At the beginning of this seminar paper, a background of the G20 with a brief historical and technical explanation of the group will be given followed by a chapter on the emergence of the group several years after its formation. The groups’ distinctive summit diplomacy will be explained before examining more closely the G20 agenda and its topics and outcomes. A critical reflection on the G20 will subsequently be expounded before giving a conclusion on the principal results.
In the wake of the financial crisis in 2008, the G20 has developed to a primary multilateral forum. The G20 comprising developing, emerging and developed member countries is reflecting the new dynamics in global politics. The constellation of membership gives the G20 a greater representativeness than other groups and organizations. Filling the governance gap during the financial crisis, the group has proven itself as successfully acting as crisis committee when managing the global financial and economic crisis.
Integral characteristics of its working framework are the “summit diplomacy” and the agenda politic. Its summits as part of a new diplomacy aim to reach a consensus within an informal forum instead of forcing a binding agreement in a formal forum . The G20 agenda has broadened over the years of its existence. From focusing on financial regulation in the course of the financial crisis, the group widened its agenda ranging from economic growth, trade to climate change. The transformation process of turning from a crisis committee into a permanent steering committee has revealed several issues and critics the G20 has to confront with.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Background of the G20
2.1 The formation of the G20
2.2 Development of the group since 2008
3. The G20 summits
3.1 Summit diplomacy
3.2 Agenda topics and outcomes
3.2.1 Managing the financial crisis
3.2.2 Reforming institutional organizations
3.2.3 Targeting economic growth
4. Critical reflections on the group
5. Conclusion
Objectives & Core Topics
This seminar paper examines the development of the G20 from its inception as a forum for financial dialogue into a prominent actor in global economic and political governance, specifically focusing on its effectiveness as a "crisis committee" and the challenges regarding its legitimacy and policy implementation.
- Historical context and formation of the G20
- Mechanisms of "summit diplomacy"
- Crisis management and financial institutional reform
- Strategies for global economic growth
- Critical analysis of G20 legitimacy and representativeness
Excerpt from the Book
3.1 Summit diplomacy
The G20 is following a distinctive diplomacy. The increasing interdependency of economies is demanding a growing economic cooperation among countries which is the reason why the G20 is representing a primary forum. The groups followed “summit diplomacy” has the ability to accomplish tasks of building confidence and setting top-level agenda within an informal global governance forum. The distinctive diplomacy of the G20 is defined by three characteristics which are required to powerful global governance: an informal forum, agreements between a small group and a face to face interaction between members. The small group membership within an informal forum allows a corporative and intense face-to face interaction between equal members. This leads to a preferable outcome for the members (Kirton 2010, P.1f.).
The informal forum of the G20 is often viewed as the principal advantage of the group (Vestergaard 2011, P.24), because it leads to “greater familiarity and a more common understanding of the key policy challenges for policy makers and their staff” (Dervis 2010).
Summary of Chapters
1. Introduction: Outlines the G20's evolution as a multilateral forum, its role in addressing the 2008 financial crisis, and the paper's structural approach.
2. Background of the G20: Explores the group's historical formation in 1999 and its development into a leaders' level forum following the 2008 financial crisis.
3. The G20 summits: Discusses the nature of summit diplomacy and the transformation of the group's agenda from crisis management to broader issues like institutional reform and economic growth.
4. Critical reflections on the group: Analyzes the ongoing debates concerning the G20's effectiveness, its legitimacy, and the limitations of its non-binding nature.
5. Conclusion: Summarizes the G20’s mixed record of effectiveness, emphasizing the need for verifiable commitment and improved governance to maintain its relevance.
Keywords
G20, Global Governance, Summit Diplomacy, Financial Crisis, Economic Growth, IMF Reforms, Mutual Assessment Process, Legitimacy, Effectiveness, Multilateralism, Crisis Committee, Global Policy, Sovereignty, Political Arena, Coordination.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the fundamental subject of this paper?
The paper explores the role of the G20 as a primary actor in global economic and political governance, tracing its evolution and evaluating its impact on international policy coordination.
What are the primary themes discussed in the work?
Key themes include the institutional structure of the G20, the shift from a crisis-focused committee to a steering forum, the challenges of summit diplomacy, and the ongoing struggle for legitimacy.
What is the central research focus?
The work aims to analyze how the G20 balances its role as a "crisis committee" with its newer responsibilities and whether its informal, non-binding structure allows for truly effective global governance.
Which scientific approach does the author use?
The author employs a qualitative review approach, synthesizing academic literature, official documents, and current economic discourse to critically assess the G20's performance.
What topics are covered in the main section of the paper?
The main section covers the G20's background, its "summit diplomacy" framework, specific agenda topics such as the 2008 financial crisis management, and the reform of institutional organizations like the IMF.
Which keywords best characterize this work?
The work is characterized by terms such as G20, Global Governance, Summit Diplomacy, Legitimacy, and Economic Growth.
How did the 2008 financial crisis impact the G20's development?
The crisis served as a catalyst for the G20 to be upgraded to a "Heads of State" level forum, shifting it into the media focus and establishing it as a crucial "crisis committee" for the global economy.
What does the author conclude regarding the G20's legitimacy?
The author concludes that while the G20 is currently the "best available option," it faces significant challenges regarding its representativeness and the ability to implement concrete actions at the national level.
- Arbeit zitieren
- Juliane Hanke (Autor:in), 2014, The G20 as a new player in the economic and political arena, München, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/503582
