Grin logo
de en es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › History of Europe - Ages of World Wars

The Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbour. ‘Awakening the Sleeping Giant’

Title: The Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbour.
‘Awakening the Sleeping Giant’

Essay , 2015 , 12 Pages

Autor:in: Blake Sullivan (Author)

History of Europe - Ages of World Wars
Excerpt & Details   Look inside the ebook
Summary Excerpt Details

This paper will analyze the overall impact of the IJN attacking Pearl Harbour and its effect on WWII. More specifically, this paper will argue how the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbour played an instrumental tactical role in the Pacific for the Japanese in the short term. However, despite the Japanese initial success at Pearl Harbour the overall strategy led by Japanese leadership resulted in an absolute disaster resulting in the loss of the Pacific War and ultimately the loss of WWII for the Tripartite Pact.

Excerpt


Table of Contents

1. The Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbour: ‘Awakening the Sleeping Giant’

Objectives and Themes

This paper analyzes the overall impact of the Imperial Japanese Navy’s attack on Pearl Harbour, specifically examining how it functioned as a tactical success in the short term while ultimately serving as a strategic blunder that led to Japan's defeat in World War II.

  • The political and economic tensions between the United States and Japan prior to 1941.
  • Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto’s planning and the strategic objectives behind the surprise attack.
  • The tactical execution of the attack and its immediate impact on the U.S. Pacific Fleet.
  • The long-term shift from tactical victory to strategic disaster for the Japanese Empire.
  • Comparative analysis of the intelligence failures preceding Pearl Harbour and modern events.

Excerpt from the Book

The Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbour: ‘Awakening the Sleeping Giant’

On December 7th, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) attacked Pearl Harbour, which ultimately brought the United States (U.S.) into the Second World War (WWII). The United States Navy (USN) lost four battleships, 180 aircraft, 2400 sailors, but more importantly, the Japanese strike delayed the USN’s ability to respond to the Japanese expansion into the Pacific in search of natural resources. The Japanese operation led and planned by Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto was a surprise attack that resulted in the USN fleet being an easy target for the IJN pilots. Dr. Dennis Showalter, former professor at both the United States Air Force and Army Academies, argues that Pearl Harbour was the final strike that brought the United States into war.

However, Showalter also attests that there were many other factors that inevitably contributed to the war between these two nations. If Admiral Yamamoto knew that attacking Pearl Harbour would “awaken the sleeping giant”, why did the Japanese leader believe attacking the American Navy was a good strategic move? This paper will analyze the overall impact of the IJN attacking Pearl Harbour and its effect on WWII. More specifically, this paper will argue how the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbour played an instrumental tactical role in the Pacific for the Japanese in the short term. However, despite the Japanese initial success at Pearl Harbour the overall strategy led by Japanese leadership resulted in an absolute disaster resulting in the loss of the Pacific War and ultimately the loss of WWII for the Tripartite Pact.

Summary of Chapters

1. The Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbour: ‘Awakening the Sleeping Giant’: This chapter introduces the historical context of the attack, outlines the research thesis concerning the divergence between tactical success and strategic failure, and explores the underlying economic and political pressures that led to the conflict.

Keywords

Pearl Harbour, Imperial Japanese Navy, Isoroku Yamamoto, Tactical Victory, Strategic Failure, World War II, United States Navy, Pacific War, Economic Sanctions, Military Strategy, Intelligence Failure, Admiral Nagumo, Battle of Midway, Tripartite Pact, 9/11 Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the central focus of this research paper?

The paper focuses on the attack on Pearl Harbour, analyzing how it functioned as a short-term tactical victory for the Japanese while simultaneously representing a major long-term strategic miscalculation.

What are the primary themes discussed?

The core themes include the pre-war economic tensions between the U.S. and Japan, the role of Admiral Yamamoto in orchestrating the raid, the tactical execution of the attack, and the subsequent shift in momentum during the Pacific War.

What is the main research question or objective?

The primary objective is to demonstrate why, despite the initial success of the surprise attack, the Japanese leadership ultimately failed to achieve their broader strategic goals, leading to their eventual defeat.

Which methodology is employed in this study?

The study utilizes a qualitative historical analysis, relying on academic interpretations, historical documents, and expert opinions from historians to evaluate the effectiveness of the Japanese strategy.

What topics are covered in the main body of the text?

The main body examines the economic provocations leading to the war, the planning and command structure of the IJN, the details of the attack itself, and the subsequent recovery of U.S. forces leading to the turning points in the Pacific.

Which keywords best characterize this work?

The work is characterized by terms such as tactical vs. strategic victory, Yamamoto, Pacific War, economic warfare, and military intelligence.

Why did Admiral Yamamoto consider the attack a "minimum-risk" mission initially?

Yamamoto viewed the mission as a "hit and run" operation intended to neutralize the U.S. fleet long enough to secure necessary natural resources in Southeast Asia, assuming the U.S. would eventually negotiate rather than commit to a long war.

What similarities does Dr. John Dreifort draw between Pearl Harbour and the 9/11 attacks?

Dr. Dreifort notes that both were unprovoked attacks on U.S. soil without a declaration of war, and that both instances were marked by a critical failure of intelligence to connect available information into a coherent picture.

Why did Admiral Nagumo decide against a third strike on Pearl Harbour?

Nagumo feared the presence of missing U.S. aircraft carriers and did not want to risk losing more of his fleet, prioritizing the protection of his existing assets over the complete destruction of the base.

Excerpt out of 12 pages  - scroll top

Details

Title
The Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbour. ‘Awakening the Sleeping Giant’
Author
Blake Sullivan (Author)
Publication Year
2015
Pages
12
Catalog Number
V319899
ISBN (eBook)
9783668195462
ISBN (Book)
9783668195479
Language
English
Tags
Pearl Harbor Yamamoto Japanese American History Pacific War WWII World War 2 Imperial Japanese Navy United States Navy Pearl Harbour Pacific Campaign
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Blake Sullivan (Author), 2015, The Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbour. ‘Awakening the Sleeping Giant’, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/319899
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  12  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint