Grin logo
de en es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › Environmental Sciences

Assessment of the potential of methyl ester production from non-edible oils

Title: Assessment of the potential of methyl ester production from non-edible oils

Doctoral Thesis / Dissertation , 2017 , 236 Pages , Grade: A

Autor:in: Venu Gopal (Author)

Environmental Sciences
Excerpt & Details   Look inside the ebook
Summary Excerpt Details

Biodiesel as an alternative fuel for diesel engines is becoming increasingly important due to diminishing petroleum reserves and the environmental consequences of exhaust gases from petroleum-fueled engines. Biodiesel, which is made from renewable sources, consists of the simple alkyl esters of fatty acids. As a future prospective fuel, biodiesel has to compete economically with petroleum diesel fuels. A two-step transesterification process (Sequential esterification and transesterification process) was used to prepare methyl ester (biodiesel) from high free fatty acid (FFA) content oils. For the yield of high FFA, two-step acid-base catalyzed method has been developed which consists of acid-catalyzed pretreatment/esterification step to reduce the FFA to less than 1% using H2SO4 as an acid catalyst and transesterification of pretreated oil to biodiesel using alkali catalyst. In the present study, the main focus is being placed to explore the non-edible oil resources like Used Cooking Oil (UCO), Cottonseed oil, Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) oil, Neem(Azadirachta indica) oil as a potential source for biodiesel. Experimental results from enzyme (lipase) catalyzed method for selected oils using influencing parameters such as reaction time and catalyst weight, experimental results from acid-alkaline catalyzed methods using common influencing parameters such as methanol to oil molar ratio, catalyst weight, reaction temperature and reaction time for above-mentioned oils were compared using batch mode. Methyl ester (biodiesel) yield range of 66.20-71.6% was attained for an enzyme-catalyzed method, whereas for acid-alkaline the yield range was 84.4-91.6%. This gives the indication of further refinement in the enzyme-catalyzed transesterification process. However, enzyme-catalyzed biodiesel production has some limitations especially when implemented in industrial scale because of the high cost of enzyme, low reaction rate and enzyme deactivation. As the catalyst, an enzyme is restricted to rigorous reaction condition and the activity loss of lipase. The influencing parameters and absolute results of the analysis give the impression of the superiority of acid-alkaline transesterification method for methyl ester production. In this study, we have selected Used Cooking Oil Methyl Ester (UCOME) and Jatropha Methyl Ester (JME) among the methyl esters of four oils.

Excerpt


Table of Contents

Chapter-1 INTRODUCTION

Chapter-2 LITERATURE REVIEW

TABLE FORMAT

Chapter-3 EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY

Chapter-4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Production and comparison of methyl esters from UCO, Cottonseed oil, Jatropha oil and Neem oil using enzymatic and acid-alkaline transesterification at optimized parameters

4.1.1 Enzymatic(lipase) transesterification

4.1.2 Acid-alkaline transesterification

4.1.3 Comparison between Enzyme-catalyzed and Acid-alkaline catalyzed transesterification methods

4.2 Screening of methyl esters of UCO & Jatropha

4.3 Optimization of process parameters using a factorial design and a surface response design

4.3.1 Used Cooking Oil Methyl Ester(UCOME)

4.3.2 Jatropha Methyl Ester

4.4 Gas Chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl ester

4.5 Predicting biodiesel properties by fatty acid methyl esters composition of oil

4.6 Elemental analysis

4.7 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis

4.8 Performance and Emissions Characteristics

4.9 Cost analysis

NOMENCLATURE

Appendix-A MODEL CALCULATIONS

Appendix-B EXPERIMENTAL AND CALCULATED DATA

PUBLICATIONS

Research Objectives and Thematic Focus

The primary objective of this research is to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of producing high-quality biodiesel from non-edible oil sources, specifically Used Cooking Oil (UCO), Cottonseed oil, Jatropha oil, and Neem oil, by employing enzymatic and acid-alkaline transesterification processes to address the energy crisis and reduce dependency on petroleum-based fuels.

  • Comparative performance analysis of enzymatic versus acid-alkaline transesterification methods for high-FFA feedstocks.
  • Process parameter optimization using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and factorial design for maximum yield.
  • Analytical characterization of produced methyl esters (biodiesel) via GC-MS, FTIR, and elemental analysis against ASTM standards.
  • Evaluation of performance and emission characteristics in a compression-ignition (C.I.) engine fueled with biodiesel blends.
  • Assessment of the economic viability and cost-benefit ratio of methyl ester production.

