The paper provides an analysis on the Decentralization policy implementation process and its challenges in line with stakeholder concerns on its practicality in Zambia. Specifically, the paper explores the insights of the policy and its feasibility in terms of implementation issues and strategies vital to its successful implementation. The paper further validates the realization of the policy in contrast to its implementation being viewed as a mere political rhetoric.
The paper emphasizes that policy by itself cannot solve a specific public problem not until it is practically implemented. The paper agrees with the notion that decentralization is indeed a step forward for Zambia. The paper concludes that the Government’s commitment to implement the decentralization policy as a priority still remains to be seen just how practically the commitment was to be translated into reality or it could just also be another political rhetoric.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Introduction
- Background
- Statement of the Problem
- Objective of the Study
- Scope of the Study
- Methodology of the Study
- Review of Literature
- Policy Implementation Procedure
- Interpretations of Policy Implementation
- Factors and Challenges to Effective Policy Implementation
- Policy Implementation Problems
- Policy Implementation “Gap”
- Decentralization Policy Implementation in Zambia
- National Decentralization policy
- Approaches to Policy Implementation
- Decentralization Implementation Plan (DIP)
- Decentralization Policy Implementation Plan Strategy
- Study Findings
- Decentralization Implementation Plan (DIP) Activities
- Policy Implementation Challenges
- Political Implications
- Financial Implications
- Options for Government
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This paper analyzes the implementation of Zambia's Decentralization Policy, examining its challenges and exploring strategies for successful implementation. It assesses the feasibility of the policy and whether its implementation is a true commitment or merely political rhetoric. The paper emphasizes the importance of practical implementation for achieving policy objectives and concludes by analyzing the government's commitment to decentralization.
- Decentralization Policy Implementation Challenges
- Government Commitment to Decentralization
- The Gap Between Policy and Practice
- The Role of Local Government in Service Delivery
- Strategies for Effective Policy Implementation
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
The paper begins by introducing the context of policy implementation and its significance in achieving government objectives. It then delves into a review of literature on policy implementation, exploring various procedures, interpretations, and challenges associated with its effective execution.
The paper then focuses on the implementation of Zambia's Decentralization Policy, examining its background, objectives, and implementation strategies. It explores the National Decentralization Policy, the Decentralization Implementation Plan (DIP), and the strategy for its successful implementation.
The paper concludes by analyzing the findings of the study, focusing on the challenges to policy implementation, including political and financial implications. It also presents possible options for the government to address these challenges and ensure effective implementation of the Decentralization Policy.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
The paper's primary focus is on decentralization policy implementation in Zambia, analyzing the challenges and the gap between policy and practice. It explores the government's commitment to decentralization, the role of local government in service delivery, and strategies for effective policy implementation. The paper also examines key concepts such as policy implementation procedures, interpretations, and factors influencing implementation effectiveness.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Stephen Gumboh (Autor:in), 2012, Decentralization Policy Implementation in Zambia, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/231193
