Grin logo
en de es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › English Language and Literature Studies - Literature

Shakespeare’s Authorship Question. A Short Input to a Long Discussion

Title: Shakespeare’s Authorship Question. A Short Input to a Long Discussion

Pre-University Paper , 2015 , 20 Pages , Grade: 15 NP

Autor:in: Lore Li (Author)

English Language and Literature Studies - Literature
Excerpt & Details   Look inside the ebook
Summary Excerpt Details

William Shakespeare was born in 1564 and died in 1616 in Stratford-upon-Avon farther writing plays like "Romeo and Juliet", "Othello", "Macbeth", "A Midsummer Night’s Dream" and others. He was a brilliant playwright creating nearly 40 productions and 154 sonnets, while dwelling in London. This is at least the majority opinion taught in schools.

There is however reason for doubt. While dealing a bit deeper with Shakespeare you unavoidably will come to the point that opinions differ in the question if he truly was who he pretended to be. Imagine the magnificent bard was not the author of all the dramas, comedies, history plays and poems. Or could it be possible that this famous name was just a pseudonym? And if it was, then the question is why? Which clues for and against are existing?

In the English lessons we learned the prevailing aspects along with the common view about the grand composer and his plays. After a rough contribution into the authorship debate more questions emerged and the foundation of this term paper was laid.

To come to one of many answers, this work will be structured at first in a short biography of Shakespeare and an overview of his time concerning the theatre and authorship in general. Afterwards I would like to explore positions that assume Shakespeare not to be the man who is thought to be the drafter Shakespeare. On the other hand also the opposing view will be presented and explained. To forge an own profound opinion it is significant to have a review about this complex of themes.
A detailed presentation of my own view regarding arguments for and against Shakespeare from Stratford as the writer will be followed by a final synopsis and prospect of the issue.

So the focus in this work is more on investigate the Stratford-man than on other theories, even though these will come up for discussion. Because of their multifacetedness it would go beyond the scopes of this term paper.

Excerpt


Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Overviews of Shakespeare and his time
    • Short biography of Shakespeare
    • Theatre and authorship in the Elizabethan and Jacobean time
  • Theories about his authorship
    • Christopher Marlowe
    • Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford
    • Francis Bacon
    • William Stanley, 6th Earl of Derby
    • Group theory
    • William Shak(e)spe(a)re
  • Own argumentation
    • Contra Shakespeare
    • Pro Shakespeare
  • Summary
  • Conclusion and prospect
  • Sources
    • Electronic Resources
    • Books
  • Enclosure

Objectives and Key Themes

This term paper aims to investigate the authorship of William Shakespeare's works by exploring both arguments for and against the traditional attribution to the Stratford-upon-Avon man. The paper will delve into the life and times of Shakespeare, examine alternative theories regarding his authorship, and present a reasoned opinion on the matter.

  • Shakespeare's biography and the context of his time
  • Theories challenging Shakespeare's authorship
  • Arguments supporting Shakespeare's authorship
  • The significance of the authorship debate
  • A personal perspective on the issue

Chapter Summaries

The introduction lays out the basis for the authorship debate, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding Shakespeare's identity as the author of his works. This is followed by a short biography of Shakespeare, assuming he is the author, and an overview of the theatrical landscape during the Elizabethan and Jacobean periods.

The paper then examines various theories suggesting that Shakespeare was not the true author of his plays and poems. These include the theories of Christopher Marlowe, Edward de Vere, Francis Bacon, William Stanley, and the group theory. The paper also explores arguments in favor of Shakespeare's authorship.

The paper concludes with a summary of the key points discussed and a personal perspective on the authorship debate. The paper emphasizes the importance of considering all evidence and perspectives when forming an opinion on this complex and multifaceted issue.

Keywords

The primary keywords and focus topics of this paper are: William Shakespeare, authorship debate, Elizabethan and Jacobean theatre, biographical evidence, alternative authorship theories, literary analysis, historical context, and personal perspective. The paper explores the complexities of attributing authorship to Shakespeare and examines the evidence from various perspectives.

Excerpt out of 20 pages  - scroll top

Details

Title
Shakespeare’s Authorship Question. A Short Input to a Long Discussion
Grade
15 NP
Author
Lore Li (Author)
Publication Year
2015
Pages
20
Catalog Number
V302077
ISBN (eBook)
9783668008335
ISBN (Book)
9783668008342
Language
English
Tags
shakespeare’s authorship question short input long discussion Shakespeare
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Lore Li (Author), 2015, Shakespeare’s Authorship Question. A Short Input to a Long Discussion, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/302077
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • https://cdn.openpublishing.com/images/brand/1/preview_popup_advertising.jpg
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  20  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Payment & Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint