This study deals with indigenous conflict resolution mechanism in Rural Alamata woreda specifically in the institution called Mezard exercised by the Raya people. The study was aimed at examining the Mezard indigenous institution of conflict resolution. The research design employed for this study was case study research design. To this end purposive sampling design was used, employing 24 total sample sizes. Its composition was from indigenous judges, court leaders, to explore the sustainability of the institution, the enforceability, strengths and weaknesses and its role in maintaining peace and stability in the area. This study was conducted using unstructured interview as the main data collection instrument along with focus group discussion employing open ended questions to supplement the data gathered from the key informants. Accordingly, the study finding shows sustainability of the institution is being in formidable challenges, this is mainly because of its less attention on transferring the practice to the young generation and some forces of modernization, etc. With regard to enforceability, the decisions passed by the institution are found to be high in being accepted by the community of the study area. In order to integrate Mezard indigenous conflict resolution mechanism with the formal court legalizing their role and defining their jurisdiction is so important. In addition advancing affirmative action, increasing the income of women by creating new job opportunities, give chance the youth to decide on their matters continually, raising finance generated from the community, etc can help the sustainability of the Mezard institution of conflict resolution.
Key words: Erq, indigenous conflict resolution, Mezard, Tabia, Wonz
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Chapter One: Introduction
- 1.1 Background of the Study
- 1.2. Statement of the Problem
- 1.3. Research Questions
- 1.4. Objective of the Study
- 1.5. Significance of the Study
- 1.6. Scope and Limitation of the Study
- 1.7. Definition of Concepts
- Chapter Two: Review of Related Literature
- 2.1. The Concept of Conflict
- 2.2. Indigenous Conflict Resolution
- 2.2.1. Advantages and Disadvantages of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanisms
- 2.2.2. Actors in Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanism
- 2.2.3. Sustainability of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanism
- 2.2.4. Enforceability of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanism
- 2.3. African Traditional Institutions of Conflict Resolution
- Chapter Three: Research Methodology
- 3.1. Site Selection and Description of the Study Area
- 3.2. Data Type and Source
- 3.3. Research Design and Strategy
- 3.4. Sampling Technique and Procedure
- 3.5. Data Collection and Instruments
- 3.6. Data Analysis and Interpretation
- Chapter Four: Results and Discussions
- 4.1. Sources and Type of Conflicts in Rural Alamata Woreda
- 4.2. Historical Foundation and Development of Mezard Institution
- 4.3. Procedure of the Mezard Institution
- 4.4. Enforceability of the Mezard Institution of Conflict Resolution
- 4.5. Relation between Mezard and Formal Court
- 4.6. Sustainability of the Mezard Institution of Conflict Resolution
- 4.7. Strengths and Weaknesses
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This study analyzes the Mezard indigenous conflict resolution mechanism employed by the Raya people in rural Alamata Woreda, Tigray Region, Ethiopia. The research aims to examine the sustainability, enforceability, strengths, and weaknesses of the Mezard institution, exploring its role in maintaining peace and stability in the area. Key themes and objectives explored in the text include:- The sustainability of the Mezard institution and its challenges, including the transfer of knowledge to younger generations and the impact of modernization.
- The enforceability of the Mezard institution, particularly the community's acceptance of its decisions.
- The relationship between the Mezard institution and the formal court system, including the potential for integration and legal recognition.
- Strategies for promoting the sustainability of the Mezard institution, such as affirmative action, income-generating opportunities for women, and youth involvement in decision-making processes.
- The historical foundation and development of the Mezard institution, providing a contextual understanding of its origins and evolution.
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
Chapter One provides an introduction to the study, outlining its background, research questions, objectives, significance, scope, limitations, and key definitions. Chapter Two explores the concept of conflict and indigenous conflict resolution mechanisms, examining their advantages, disadvantages, actors involved, sustainability, and enforceability. It also delves into African traditional institutions of conflict resolution. Chapter Three details the research methodology, including site selection, data types and sources, research design and strategy, sampling techniques, data collection methods, and data analysis procedures. Chapter Four presents the results and discussions of the study, analyzing the sources and types of conflict in rural Alamata Woreda, the historical foundation and development of the Mezard institution, its procedures, enforceability, relationship with the formal court, sustainability, and strengths and weaknesses.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
The primary focus of this research centers on indigenous conflict resolution, specifically examining the Mezard institution practiced by the Raya people in rural Alamata Woreda, Tigray Region, Ethiopia. Key terms and concepts include: Mezard, indigenous conflict resolution, sustainability, enforceability, formal court, traditional institutions, and peace and stability.- Quote paper
- Yonas Berhe (Author), 2012, An Assessment of Indigenous Conflict Resolution Mechanism of Mezard in Rural Alamata Woreda, Tigray National Regional State, Ethiopia, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/214145
