Kinship is grounded in biological facts. It is based on the undeniable, universal reality of biological rules – a child is related to two parents of different sex – and concerned about how sociological structures – who cares for the child? – map on to this. This view of kinship as the hard science of biology for a long time had ardent supporters, Morgan and Gellner among them. The exceptions – adoption for instance – that even Morgan and Gellner admitted to this rule of ‘biology only’ soon took got the upper hand. However, alternatives were not immediately at hand. Needham and after him Schneider argued for the death of kinship as a whole while already very early Durkheim and Rivers search for a solution in a recourse to ‘social kinship’. It took another couple of decades, however, until scholars such as Bloch/Guggenheim and Clarke fully developed a repertoire for analysing social kinship in terms of for instance nurture and care. Problematic in all those accounts was merely one thing: they did not deal with the dichotomy between nature and culture, between biological and social kinship. Carstens tries to address this shortcoming with her more dynamic notion of ‘relatedness’ mapped onto Latourian networks. The final question, however, remains: are we really developing towards a ‘hybrid idea’ if kinship between biological and social relations?
Table of Contents
1. What is kinship all about?
Objectives & Topics
The work explores the historical and theoretical evolution of kinship studies, critically examining the tension between biological determinism and social constructionism. It investigates how anthropological definitions have shifted from traditional, biology-centric models toward dynamic, hybrid concepts of "relatedness" that incorporate social, technological, and emotional dimensions.
- The historical reliance on biological facts as the primary basis for kinship.
- Critiques of the nature-culture dichotomy in kinship theory.
- The impact of new reproductive technologies on traditional kinship definitions.
- The shift toward "relatedness" and network-based models of human connection.
- Case studies on the social construction of kinship across different cultures.
Excerpt from the Book
What is kinship all about?
Kinship is grounded in biological facts. It is based on the undeniable, universal reality of biological rules – a child is related to two parents of different sex – and concerned about how sociological structures – who cares for the child? – map on to this. This view of kinship as the hard science of biology for a long time had ardent supporters, Morgan and Gellner among them. The exceptions – adoption for instance – that even Morgan and Gellner admitted to this rule of ‘biology only’ soon took got the upper hand. However, alternatives were not immediately at hand. Needham and after him Schneider argued for the death of kinship as a whole while already very early Durkheim and Rivers search for a solution in a recourse to ‘social kinship’. It took another couple of decades, however, until scholars such as Bloch/Guggenheim and Clarke fully developed a repertoire for analysing social kinship in terms of for instance nurture and care. Problematic in all those accounts was merely one thing: they did not deal with the dichotomy between nature and culture, between biological and social kinship. Carstens tries to address this shortcoming with her more dynamic notion of ‘relatedness’ mapped onto Latourian networks. The final question, however, remains: are we really developing towards a ‘hybrid idea’ if kinship between biological and social relations?
Summary of Chapters
1. What is kinship all about?: This chapter introduces the foundational tension between biological and social definitions of kinship and outlines the shift from traditional consanguinity models to contemporary concepts of relatedness.
Keywords
Kinship, Biology, Social Construction, Relatedness, Nature-Culture Dichotomy, Anthropology, Consanguinity, Reproduction, Technology, Hybridity, Social Kinship, Network Theory, Personhood, Genealogy, Culture.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core focus of this work?
The work examines the transformation of kinship studies from a biological, nature-based perspective to a more nuanced, socially constructed understanding of human connections.
What are the central themes discussed?
The central themes include the historical dominance of biological "blood" ties, the challenges posed by cross-cultural adoption, the impact of reproductive technology, and the theoretical shift toward "relatedness."
What is the primary research question?
It questions whether kinship can be understood as a "hybrid" concept that effectively integrates both biological and social realities without falling into static dichotomies.
Which methodology is employed?
The author uses a comparative, historical analysis of anthropological literature, contrasting the theories of influential scholars like Morgan, Gellner, Needham, Schneider, and Carstens.
What topics are covered in the main section?
The main sections analyze the "biological" school of thought, the critical responses to it, the rise of "social kinship," and the application of network theory to human relatedness.
Which keywords best characterize the text?
Key terms include Kinship, Biology, Relatedness, Social Kinship, Hybridity, and Nature-Culture Dichotomy.
How does the author view the "nature versus culture" debate in kinship?
The author argues that this dichotomy is increasingly problematic and that modern anthropology is moving toward a more dynamic, hybrid model that acknowledges the complexity of human relations.
What role does new reproductive technology play in these debates?
Technological developments, such as in-vitro-fertilization, are identified as "denaturalizing" factors that force anthropology to move beyond traditional definitions of biological birth as the sole basis for kinship.
What is meant by the "Genealogical Unity of Mankind" assumption?
It refers to the assumption held by early anthropologists that all human cultures share a common belief in biological relatedness, which is then used as a universal standard for analysis.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Johannes Lenhard (Autor:in), 2013, What is kinship all about?, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/230431
