In an experiment, Russian film maker and film theorist Lev Kuleshov edited together a short film in which a shot of the actor Ivan Mosjoukine was combined with various other shots, among them a bowl of soup, a woman, and shot of a child in a coffin. The film was shown to an audience who believed the actor expressed different emotions with each situation, when in fact, the footage of Mosjoukine was the same shot repeated over and over again. Even though, Mosjoukine did not see the shots, and hence, could not react to either of them, the viewers were convinced to witness the adequate emotions. Thus, the viewer filled in the blanks and saw the expression, although there was none.
The impact of this experiment was called the Kuleshov effect. It illustrates the significance of film editing as well as the importance of the viewer. The Kuleshov effect brings together the thought of the cinematographer and the idea the viewer creates in his own mind. The result of this co-production is a whole new meaning that can refer to something that was denoted before, but can also be unrelated to it.
Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita manifests a lively dialogue between literature and cinema. But how and to what extent has montage philosophy influenced this work? In the following paper, I aim to show that Humbert Humbert, the central character's presentation of the story appears in a cinematic manner as his first-person narrative makes use of various means of film technique. Moreover, his position towards people, particularly Lolita, bears resemblance to the relationship between a director and his actors. In other words, in Lolita, we follow the protagonist as he directs the story and the people around him.
Table of Contents
1 Introduction
2 Russian Formalism
2.1 Principles of Formalism
2.2 Russian Formalist Influences in Lolita
3 Montage Culture as Modernist Culture
3.1 The Basics of Editing
3.2 Introduction to Montage Philosophy
3.3 Montage's Modernist Notions
3.4 Features and Deployment of Montage
4 Lo.Lee.Ta. – A Montage Narrative
4.1 Nabokov and Film
4.2 Americanitis and European Consciousness: The Functions of Film in Lolita
4.3 Director's Cut: Humbert's Roles and the Role of the Cinematographer
4.4 The Kuleshov Effect
4.5 Lo.Lee.Ta. – A Montage Narrative
5 Conclusion
Research Objectives and Themes
This paper investigates the intersection of literary narrative and cinematic technique in Vladimir Nabokov's novel Lolita. It explores how the protagonist, Humbert Humbert, utilizes filmic concepts—specifically montage and the role of the director/cinematographer—to manipulate the presentation of his narrative, objectify those around him, and construct a personal reality that masks the moral implications of his actions.
- Application of Russian Formalist theories to the narrative structure of Lolita.
- Analysis of "montage culture" as a modernist framework for understanding textual fragmentation.
- Examination of Humbert Humbert as both a narrator and a cinematic "director."
- Identification of specific filmic techniques, such as the Kuleshov effect and close-ups, within the novel's prose.
Excerpt from the Book
3.1 The Basics of Editing
Montage is a major part of film culture at the beginning of the 20th century, particularly in Russia, even though it was developed in other countries during the same period as well. In general, montage is understood as a technique of editing a series of shots in order to create an intensified sequence with regard to time, space or information. The use of montage can denote a certain passage of time within a sequence, or, as it is common practice in Soviet montage theory, it can convey a symbolic meaning.
In Film Technique and Film Acting, Russian director and theorist Vsevolod Pudovkin illustrates the technical side of montage, that is editing. He summarizes the main principles of it in the following aspects: symbolism, contrast, parallelism, simultaneity and leitmotif.
Symbolism. A method of connecting two scenes is to create a symbolic link. Especially when referred to a political idea, symbolism is often used. This could be a situation in which the author wants to call attention to violence or injustice by cutting between two scenes comparing the decay of an object to the death of a human being or a spilled glass of red wine to a bleeding nose.
Contrast. A contrast is shown by cutting between two scenarios that are different in order to emphasise an antagonism respectively two extreme oppositions like wealth and poverty by alternating scenes of a family sitting on a well-laid table and starving people living rough.
Summary of Chapters
1 Introduction: This chapter provides the theoretical context of the Kuleshov effect and introduces the paper's thesis regarding the influence of montage techniques on the narrative structure of Lolita.
2 Russian Formalism: This section defines the core principles of Russian Formalism, including "literariness" and "defamiliarization," and explores how these concepts inform the reading of Nabokov's work.
3 Montage Culture as Modernist Culture: This chapter examines the historical and theoretical background of montage, discussing how cinematic editing principles function as a metaphor for modernist literary construction.
4 Lo.Lee.Ta. – A Montage Narrative: The primary analytical section of the paper, demonstrating how Humbert Humbert employs cinematic roles and techniques to manipulate the reader's perception and his own memories.
5 Conclusion: The concluding chapter synthesizes the arguments, confirming that filmic montage serves as a significant leitmotif that highlights the protagonist's delusions and his attempt to escape reality.
Keywords
Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov, Montage, Russian Formalism, Kuleshov Effect, Cinematic Narrative, Humbert Humbert, Defamiliarization, Modernism, Intertextuality, Film Theory, Narratology, Subjectivity, Symbolism, Editing Techniques.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this academic work?
This paper explores the integration of cinematic montage techniques into the literary narrative of Vladimir Nabokov's novel Lolita.
What are the central themes discussed in the text?
The central themes include the relationship between literature and film, the role of the narrator as a director, the use of visual language in prose, and the construction of subjective reality.
What is the main research question or goal?
The goal is to determine to what extent filmic montage qualifies as a technical and thematic foundation for the narrative structure of Lolita.
Which scientific methodology is applied?
The paper employs a structural and comparative analysis, drawing upon Russian Formalist theory and Soviet montage philosophy to interpret the novel's text.
What topics are covered in the main body of the work?
The main body covers the principles of Russian Formalism, the basics of film editing and montage philosophy, and a detailed examination of Humbert Humbert's role as a cinematic narrator within the novel.
Which keywords best characterize the study?
Key terms include Montage, Russian Formalism, Lolita, cinematic narrative, defamiliarization, and intertextuality.
How does Humbert Humbert manipulate his narrative?
Humbert uses montage-like techniques, such as selective "editing" of memories, zooming in on specific objects to ignore reality, and treating characters as cinematic "actors" to maintain control over his narrative.
What is the significance of the "Kuleshov effect" in this context?
The Kuleshov effect illustrates how the combination of separate elements can create new meanings; the paper argues that Humbert utilizes this effect to force the reader to perceive his subjective version of events.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Irina Kirova (Autor:in), 2012, Lo.Lee.Ta. - A Montage Narrative, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/207641
