The focus of this paper is on the implementation of corporate entrepreneurship and on the exchange and communication of knowledge in a global context, because it allows a targeted and interactive transfer and development of knowledge as well as the creation of innovations (Eppler & Reinhardt, 2004).
After the introduction, the main terms used in this paper will be explained now. This allows the correct usage of terms in order of importance. The concept of entrepreneurship is very extensive and an evolving field of research. The term has several dimensions and therefore a scientifically uniform definition is not possible (Gautam & Verma, 1997). But entrepreneurship has been developed as a generally recognized phenomenon towards economic growth of every country of all over the world. Entrepreneur, according to Schumpeter (1934), “is the innovator who implements change within markets through the carrying out of new combinations” and entrepreneurship “is seen as new combinations including the doing of new things or the doing of things that are already being done in a new way.” Onuoha (2007) defined entrepreneurship as “the practice of starting new organizations or revitalizing mature organizations, particularly new businesses generally in response to identified opportunities.” Both authors only consider the entrepreneur or entrepreneurship and what they represent. But they did not discuss the cause of this behavior. The behavior of entrepreneurship is based on cultures values and that refers on the framework of Hofstede's cultural dimensions. The national culture and also the corporate culture play an important impact on entrepreneurship (Eroglu & Picak 2011).
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Theory of (corporate) entrepreneurship
3. Knowledge
3.1 Theory of knowledge
3.2 Forms of knowledge
3.2.1 Explicit and implicit knowledge
3.2.2 Individual and collective/organizational knowledge
3.3 Barriers in the exchange of individual knowledge
3.4 Barriers in the exchange of collective knowledge
4. Conclusion
Research Objectives & Topics
This paper examines the influence of national culture, values, and knowledge management on the development of corporate entrepreneurship within a global context, focusing on identifying organizational challenges and cultural determinants.
- Theoretical foundations of corporate entrepreneurship
- Taxonomy and management of knowledge within organizations
- Analysis of barriers hindering individual and collective knowledge transfer
- The impact of national culture on entrepreneurial behavior
- Comparative analysis of entrepreneurship in Turkey and the United States
Excerpt from the Book
Theory of (corporate) entrepreneurship
After the introduction, the main terms used in this paper will be explained now. This allows the correct usage of terms in order of importance. The concept of entrepreneurship is very extensive and an evolving field of research. The term has several dimensions and therefore a scientifically uniform definition is not possible (Gautam & Verma, 1997). But entrepreneurship has been developed as a generally recognized phenomenon towards economic growth of every country of all over the world. Entrepreneur, according to Schumpeter (1934), “is the innovator who implements change within markets through the carrying out of new combinations” and entrepreneurship “is seen as new combinations including the doing of new things or the doing of things that are already being done in a new way.” Onuoha (2007) defined entrepreneurship as “the practice of starting new organizations or revitalizing mature organizations, particularly new businesses generally in response to identified opportunities.” Both authors only consider the entrepreneur or entrepreneurship and what they represent. But they did not discuss the cause of this behavior. The behavior of entrepreneurship is based on cultures values and that refers on the framework of Hofstede's cultural dimensions. The national culture and also the corporate culture play an important impact on entrepreneurship (Eroglu & Picak 2011).
Summary of Chapters
Introduction: Provides the context of global socio-economic changes and highlights the rising importance of knowledge management and corporate entrepreneurship for firm competitiveness.
Theory of (corporate) entrepreneurship: Discusses various definitions of entrepreneurship and corporate entrepreneurship, emphasizing the influence of national and corporate culture on entrepreneurial behavior.
Knowledge: Explores the hierarchical nature of knowledge, distinguishes between tacit and explicit forms, and identifies significant barriers that impede its effective exchange at individual and collective levels.
Conclusion: Summarizes that national culture, values, and effective knowledge transfer are critical determinants of entrepreneurial success, specifically noting how cultural dimensions can hinder or facilitate innovative activity.
Keywords
Corporate Entrepreneurship, Knowledge Management, National Culture, Hofstede, Knowledge Transfer, Innovation, Tacit Knowledge, Explicit Knowledge, Organizational Culture, Global Context, Competitive Advantage, Uncertainty Avoidance, Power Distance, Entrepreneurial Behavior.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary focus of this paper?
The paper explores the intersection of corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge management, and national culture, analyzing how these factors influence a company's ability to innovate and compete globally.
What are the central themes discussed?
The central themes include the conceptualization of corporate entrepreneurship, the classification and management of organizational knowledge, the barriers to knowledge exchange, and the role of cultural dimensions in shaping entrepreneurial intent.
What is the core research objective?
The objective is to understand how organizational environments and cultural value systems act as facilitators or barriers to knowledge sharing and entrepreneurial activities within companies.
Which scientific methods are utilized?
The study relies on a comprehensive literature review and theoretical analysis, synthesizing various management models and Hofstede's cultural dimensions to explain empirical observations.
What is addressed in the main body?
The main body defines corporate entrepreneurship, details the theory of knowledge, categorizes knowledge types, and provides an in-depth analysis of obstacles (barriers) to individual and organizational knowledge flows.
Which keywords best characterize this work?
Key terms include Corporate Entrepreneurship, Knowledge Management, National Culture, Innovation, and Knowledge Transfer.
How does national culture affect entrepreneurship?
National culture influences risk tolerance, the perception of opportunities, and decision-making styles, which in turn dictate the level and type of entrepreneurial activity within a country.
Why is Turkey used as a comparative case study?
Turkey serves as a case study for a culture with high power distance and high uncertainty avoidance, contrasting with the United States to demonstrate how these values can impede certain entrepreneurial behaviors.
What constitutes 'skilled incompetence' as a knowledge barrier?
It refers to the strategic defensive behavior individuals display to hide knowledge gaps, which effectively blocks learning and prevents the expansion of the organizational knowledge base.
- Quote paper
- Nils Cröger (Author), 2015, Entrepreneurship, national culture and knowledge management in a global context, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/318290
