Throughout the centuries maize has played a vital role in the power relations between people and has been used as a tool to manipulate power, particularly among the poor (Warman, 2003). From the African slave trade across the Atlantic, where it was given as a primary means of sustenance in the form of paste, its use as an introduced crop of control by colonial settlers, to its modern day use as animal feed and food aid, maize has a rich history in power relations, especially in traditional third world countries. This essay will identify and explore the way that maize is linked to power within its local commodity chain in the country of Bhutan – that is, among the vast majority of the peasantry who utilise maize as a primary subsistence food. Through outlining Bhutan’s general maize statistics and demonstrating the key forces behind the power relations of maize throughout Bhutan, it will be concluded that power lies primarily in the political and religious conditions of the country on the macro level and the social conditions of the family unit on the micro level. Furthermore, it will be shown that the religious and political conditions directly contribute to how power is manifested and utilised in the family with regards to maize production, exchange, and consumption.
Table of Contents
Note: The provided document is an essay and does not contain a formal table of contents section. Therefore, no entries can be extracted.
Research Objectives and Key Themes
This essay explores the complex power dynamics surrounding maize within Bhutanese society, specifically examining how political, religious, and social structures influence its production, exchange, and consumption among the peasantry.
- The intersection of traditional subsistence farming and emerging capitalist influences.
- The impact of the Monarchy and government legislation on agricultural efficiency.
- The role of Buddhism in shaping economic behavior and social tradition.
- Power distribution within the household unit regarding food production and labor.
- Theoretical perspectives on "inside" and "outside" meanings of food.
Excerpt from the Book
Exploring the Power Relations of Maize in Bhutanese Society
Throughout the centuries maize has played a vital role in the power relations between people and has been used as a tool to manipulate power, particularly among the poor (Warman, 2003). From the African slave trade across the Atlantic, where it was given as a primary means of sustenance in the form of paste, its use as an introduced crop of control by colonial settlers, to its modern day use as animal feed and food aid, maize has a rich history in power relations, especially in traditional third world countries. This essay will identify and explore the way that maize is linked to power within its local commodity chain in the country of Bhutan – that is, among the vast majority of the peasantry who utilise maize as a primary subsistence food.
Through outlining Bhutan’s general maize statistics and demonstrating the key forces behind the power relations of maize throughout Bhutan, it will be concluded that power lies primarily in the political and religious conditions of the country on the macro level and the social conditions of the family unit on the micro level. Furthermore, it will be shown that the religious and political conditions directly contribute to how power is manifested and utilised in the family with regards to maize production, exchange, and consumption.
Summary of Chapters
Note: As the document is a continuous essay rather than a book with chapters, the content is summarized by its thematic sections:
Introduction and Context: The essay introduces the historical significance of maize in power relations and establishes the scope of the study within Bhutan.
Theoretical Framework: The author utilizes the theories of Sydney Mintz and Eric Wolf to define "structural power" and the "inside/outside meanings" of food.
Political and Religious Influences: This section details how the Monarchy and Buddhism function as macro-level forces that dictate agricultural practices and subsistence culture.
Micro-level Power Dynamics: The analysis shifts to the family unit, examining decision-making roles and the impact of evolving household structures on maize production.
Conclusion: The essay synthesizes the interconnectedness of political, religious, and family factors in maintaining the current maize chain in Bhutan.
Keywords
Maize, Bhutan, Power Relations, Subsistence Agriculture, Commodity Chain, Monarchy, Buddhism, Structural Power, Household, Peasantry, Political Economy, Socio-cultural, Traditional Farming, Food Security, Economic Development.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this essay?
The essay explores how maize production in Bhutan is influenced by power relations on both macro (political/religious) and micro (family) levels.
What are the central themes discussed?
Key themes include the role of the Monarchy in agricultural legislation, the influence of Buddhism on subsistence living, and the internal power structures of the Bhutanese family.
What is the core research question?
The essay investigates how political and religious conditions in Bhutan manifest and are utilized within the family unit regarding the production, exchange, and consumption of maize.
Which theoretical frameworks are applied?
The author applies the theories of Sydney Mintz (inside/outside meanings of food) and Eric Wolf (structural power and modes of production).
How is the subject matter treated in the main body?
The main body moves from a macro-level analysis of national statistics and governing structures to a micro-level analysis of household dynamics and labor distribution.
Which terms characterize this work?
Significant keywords include commodity chain, subsistence, power relations, political-economic structure, and traditional vs. modern agricultural practices.
How does Buddhism specifically influence maize production?
Buddhism encourages a culture of non-materialism and subsistence, while also driving local demand for maize through traditional beverage production like Bangchang and Ara.
Why is the transition from a traditional to a nuclear family structure significant?
The shift towards a "Westernized" nuclear family potentially reduces the labor force available on farms, which in turn impacts the ability of families to maintain subsistence maize production.
What role does the Monarchy play in the maize chain?
The Monarchy holds control over the political sphere, enacting laws and economic directions that influence technological adoption, land use, and overall efficiency in maize production.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Lee Hooper (Autor:in), 2012, Exploring the Power Relations of Maize in Bhutanese Society, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/262250
