Electric cars have emerged at a time when a constellation of issues is gathering among the global population. From a personal perspective, it is apparent that electric cars are not as beneficial to human race as it is claimed by some people. First, they pose health risk to the users due to electromagnetic radiations. Second, they cause harm to the environment. Finally, these cars are not convenient to the consumers. It is apparent that electric cars are not as beneficial as it is preached by most crusaders.
Evidence indicates that these cars are not safe, long-lasting and convenient for consumers. However, proponents argue that electric cars are safe. Second, electric cars are not environmental-friendly, especially due to their production process and disposal. In contrast, proponents claim that the cut in CO2 emission outweigh their environmental harm. Finally, electric cars are not convenient to the consumers due to affordability, mileage and recharging period. However, it is argued that these cars are quick with not fueling point visits.
Conclusively, it is apparent that the debate on electric cars is not varnishing from public talk any time in a foreseeable future. Therefore, this essay seeks to justify that electric cars are not any better than the ordinary cars.
Table of Contents
1. Abstract
2. ARE ELECTRIC CARS BETTER THAN THE ORDINARY CARS
3. References
Objectives and Topics
The primary objective of this essay is to critically evaluate the comparative advantages of electric vehicles versus conventional internal combustion engine cars. The author challenges the prevailing notion that electric vehicles are superior by examining potential health risks, environmental impacts, and consumer convenience factors to determine if they truly offer a better alternative for the global population.
- Health risks associated with electromagnetic radiations in electric vehicles.
- Environmental consequences of battery manufacturing, disposal, and lifecycle emissions.
- Comparative analysis of vehicle safety and crash performance.
- Consumer convenience regarding affordability, range limitations, and charging infrastructure.
- Critique of the 'clean technology' narrative in the automotive industry.
Excerpt from the Book
ARE ELECTRIC CARS BETTER THAN THE ORDINARY CARS
Over the centuries, advances in the automobile industry have led to fast and convenient movement of people. It is also worth noting that the availability of reliable transport for goods has enhanced mobility in the post-industrial era. In road transport, life-changing transport technologies have increased the mobility of people. Since the invention of the first car by Dr. J.W. Carhart in 1871, the search for faster means of road transport has driven technological advancements in the automobile industry. This first full-carriage car was powered by steam, more or less the same as the other steam-powered engines which were used by other locomotives in the automobile industry. However, it did not take long before petroleum-powered cars were invented. This made a significant departure from the use of steam-powered motor vehicles to today’s vast range of vehicles. Of great importance to note is the development of electric cars which seemingly becoming popular in the automobile industry. Electric cars are considered as a reliable alternative to gasoline-powered cars (Hawkins, Singh, Majeau-Bettez & Strømman, 2012). From a critical perspective, there are several reasons why the development of electric cars has been gaining popularity over the past few decades. Foremost, gas shortages seem to be one of key factors which are behind the advancement in the development of electric cars. It is a common-knowledge that over-dependence on fossil fuel, primarily petroleum has influenced the global economy. This is evidenced by the past global financial crises whose underlying causes are related to changes in petroleum supply from oil-producing countries. An outstanding example is the 1973 oil crises which plugged the global economy into a dark end (Hammes & Wills, 2005). The second factor which seems to be driving electric cars forward is the raising environmental concerns associated with gasoline-powered vehicles. Finally, convenience of these cars to consumers has turned out to be a challenge.
Summary of Chapters
Abstract: Provides an overview of the arguments against the perceived benefits of electric cars, focusing on health risks, environmental impact, and consumer inconvenience.
ARE ELECTRIC CARS BETTER THAN THE ORDINARY CARS: Examines the historical context of automotive development and argues that electric vehicles present significant drawbacks regarding safety, electromagnetic radiation, environmental footprint, and usability.
References: Lists the scholarly sources and literature used to support the critical arguments presented throughout the essay.
Keywords
Electric cars, ordinary cars, electromagnetic radiation, fossil fuel, carbon emission, safety, battery disposal, convenience, clean technology, environmental impact, transport mobility, gasoline-powered vehicles, health risks, charging, affordability.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core subject of this essay?
The essay critically investigates whether electric vehicles are truly superior to conventional internal combustion engine cars by challenging common perceptions of their benefits.
What are the primary thematic areas explored?
The central themes include the potential health hazards of electromagnetic fields, the environmental impact of battery production and disposal, vehicle safety, and the practical challenges of consumer convenience.
What is the author's central research stance?
The author argues that electric vehicles are not as beneficial as often claimed and asserts that their drawbacks in terms of health, environment, and usability outweigh their perceived advantages.
Which methodology does the author employ?
The author uses a qualitative, argumentative approach by synthesizing existing research, literature, and comparative data to construct a critical rebuttal against the adoption of electric cars.
What topics are covered in the main body?
The main body discusses the health risks of electromagnetic radiation, the environmental consequences of manufacturing and battery disposal, and the lack of consumer convenience regarding cost and range.
Which keywords best characterize this work?
Key terms include electric cars, electromagnetic radiation, carbon emissions, environmental impact, vehicle safety, and consumer convenience.
How does the author address the issue of electromagnetic radiation?
The author cites studies indicating that batteries and electronic components in electric cars generate extremely low-frequency magnetic fields, which may pose carcinogenic health risks to passengers.
What is the author’s critique regarding the 'clean technology' label?
The author argues that the 'clean' designation is misleading because it overlooks the environmental degradation caused by battery manufacturing and the relatively small impact that replacing cars will have on global CO2 emissions.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Patrick Kimuyu (Autor:in), 2018, Are Electric Cars Better than Ordinary Cars, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/412967
