This academic paper is based on territorial disputes between China and Tibet.
I am working to unravel the ongoing controversial territorial disputes between Central Tibetan Administration; more specifically the exile Tibetan government in Dharmasala run by 14th Dalai Lama vs. People’s Republic of Chinese administration (PRC) and emphasizing why India has involved in this issue.
This paper proposes a diplomatic strategy to resolve the ongoing territorial conflict between this two. In this scenario, my role is of a mediator and I represent the government of Sweden.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Policy objectives
Brief background of the disputes
Parties involve in China-Tibet conflict
Involvement of India in China- Tibet conflict and interest of India
Proposed tactics to resolve the conflict
Future Scenario of Tibet- China Relations
Unintended consequences and dealing strategy
Conclusion
Reference
Research Objectives and Core Themes
The primary objective of this paper is to propose a diplomatic mediation strategy to address the ongoing territorial dispute between the Central Tibetan Administration and the People's Republic of China, while specifically examining the strategic involvement and geopolitical interests of India.
- Historical and contemporary territorial claims between Tibet and China.
- The role of external actors, particularly India's geopolitical interests and security concerns.
- Conflict resolution frameworks, including mediation, negotiation tactics, and track-two diplomacy.
- The impact of ideology, ethnicity, and religion on the administrative conflict.
- Future geopolitical scenarios and the potential evolution of China-Tibet relations.
Excerpt from the Book
Brief background of the disputes
If we analysis the historical background of Tibet which is occupied by China then we see that there are two types of views whether Tibet was an independent state or not. Chinese perceptions about Tibet is contrary to Tibetan perceptions. So historically and geographically both sides give subjective perceptions and this historical debates are one of the core cause of the conflict between this two parties. According to Tibetan government –in –exile, they said that Tibet was an independent state but it is unlawfully and forcefully occupied by Chinese communist party or People’s Republic of China in 1949 (WWW.freetibet.org) which is completely contrary to international law and United Nations (UN) Charters. Historically if we go back 2000 ago then we see it was Tibetan imperial age and whole country came under a powerful ruler and consequently there was no doubt about the independence of Tibet. Tibetan also claims that Chinese historical records also say that Tibet was an independent state. Now the question may arise if Tibet was an independent state then how did it become an integral part of China? The answer is gradually Tibet started to influence its power over its neighbor’s and it became boomerang and she itself came under various foreign powers and they were the mighty Mongols, Manchu emperors, Gorkhas and then British who ruled Indian subcontinent until 1947. So when Mongol emperor Genghis Khan started to expand his territory. Tibetan leaders Sakya school of Buddhism then made an agreement with Mongols to get rid of immediate attack from Mongols. (Pragg & Van.1988). Political and religious alliance became very strong and still today there is strong bondage between this two central Asian people.
Summary of Chapters
Introduction: Outlines the territorial dispute between the Central Tibetan Administration and China and sets the scope for a mediated diplomatic resolution.
Policy objectives: Defines the specific goals for conflict resolution, ranging from establishing mutual trust to ensuring human rights and political representation.
Brief background of the disputes: Examines the conflicting historical narratives regarding Tibetan independence and the impact of various dynasties on the region.
Parties involve in China-Tibet conflict: Identifies the primary, indirect, and external actors involved in the conflict and the nature of their interpersonal and group dynamics.
Involvement of India in China- Tibet conflict and interest of India: Analyzes India's security concerns, the role of the Dalai Lama, and the use of Tibet as a geopolitical bargaining chip.
Proposed tactics to resolve the conflict: Details mediation strategies, including pre-negotiation steps, track-two diplomacy, and power-sharing models.
Future Scenario of Tibet- China Relations: Discusses long-term projections, focusing on the potential impact of Chinese domestic policy and the transition of the Dalai Lama’s leadership.
Unintended consequences and dealing strategy: Reflects on the challenges faced during the mediation process, specifically regarding information management and power imbalances.
Conclusion: Summarizes the current reality that full independence for Tibet is unlikely and emphasizes the shift toward autonomy-based negotiations.
Reference: Lists the academic and journalistic sources utilized for the analysis.
Keywords
Tibet, China, Central Tibetan Administration, Territorial Dispute, India, Mediation, Diplomacy, Dalai Lama, Geopolitics, Autonomy, Conflict Resolution, Human Rights, Sovereignty, Foreign Policy, International Law
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core focus of this research paper?
The paper examines the ongoing territorial conflict between the Central Tibetan Administration and the People's Republic of China, proposing diplomatic mediation strategies to reach a resolution.
What are the primary themes discussed in the work?
The work explores historical sovereignty, the influence of religious and ethnic identity, the strategic importance of Tibet for Indian security, and potential frameworks for political compromise.
What is the central research objective?
The objective is to act as a mediator to facilitate a negotiated settlement that balances Chinese territorial integrity with the demand for Tibetan autonomy.
Which scientific or analytical methods are applied?
The author applies conflict analysis, international relations theory (specifically English School concepts like Great Power Management), and diplomatic mediation techniques such as track-two diplomacy.
What does the main body of the paper cover?
It covers the historical background of the dispute, an analysis of the stakeholders involved, an assessment of India's strategic interest, and specific tactics for negotiation.
Which keywords best characterize this research?
Key terms include Tibet, China, Diplomacy, Territorial Dispute, Mediation, Geopolitics, and Autonomy.
How does the author view India's role in the conflict?
The author considers India a critical external actor that utilizes the "Tibet Card" to address its own national security concerns and as a buffer state strategy against Chinese influence.
What is the author's proposal for the "Future Scenario of Tibet-China Relations"?
The author concludes that full independence is increasingly unlikely and projects a future defined by potential political reforms, modern governance, and the sensitive issue of selecting the next Dalai Lama.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Undergraduate (B.S.S) Sultan Mahmud (Autor:in), 2018, Territorial Dispute. The controversial territorial disputes between Central Tibetan Administration vs. People’s Republic of China and the involvement of India, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/442134
