This paper hopes to establish the continued forcefulness of Cesare Beccaria's argument against torture and the death penalty by reconciling its reasoning with the societal and legal context of the modern day.
Cesare Beccaria, considered one of the founding fathers of Enlightenment penology and legal theory, is perhaps most well known for his treatise On Crime and Punishment in which he argues against punitive administration of torture and capital punishment. This paper analyzes the arguments proposed by Beccaria and reasserts their modern relevance to contemporary legal conversation on the death penalty and government-administered torture. Weaknesses in Beccaria's argument such as his questionably justified causal claims on human behavior are examined, but ultimately found to not render his argument less sound insofar as it seeks to discredit capital punishment. Beccaria's own model of social contract theory is also examined and used as a basis by which to evaluate his legal claims.
Inhaltsverzeichnis (Table of Contents)
- Presenting and Evaluating the Argument of Cesare Beccaria Against Capital Punishment
- A Social Contract Framework
- Empirical Evidence: Romans and Muscovy
- The Psychosocial Impact of Punishment
- Capital Punishment and the Social Contract
- The Pragmatic Deficiencies of Capital Punishment
Zielsetzung und Themenschwerpunkte (Objectives and Key Themes)
This text examines the philosophical arguments of Cesare Beccaria against capital punishment, exploring his justifications, evidence, and key themes. It analyzes his use of social contract theory, empirical observations, and psychosocial claims to advocate for long-term labor as a more effective and ethically justifiable form of punishment.
- Social Contract Theory
- The Effectiveness of Punishment as Deterrent
- Psychosocial Impact of Punishment
- The Role of Justice in Society
- The Cultural and Social Implications of Capital Punishment
Zusammenfassung der Kapitel (Chapter Summaries)
- Presenting and Evaluating the Argument of Cesare Beccaria Against Capital Punishment: This chapter introduces Beccaria's argument against capital punishment, outlining his philosophical framework based on social contract theory, and his preference for long-term labor as a more effective deterrent.
- A Social Contract Framework: This section examines Beccaria's conceptualization of society as a contract between the sovereign and individuals, outlining his rationale for capital punishment only in exceptional circumstances where it serves to prevent greater harm.
- Empirical Evidence: Romans and Muscovy: This chapter analyzes Beccaria's use of historical examples from ancient Rome and Muscovy to demonstrate the inefficacy of capital punishment as a deterrent.
- The Psychosocial Impact of Punishment: Beccaria argues that long-term labor has a greater psychological impact on individuals than death, effectively deterring future offenses. This section delves into his reasoning and the evidence he presents.
- Capital Punishment and the Social Contract: This chapter explores how Beccaria contends that capital punishment violates the principles of the social contract, leading to potential resentment and social unrest.
- The Pragmatic Deficiencies of Capital Punishment: This section examines Beccaria's final argument, highlighting the negative impact capital punishment has on cultural values and societal attitudes.
Schlüsselwörter (Keywords)
The text focuses on key terms and concepts such as social contract theory, capital punishment, long-term labor, deterrence, justice, psychosocial impact, and the relationship between punishment and social order.
- Quote paper
- Seth Carter (Author), 2015, Cesare Beccaria Against Capital Punishment. Presenting and Evaluating his Argument, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/371955
