This research assesses woreda capacity in Gindeberet and Abuna Gindeberet Woreda of West Shoa Zone Oromia National Regional State since the implementation of District Level Decentralization Program. To this end, the research has assessed the human resource, financial, managerial, facility capacity as well as the extent to which enabling work environment and community participation is available. In order to achieve these objectives, qualitative and quantitative research approaches were used. Furthermore, to generate qualitative and quantitative data primary and secondary sources were employed. Key informant interview, questionnaires, and focus group discussions were used as primary sources whereas financial and human resource reports and other relevant documents were used as secondary sources. Both probability and non-probability sampling techniques were employed.
The finding of the study indicated that the capacity building program which was launched to address the problem of rural woredas has not brought about significant changes or could not bring about the desired change though there are some improvements in terms of community participation, service delivery and responsiveness to customers. It has also empowered woreda civil servants to provide decisions on their own. However, constraints of resources and its utilization, lack of conducive work condition, lack of strong political leadership and commitment, and lack of governance system have been identified as factors responsible for the ineffectiveness of the program. Accordingly, the study found out among other things, problem of adequate and competent human resources as well as lack of managerial capacity. Furthermore, woredas have limited financial and human resource autonomy as well as lack autonomy to set priority and targets. Besides, low revenue generating capacity has forced woredas to heavily rely on block grant from the regional government. Moreover, the overall work environment was not conducive and attractive as inter alia organizational structures were unclear, unstable and complex as well as there was weak coordination and communication among local governance actors. The level of the participation of the community in matters affecting their life was found not to the desired level.
[...]
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Chapter One: Introduction
- 1.1 Background of the Study
- 1.2 Statement of the Problem
- 1.3 Objectives of the Study
- 1.3.1 General Objectives of the Study
- 1.3.2 Specific Objectives of the Study
- 1.4 Research Questions
- 1.5 Research Design and Methodology
- 1.5.1 Sample Size and Selection
- 1.5.2 Data Collection Techniques
- 1.5.2.1 Questionnaires
- 1.5.2.2 Focus Group Discussion
- 1.5.2.3 Interview with Key Informants
- 1.5.2.4 Document Analysis
- 1.5.3 Data Analysis and Presentation
- 1.6 Significance of the Study
- 1.7 Scope and Limitations of the Study
- 2. Organization of the Paper
- Chapter Two: Review of Literature
- 2.1 The Concept of Capacity
- 2.2 Capacity Building
- 2.2.1 Dimensions of Capacity Building or Capacity Development
- 2.2.2 Factors that Determines the Success of Capacity Building or Capacity Development
- 2.3 Capacity Building for Decentralized Local Governments
- 2.4 Decentralization and Capacity Building in Ethiopia
- Chapter Three: Data Presentation and Analysis
- 3.1 Description of the Study Areas
- 3.1.1 Gindeberet Woreda Profile
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This thesis aims to assess the capacity of Woredas (districts) in the Oromia National Regional State of Ethiopia, focusing on Gindeberet and Abuna Gindeberet. The study seeks to understand the factors contributing to or hindering effective local governance and development.
- Woreda Capacity Assessment
- Factors influencing Woreda effectiveness
- Decentralization and capacity building in Ethiopia
- Local governance and development
- Comparative analysis of two Woredas
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
Chapter One: Introduction: This chapter sets the stage for the research, establishing the background of the study by discussing the context of Woreda governance in Ethiopia and highlighting the significance of assessing their capacity. It clearly defines the research problem, outlining the challenges and gaps in understanding Woreda effectiveness. The chapter articulates the specific and general objectives of the study, providing a clear roadmap for the research. The methodology is detailed, explaining the research design, sample selection, data collection techniques (questionnaires, focus group discussions, key informant interviews, and document analysis), and data analysis approaches. Finally, it outlines the scope and limitations, acknowledging any constraints on the study's reach and impact.
Chapter Two: Review of Literature: This chapter provides a thorough review of existing literature on capacity building, focusing on its various dimensions (individual, organizational, institutional, human resource, and societal). It explores critical factors that determine the success or failure of capacity-building initiatives, including internal demand, political leadership, governance systems, broader environmental factors, and resource management. The chapter also examines the specific context of capacity building for decentralized local governments in Ethiopia, offering a framework for understanding the research problem within the broader national context. It links theoretical concepts to the empirical context of the study, establishing a theoretical foundation for the subsequent analysis.
Chapter Three: Data Presentation and Analysis: This chapter presents and analyzes the data collected from the two study areas, Gindeberet and Abuna Gindeberet Woredas. It begins with a description of the Woredas' profiles, providing essential contextual information for understanding their unique characteristics. The subsequent sections delve into the detailed analysis of the data, employing appropriate quantitative and qualitative methods to address the research questions. This likely involves comparing and contrasting findings from various data sources, potentially including statistical analysis of quantitative data and thematic analysis of qualitative data, to generate insights into Woreda capacities and related factors. The chapter lays the groundwork for drawing conclusions and recommendations in later chapters (not included in this preview).
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
Woreda capacity, local governance, decentralization, capacity building, Ethiopia, Oromia, public administration, development management, qualitative research, quantitative research, case study, comparative analysis.
Frequently Asked Questions: Woreda Capacity Assessment in Oromia, Ethiopia
What is the main topic of this document?
This document is a comprehensive preview of a thesis assessing the capacity of Woredas (districts) in the Oromia National Regional State of Ethiopia, specifically focusing on Gindeberet and Abuna Gindeberet. It examines factors influencing effective local governance and development within the context of decentralization and capacity building in Ethiopia.
What sections are included in this preview?
The preview includes the table of contents, objectives and key themes, chapter summaries, and keywords. It provides a detailed overview of the research, outlining the methodology, data collection techniques, and planned analysis.
What are the key objectives of the study?
The study aims to assess Woreda capacity, identify factors influencing Woreda effectiveness, analyze the role of decentralization and capacity building in Ethiopia, examine local governance and development, and conduct a comparative analysis of the two selected Woredas (Gindeberet and Abuna Gindeberet).
What research methods are employed?
The research utilizes a mixed-methods approach. Data collection techniques include questionnaires, focus group discussions, interviews with key informants, and document analysis. Both quantitative and qualitative data analysis methods will be employed.
What are the key themes explored in the thesis?
Key themes include Woreda capacity assessment, factors influencing Woreda effectiveness, decentralization and capacity building in Ethiopia, local governance and development, and a comparative analysis of the two selected Woredas.
What is covered in each chapter?
Chapter One (Introduction): Establishes the background, research problem, objectives, methodology, significance, scope, and limitations of the study. Chapter Two (Review of Literature): Reviews existing literature on capacity building, focusing on its dimensions and success factors, within the Ethiopian context. Chapter Three (Data Presentation and Analysis): Presents and analyzes data collected from Gindeberet and Abuna Gindeberet Woredas, including Woreda profiles and findings from various data sources.
What are the keywords associated with this research?
Keywords include Woreda capacity, local governance, decentralization, capacity building, Ethiopia, Oromia, public administration, development management, qualitative research, quantitative research, case study, and comparative analysis.
For whom is this research intended?
This research is intended for academic use, focusing on analyzing themes related to Woreda capacity, local governance, and development in Ethiopia.
- Quote paper
- Telaye Mulubiran (Author), 2012, An Assessment of Woreda Capacity, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/232588
