This work will outline the most important steps in the creation of the images of a personified devil, starting with the Jewish religion and the earliest appearances of the term Satan. The author will then continue to compare the figures of Lucifer/Satan and Iblis in Islamic and Christian literature, based upon their development, mentioning and role.
Evil as a supernatural force is a topic that unites all Abrahamitic religions. Jewish sources about a personified supreme evil as imagined today are scarce, but the image of Satan as the divine adversary and subsequently the idea of Lucifer as a fallen angel in Christian religion is better documented. The Islam knows Iblis as a rebellious angel cast out of heaven by Allah. While all these personifications of evil show some similarities, their development shows some striking differences.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. The Devil of the Christians
2.1. Jewish Origins
2.2. The Term שָׂטן
2.3. Creating a Fallen Angel from Scraps
2.4. Apocrypha and Their Role in the Devil’s History
2.4.1. The Book of Adam
2.4.2. The Book Henoch
3. The Devil in Islam
3.1. Iblis in the Qur‘an
3.2. Of Djinn and Shaitani
3.3. A Different Turn of Events
4. Between Two Cultures
4.1. The Role of the „First Creation”
4.2. Rebels and the Sin of Pride
4.3. The Role of the Devil
4.3.1. Temptation
4.3.2. Accusation
4.3.3. Punishment
5. Conclusion
Objectives & Core Topics
This academic paper examines the historical and theological development of the personified devil in Abrahamitic religions, specifically comparing the Christian figures of Satan and Lucifer with the Islamic figure of Iblis. The research aims to identify parallels and differences in their origins, roles, and narrative evolution to better understand how these figures function within their respective religious frameworks.
- Etymological origins and early definitions of the term "Satan" in Jewish sources.
- The construction of the "fallen angel" myth within Christian apocrypha.
- Islamic perspectives on Iblis, including his nature as a djinn versus an angel.
- Comparative analysis of pride, rebellion, and temptation as central narrative themes.
- The functional shift of these entities from complex characters to symbolic adversaries.
Excerpt from the Book
2.3. Creating a Fallen Angel from Scraps
From what we can observe so far, the idea of a fallen angel had not yet emerged in the HBOT. The idea of Lucifer was developed in a later period, however, from Bible passages that reflect parts of the image commonly known today.
In Jesaja 14, we find the following passage:
„Wie bist du vom Himmel gefallen, du Glanzstern, Sohn der Morgenröte! zur Erde gefällt, Überwältiger der Nationen! Und du, du sprachst in deinem Herzen: "Zum Himmel will ich hinaufsteigen, hoch über die Sterne Gottes meinen Thron erheben, und mich niedersetzen auf den Versammlungsberg im äußersten Norden. Ich will hinauffahren auf Wolkenhöhen, mich gleichmachen dem Höchsten." Doch in den Scheol wirst du hinabgestürzt, in die tiefste Grube.”
Modern theological interpretations read this passage as addressed to the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar II. Israel, after the period of the Babylonian Exile, was supposed to have survived despite the Babylonian kingdom declining; the symbolism of the falling morning star representing Babylon in comparison to the rising sun of Israel. In later translations of the original Hebrew texts, the word „morning star” has been into the Latin lucifer, adding an entire new layer of meaning by the association of a „light bearer”.
Summary of Chapters
1. Introduction: Presents the topic of evil as a supernatural force in Abrahamitic religions and outlines the comparative focus on Satan, Lucifer, and Iblis.
2. The Devil of the Christians: Explores the origins of Christian devil figures, starting with Jewish roots and the etymology of "Satan" through to the development of the Lucifer myth.
3. The Devil in Islam: Analyzes the character of Iblis in the Qur’an, his specific nature as a djinn, and the terminology surrounding his disobedience.
4. Between Two Cultures: Provides a comparative analysis of similarities and differences, focusing on pride, rebellion, and the roles of temptation, accusation, and punishment.
5. Conclusion: Summarizes the linear development of the Luciferian narrative in Christianity versus the anti-climactic shift in later Islamic interpretations.
Keywords
Abrahamitic religions, Satan, Lucifer, Iblis, fallen angel, theology, Hebrew Bible, Qur'an, apocrypha, pride, rebellion, temptation, djinn, myth, comparative religion
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the core subject of this paper?
The paper explores the comparative history and theological characterization of the devil across Christian and Islamic traditions.
What are the primary themes discussed?
The work focuses on the creation of the devil image, the motif of the fallen angel, the role of pride, and the functional differences between Satan, Lucifer, and Iblis.
What is the primary research goal?
The goal is to outline the developmental stages of these evil entities and compare how their narratives have been shaped in their respective religious texts.
Which methodology is employed?
The author uses a comparative, literature-based approach, analyzing scriptural sources (Hebrew Bible, Qur'an, Apocrypha) and secondary theological commentaries.
What topics are covered in the main body?
The main body examines Jewish origins, the etymology of the term "Satan," the creation of the Lucifer myth, the Islamic Iblis narrative, and comparative themes like temptation and punishment.
How would you describe the key terminology?
The paper is characterized by terms such as Lucifer, Iblis, djinn, pride (hybris), rebellion, and comparative religious mythology.
How does the Iblis narrative differ from the Christian Lucifer myth?
While both share the motif of pride and defiance, Iblis is often identified as a djinn in the Qur'an, and the later Islamic narrative focuses more on his functional role than on the dramatic "fallen angel" back-story found in Christian apocrypha.
Why is the term "Satan" historically significant in this context?
In the Hebrew Bible, "Satan" originally meant "opponent" in a legal or political sense, only later evolving into the concept of a personified supernatural adversary.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Simone Lohmeier (Autor:in), 2017, Devil in the Detail. A Comparison Between Iblis and Lucifer, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/464277