Excerpt from the Thesis

1.1 Introduction

Energy consumption is inevitable in human existence. Man relies immensely on it for various sectors of life like transportation, power generation, industrial processes, and residential consumption. World energy consumption doubled between 1971 and 2001 and the world energy demand will increase 53% by the year 2030. It is estimated that petroleum consumption will rise from 84.4 to 116 million barrels per day in the USA until the year 2030 [1]. Petroleum-based fuels are limited reserves concentrated in certain regions of the world. These sources are on the verge of reaching their peak production. The fossil fuel resources are shortening day by day. At the same time, its consumption rate is pacing at an alarming rate. The world currently faces an energy crisis. The global fossil fuel prices have been increasing dramatically way beyond the imaginations of common men. The scarcity of known petroleum reserves will make renewable energy sources more attractive. Also, the extensive use of fossil fuels has led to various environmental problems including pollution, increase in the amount of CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, global warming etc. The depletion of fossil fuel has forced the mankind to find alternate ways of energy generation which is renewable, environmentally friendly and technically suitable for conventional engines without any modifications. Among the various alternatives biofuels especially biodiesel stands out as a promising method.

Summary of Chapters

Chapter-1 INTRODUCTION: Provides an overview of the energy crisis, the necessity for alternative fuels, and outlines the research motivation and objectives regarding biodiesel production from non-edible oils.

Chapter-2 LITERATURE REVIEW: Reviews existing research on transesterification processes, catalyst types, engine performance evaluations, and the potential of various feedstocks like used cooking oil, Jatropha, and Neem.

TABLE FORMAT: A structured summary of previous research studies, detailing the feedstocks, methods, and key findings from the literature reviewed.

Chapter-3 EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY: Describes the materials, equipment, preparation of lipase enzymes, feedstock pretreatment, and the detailed procedures for transesterification, performance testing, and data analysis.

Chapter-4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Presents the findings regarding yield optimization, characterization via GC-MS and FTIR, engine performance, emission analysis, and the comprehensive economic cost evaluation.

Keywords

High FFA content oils, transesterification, methyl ester, RSM, GC-MS, FTIR, performance, emission characteristics, cost analysis, Used Cooking Oil, Jatropha oil, biodiesel, engine testing, optimization, non-edible oils.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core focus of this research?

The research focuses on assessing the potential of producing biodiesel from non-edible oil resources, specifically Used Cooking Oil (UCO), Cottonseed oil, Jatropha oil, and Neem oil, as viable substitutes for petroleum-based diesel.

What are the central themes discussed in this study?

The central themes include feedstock selection, comparison of enzymatic and acid-alkaline transesterification techniques, process optimization using statistical models, fuel characterization, and engine performance evaluation.

What is the primary objective of this thesis?

The primary objective is to develop a green, economically viable process for biodiesel production that reduces reliance on edible vegetable oils and fossil fuels by utilizing low-cost, waste, or non-edible oil feedstocks.

Which scientific methodology is primarily employed?

The study utilizes both enzymatic (lipase-catalyzed) and two-step acid-alkaline catalyzed transesterification processes, optimized through Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and factorial design.

What topics are covered in the main body of the work?

The main body covers the experimental setup for biodiesel production, the specific optimization of process variables (such as catalyst weight, temperature, and methanol-to-oil ratio), analytical characterization of the produced methyl esters, and real-world testing in diesel engines.

Which keywords best characterize this academic work?

Key terms include High FFA content oils, transesterification, methyl ester, Response Surface Methodology (RSM), GC-MS, FTIR, performance and emission characteristics, and cost analysis.

Why is used cooking oil considered a promising feedstock in this study?

UCO is highlighted as a low-cost, widely available waste resource that helps resolve disposal issues while preventing the competition between fuel production and the food industry, thus offering an environmentally sustainable solution.

What were the major findings regarding engine emissions using the produced biodiesel?

The study found that using the produced biodiesel resulted in significant reductions in CO (carbon monoxide) and HC (hydrocarbon) emissions compared to petroleum diesel, although NOx emissions were slightly higher.

What conclusions did the author reach regarding the economic feasibility?

The author concluded that while producing biodiesel from UCO and Jatropha oil is currently more expensive than petroleum-based diesel, the long-term environmental and health benefits make it a promising, economically viable alternative if process parameters are optimized at an industrial scale.

Excerpt out of 236 pages  - scroll top

Details

Title
Assessment of the potential of methyl ester production from non-edible oils
College
Andhra University  (College of engineering)
Grade
A
Author
Venu Gopal (Author)
Publication Year
2017
Pages
236
Catalog Number
V432128
ISBN (eBook)
9783668795754
ISBN (Book)
9783668795761
Language
English
Tags
assessment
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Venu Gopal (Author), 2017, Assessment of the potential of methyl ester production from non-edible oils, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/432128
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  236  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint