In this research, European footwear industry and its interaction to Turkish footwear industry will be analyzed in the context of Turkey-EU relations. Main target is to frame the impacts of relevant policies implemented to Turkey in its accession process to the European Union and assess the possible outcomes by seeking an answer to the question whether if the legal framework of this industry is being shaped from a top-down approach under the EU directives.
Table of Contents
1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Scope and Delimitations
1.2 Theoretical Framework
1.3 Methodology
2A: TURKEY AND EUROPEAN UNION
2A.1 Historical Glimpse
2A.2 Negotiations’ Timeline
2A.3 Current Status
2B: FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY
2B.1 Turkey’s Footwear Industry
2B.2 Turkey-EU Footwear Relations
2B.2.1 Directive 94/11/EC of European Parliament and Council of 23 March 1994
A. Article One
B. Article Two
C. Article Three
D. Article Four
E. Article Five
F. Article Six
2B.3 Other Regulations
2B.3.1 Respect of WTO Rules and Disciplines
2B.3.2 Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy
2B.3.3 Combating Fraud
2B.3.4 Commitment to the Environment
2B.4 Related Chapters of Negotiations
2B.4.1 Free Movement of Goods
2B.4.2 Free Movement of Capital
2B.4.3 Enterprise and Industrial Policy
2B.4.4 Customs Union
3. LEGAL AND TECHNICAL ARRANGEMENTS
3.1 Free Movement of Goods
3.2 Free Movement of Capital
3.3 Enterprise and Industrial Policy
3.4 Customs Union
4. CONCLUSION
4.1 Delineating State Approache(s) and Interdependency
4.2 National and International Competitiveness
4.3 NGOs as Incentives for the Footwear Industry
Research Objectives and Core Themes
This research investigates the interaction between the European and Turkish footwear industries within the broader context of Turkey-EU relations. The primary goal is to examine the impact of policies implemented during Turkey's accession process to the European Union and to assess whether the industry's legal framework is being shaped by a top-down approach dictated by EU directives.
- Analysis of Turkey-EU relations and their historical evolution.
- Evaluation of the Turkish footwear industry’s structural development and market position.
- Examination of specific legislative alignments including Directive 94/11/EC.
- Assessment of the "top-down" influence of EU directives on the Turkish industrial framework.
Excerpt from the Book
1.2 Theoretical Framework
The conceptual framework of complex interdependence by Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye will be the theoretical basis or ground in assessing its locality within the bounds of the discipline of International Relations. Human aspirations, communications, and economics were the interdependent factors of continuity of change in world politics.
According to the authors, interdependence means mutual dependence, it refers to situations characterized by reciprocal effects among countries in world politics. It involves costs and benefits in an interdependent relationship. This somehow establishes international regimes which refer to sets of governing arrangements that affect the relationship of interdependence. It may be incorporated into interstate agreements or treaties.
Moreover, there are three characteristics of complex interdependence: (1) Multiple channels which feasibly connect societies via models of interstate, transgovernmental, and transnational. (2) Absence of hierarchy among issues such as high politics (military, security or foreign policy) and low politics (economics, cultural exchanges or education). (3) Minor role of military force (this according to them is the use of force often has costly effects on nonsecurity goals that popular opposition to prolonged military conflicts is remarkably high).
Military force could, for instance, be irrelevant to resolving disagreements on economic issue among members of an alliance, yet at the same time be tremendously crucial for that alliance's political and military relations without rival bloc.
Summary of Chapters
1: INTRODUCTION: Outlines the scope and delimitations of the research, focusing on the time frame from 2007 onwards and the theoretical foundation of complex interdependence.
2A: TURKEY AND EUROPEAN UNION: Provides a historical overview of Turkish-EU relations, including the negotiation timeline and the current status of accession discussions.
2B: FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY: Details the structure of the Turkish footwear industry and its evolving relationship with the European Union, including various relevant directives and regulations.
3. LEGAL AND TECHNICAL ARRANGEMENTS: Discusses the actual legal and technical adjustments made by Turkey to align with EU acquis, specifically regarding the movement of goods, capital, and industrial policy.
4. CONCLUSION: Synthesizes the research findings regarding state approaches, national competitiveness, and the role of non-governmental organizations in shaping the industry.
Keywords
Turkey, European Union, Footwear Industry, Europeanization, Complex Interdependence, Accession Process, Customs Union, Industrial Policy, Trade, Legislation, Market Surveillance, Economic Competitiveness, Directive 94/11/EC, Regulation, Standardization
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core focus of this research?
The research explores the impact of the European Union's accession process on the Turkish footwear industry, specifically questioning whether the legal framework is subject to a top-down imposition of EU regulations.
What are the central themes of the work?
Key themes include Turkey-EU diplomatic relations, the legislative alignment of industrial standards, the competitiveness of the Turkish footwear sector, and the theoretical application of complex interdependence.
What is the primary research goal?
The primary goal is to determine if Turkey's accession process acts as an opportunity or a constraint for its local footwear industry and whether legislative changes are beneficial to the sector.
Which scientific methods are employed?
The study utilizes a descriptive research design, relying on secondary data from official sources, library archives (OPAC), electronic databases (Research Forum), and anecdotal evidence gathered via interviews.
What does the main body cover?
The main body covers the history of Turkey-EU relations, the structure of the Turkish footwear industry, and detailed analyses of how Turkey harmonizes its national laws with EU directives, such as the customs union and product safety standards.
Which keywords characterize this work?
The work is characterized by terms such as Europeanization, complex interdependence, Turkey, EU footwear industry, accession negotiations, and customs union.
What role does Directive 94/11/EC play in the analysis?
Directive 94/11/EC is analyzed as a specific case of European legislation that impacts how footwear materials are labeled and sold, illustrating the legislative requirements Turkey must adopt during its accession path.
How does the author view the "top-down" approach in Turkish industry?
The author argues that there is a need for a more inclusive "bottom-up" process that considers the strengths and weaknesses of the local industry rather than relying solely on the mandatory, top-down implementation of EU-led reforms.
- Arbeit zitieren
- F. Deniz Erdoğan (Autor:in), 2013, European Union and Turkish Footwear Industry, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/268358
