of the Swat Pathans in Pakistan prioritizes the role of individual action and micro-level phenomena in shaping political processes. He emphasizes the importance of "real people in real life situations" and argues that political structures emerge from the aggregation of individual choices and interactions. Barth highlights the temporary and revocable nature of political authority among the Swatis, which is based on alliances, contracts, and strategic exchanges. While recognizing the influence of structural features such as land ownership and caste, Barth emphasizes the dynamic and conflict-ridden nature of political systems, suggesting that they are not static structures but rather constantly evolving products of individual agency.

Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)

The primary keywords and focus topics of this text include: structural-functionalism, temporal processes, change, process, oscillation, dynamic systems, individual action, micro-level phenomena, conflict, instability, political systems, Kachin society, Burma, Swat Pathans, Pakistan, anthropology, methodology.

Excerpt out of 5 pages  - scroll top

Details

Title
Structure vs Process - How to look at politics
Subtitle
Compare, contrast, and assess attempts by at least two anthropologists to analyse politics in terms of temporal processes rather than (a-temporal) structure.
College
University of Cambridge
Grade
65
Author
Johannes Lenhard (Author)
Publication Year
2012
Pages
5
Catalog Number
V205568
ISBN (eBook)
9783656323792
Language
English
Tags
structure process compare
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Johannes Lenhard (Author), 2012, Structure vs Process - How to look at politics, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/205568
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • https://cdn.openpublishing.com/images/brand/1/preview_popup_advertising.jpg
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  5  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Payment & Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint