Grin logo
de en es fr
Shop
GRIN Website
Publish your texts - enjoy our full service for authors
Go to shop › Business economics - Operations Research

ROIC and revenue growth versus total return to shareholders (TRS)

Title: ROIC and revenue growth versus total return to shareholders (TRS)

Term Paper , 2018 , 10 Pages , Grade: 80%

Autor:in: Arno Hetzel (Author)

Business economics - Operations Research
Excerpt & Details   Look inside the ebook
Summary Excerpt Details

In this paper, the key variables of company valuation, return on invested capital (ROIC) and revenue growth, are connected to the total returns to shareholders (TRS). It will be examined whether a firm with higher ROIC and revenue growth numbers could lead to a lower TRS. For a better understanding of this specific field of practice, there will first be a brief explanation of the relevant terms in the next chapter.

Excerpt


Table of Contents

1 Introduction

2 Explanation of ROIC, revenue growth and TRS

3 Discussion of the research question

4 Conclusion

5 References

Research Objectives and Key Topics

This paper examines the relationship between Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), revenue growth, and Total Return to Shareholders (TRS) to determine whether firms with superior operational metrics can paradoxically deliver lower shareholder returns.

  • Analysis of ROIC as a primary driver of shareholder value.
  • Evaluation of different revenue growth components and their impact on value creation.
  • Discussion of the "treadmill effect" and market expectations regarding performance.
  • Investigation into why high operational performance does not always translate into high TRS.

Excerpt from the Book

Discussion of the research question

Generally, there should be a strong positive relationship between companies with high ROIC and revenue growth and their stock market performance, expressed by the previous explained traditional metric TRS, as value creation should be aligned with rising equity valuations leading to higher shareholder returns. “Greater focus on ROIC and other economic value metrics can help align managers with the long-term interest of investors and build stronger company foundations”. (Patterson 2017) Of course, this is only true, if ROIC is higher than the WACC, as presented in chapter 1. Concerning valuation multiples, it can be stated that a higher ROIC means that there is higher cash flow at the same earnings, which leads to a higher earnings multiple. And if multiples are expanded, shareholder value in terms of TRS is enlarged. Next to that, long-term organic revenue growth is the most important driver of stockholder returns for companies with high returns on capital, i.e. growth is also positively affecting multiples (Koller et al. 2015). Thus, on first sight, the research hypothesis stating that there could be lower TRS in a higher ROIC and growth environment, all else equal, could be clearly rejected.

However, there are other circumstances imaginable, where TRS could be decreasing even if ROIC and growth are on a high level. It is important to recognize, that profits, ROIC and revenue growth are all backward looking, and are giving no reliable indicator for future short term value improvement. If an exemplary company is increasing ROIC and revenue growth by raising prices while cutting advertising budgets, it is very likely that competitors can take market shares in the next period. The necessary reaction would be a dramatic shift in strategy, lowering prices to win back customers. This process could last many years and would in turn lead to lower TRS as shareholders expectations are not met and returns as well as growth numbers are shrinking (Koller et al. 2010).

Summary of Chapters

1 Introduction: Introduces the research topic regarding the potential disconnection between operational performance metrics and shareholder returns.

2 Explanation of ROIC, revenue growth and TRS: Defines the core financial metrics and explains their role as drivers of corporate value and shareholder wealth.

3 Discussion of the research question: Critically analyzes why companies with high ROIC and growth might underperform in terms of TRS due to market expectations and irrational behavior.

4 Conclusion: Summarizes that value creation is not linear and emphasizes the need for a long-term perspective and valuation awareness.

5 References: Provides a list of academic and professional sources utilized throughout the paper.

Keywords

ROIC, Revenue Growth, TRS, Total Return to Shareholders, Company Valuation, NOPLAT, WACC, Shareholder Value, Treadmill Effect, Market Expectations, Capital Allocation, Investment Strategy, Economic Profit, Financial Performance, Competitive Advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary focus of this research paper?

The paper explores the connection between fundamental performance metrics—specifically ROIC and revenue growth—and the total returns delivered to shareholders (TRS).

Which key financial metrics are central to this study?

The study centers on Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), revenue growth, and Total Return to Shareholders (TRS).

What is the core research question addressed by the author?

The paper asks whether it is possible for a company with higher ROIC and revenue growth to deliver lower TRS than a firm with poorer operational results.

What scientific or analytical method is applied?

The author uses a theoretical and evidence-based discussion, drawing on established corporate finance literature and empirical observations to evaluate the relationship between these metrics.

What does the main body of the work cover?

The main body defines the metrics, discusses the "treadmill effect" of market expectations, examines the impact of short-termism, and analyzes risks like share buybacks or excessive growth.

Which keywords best characterize this work?

Key terms include ROIC, Revenue Growth, TRS, Corporate Valuation, and the Treadmill Effect.

What is the "treadmill effect" in this context?

It refers to the phenomenon where high-performing companies struggle to meet the exponentially increasing expectations of analysts and shareholders, potentially leading to lower TRS if they fail to consistently exceed past results.

Why might high growth actually be detrimental to TRS?

If growth is achieved through unsustainable means (e.g., ignoring competitive responses) or if expectations become so high that they are impossible to satisfy, share prices—and thus TRS—can decline despite high growth rates.

Excerpt out of 10 pages  - scroll top

Details

Title
ROIC and revenue growth versus total return to shareholders (TRS)
College
University of London  (CeFiMS)
Grade
80%
Author
Arno Hetzel (Author)
Publication Year
2018
Pages
10
Catalog Number
V449815
ISBN (eBook)
9783668836921
ISBN (Book)
9783668836938
Language
English
Tags
roic
Product Safety
GRIN Publishing GmbH
Quote paper
Arno Hetzel (Author), 2018, ROIC and revenue growth versus total return to shareholders (TRS), Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/449815
Look inside the ebook
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
  • Depending on your browser, you might see this message in place of the failed image.
Excerpt from  10  pages
Grin logo
  • Grin.com
  • Shipping
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Imprint